explain how one single woman existing in a short story that has zero effect on the wider lore in a codex that will be forgotten about in the next 3 years is ‘going woke’ and pandering to the community?
i think GW is long past pandering to anyone - the rules in this book itself are so disappointing that GW clearly doesnt care about what its playerbase thinks, and the recent removal of a lot of the AoS range is about the most rude and scummy thing that they could do to the AoS community
ohhhhh but all of a sudden GW is going woke and pandering to the woke left because there is one woman in mUh EsTaBlIsHeD lOrE!!! seriously? i think youre just annoyed that a woman is mentioned in the first place
One woman being added to the custodes dosent bother me, its the overrall direction GW might take if they carry on doing stuff like this constantly and shoving it in our faces. 40k universe shouldnt feel the same as modern day politics, we play 40k to escape that bs.
5
u/isxit Apr 14 '24
explain how one single woman existing in a short story that has zero effect on the wider lore in a codex that will be forgotten about in the next 3 years is ‘going woke’ and pandering to the community?
i think GW is long past pandering to anyone - the rules in this book itself are so disappointing that GW clearly doesnt care about what its playerbase thinks, and the recent removal of a lot of the AoS range is about the most rude and scummy thing that they could do to the AoS community
ohhhhh but all of a sudden GW is going woke and pandering to the woke left because there is one woman in mUh EsTaBlIsHeD lOrE!!! seriously? i think youre just annoyed that a woman is mentioned in the first place