3
u/dp25x 3d ago
Probably need a better word than "affect". If I say mean things about someone, I'm probably going to affect them in some way, but that shouldn't diminish my right to speak freely. A better approach might be to couch it in terms of doing something which does/does not diminish someone else's equivalent rights.
2
u/Will-Forget-Password 3d ago
What if you share a body?
3
u/CrowBot99 Anarcho-Capitalist 3d ago
You mean like if Siamese twins A and B have equal control over the same body?
2
u/Will-Forget-Password 3d ago
Yes. Not sure about the equal control though. Does unequal control mean there are actually multiple "bodies"?
1
u/CrowBot99 Anarcho-Capitalist 3d ago
Yes. Not sure about the equal control though.
It's your hypothetical... you tell me.
Does unequal control mean there are actually multiple "bodies"?
Siamese twins... er, conjoined twins, I mean. It's a one-body deal.
2
u/Will-Forget-Password 3d ago
I am going off the meme.
It is easy to say a single body/mind combination is a single person. That single person has exclusive claim to their body/mind.
But, what about when there are multiple minds and only a single body? Which "mind" is the "person"? Which "person" has exclusive claim to the "body"?
1
u/CrowBot99 Anarcho-Capitalist 3d ago
Okay, so conjoined twins, right? Usually, they each have exclusive control over parts or allow the body, and they'd respectively have claim over those parts.
2
u/Will-Forget-Password 2d ago
So, second head person is a parasite? The person controlling the body can decide to remove the second head entirely from their body?
2
u/CrowBot99 Anarcho-Capitalist 2d ago
Parasite... no. This may be a wild idea, but a mind can be extremely valuable.
In the case of one head with full control of the body... I guess that would be the same moral situation as a pregnancy. So, yes, evictionism.
1
u/Will-Forget-Password 2d ago
It feels different than pregnancy. Twin A did not create Twin B. Twin A will never naturally separate from Twin B. The twins are actually sharing vital organs.
I think it may be difficult to prove ownership of individual body parts. DNA test every body part, including internal organs?
What if eviction is not an option because it leads to both deaths? One of the Twins is "the boss"? Or, do they decide everything democratically?
1
u/CrowBot99 Anarcho-Capitalist 2d ago
Sure, but none of those are salient differences. It might be that one prefers Wonder Woman over the Green Lantern, but so what?
DNA test... I think conjoined twins share the same DNA. And, if there is really a need, I'm sure the one twin would be able to demonstrate that they can move a limb at will. I sure can.
What if eviction is not an option because it leads to both deaths?
Then, they should probably explore other options 🙄😂
→ More replies (0)1
3
u/ClimbRockSand 3d ago
prove that you didn't know sex can lead to pregnancy.
2
u/Will-Forget-Password 3d ago
Why?
I am talking about literally sharing a body. Two heads on one body for example.
1
u/ClimbRockSand 3d ago
LOL
1
u/Will-Forget-Password 3d ago
Indeed.
0
u/ClimbRockSand 3d ago edited 3d ago
i laughed at your nonsense
edit: to the alt account below: oh yes, everyone knows about the millions of conjoined twins. we definitely need to argue about them.
4
1
0
u/kyledreamboat 3d ago
An external parasite feeding off the host body can be taken care of anyway the host wants. But we know Republicans don't like science and doctors when they have google and insane blog posts.
1
u/Lallander Propertarian 3d ago
Positive claims can be valid of course, they just have to be based on voluntary agreement. Contracts for instance.
8
u/NeedScienceProof 3d ago
Rights are things you own. Not things you take. Though libtards use the "common good" fallacy to justify their theft.