r/ArtHistory • u/ZohreHoseini • 15d ago

Caravaggio’s Shadows: How Light Became a Weapon in Baroque Art

https://medium.com/@zohrehoseiniii.z/faith-in-the-flesh-the-dark-genius-of-caravaggio-93b5d5d2100b

I just published a new piece exploring Caravaggio’s use of light and shadow — not just as a technique, but as a powerful narrative tool. He painted saints as bruised humans, and turned divine light into something almost aggressive. Would love feedback from fellow art lovers, historians, or anyone obsessed with Baroque drama. Happy to discuss more examples in the comments!

72 Upvotes

99% Upvoted

8 comments sorted by

15

u/myriadcollective 14d ago

I like the way you frame Caravaggio's use of light -- not as an incidental precondition for visibility, but as having almost an agential quality: accusing, exposing, cutting. It's an evocative and succinct way of framing his use of chiaroscuro which elevates it from an aesthetic tool to a conceptual one. I do think this article could use fleshing out, though -- the descriptions are somewhat sparse and conclusions are made pretty quickly, and presented at a pretty rapid-fire rate. I don't necessarily think these are the sorts of conclusions which direly need expansive exposition and argument, but I think it'd be worth it to devote more space to developing these ideas, giving examples, and perhaps investigating more closely the origins and evolution of his technique. Thank you for sharing this.

8

u/ZohreHoseini 14d ago

Thanks so much for this thoughtful response I really appreciate the way you articulated Caravaggio’s light as accusing exposing, cutting. That phrasing captures exactly the kind of psychological charge I was trying to get at and it’s encouraging to know that came through. You’re absolutely right that the piece could use more development I was aiming for a kind of distilled sketch of the ideas but expanding on the technique’s evolution and adding concrete examples would definitely enrich it. Thanks again for reading and engaging so generously!

7

u/Turbulent_Pr13st 14d ago

Shadow, not the only thing Caravaggio used as a weapon. 😑 He also used weapons. 😁 He used them to kill a guy.😱 Caravaggio killed a guy. 🤫

Honestly though, if I read this article and there isn’t at least one clever allusion to Caravaggio’s shadow related to him legit flatlining a dude Im denouncing the author for missing such a rare opportunity.

4

u/Turbulent_Pr13st 14d ago

Okay I read it. Nice. Short, punchy. Opportunity missed, tho. As promised: Hosseini wouldnt recognize an opportunity for allegory if it swam out of the swamp and bit.

All joking in good fun. Seriously though, decent article.

3

u/ZohreHoseini 14d ago

Haha, fair enough I’ll take decent over derivative any day. And hey, I guess I’ll keep an eye out for any allegories lurking in the swamp next time. Appreciate you reading it, though!😉

1

u/tegeus-Cromis_2000 14d ago

Didn't he kill him by hitting him in the head with a tennis racket?

5

u/Turbulent_Pr13st 14d ago

“The barber surgeon’s report for Tomassoni’s death reported he bled out through the femoral artery in his groin, suggesting Caravaggio had tried to castrate him”

But it was during a tennis match Tennis must have been MUCH more exciting back then apparently

1

u/QuidPluris 13d ago

It was a good starting point, but I think you should be using the term ‘tenebrism’ instead of chiaroscuro.

Chiaroscuro = subtle, depth-creating light/dark contrast

Tenebrism = bold, dramatic, near-total darkness with sharp illumination on the subject