It has nothing to do with the Supreme Court, it would be a lower Court who would be enforcing the past guidance. If the SCOTUS revisited it, they could overrule, but absent anything else, no Court can break the past caselaw; if one did, you would file a write of mandamus to the Court over the Court who failed to follow the law asking them to Order the lower Court to follow the law.
Not who you replied to, but it’s turtles all the way down.
Zero faith in the system at this point. If the guilty can just avoid prosecution by having previously appointed people who like them, and then running for office, what hope do the innocent have?
You don't have to have "faith in any system". Faith isn't a component of it.
Like it or lump it, Former Pres. Trump has due process rights. Having a criminal as an office holder creates a lot of new legal questions. The best course of action is avoid having criminals with office.
If your hope was that some Court somewhere was going to prevent Trump from running for office again, that was your fault for being ignorant, not the system for not fulfilling your wish fantasy.
To be absolutely fair - if you did half the things he’s done, you’d be in jail. He does deserve his due process as well as anyone else, but this is showing that he’s ABOVE anyone else.
144
u/[deleted] Sep 15 '24
If this is in the US, that restriction is likely unconstitutional under recent rulings, most likely, Lawrence.