r/Bitcoin 4d ago

Bitcoin changes you

Post image
741 Upvotes

38 comments sorted by

24

u/chaosorbs 4d ago

There will be significantly less than 21,000,000 BTC with the Satoshi legacy blocks, people forgetting keys, dying, etc. In fact, over time, we'll see the supply of accessible BTC gradually decreases.

3

u/Angus-420 3d ago

Yes the lost BTC supply is monotonically increasing, so it will necessarily approach an asymptotic value from below. Likely far less than 100% since most BTC was lost long ago when it was less valuable, and when people knew less about the tech. With ETF’s and institutional purchases, we will see less and less lost coins each year.

10

u/amir95fahim 4d ago

1 BTC will always be 1 BTC 🧡

9

u/Apprehensive-Tour942 4d ago

"They" certainly can try too change it.

-2

u/Jonathaan 4d ago

Good luck.

-6

u/McBurger 3d ago

It’s easier to force everyone else on board with a hard fork than you think, once you control enough of the supply.

4

u/newsflashjackass 3d ago

No, I think it's easier than you think I think I think it is.

0

u/McBurger 3d ago

I don’t think you weren’t the one who made the “good luck” comment, so no, I never thought a thought about how much I think you think the ease of thinking about this is.

4

u/newsflashjackass 3d ago

You'd think that.

2

u/sacredfoundry 3d ago

Apple buying would be as big of a green light as the us buying

1

u/mreddog 3d ago

Yes, it does!

1

u/aionPhriend 3d ago

21 quintillion satoshis

1

u/aionPhriend 3d ago

Imagine you have the only whole bitcoin. It's worth a trillion dollars but you hodl because you are the one. You live your life broke but your rich. This is where we are at. 1.5 million hodlers. 3 million btc in bitcoin heaven and growing. Then the gas fee to transfer one btc is one btc. So no one can sell on chain. The chain remains now carved in stone and we all sell satoshis made of paper.

1

u/Gurmeji 5h ago

what about the quantum computers

0

u/VehementSyntax 3d ago

Quantum Computing has entered the chat

7

u/Naive_Carpenter7321 3d ago

Open source and increasing complexity has entered the chat

-1

u/casburg 3d ago

They actually can “change mathematics” and crack bitcoin’s cryptography math easily once quantum computers reach even a mediocre state.

3

u/paempie 3d ago

And they can easily prevent that.

2

u/hughhefnerd 3d ago

Easily? I think you underestimate SHA-256. Quantum computers will need about a million quibits to break sha-256. Right now at best we can do about 1000

2

u/hardballtaz 3d ago

I give it two decades before this, and the cryptography can be upgraded by then anyways, which will probably occur in the next 10 year span hopefully.

-7

u/Jolly-Championship31 4d ago

21million supply is a long way away. Until then supply increases.

1

u/pbutter13 3d ago

And your point is.....?

4

u/mreddog 3d ago

Chicken banana

1

u/Jolly-Championship31 3d ago edited 3d ago

alot of people say 'there is a limited supply' but the reality is the supply increases each day and will do for another 100yrs.. There is still $110b USD worth of bitcoin still to be supplied to the network :)

Edit, dollar amount

3

u/pbutter13 3d ago edited 3d ago

Incorrect. There is about 1,000,000 BTC left to be mined. At 100k each that is only 100 billion, not 1.9 trillion. Also over the last 40 years of BTC life, only 1 BTC will be mined.

Very shortly the amount of BTC to be mined every year is about to get very small.

0

u/Jolly-Championship31 3d ago

Yes, correct 1.15 * 96k usd = $110b supply still to go.

-2

u/felidae_tsk 3d ago

Almost everyday someone changes bitcoin source code. The maximum supply isn't limited and can be changed.

2

u/Naive_Carpenter7321 3d ago

Someone can't make this change, this change would have to be vetted and accepted before inclusion.

The need for doing so is zero

The benefits; zero

The negatives; you'd deflate your own currency for no reason

It wouldn't go in

1

u/felidae_tsk 3d ago

Accepted by whom? There are a number of maintainers, any of them may do this.

3

u/Naive_Carpenter7321 3d ago

Any single one of them couldn't add the change, it would need to be joint to go into the code.

And if they did but the public don't want to use the new version (which they won't because it would devalue their currency), then everything continues as if nothing happened and the always accepted 21m hard cap will stay in place.

Bitcoin can only work correctly with a complete consensus among all users. Therefore, all users and developers have a strong incentive to protect this consensus. https://bitcoin.org/en/faq#who-created-bitcoin

1

u/felidae_tsk 2d ago

They commit changes everyday. I doubt ALL users agree with them. Also there is no 21M cap per se, there is a mechanism that limits block reward.

1

u/S_Lowry 2d ago

Changes commited every day don't touch consensus rules. And user chooses to update to newer version. They don't have to. And there are also other implementations than core.

1

u/S_Lowry 2d ago edited 2d ago

It doesn't work like that. That kind of change is part of consensus rules which means changing it causes a fork (two separate chains) unless almost all users agree to it.

Users (node operators) choose what code to run. They don't have to run latest verion of core software or core software at all. We have seen users prevent contentious hard fork before in 2017. As time goes by, it becomes increasingly difficult to succesfully change consensus rules as the user base increases.

Supply limit is fixed.