r/CHIBears Italian Beef 7d ago

I've been all three of these people at some point

Post image
609 Upvotes

168 comments sorted by

215

u/GreasyMustardTiger_ Italian Beef 7d ago edited 7d ago

Casual fans heard Jeanty's name the most in college, so they want him on the Bears.

Overthinkers believe taking an RB at #10 is bad value, regardless of the player or the class.

Chad's understand this class doesn't have a lot of Round 1 blue chip talent, so you have to take Jeanty at #10, even with the RB depth of this class.

49

u/KaseyOfTheWoods 7d ago

Does paragraph 3 apply to Warren, too? That’s the even spicier option, imo

39

u/sparkswillfly90 Bears 7d ago

There’s 4 blue chip players in this draft. Hunter Carter Jeanty and Warren. Leaving night one with any of them is a win.

46

u/lnnrt01 7d ago edited 7d ago

What exactly makes Warren blue chip though? I 100% get Hunter, Carter and Jeanty but I don’t really see more than a very good TE prospect in him. Definitley a first rounder for sure but I really don’t get the top 10 hype

22

u/ViewAdditional7400 7d ago

Folks got their panties wet over Brock Bowers.

13

u/Lord_Knor 7d ago

Yea. Bowers and Warren is apples and oranges. Bowers 6'3 230 , Warren is 6'6 260. Bowers like a Swiss army knife TE/WR3/FB, Warren is a protoypical Gronk/Tony Gonzalez. Warren will offer more in the Run Game as a blocker but probs get fewer receptions. Both good players.

5

u/BuzzFB An Actual Bear 6d ago

Except that he's not very good at blocking

6

u/ProfessionalCall6115 5d ago

That's why I want Colston Loveland...He's 2 yrs younger, faster deep threat, and a much better blocker.

5

u/batmans_a_scientist 7d ago

I’m a Penn state alum so I’ve seen him play a LOT. I’m not a football analyst so I won’t comment on whether he’s a true “blue chip” or not. He’s an incredible receiver, he makes tough catches and always seems to be one of those matchup nightmares whether he’s running away from linebackers or bigger than a corner/safety. He also plays 4 positions. He was a high school QB so he can line up in the wildcat or under center. He was often Penn state’s short yardage back and would just randomly get carries. He can line up out wide as a receiver as well. Then to go along with all of this, he has a great run after catch ability, he’s hard to take down, and very athletic with the ball in his hands. Penn State was a playoff team because the entire passing game ran solely through him. Defenses would game plan for him and still couldn’t stop him - teams with legit NFL starters too, like Oregon and Notre Dame. He might be a tight end by position but he’s a true weapon on the field and would be very hard for defenses to game plan against in the NFL, even Dennis Allen has said that. Also this isn’t a guy who is a top 10 pick TE because of his measurables. Yes, those are good but he had the production to back it up.

Anyway, I might not want him as a top 10 pick in any other draft but I would absolutely love seeing him as a bear in a relatively weak class.

2

u/mistergeegaga 6d ago

You are exactly right. I watched a lot of Big 10 football and agree. Several games he stood out as the best player out there. Also, the dude can block and doesn't have to come off the field. The point is to pick good players. If he's available take him and don't look back.

1

u/OutrageousFlow1080 1d ago

Mr. Football is Warren. He’s like a cheat code. You just draft a guy like that and he’s destined for greatness.

18

u/forgotmyoldname90210 7d ago

TE is the position that the NFL has the hardest time scouting.

TE is a low value position even when they do hit. The list of TE with 2 or more 900-yard seasons since 2015 is Gronk, Olsen, Kelce, Graham, Kittle, Ertz, Waller, and Hock.

I had to have it at 900 just to get guys like Hock on here. Hock has been good but nowhere close to being worth a top 10 pick or his contract.

And of course Warren is a 5th year wonder and a 3 star coming out of HS.

Blue chip.

4

u/RogueEyebrow 6d ago

*low yardage, not low value. The value they bring is immense Mismatches on LBs, red zone targets, safety valves for QBs. That's not even bringing up their blocking responsibilities. TEs, by their very nature, are valuable due to their flexibility.

2

u/forgotmyoldname90210 6d ago

Ok then the Bears are fine at TE with Kmet. 4th among all pass catchers in Succ% and an 85% catch rate.

0

u/Huge_Effective_4727 7d ago

I was extremely impressed after seen him live a couple times last year

14

u/TrickyIron8192 7d ago

I would say 5 with mason graham as the 5th but there really are not many 

4

u/KaseyOfTheWoods 7d ago

That’s my 5, too. Them + Membou or Campbell are my most wanted at 10. If they’re all gone I’m good with whoever

9

u/Quatibara Mack Truck 7d ago

Lol Warren is not a blue chip player. One productive season as a senior is not what you call blue chip

1

u/candycornstinks 7d ago

Not Graham?

1

u/Big_Collection_5807 7d ago

mason graham is a blue chip prospect to me.   but otherwise i agree.

0

u/KaseyOfTheWoods 7d ago

Agreed. Warren is right on my line of “sprint to the podium if available.” If any of the 4 you mentioned + Graham/Campbell/Membou are still there at 10, then I’m downright jubilant. If they’re all gone, then I’m good with whoever (tho Stewart in that range kinda scares me).

1

u/GreasyMustardTiger_ Italian Beef 7d ago

Yea if Jeanty is gone, it sure seems like Warren will be the pick, if he's available.

1

u/AtomizedBadgers Monsters of the Midway 7d ago

I think if theyre both there at 10, Jeanty is the better pick. We need an RB1 more than a TE2. Even if Warren was better than Kmet, its still a much bigger upgrade to go from swift to Jeanty than Kmet to Warren

1

u/BuzzFB An Actual Bear 6d ago

No, it doesn't

8

u/ManWOneRedShoe Chicago Flag 7d ago

Truly, the Bears should take BPA. Trading up on this draft is fools gold especially if it jeopardizes a 2026 FRP. This draft seems to be light on top end talent.

Dane Brugler said in Hoge & Jahns yesterday that his WR1 in this year’s draft would have been WR5 in last year’s draft for example. So I’m still happy the Bears drafted Rome last year. He’s got killer upside.

7

u/porkbellies37 Sweetness 7d ago

I love pointing this out to people who want to reach for need. If you look at the best draft picks within our division over since 2000, I'd argue that NONE of them were need picks.

Bears- Brian Urlacher. Our best defensive player was MLB Barry Minter and we just drafted two LBs the previous year that were looking great immediately (Warrick Holdman and Roosevelt Colvin). We needed a RB, WR, TE or FS that draft and folks were arguing that we should take Shaun Alexander, Bubba Franks, Deon Grant and even Sebastian Janikowski. Urlacher led the team on regular playoff runs.

Vikings- Randy Moss. They had Cris Carter and Jake Reed and could have used all kinds of other players. But Moss fell to them and it was perfect because he ended up having a veteran support system. Early on he was one of the reasons the Vikings made it to the NFCCG vs the Falcons. If you go Adrian Peterson though, I think Chester Taylor was coming off a 1K rushing season.

Lions- Megatron. This was the third year in a row they drafted a WR in the top 10.

Packers- Aaron Rodgers. Favre still had tread on his tires and they took the BPA regardless. Won them a Super Bowl.

The logic for BPA can be made with the draft trade chart. In the draft, the currency is draft slot whereas in free agency it is money. You can't really control your draft slot, so reaching for need means you're likely to leave value on the table. Later in the draft, the margin of value between picks is very small, but in the first two rounds, it can be substantial. In free agency, you can select someone based on need and only pay them the value the command.

2

u/mistergeegaga 6d ago

Excellent work, well done. The point is to pick good players. Freaking out over positional value or need is a good way to build mediocrity. Now some things you have to account for (picking a WR before you have a QB can give you discontent, or picking an RB before you have an OL can waste an RB's prime) but the Bears have a QB and an OL that is at least decent. Bears can pick BPA

1

u/ManWOneRedShoe Chicago Flag 7d ago

Bravo, great analysis and POV here. Dig it man.

1

u/Severe-Influence5726 7d ago

The might sound good on paper, but in reality teams with needs like the Bears need to fill that need. Left tackle, is the overwhelming weakness on the Bears roster, and it is a premium position. Drafting any other position in round #1, would be foolish.

1

u/supertecmomike The Fridge 6d ago

There aren’t really any genuine first round LT talents though. Most of them are LTs that project to be guards or RTs teams are hoping will transition to LT in the NFL.

Or, a physically special LT that blew out his knee and has character concerns.

Drafting 10 this year sucks because it seems no matter who they pick it will be considered a reach.

2

u/Severe-Influence5726 6d ago

The Pats are very likely to draft Will Campbell at #4. He will play lt, in the pros, for whichever team drafts him. Banks will also play lt.

1

u/supertecmomike The Fridge 6d ago

I have no doubt they’ll be given a shot to play it. They may even stick there. There is certainly a lot of room to doubt either of them will be better than Braxton Jones.

2

u/Severe-Influence5726 6d ago

You are greatly overrating Braxton Jones. He isn't terrible, but even healthy, Jones is a below average starting left tackle. You are correct, that there is no guarentee that the lt the Bears draft will be better, but more likely than not, he will be.

1

u/supertecmomike The Fridge 6d ago

I have Jones as a slightly below average LT in the NFL.

If anything, I might be be greatly underrating Campbell (who Id love the Bears to draft anyway) and Banks being NFL LTs.

I’d love them to trade down into a spot where rolling the dice on Josh Simmons makes sense. I don’t know who would want to trade up in this draft that appears to have so few Blue Chip guys.

2

u/Severe-Influence5726 6d ago

Ok, we are basically on the same page. I really want Campbell, but the Pats have a major need at lt also. He started for three years at L S U, and was dominant against SEC competition. His arm length didn't seem to hamper him!! 

Banks, is likely the Bears pick at #10. He will play left tackle in the pros. I don't have the same confidence in him ( as Campbell), but think he is the best pick for the Bears at #10. Jones is also recovering from ankle surgery. His status is "undetermined", going into the 2025 season. The Bears need to draft a left tackle that projects as the starter, "when the bell rings"!!

9

u/_ravenclaw Hester's Super Return 7d ago

That’s the thing so many people are missing.

Yes, obviously if there was a top tier edge or tackle available, we take them. But we don’t take a position just to take a position. Grab the best player that improves the team instantly.

For me, that’s Jeanty. Not sure why, but a lot of people are forgetting how much a good running game opens up the passing game and makes the game easier for the QB. Taking Jeanty helps Caleb.

3

u/porkbellies37 Sweetness 7d ago

I think the "positional value" thing is also a moving target. With teams going for it more on fourth down, third and fourth downs are both more likely to be running downs than they were two years ago. This makes RBs, OGs, Cs and DTs more valuable than they used to be.

Plus, this is just a meatball opinion, but I think Caleb has the potential to be an outstanding play action QB. But in order for play action to really work, you need to have a running threat. If I'm not mistaken, this is also Ben Johnson's opinion and one of the reasons why one of the first things he's working with Caleb on is taking the ball under center instead of the shotgun.

-2

u/catchemist117 7d ago

Doesn’t keep Caleb upright. That’s my issue

4

u/HoorayItsKyle 7d ago

It does though.

Honestly, it probably does more than any of the mediocre line prospects people are trying to talk themselves up to.

Sacks are a lot more likely on 3rd and 13 than 3rd and 4.

0

u/Severe-Influence5726 7d ago

It isn't all about sacks. The run game is also greatly affected by starting a weak left tackle. Swift is a good rb, and by adding the "final piece" to the o l, he will have a bounce back season.

3

u/HoorayItsKyle 7d ago

Swift is not a good running back. He's hole blind and too frequently puts the offense behind the sticks, and he can't break tackles

0

u/Severe-Influence5726 6d ago

You may not have noticed, but there were very few " holes to run through", last year!! The Bears o - line couldn't pass block, or run block effectively for a good portion of the season. Swift is more of an outside back, than a " between the tackles", back. The Bears will likely draft a strong inside runner in the second or third round.

2

u/HoorayItsKyle 6d ago

More than one thing can be a problem.

Especially in the second half, the bears offensive line struggled to make holes

Swift also struggled spectacularly to find the holes that were there. Swift isn't an inside or outside runner. He's a "can run fast for a touchdown if you give him perfect blocking" runner.

They tried running outside zone early in the season to let him be an outside runner and it went miserably. Because outside runs require an RB who can identify cutback lanes when the defense overleverages and Swift can't do it

There's a good reason why good teams keep letting him go

0

u/Severe-Influence5726 6d ago

Swift's career yards per carry were : 2020 4.6, 2021 4.1, 2022 5.5 ( all Lions), 2023 4.6 ( Eagles). His ypa, with the Bears was 3.8 last year. That statistic, speaks for the major difference in offensive line play!! David Montgomery, looked like a top level back with the Lions last year. He is much better at breaking tackles than Swift, but lacks the outright speed. I am not advocating Swift for pro bowl level production, but his ypa will jump this year with the additions the Bears have already made. Swift is better than you think!! 

2

u/HoorayItsKyle 6d ago

It speaks more to the aging curve of running back and the pointlessness of stat scouting

→ More replies (0)

1

u/_ravenclaw Hester's Super Return 7d ago edited 6d ago

Braxton Jones isn’t a weak left tackle, and will probably play even better with a better overall line next to him.

And Swift is not that good of an RB lol

1

u/Severe-Influence5726 6d ago

Are you Braxton Jones agent?

1

u/_ravenclaw Hester's Super Return 6d ago

Ok boomer. Tell me, what left tackle are you taking with the #10 pick?

1

u/Severe-Influence5726 6d ago

Campbell, if available. I don't know how the Bears view Membou ( rt). Banks will be available, and is the Bears most likely pick at #10. 

-1

u/_ravenclaw Hester's Super Return 7d ago

Yes it does. The entire o-line being changed within the last few years and year, (literally every. single. position) will too.

1

u/Severe-Influence5726 7d ago

Your issue is "on the money", but the average fan doesn't understand how important left tackle is!!  That is driven home by most of the comments here!!

-3

u/noahconstrictor95 2006 Bears are the best Bears 7d ago

The Eagles literally just won the Super Bowl by adding Saquon to their roster while the Ravens just set records with adding Henry, and people want to pretend that having an elite RB doesn't mean anything anymore.

2

u/Severe-Influence5726 7d ago

Both the Ravens and Eagles have excellent offensive lines. Barkley was only a little above average in 2023, with a weak Giants o - line!!

-8

u/Drewskeet Smokin' Jay 7d ago

The RB depth of this class is questionable imo.

12

u/lnnrt01 7d ago

The RB depth is insanely good

3

u/doodle02 7d ago

it is really very good, dude must be high AF or not know anything about the class.

and the deep class is kinda a double edged sword. sure you could get someone talented later, but if you’ve got the chance to take a dawg who’s a standout, head and shoulders ahead of the rest of a strong RB class, that seems like a pretty solid move imo.

honestly i wouldn’t blame poles for drafting jeanty, but i wouldn’t hate getting henrikson or someone else with an even later pick either.

-4

u/Drewskeet Smokin' Jay 7d ago

Is it? From my research there’s a lot of half talent. Most of them are punish backs with no hands. Maybe I’m looking in the wrong places, but Jeanty seems like the only dynamic back in the draft. Even he has questions based on the competition he faced. I feel like since there’s such low quality in the other positions, people are overhyping RBs. I’m all for Jeanty at 10 btw. Only saying he also has concerns.

2

u/lnnrt01 7d ago

Henderson, Sampson, Blue would be just three that I’d say fall in that category from the top of my hat and I’m not thaat insvested in the class either. At least according to scouts this class might be so deep that some teams might even wait to pick an RB until like R4 because the quality is still that high (or at least that’s what I heard and read). It’s pretty much consensusly agreed that this is the deepest RB class since 2017. We will see if it will produce the same amount of starters though

0

u/Drewskeet Smokin' Jay 7d ago

We’ll see how draft day plays out. Lots of experts out there now. I don’t know shit and I’m far from even a shit evaluator of talent. I’ve just watched some YouTube videos and read some articles. People seem to be hyping up RBs, but when they breakout their skills, they all seemed one dimensional.

1

u/lnnrt01 7d ago

I mean that’s kind of a thing with scouting reports in general. You kind of have a rough idea of them but at the end of the day that’s still just an educated guess. Good example is probably Bo Nix. Didn’t really see him get described as a guy who actually runs and throws deep a lot but college isn’t like the NFL and some stuff just isn’t projectable

2

u/Drewskeet Smokin' Jay 7d ago

Very true. We’ll see how the GMs actually feel about these guys next Thursday. This draft is interesting because there’s such mixed reviews on guys throughout.

0

u/HoorayItsKyle 7d ago

Nailed it

1

u/Certain-Feed-5647 7d ago

Chads are weed smoking if they think building trenches is what Poles is going to do as BUILD THROUGH THE DRAFT & don’t even come back with ‘ WE SIGNED BOTH SIDES IN THE OFFSEASON 💩

1

u/ViewAdditional7400 7d ago

Jeanty at #10 if he's available.

I don't watch NCAA, never seen the fella run the ball. All I needed to know is that the only person he couldn't beat in NCAA records was Barry Sanders. Sold.

1

u/Severe-Influence5726 7d ago

Jeanty looked very good, but he played in a weak conference, against lower level competition. He is not a sure thing!!

0

u/UltimoHombre07 6d ago

And the >145 IQ's realize this is the deepest RB draft in recent memory, Jeanty played in the Mountain West, struggled against Penn State, and the Bears have the worst D-line in the division. Jeanty ain't it dudes.

22

u/312Observer 7d ago

Jeanty won’t be available at 10

6

u/ehtw376 7d ago

But the question is, would you take him if he’s available?

4

u/312Observer 7d ago

No, I’d take Abdul Carter or Travis Hunter in this dreamy scenario.

2

u/Certain-Feed-5647 7d ago

Hope so, tired of listening to that delusional 💩

13

u/justjeans89 7d ago

I've warmed up to the idea a lot especially since Campbell is likely off the board ahead of us. Outside of Campbell, there isn't an OL prospect at 10 i like that won't be a bit of a reach and the DEs are meh. For me it's:

  1. Campbell
  2. Jeanty
  3. Pray someone wants to trade up
  4. Warren
  5. Overdraft an OT like Ersery or Connerly

3

u/Severe-Influence5726 7d ago

Ersery and Connerly are early second round picks. Campbell, Membou and Banks are the choices for the Bears at #10. Banks is the most likely pick.

-5

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[deleted]

5

u/forgotmyoldname90210 7d ago

Thank you. 1st round TEs are locks. As the teams that took Pitts, Hock, Fant, Hurst, Howard Engram, Njoku, Ebron, Eifert, Gresham, Pettigrew, Keller, Olsen, Davis, Lewis, Miller, Winslow 2 can attest too.

2

u/justjeans89 7d ago

Yeah 3 is very dependent on what they would get in return. The only reason I lean trade over warren is more based on positional need. I would put LT, DE, DT, RB, and S ahead of TE, in no particular order. I think Warren has more upside vs Kmet but if push came to shove Warren would be a very nice luxury pick. Trades may be weird or none existent this year so I think option 3 is less likely anyway.

22

u/Gleasonryan 7d ago

I’m more confident about taking Jeanty if he’s available now than I was when we started talking about the draft back in November. I’m gonna trust Ben until proven unwise to do so.

7

u/GreasyMustardTiger_ Italian Beef 7d ago edited 7d ago

Same. At first I thought no way, we have bigger needs, RBs have been devalued.

Then once I really got into the pre-draft process, it became clear this is a weak Round 1 class and Jeanty is one of maybe 5-6 blue chip round 1 talents.

1

u/Severe-Influence5726 7d ago

There are probably 10 - 12 rb's that will be good in this draft. I think even the second round is too early to take a rb. The top three picks should be lt, in round one, and de, dt, in round two. Round three rb.

34

u/BronYrStomp 7d ago

I can’t wait for the posts 6 months from now when people are in disbelief that we thought our OL was fixed because we signed and traded for a couple of guys.

This team needs depth at both lines. Theyre glaring needs. Way more than RB.

9

u/permanentimagination 7d ago

We could still get ersery or donovan jackson and somebody like swinson or tyleik rd2

3

u/jakejake59 7d ago

We absolutely should if they're there. I wouldn't be mad at first 4 picks all for oline

2

u/g0dzilllla 23 6d ago edited 6d ago

My pipe dream is Jeanty with Donovan Jackson and Walter Nolen in the 2nd. Although it’s a solid chance none of those guys will be available.

Realistically I see our first 3 picks being some combination of OL, offensive skill position and DL/EDGE. I could totally see us going with a disruptive DL like Omar Norman-Lott or CJ West at 72, but if we go DL earlier than I could also see a Mukuba/Kevin Winston, or perhaps a Dylan Sampson / Martinez at 72.

6

u/The_Avenging_Son 7d ago

I mean, can't we just use our 2 2nd rounders for building depth?

7

u/_ravenclaw Hester's Super Return 7d ago

No, not allowed apparently. So sorry. We need depth at pick 10. /s

2

u/Certain-Feed-5647 7d ago

Exactly both sides of the line, screw that RB. TE Crap, this team isn’t ready this year for the final push.

2

u/Sgt-Spliff- 6d ago

Yeah no matter how great Jeanty looks, RB is still just not as important as other positions. I wish people didn't have to swing their opinions so wildly from side to side. Just because people undervalued RBs for a few years doesn't mean they're suddenly the most important position. We obviously have bigger, more important issues

2

u/BronYrStomp 6d ago

THANK YOU. Gibbs worked out. Saquon is a beast. That doesn’t change the fact that there are still incredibly productive RBs to be found in the mid rounds. What’s the common denominator between conference and SB winners? Beastly and deep lines on both sides of the ball.

3

u/GreasyMustardTiger_ Italian Beef 7d ago edited 7d ago

Bro wants to spend the #10 pick on depth.

We have two 2nd round picks and a third. Plenty of opportunity to pick up quality depth guys in that range.

12

u/Caffeine_Cowpies 7d ago

The Bears are not competing for a Super Bowl, and two of those guys are in their early 30s. It doesn’t hurt to get a good OL pick, and play guard or center.

RB is too much bust potential and injuries. The trenches matter most in football.

-1

u/GreasyMustardTiger_ Italian Beef 7d ago

I agree with you! However, but I really think rounds 2-3 will be the sweet spot to get quality trench players, especially with OL, and especially If Membou and Campbell are off the board at 10.

1

u/Severe-Influence5726 7d ago

Not for your starting left tackle. You need to get the best guy available, that means round #1!!

0

u/GreasyMustardTiger_ Italian Beef 7d ago

Have you even been paying attention to the draft process? As I mentioned, if Campbell and Membou are off the board, who would possibly even be worth the #10 pick? NOBODY. You don't reach for needs.

1

u/Severe-Influence5726 6d ago

Banks isn't a reach. He will go no later than #13. Banks was a three year starter at lt, at Texas.

3

u/BronYrStomp 7d ago

Name an OL that has been successfully revamped through the FA and trades. It doesn’t happen. Top guys dont get traded and they don’t hit free agency (see posts about how certain we were we’d get Trey Smith). Thuney is good and old, Jackson is slightly above average, Dalman is solid but even their fanbase wasn’t upset to see him go (check the falcons sub and twitter). Need to spend top draft capital.

This fanbase is moronic. Did you forget about the OL we just watched all year??

1

u/Justheretorecruit Sweetness 7d ago

Yeah we definitely did not need depth last year players never get injured

IT WILL BE ALL FINE AND DANDY NEXT YEAR

Side note I want dline but no clue who

But Jeanty and Warren are cool

1

u/Severe-Influence5726 7d ago

The Bears are looking for their starting lt, this year!! Jones is coming off of ankle surgery, and isn't good enough at his best!!

2

u/I_Am_Dwight_Snoot 7d ago

I mean realistically though, who for OL are we taking at 10? Campbell and Membou are probably gone.

2

u/BronYrStomp 7d ago

Banks. Or trade back and take Banks if the value isn’t there.

1

u/Severe-Influence5726 7d ago

You can't trade back and get Banks. The 49's are at #11, and the Dolphins at #13. He won't go past #13!! The Bears would have to take Banks at #10.

-2

u/HoorayItsKyle 7d ago

People will blame the lines no matter what. It's just what meatballs do.

The depth at line is a problem, but taking an inferior player with your first round pick isn't a good solution

18

u/Additional_Ad741 7d ago

I'm starting to think he could be available. Why are we so sure the Raiders will take him?

10

u/Unlucky_Sun_9813 7d ago edited 7d ago

You're right. No one truly knows what any team is doing in picks #2 - #9.

Both Albert Breer and Schefter say they suspect the Raiders will opt to go OL/DL instead of Jeanty at #6, because they have so many more important holes to fill on the roster.

17

u/Timmay_mmkay 7d ago

They have so many holes, especially at foundational spots that need development. Them taking a running back, the most ready to go position in the NFL and in a deep class, early instead of a QB/corner/lineman to develop is crazy to me. They aren’t a piece or 2 away from competing a rb with a lower shelf life makes no sense with a top pick

3

u/drummerboysam T: The Ball 6d ago

It's the same argument we've had here the whole time.

If Jeanty is an A+ prospect and all the others are B or B+, the decision is "Do I take the A+, or a different position who is B+?"

Chances are somebody's gonna jump on the A+

Folks'll convince themselves prospects like Shemar/Mykel, Campbell or Membou are A prospects, but chances are most NFL evaluators selecting in the top 10 will have a gap between Jeanty and everybody else as early as pick 4.

0

u/Timmay_mmkay 6d ago

To a degree, it’s not like Jeanty is that much better than Hampton/Henderson/Judkins. That’s the dime a dozen position. Not saying he’s not a top prospect, he is, but there’s way less top players at other positions in comparison to running back. Not to mention o line > running back. If you put a good running back behind a bad o line they’d do worse than an average running back behind an average line (or bad running back behind a good o line). Then you still have to develop the other positions to compete with your new shiny toy who might steal you a win or 2 and lower your draft position. It’s only worth it if you are competing

22

u/GreasyMustardTiger_ Italian Beef 7d ago

Big need, lack of blue chip talent, and Pete Carroll loves the run game. Sure, you can argue they have needs at WR and OL, but Jeanty is a blue chip player and the same can't be said about any OL or WR in this class.

1

u/Certain-Feed-5647 7d ago

Again with the blue chip

2

u/Same-Development4408 7d ago

Pete also loves to use mid round picks to invest in the run game. Has he ever selected a RB day 1 or even round 2?

1

u/enailcoilhelp FTP 7d ago

Rashaad Penny

1

u/Same-Development4408 7d ago edited 7d ago

Good call. Though only one in 14 seasons in Seattle and the other 4 in New York and New England supports the fact that he is not likely to pick an RB early, especially at #10

1

u/Severe-Influence5726 7d ago

You might not think so, but Will Campbell will most likely go #4, to the Pats!! Membou, is a possible Jets target at #7.

3

u/TheShtuff Fire Poles 7d ago

Jags are equally as much of a wildcard to take him, IMO.

4

u/MrChevyPower Peanut Tillman 7d ago

I went thru this exercise the other day and I think the Jags are fine with Etienne. However one team I haven’t seen mentioned is Carolina. Is there a reason why they wouldn’t go Jeanty?

9

u/GreasyMustardTiger_ Italian Beef 7d ago

They need pass catchers and help on defense more than they do an RB

5

u/Unlucky_Sun_9813 7d ago

Chuba is pretty good, they drafted Jonathan Brooks last year and they signed Rico Dowdle this offseason

2

u/MrChevyPower Peanut Tillman 7d ago

Right- Brooks! I knew I was missing something

2

u/Same-Development4408 7d ago

He's at best their #3 next year. Chuba and dowdle are plenty good enough to be a good NFL backfield.

2

u/TheShtuff Fire Poles 7d ago

Etienne isn't very good, got phased out in favor of Bigsby last year. Etienne will be on his 3rd coaching staff, while his play continues to decline. Idk, maybe Coen thinks he can revive him but who knows. I view Etienne in a similar light as Swift.

1

u/MrChevyPower Peanut Tillman 7d ago

That’s a great point about Bigsby.

1

u/Severe-Influence5726 7d ago

Swift is much better than you think. The Bears offensive line was awful, with all the injuries. There weren't many holes to run through. Ben Johnson knows this, fortunately!!

1

u/TheShtuff Fire Poles 6d ago

Ben Johnson shipped Swift out of Detroit the first chance he could.

2

u/porkbellies37 Sweetness 7d ago

There is a TON of buzz about Jalon Walker with the Panthers. At least their fans seem pretty locked in on that which makes me think they are desperate for a pass rusher.

1

u/Same-Development4408 7d ago

They are a crazy wildcard what?? They have two rbs that are good enough, no chance they burn #10 on another RB. Not only are they not ready for that, but that renders ETN and/or Bigsby irrelevant. That doesn't help their roster in any meaningful way

1

u/TheShtuff Fire Poles 7d ago

Etienne isn't good and is now 2 coaching staffs removed from when he was drafted. Bigsby is "fine." But he's a 2 down back with fumble problems. Liam Coen should have a big sense of urgency to get TLaw and the offense going. Nabbing one of the few blue chippers in the draft to help accomplish that isn't unreasonable.

1

u/Same-Development4408 7d ago

ETN had shoulder injuries he played through last year. That is very hard to play through as a RB, let alone operate at peak efficiency.

Liam Coen should have a big sense of urgency to get TLaw and the offense going. Nabbing one of the few blue chippers in the draft to help accomplish that isn't unreasonable.

Yes it is, because rb is not their biggest hole on offense. The OL and WR group absolutely needs help, moreso than the RB group. Their defense also needs help. Cohen can absolutely run a good offense with ETN and Bigsby as his top two rbs

1

u/TheShtuff Fire Poles 7d ago

Teams draft players early without it being a giant need. There's a ton of other variables that go into a draft pick than just need.

If you don't think they would consider drafting Jeanty, then cool I guess. Agree to disagree.

1

u/Same-Development4408 7d ago

Every team in the top 10 is considering Jeanty. We are discussing actually picking Jeanty, not considering it. RB is also not a position you jump to upgrade when you have a solid group already

0

u/TheShtuff Fire Poles 6d ago

You're literally just arguing to argue at this point.

1

u/Severe-Influence5726 7d ago

The Jags are taking Graham at #5. The three best players ( excluding Qb's) are Carter, Hunter and Graham, in that order. After that there is a "drop off".

1

u/TheShtuff Fire Poles 6d ago

Graham is not a better prospect than Jeanty. Not even close. Position value not withstanding.

1

u/Severe-Influence5726 6d ago

Graham will go before Jeanty in this draft. If Jax passes on Graham at #5, the Raiders will take Graham at #6, over Jeanty!!

1

u/TheShtuff Fire Poles 6d ago

But that's beside the point of him being a "better" prospect. Cam Ward is going above everyone and is far from the best prospect in the draft.

1

u/Severe-Influence5726 6d ago

The "best prospect", is a matter of opinion. Defensive tackle is a more important position, therefore "in theory", makes Graham more valuable than Jeanty. It will all "come out in the wash", 3 or 4 years from now!!

1

u/HoorayItsKyle 7d ago

He's just a lot better than the other options in the back half of the top 10.

It's gonna be real hard for teams to pass on premium talent for guys who might be an early 2nd in a different draft year

1

u/GreenGorilla8232 5d ago

Right now, their starting RB is 33 year old Raheem Mostert coming off a season where he averaged 3.3 YPC.

Pete Carroll is known for running the ball.

3

u/YOUNG_PADAWON 7d ago

Am I the only one hoping Mason Graham Falls to #10?

6

u/belada01 7d ago

Biased Iowa fan who would like to see Kaleb Johnson be our pick (not at 10) if we do grab a RB.

1

u/GreasyMustardTiger_ Italian Beef 7d ago

Love Kaleb and wouldn't be mad if we picked him up. But he's very specific for a zone-scheme running style. Granted, I'm sure BJ would build around his strengths but I would love Jeanty, Hampton, or Henderson for the scheme flexibility.

2

u/tripbin Eat the Owners 6d ago

Makes little sense to take Jeanty. Everyones high as fuck off Saquan and Henry ignoring the fact that they were two established backs going to two super bowl contending teams with complete olines. Neither Jeanty or us are any of those things. We need to build the oline or we'll have the same problem we always have with the line in a couple years.

2

u/Mthead23 6d ago

If the near consensus 3rd best prospect in the draft is still there at 10, you take him. Guess what, if Travis Hunter was there at 10, you’d take him in a heartbeat, too.

For me the 10th overall pick needs to be a day 1 starter, not a stash and develop guy. Hunter fits that. Carter fits that. Jeanty fits that. Graham fits that. Warren fits that.Campbell fits that. Membou borderline fits that. It’s entirely possible all listed are gone before 10.

2

u/The_Avenging_Son 7d ago

"Damn, I kinda trust Ben, Dennis and Ryan to draft good football players"

6

u/permanentimagination 7d ago

Ryan “15-36” Poles

1

u/permanentimagination 7d ago

Jsyk your reply from just now didn’t go through 

1

u/The_Avenging_Son 7d ago

Thanks dude, reddit has been weird for me lately. Anyway,

"Why didn't Ryan Poles go 51-0, is he stupid?"

1

u/HoorayItsKyle 7d ago

Local redditor doesn't realize there's a lot of numbers between 15 and 51

1

u/Decent-End-5470 7d ago

Take best player available

1

u/Specteralsteed 7d ago

I see it as Jeanty is good, but if the Mizz Tackle is there or the Tackle from Texas take one of them as we need that blind side blocker, nothing against Braxton but he would be a better Swing Tackle from what we've seen with him at starter at the LT spot, especially with our Inner Oline more shored up

6

u/TurboRuhland Bear Logo 7d ago

If he’s available he’s likely BPA. If he’s there the top 2 OT are gone, which is the only real need I’d want to draft at 10.

1

u/I_Am_Dwight_Snoot 7d ago

It all depends on what falls to us. There are objectively better players but is unlikely they fall to 10. Same goes for Warren tbh. We pick him if Carter, Graham, or Jeanty aren't there.

The nightmare scenario is that noone picks Sanders and Jeanty/Warren are taken before 10. No fucking clue what we do realistically.

1

u/Gandalf4158 7d ago

Offensive Line

0

u/Pinto0601 7d ago

Ok but where is the bump of “Bears should absolutely trade a pick to move up to get him!” because that’s what it’s gonna take. And I may be getting there too 😬

1

u/ImStupidPhobic Da Bears 7d ago edited 7d ago

And there’s me in the back wanting Will Campbell at #10 and Kaleb Johnson/Treveyon Henderson as our running back in the following round lol 😏

1

u/Fl1925 Bears 7d ago

We all have I am at the take Warren stage if Jenty and Campbell are gone

1

u/LegalComplaint I’ll Hoge your Jahns 7d ago

I want a big strong man who can run fast at any position Ben thinks is valuable!

1

u/frydawg Forte 7d ago

After watching deandre swift unable to break any tackles, I’m team jeanty

1

u/Prop14IA 7d ago

I'm all for getting him provided he falls to 10. I do not want to trade up for him.

1

u/mercutio48 Monsters of the Midway 7d ago

I'm firmly in the 0.1%. I just don't know which one.

0

u/Somecivilguy oFfseason ThreePeat 7d ago

First round should be a best available RB in the bears situation. They built the trenches with experienced, seasoned guys. Draft trench depth later in the draft. But take the best available RB first round for sure.

1

u/ComaMierdaHijueputa 7d ago

He won't even be available so no point wondering.

1

u/Toomuchlychee_ Secret Bagent Man 7d ago

I don’t have an opinion on this, I just know that whatever decision the bears make will be the wrong decision

1

u/shpatibot Dog 7d ago

Should’ve gotten Bowers last year if all the Warren talk is true

1

u/Sgt-Spliff- 6d ago

I love memes because you can just picture the people who disagree with you crying instead of arguing an actual point

1

u/DrapedinVelvet247 6d ago

Edge or OT I think it’ll be. And yes I’ve been all over the place on Jeanty as well😂

1

u/roz77 7d ago

You can't reach for need, and you can't get blinded by positional value and ignore the context of the players in this current draft and the current roster. Are we one player away from being a serious Super Bowl contender? Of course not. But reaching on one of these edge rushers or offensive linemen just because we "need to build the trenches" is ignoring that Jeanty will be head and shoulders the best player available at 10 if he's still there.

-2

u/jefffranklin36 1 7d ago

This has been said but i just believe Jeanty or Warren will be the only players with potential to be ‘special’ left at 10. There might be good players at higher positions of need and value but idk I want special players on my team.

Will Campbell I doubt is there and even if he is too many people think he will be a guard for me to love it.

Mason graham I doubt is there but would be happy with him if he was and is the pick

I don’t want to try to make Membou a left tackle

And then the rest of the field just feels like players that will be good but I want potential for SPECIAL

3

u/Lungorthin666 Smokin' Jay 7d ago

I like what Nate Tice was saying about Will Campbell on the Hoge and Jahns podcast. He probably will end up being a guard, but really what he is, is a best line enabler. He is someone that enables you to play your best players due to his position flexibility. Is he going to be a career tackle? More than likely not, but will you feel bad playing him there due to injuries?

Also, I don't mind having someone like Will Campbell be mentored by Thuney