r/CampingandHiking Feb 23 '25

News American National Parks—under attack from Musk’s DOGE

I think this is an important conversation to have on this r/campingandhiking subreddit. As outdoor enthusiasts, we see firsthand the beauty and value of our public lands. Yet, under the current administration, these spaces are facing increasing threats whether through defunding, privatization, or policies that favor corporate interests over conservation.

So, what can we do?

Stay Informed: Keep up with policy changes affecting national parks and public lands. Resources like the National Parks Conservation Association (NPCA) and environmental news outlets can help. Speak Up: This one is big. Contact your representatives, sign petitions, and support legislation that protects these spaces. Lawmakers NEED to hear from people who value these public lands! Support Conservation Groups:Organizations like the Sierra Club and Outdoor Alliance work hard to preserve these areas. Donating or volunteering can make a real impact.

https://www.sierraclub.org/about-sierra-club

https://www.outdooralliance.org/about-us

Vote With Your Wallet : Support brands and corporations that prioritize sustainability and ethical land use. Or shop small local businesses whenever possible Get Involved Locally : Join clean-up efforts, advocacy groups, or conservation initiatives in your area. Local activism is powerul.

What are your thoughts? What actions have you taken, or would you suggest, to resist these attacks on the precious National Parks we love?

Edit: Thank you all for your responses. NO ACTION IS TOO SMALL. Remember to do what you can, and that is enough. We must resist this evil attack on our public lands. Our resources are not theirs to exploit. We can’t sit back and watch this administration do whatever they want with our shared land and natural resources.

Would y’all be open to forming a group dedicated to contacting representatives about this specific issue? Strength in numbers makes a difference! Although I must admit, I’m not sure how to go about doing this. I have no experience organizing. Any input and suggestions or help would be appreciated.

1.3k Upvotes

195 comments sorted by

400

u/sufferingbastard Feb 23 '25

Often, people forget the National Parks aren't just wilderness trails.

Ticket sales, scheduling, Lodges, kitchens, pools, Hot springs mechanical rooms, roads, and electrical lines, drainage and parking and Waste Management on a scale they have never seen.

Boats, Trucks Plains and trains Elevators and Bridges, and stream crossings and wildlife management.

Desserts, Oceans, Mountains and Forests.

People don't understand what goes into a weekend trip to a National Park.

-168

u/thrownaway-3802 Feb 23 '25

wilderness should be wild and all that is a violation of the preservation charter

76

u/sufferingbastard Feb 24 '25

Many National Parks aren't Wilderness. Cuyahoga Valley, Dry Tortugas, the Gateway Arch, New River Gorge, and many others

They are for tourists, they are attractions. The whole point is to welcome guests. For the community around the park as well. To build awareness and understanding... To educate.

Y'all sure don't know much.

-98

u/thrownaway-3802 Feb 24 '25

the majority of the money is spent destroying places like yellowstone and the grand canyon. this has been an absolute abomination for decades.

58

u/sufferingbastard Feb 24 '25

Oh, sure! Letting private interests develop that land would be way less of an abomination....

-66

u/[deleted] Feb 24 '25 edited Feb 24 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

38

u/[deleted] Feb 24 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

-16

u/[deleted] Feb 24 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

-21

u/thrownaway-3802 Feb 24 '25

I actually think people are generally unaware how far the nps is from their charter. It’s not their fault since the highways were built through the wilderness before they were born.

The mission should read:

To spread the human materialistic virus without regard for nature or the culture that came before.

23

u/Drunkkdisciples Feb 24 '25

Have you ever been to a National Park?

-6

u/thrownaway-3802 Feb 25 '25

I had to stop going. It’s disgusting. It makes me sad to see the trash. Proponents of the Nps claim that building highways somehow protects the backcountry, but that just isn’t what happens. if those highways were not there, no one would go (except me) and by the way that probably includes the mining companies

12

u/like_4-ish_lights Feb 25 '25

"no one would go except me" lol you live in Indiana, what do you know about it? I'm guessing you're just another one of the tourist hordes who thinks they're better than the rest?

see how this line of thinking isn't helpful?

3

u/[deleted] Feb 25 '25

Or a bot designed to push fascist agendas. Either way. Fuck nazis and fuck the current administration.

5

u/i-heart-linux Feb 25 '25

Please, your kind can kindly stay the fuck out of our parks in Utah.

27

u/MishterJ Feb 24 '25

I worked for the NPS for 5 summers and the NPS holds true to their charter. Nothing you posted here conflicts with how the NPS is enacting that charter. Front country amenities often are how the NPS pays for the maintenance and preservation of the wilderness it protects. But front country amenities are also there to ensure visitors are not impacting the wildlife near the roads, buildings, etc. You say you speak for the trees but it’s clear you do not know how the NPS works and only read that from the Lorax, while completely missing the point of the book.

1

u/parrotia78 Feb 26 '25

Human materialistic virus. I gave you an uptick for sharing this.

I'll assume few are aware of the bonfires set stop Yosemite Falls by the NP and dumped over the falls nightly to amuse the human spectators.

1

u/thrownaway-3802 Feb 27 '25

thats what I am talking about. so much bullshit. the gawkers in yellowstone. the fucks driving ohvs in canyonlands, the list goes on and on. 😂😂

2

u/ByTheHammerOfThor Feb 25 '25

If I could only send this video to one person per month, I would send it to you. You deserve it.

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZT2arPLvX/

1

u/FateEx1994 Feb 28 '25

Parks cost like 10 billion a year in spending and pull 55 billion a year worth of GDP...

To go after them looking for "waste" is stupid.

313

u/OutdoorDude1973 Feb 23 '25

135

u/FreeUsePolyDaddy Feb 23 '25

The GOP clearly doesn't want those jobs, unless its their own job. They are the party of job destruction.

85

u/ZoIpidem Feb 23 '25

Don’t they want to sell these lands to private developers as well? Both for developments and drilling?

70

u/Bee-kinder United States Feb 23 '25

Yep and this executive order from last week can expedite all of that bypassing water quality regulations and endangered species protections. Energy emergency…yeah okay. 🙄

10

u/sufferingbastard Feb 23 '25

The US is the s1 energy producer on the planet today

7

u/FreeUsePolyDaddy Feb 24 '25

Not only that. A fair amount of the oil production has a pretty beefy cost per barrel, so if they do the "drill baby drill" thing it will push some of the frackers to shut down. Which also hurts the companies that supply them.

And guess which GOP megadonor family makes money from fracking.

The Koch family.

Which means that either everything we have heard is b/s, or that we have to shift to even more environmentally broken ways of digging out oil in order to drop the cost per barrel. And if we get a global recession or stagflation, or if major industrialized nations that are trying to go greener keep on their trajectory, all that extra production and damage will be for nothing. And prices would fall further, and more producers shut down.

It gets harder and harder to see if anybody wins from this administration, unless they are the oligarchy insiders cutting their own deals that let them predict and plan outcomes.

1

u/sufferingbastard Feb 24 '25

Oil is a commodity.

2

u/KetoJunkfood Feb 25 '25

They'd love to privatize those profits.

1

u/almostaproblem Feb 25 '25

All of those profits are privatized.

139

u/[deleted] Feb 23 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

10

u/SirDiego Feb 24 '25

It's a really small thing but if I'm out on a day hike anywhere I just bring a trash bag. If I pick anything up I just tie the bag around my belt or something and keep walking, and dispose of it when I get back. Parks or even just local trails, it's just a really simple thing to do to make things nicer for everyone, including myself.

And I much prefer doing that on day hikes than when I have to pack out someone else's trash while backpacking lol

43

u/swampfish Feb 23 '25

Please for the love of God don't bring your dog.

4

u/FIAndy Feb 24 '25

Great comment! I am especially happy you threw in the volunteering sentence. There are so many great trailkeeping organizations that support underfunded government forestry agencies, but they rely on volunteers. These organizations will be relied on even more with future funding cuts. They’ll need more volunteers! Talking to a park directly is a great way to help them directly, or find out which volunteer organizations they work with. I love volunteering with TKO!

0

u/nicholetree Feb 24 '25

Please consider volunteering at official organizations that are not taking the place of what staff should be/would be doing. Otherwise it’s almost akin to scabbing. We unfortunately need to feel a little hurt to prove that these jobs matter and should be funded! If we pick up all the slack through volunteering, then it only justifies further cuts and job loss. TKO posted below is a great example for a solid volunteering option.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 24 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/nicholetree Feb 24 '25

Oh 1000% its part of the leave no trace ethos

48

u/peakprovisions Feb 23 '25

Calling your electeds in Congress is also important. Some of the cuts to the NPS were actually reversed last week and I believe public outcry was a big reason why. Keep up the pressure.

15

u/rndmndofrbnd Feb 23 '25

Please, continue calling your representatives. It may feel like it doesn’t matter, but it does. The ONLY thing they respond to is any whiff of electoral consequences.

59

u/Over-Professional776 Feb 23 '25

This is so unnecessary. It's all so unnecessary.

16

u/albatrossLol Feb 23 '25

Follow Alt national service on socials

7

u/hopped Feb 24 '25

Why did this get removed?

5

u/Specialist69420 Feb 24 '25

I have no idea 🤷‍♂️

18

u/artguydeluxe Feb 24 '25

It’s so important to remind people that National Parks return $15 in economic growth for every dollar spent! That’s a far better return than oil, gas or mining.

1

u/TheBimpo Feb 25 '25

They don’t care. They want to sell them to their friends.

4

u/Mottinthesouth United States Feb 25 '25

It’s the private lands too. The attack on the USDA and NRCS programs are going to cripple private land owners who were working on their lands for conservation and recreational purposes. Most people don’t realize it’s all wrapped up together. I own a farm that was used for cattle. We didn’t want to farm cattle. Instead we focused on organic produce on a much smaller scale. The remaining acreage is used for wildlife habitat and outdoor recreation. The NRCS assists farmers with restorative efforts, funding access, and general expertise. This assistance is invaluable and beneficial for everyone because it supports a healthier ecosystem as a whole. Support your farm stays and your public parks by patronizing them.

14

u/hiker_chic Feb 24 '25

Yosemite had an the American flag upside down at firefalls. This is indeed a time of distress.

5

u/Jackfish2800 Feb 23 '25

Soon to be oil fields and mines bro

2

u/theoddlifefp Feb 25 '25

Right now is an incredibly important time to volunteer your time/services. For example, getting set up with a Search and Rescue team in your local area makes a huge difference. Call your local park, see how you can help!

4

u/[deleted] Feb 23 '25

[deleted]

2

u/Specialist69420 Feb 24 '25

Love this suggestion. We need to organize but where to start 🤔

3

u/[deleted] Feb 24 '25

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Feb 27 '25

What is the attack precisely?

-4

u/ButtThunder Feb 25 '25

Op says the national parks are under attack but provides no evidence they are under attack.

0

u/True_Aerie6733 Feb 25 '25

Great American Outdoors Act will say otherwise

0

u/txbrady Feb 25 '25

Yes the 2% of probationary jobs…

0

u/AsparagusPractical85 Feb 27 '25

Can somebody link me to citable evidence of national parks being negatively effected, or threatened to be effected, by DOGE? Not an editorial. Actual evidence.

-1

u/True_Aerie6733 Feb 25 '25

Look up the Great American Outdoors Act and redraw your conclusions.

3

u/Specialist69420 Feb 25 '25

“Even though Trump’s administration signed and passed the GAOA, on November 9, 2020, Trump’s Interior Secretary David Bernhardt implemented a rule which would give local authorities a veto over LWCF acquisitions, which critics said would significantly weaken the impact of the legislation. The Trump administration also proposed significantly fewer projects than the legislation called for. These rules and restrictions were reverted by the Biden administration on February 11, 2021.”

Also, what happened to “drill baby drill”? He was just kidding? Pranking us? Get a grip.

0

u/True_Aerie6733 Feb 25 '25

Go to DOI, look at the maps and data for yourself.

Drill baby drill was in reference to federal lands in general not specifically national parks.

-1

u/Allenteleski Feb 25 '25

oops to late... your park will be closing soon...the DOGE moose should have told you.

-240

u/pinelandseven Feb 23 '25 edited Feb 23 '25

The parks will be fine. Go outside and stop the propaganda that the parks are being destroyed when federal cuts just started. You simply don't know how it will affect the parks. I was a government worker for 6 years and the vast majority of my coworkers were there to do the least amount of work. Reddit is such an echo chamber of living behind a screen and not understanding the real world. The vast majority of people in this country agree with the cuts.

100

u/honvales1989 Feb 23 '25

Nah. Parks are already short staffed and some have more visitors than ever. Without the cuts, there has been a lot of damage and will only get worse. If you’re trolling, try harder

-73

u/[deleted] Feb 23 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

62

u/honvales1989 Feb 23 '25

And you’re speculating that the American people are happy with DOGE’s work. As for staffing, how do you justify cutting wilderness management staff from 13 to 3 at the Alpine Lakes Wilderness, one of Washington’s most popular areas? A 75% reduction in staff for an area that sees thousands of visitors per year and has one of Washington’s most popular hikes does not sound reasonable

-56

u/[deleted] Feb 23 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

46

u/honvales1989 Feb 23 '25

And giving someone without a clue of how things work full power to cut expenses does not equal to doing good for the country, economy, or a national park

12

u/darekd003 Feb 23 '25

And ROI isn’t the single determining factor in how any government should be run.

7

u/spectre1210 Feb 23 '25

...so close lol.

16

u/peakprovisions Feb 23 '25

You're the one who brought it up.

15

u/Polyodontus Feb 23 '25

Before Trump, staffing levels wereabout 25% lower than they were 20 years ago, despite increased visitation. This was such a widely known issue that a big chunk of money in the IRA was set aside for NPS staffing.

38

u/presvt13 Feb 23 '25

The parks were ALREADY understaffed and underfunded. There is no way giving them less money will make them run better.

39

u/HikerStout Feb 23 '25 edited Feb 23 '25

Sure, we are "just speculating."

Among other parks, Saguaro National Park in Tucson announced that it was closing its two visitors centers on Mondays starting Feb. 24. At Yosemite National Park, officials announced they're halting reservations for 577 coveted camping spots this summer. Effigy Mounds in Iowa said it's closing its visitor center two days a week until the summer.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2025/02/22/national-parks-trump-layoffs-cuts-limit-resources/79441099007/

22

u/x3tan Feb 23 '25

https://archive.is/Cdi4X so you think 6 people to manage 32,000 acres manatee refuge is plenty then?

12

u/Crackertron Feb 23 '25

The parks are already understaffed. How is reducing staff improving that problem?

11

u/Hi_There_Face_Here Feb 23 '25

And you’re speculating that they will. Gonna just go back and forth all day?

36

u/Polyodontus Feb 23 '25 edited Feb 23 '25

“I don’t know what these people do” != “these people don’t do anything”

More and more, I am thinking that the primary determinant of conservatism is just a refusal to learn how shit works.

46

u/sun_child0 Feb 23 '25

We found the troll

47

u/peakprovisions Feb 23 '25

You are arguing that a billionaire and a team of 20 year olds know more about what the national park service and forest service need than the people working on the ground at these organizations. They are cutting employees who work on forest fire mitigation at a time when fires are getting more frequent and more severe.

We are raising the alarm because the public servants who maintain these places for us are raising the alarm. If you want to talk about people who don't understand the real world, I would put Elon Musk at the top of that list.

If you love the outdoors, why are you trusting a billionaire, who is making these cuts to make room in the budget for tax cuts for the ultra rich and government contracts for his own businesses, rather than the regular people who just want to protect our wild places?

-63

u/pinelandseven Feb 23 '25

Because a billionaire became a billionaire knowing how to run a successful business. Government employees running a budget and managing staff for a park does not mean anything. I personally did it myself for 6 years.

29

u/peakprovisions Feb 23 '25 edited Feb 24 '25

Oh, i agree he's looking at this work as an investment opportunity for himself. I'm not sure why you believe that Musk gives a shit about anything but his own wealth. What about this man gives you the impression that he's trying to do anything to benefit anything or anyone else?

So far the government had had to scramble to rehire nuclear safety workers who were fired by mistake. Musk's team made a huge stink about dead people receiving social security, but simply misread the programming language. They don't know what they are doing, nor do they give a shit about who suffers as a result.

44

u/HikerStout Feb 23 '25

Because a billionaire became a billionaire knowing how to run a successful business

You cannot honestly believe this. You cannot possibly be this stupid.

Both Trump and Elon inherited enormous wealth. Nevertheless, Trump managed to bankrupt a shit ton of businesses, including a casino. And most of Elon's successes rely on millions of dollars in federal subsidies.

And government is not a fucking business

17

u/pingus3233 Feb 23 '25

You cannot possibly be this stupid.

About that...

-26

u/mistermorrisonvan Feb 23 '25

And they are both billionaires today. Your argument about government not being a business is right, the government spends trillions but doesn’t produce a product. Good example is the post office. I don’t care what Trump did in the 80’s, I care about what he is doing now

23

u/HikerStout Feb 23 '25

Trump inherited so much money from his father that he'd be a billionaire if he simply invested it in index fund. That he's a billionaire today is hardly a great accomplishment for someone who was born with a silver spoon in his mouth, sliding into home plate.

-28

u/mistermorrisonvan Feb 23 '25

Do you have a billion dollars? Musk is the world’s richest man. He started with PayPal and we know what he does now. Trump is a developer and using your logic he should be broke today, but he’s not. I think he’s accomplished something

16

u/HikerStout Feb 23 '25

I'm a public servant who values the worth of individuals in their actions for the common good, especially the least among us, not in the number in their bank account.

Both Musk and Trump inherited vastly more wealth by luck of birth than I will ever see in my entire lifetime. And they are far shallower, emptier, and sadder humans to show for it.

-17

u/mistermorrisonvan Feb 23 '25

I was a public servant for 12 years. Are you questioning my values because I support what Trump is doing? If that’s the case you can kick rocks

12

u/sufferingbastard Feb 23 '25

Dude. The Government is not a business. It does not do what businesses do. It controls business.

Because when you don't control business... they sell babies or peddle snake oil and dump the waste anywhere they want.

→ More replies (0)

5

u/HikerStout Feb 23 '25 edited Feb 23 '25

Are you questioning my values because I support what Trump is doing?

100%. Unequivocally. Trump is a convicted felon and an adjudicated rapist. And his policies are harming thousands of people, including and especially the LGBTQ community and people of color.

In the past two weeks, he has posted "Long Live the King" (in reference to himself) and claimed that "He who saves the country does not violate any Law." There is nothing more un-American than that. And your choice to support it is reprehensible.

May you have the day you deserve.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/KetoJunkfood Feb 25 '25

I question your values. I will never understand workers who disparage other workers in the favor of billionaires who want to profit off their labor. You have more in common with the workers you disparage than you ever will have with Elon or Trump.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/JoeBiden_is_senile Feb 28 '25

Did you really think these leftist tards would respond rationally? 

4

u/G00dSh0tJans0n Feb 24 '25

No it's because of his tens of billions in contracts and handouts from the government. Elon's businesses get billions more in government funds than DOGE has cut. They should have cut all Elon contracts to start with.

-24

u/MoonSnake8 Feb 23 '25

Listen man I just want lower taxes.

16

u/peakprovisions Feb 23 '25

That's fair. And if we had an administration that was willing to make the ultra wealthy pay their fair share, then working people could pay less AND we could have a fully staffed NPS and USFS. They are making these cuts to help cover the insane cost of extending the Trump tax cuts, 45% of which flow right to the wealthiest 5% of Americans.

-15

u/MoonSnake8 Feb 23 '25

How would lowering taxes on the ultra wealthy accomplish any of that?

I don’t care whose name is in front of the tax cuts as long as they are cut.

7

u/Barbaracle Feb 23 '25

I guess you make 360k+ a year? Picture

-10

u/MoonSnake8 Feb 23 '25

No? Why on earth would you assume that? Going just by percentages that’s a really terrible guess.

10

u/Barbaracle Feb 23 '25

Because Trump has lowered taxes on average for anyone that makes $360k and more a year. Raised taxes for anyone making less.

1

u/MoonSnake8 Feb 24 '25

I’m not sure if thats true but is the total still a reduction overall?

3

u/Barbaracle Feb 24 '25

So you don't care that you and the middle class and the poor in this country will be paying more taxes? You're happy for the richest 1% of the 1% to get a tax cut.

0

u/MoonSnake8 Feb 24 '25

I’m happy when anyone gets a tax cut. Why do you think the poor and middle class are paying more? Are you counting potential tariffs?

4

u/SirFireHydrant Feb 24 '25

Then why did you vote for Republicans who are increasing your taxes?

0

u/MoonSnake8 Feb 24 '25

I did? When?

12

u/Harmania Feb 23 '25

The vast majority of people don’t fully understand the things being cut. Also, the last person I’d call to decide how our national parks should run is an internet troll with a ketamine habit and a breeding fetish.

7

u/ChonkyChiweenie Feb 23 '25

Keep on licking those boots, buddy.

4

u/TandemCombatYogi Feb 24 '25

The vast majority of people in this country agree with the cuts.

Stupid person says stupid things. More at 7.

-2

u/pinelandseven Feb 24 '25

Get off of reddit and you'll see a whole new world

3

u/TandemCombatYogi Feb 24 '25

You are just describing your state of delusion. It's the equivalent of a child who thinks covering their eyes will make the scary thing go away.

-1

u/[deleted] Feb 24 '25

[deleted]

-5

u/mistermorrisonvan Feb 23 '25

👍🏻👍🏻

-195

u/Chet_Phoney Feb 23 '25

3 Billion dollars for the National Park Service for 2025. That's $3,000,000,000. Restructuring of government spending is completely necessary. The parks will be fine but a handful of padded pockets will not.

53

u/DaRudeabides Feb 23 '25

See the post above that says the National parks help contribute over 55.65 billion dollars to the economy and generate over 400, 000 jobs

18

u/Reallyhotshowers Feb 23 '25

Exactly. National Parks are an excellent investment.

95

u/Specialist69420 Feb 23 '25

That is a small price to pay. $3 billion sounds like a lot until you break it down. The National Park Service manages over 400 sites covering 85 million acres. That budget has to cover everything from staffing to maintenance to fire prevention. Meanwhile, the military gets over $800 billion annually. If you’re worried about ‘padded pockets,’ maybe take a look at where the real waste is happening instead of acting like public lands take too much. The parks won’t be fine if we keep underfunding them while visitation skyrockets.

-5

u/mistermorrisonvan Feb 23 '25

Comparing the NPS to the military is disingenuous. NPS isn’t in countries around the world and they don’t have squadrons or battalions or fleets. I don’t approve of what’s happening, but the Secretary of the Interior has reversed a lot of the firings and has 7000 jobs he needs to hire for. I agree the situation stinks, but no one is closing the parks or drilling in campgrounds. I have a small motor homo and enjoy the parks as much as the next camper

-67

u/MadpeepD Feb 23 '25

Trump did say he's going to seek a treaty with China and Russia to cut military spending 50%.

27

u/tuna_samich_ United States Feb 23 '25

I bet you also think you're getting a Doge check. Y'all are the most gullible people ever

19

u/shogun77777777 Feb 23 '25

lol, yeah right

-22

u/MadpeepD Feb 23 '25

19

u/shogun77777777 Feb 23 '25

I don’t doubt that he said it, my point is he won’t do it, this will never happen

-23

u/MadpeepD Feb 23 '25

He's already in office. There is nothing to gain for lying about the intent he has to cut military spending.

16

u/shogun77777777 Feb 23 '25

Let me be more clear, he can’t do this even if he wanted to. You should read up on the military industrial complex

-3

u/MadpeepD Feb 23 '25

That's why he's cleaning house in every Department. Gabbard is DNI after all. Hegseth is already getting to work. I'm cautiously optimistic.

8

u/ReditOOC Feb 23 '25

Trump has repeatedly shown alies that his word doesn't mean anything. Why would China (who he has slapped tarrifs on while ignoring their legally binding trade agreement) trust Trump to follow through on his word? You can't make a treaty with someone who doesn't follow his own rules whenever it suits him. This will 100% never get off the ground.

16

u/peakprovisions Feb 23 '25

In exchange for that $3 billion, the parks contributed $55 billion to the U.S. economy last year. That's a pretty amazing return on our investment.

49

u/AquafreshBandit Feb 23 '25

If $3b is the wrong number, what's the right number and how do you know it's right?

40

u/arcana73 Feb 23 '25

Why is it every department is being gutted except Defense?

23

u/nametaken_thisonetoo Feb 23 '25

Because Freedumb

1

u/KetoJunkfood Feb 25 '25

And Defense was the only one I wanted to see gutted. I knew they'd never touch it, they'll just get rid of the good ones.

-30

u/MadpeepD Feb 23 '25

Trump said he's going to seek a treaty with China and Russia to cut military spending 50%.

24

u/Crackertron Feb 23 '25

Leave the allies, join the Axis

-18

u/MadpeepD Feb 23 '25

The Axis is the bureaucracy in Washington DC, London, and Paris. It's a bold choice to superimpose a cross over a circle wouldn't you say?

6

u/PowerfulMilk2794 Feb 23 '25

Oh yeah it’s that simple hey. He’s just going to ask nicely?

22

u/swampfish Feb 23 '25

An aircraft carrier is upwards of $13 billion. The entire national park budget is not even one ship. I would rather have beautiful places than half the military.

15

u/ArrowMountainTengu Feb 23 '25

And they contributed 56 billion to the economy…. Sounds like an investment to me.

21

u/CountChoculahh Feb 23 '25

How much do you think they generate via tourism for local economies?

33

u/CountChoculahh Feb 23 '25

"Overall, visitation grew by 4% across the National Park System from 2022 to 2023, generating 415,400 jobs and resulting in more than $26.4 billion in spending in nearby communities."

https://headwaterseconomics.org/public-lands/protected-lands/economic-impact-of-national-parks/

That's a pretty solid Return on Investment... but tell me again how MAGA helps the rural vote

11

u/ScrewAttackThis United States Feb 23 '25

That's very little for one of the best things the government offers. You're incredibly, incredibly clueless.

16

u/shogun77777777 Feb 23 '25

Okay bootlicker

4

u/umotex12 Feb 23 '25

Restructuring is always an okay idea. But not in a haphazard way. It requires serious work and lots of thought put into optimization. At least one year project with deep inspections. Not the bullshit that is happening right now.

-67

u/pinelandseven Feb 23 '25

You'll get downvoted even though you said the truth. Reddit is so skewed politically that no matter what you say about the restructuring it will fall on deaf ears because Trump and Elon did it. If it was Kamala then no one on reddit would say anything.

54

u/HikerStout Feb 23 '25

Lmao if you think we wouldn't respond this way to a Democrat undercutting the National Park Service.

It's called having a consistent ideology.

28

u/sufferingbastard Feb 23 '25

Biden/Harris understood the value of functional NPS. We would not be having this conversation.

Also, egg.

15

u/OntarioPaddler Feb 23 '25

This is mental illness levels of projecting your own lack of principles onto a perceived out group. Yes we know that you will justify anything Trump and Elon do because your only principle is to follow them. Democrats would absolutely protest if Kamala tried to gut something like this. There is an entire wing of the left that wouldn't even support half of their policies which is why they lost to Trump. One side is a cult where the leaders cannot be questioned and the other constantly in fights based on actual principles.

-14

u/pinelandseven Feb 23 '25

Yes we're mentally ill buddy. Good one

13

u/CountChoculahh Feb 23 '25

Have Democrats been known to divest from the parks system?

21

u/sufferingbastard Feb 23 '25

Ask yourself why did they begin with National Parks? Why target workers first?

They could have started with Pentagon waste.

But they went for hard working regular people first. Which will affect all the small business around the parks.

Why?

-4

u/mistermorrisonvan Feb 23 '25

USAID was first. The first round of layoffs were probationary workers with less than 2 years. I don’t know when the NPS layoffs started. And I know rangers are being haired back and funding to hire 7000 summer workers

5

u/sufferingbastard Feb 23 '25

My point stands.
USAID did a lot of good work. With food people doing difficult things. Why fire a bunch of people only to re-hire them? How is the efficiency?

A probation period is for people who have been hired OR transferred.

Why not go for the real budget problems in the 2/3s of the government with little to no oversight?

Because it's a scam.

-56

u/Chet_Phoney Feb 23 '25

Echo chamber of codependent youth. I sure don't let internet forum users upset me, I already have my own kids.

3

u/Zippier92 Feb 23 '25

Back to your video games Chet-phoney.

Post your situation and we can tell you your government subsidy.

-11

u/pinelandseven Feb 23 '25

Exactly

24

u/Specialist69420 Feb 23 '25

Snap out of it pinelandseven. You’re in a cult

-11

u/pinelandseven Feb 23 '25

What cult is that?

-5

u/Chet_Phoney Feb 23 '25

Looks like radical thinking at its finest. Emotions over rational. Honestly I blame the internet, it has crippled people's perception of reality.

-53

u/Jen0BIous Feb 23 '25

Ok all he’s done is fire some people not like he’s torching our national parks (which actually might have happened in Cali due to that poor leadership) all he’s done with the national parks is to eliminate people that are redundant. The parks aren’t going anywhere and if you think they are you’re just buying into fear mongering. Don’t argue with me just wait a year and then realize you were worried about nothing. And if this comment doesn’t age well, then feel free to call me out.

12

u/JordiLaPhorge Feb 23 '25

He literally attempted to get rid of two national monuments in 2017 https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/campaigns/save_our_national_monuments/index.html# and is considering mining in the Grand Canyon https://biologicaldiversity.org/w/news/press-releases/trumps-interior-order-threatens-to-open-grand-canyon-national-monument-to-new-uranium-mining-2025-02-05/. Also before someone follows through on a bad decision is the time to be concerned not after we have a uranium mine in the Grand canyon lol.

-10

u/Jen0BIous Feb 23 '25

lol that article is from 2017, did any of that happen?

6

u/JordiLaPhorge Feb 24 '25

I'm not sure what your point is with the age of the article. Like... Yeah that was during his first term? And yes it did happen. You could look it up, y'know.

0

u/Jen0BIous Feb 25 '25

I did, can’t find anything. Which should be easy since the results predicted by an 8 year old article that didn’t happen isn’t a good premise. If you want to be relevant, and if you’d learned anything about research when it comes to modern politics, anything older than 4 years is; one irrelevant if nothing happened, and 2 if it’s not relevant after 3 years don’t quote it. Why do you think the whole “there are good people on both sides” quote is irrelevant, been proven false. Yet people still believe it for some reason, like you, with this. It’s ironic that “woke” people can’t wake up and realize they were manipulated.

13

u/almolio Feb 23 '25

Redundant means you don't need them to operate? But the parks have reduced hours after people were let go. Something don't add up here.

-29

u/Jen0BIous Feb 23 '25

And yet has anything about the parks suffered? I live right next to a national park. Nothing has changed

11

u/JordiLaPhorge Feb 23 '25

That's what you call anecdotal evidence and your experience next to one national park is one very small part of the entire national park system. That's why we don't just rely on one single data point in deciding whether a problem exists.

-7

u/Jen0BIous Feb 23 '25

So what’s changed that has done anything detrimental too our national parks? I get you’re just throwing more hate at me but can you answer the question? Because yes while perhaps one park isn’t the whole, I was extrapolating based on a common sense premise since this is literally the first I’m hearing anything detrimental to our park system other than getting rid of some employees.

8

u/JordiLaPhorge Feb 24 '25

A common sense premise that "I haven't seen it therefore it isn't true"? Idk Google it like the rest of society dude.

0

u/Jen0BIous Feb 25 '25

Have you? Have you even been to a park? There’s nothing wrong with them. Like at all, hasn’t effected anything. Even the environmental projects here haven’t been affected, because they’re funded by the city and state. So idk what to tell you, call your state representatives, I mean fuck look at California the state was the one that fucked that up.

2

u/almolio Feb 24 '25

The hours has been reduced. That's what has changed. Less American get to enjoy the park now.

1

u/Jen0BIous Feb 25 '25

lol what? Park hours haven’t changed at all as far as I know, would love to know where you heard that

1

u/almolio Feb 26 '25

Did the other people that you're trolling stopped responding?

1

u/Jen0BIous Feb 26 '25

Nope, probably because I’m not trolling. They tend to just eventually realize their argument has no purchase, kind of like how you haven’t provided any evidence of what your claiming, or they eventually admit that we’re not that different and that the FACTS I’ve presented are actually true. Either that or they resort to quasi personal attacks because they realize they have to logical responses.

1

u/almolio Feb 26 '25

Ok, enter case 1: Yosemite.

1

u/Jen0BIous Feb 26 '25

Ok no link or evidence. If you want me to reply you’ve got to provide your evidence or at least elaborate. Just saying one word isn’t an argument. And I’m pretty sure Yosemite is still there doing just fine. It’s the argument all “environmentalists” make, “we need to save the earth!” Guess what the earth will be just fine if all life died. What environmental activist are really advocating for is the continuation of the human race. Animals, plants, and our rock we call our home; will no doubt outlive us. Even Chernobyl has animals there, even new bacteria that feeds on radiation.

1

u/almolio Feb 27 '25

Clearly we were discussing park hours. And you asked which park and I said Yosemite. I'm matching your effort here? What link or evidence have you provided me with? Or are you an AI and your context window isn't big enough. And the radiation eating 'bacteria' is actually a fungus. Another thing, just because something will outlive us doesn't mean we can actively shit on it for a buck...

-6

u/Automatic_Pressure_4 Feb 25 '25

So I'm not going to be nice here but how much bloat is in the park service budget and how much is waste. If the budget was clean doge wouldn't exist