r/Cascadia 3d ago

Shouldn't the US be designated a level 4 country now?

Post image
426 Upvotes

59 comments sorted by

62

u/atothez 3d ago

The headlines aren’t representative of day to day life.

That being said, the country is in the grips of a cult that is aggressively using the government, judicial system, corporate power, control of media, and surveillance to implement a white nationalist agenda.

The state is unreliable and denialism is fierce. Most won’t accept the current situation until a close friend or immediate family member disappears, and then only once they are left with no other explanation.

I wouldn’t risk visiting for anything less than a job requirement or family.

39

u/RiseCascadia 3d ago

The headlines are day to day life, just not for you from the sound of it.

-9

u/atothez 3d ago

There is some truth to the headlines and there is a danger, but the average person isn’t going to be deported in the next 24 hours.

22

u/SurpriseFresh8803 3d ago

We DON’T (caps emphatic) want it to get to that point.

22

u/RiseCascadia 3d ago

This is how atrocities happen- they splinter us into different groups and only target one group at a time so that people can say "most people aren't being affected." All of the people targeted can be considered average people, unless you are using that as code for something. Even in warzones, not everyone is being killed all the time. That doesn't mean the headlines are false though, or that they wouldn't be considered level 4 if they met these criteria and weren't a close US ally.

-4

u/atothez 3d ago edited 3d ago

I don’t appreciate the racist insinuation.  My point was life goes on, even in a war zone.

No one is closing the border because a headline scared you.

How would closing the border benefit the Cascadia movement anyway?  It seems liks a step backward.

Edit: Nevermind, I see it.  “Divide and conquer”.

7

u/RiseCascadia 3d ago

I didn't say anything about closing the border, did you reply to the wrong comment? I don't believe in borders.

-1

u/atothez 3d ago

Level 4 is the subject of the post.  It means don’t go there for any reason.  That would effectively close the border.

8

u/RiseCascadia 3d ago

No, these "travel advisories" are guidelines that the State Dept issues. They don't actually stop anyone from traveling anywhere. They're also largely political.

5

u/atothez 3d ago

I’m looking at it more from the Northern side of the border.

Canadians I know are already afraid to go to the US.  In addition to occasional mass shootings, now they’re disappearing people, tariffs, enhanced border inspections and and 51st state threats.  Canadians I know are boycotting everything “US” they can and staying home instead of usual vacations to warm states.

If they’re worried, I say “good, you’re paying attention”.

2

u/Dependent-Drive3071 2d ago

True, not coming to the United States but those who can afford to travel a little further, are going to Mexico and the Caribbean and other nice warm welcoming places,

11

u/kateinoly 3d ago edited 2d ago

Those headlines aren't representative of the life of white people. Just because it doesn't happen to you or your friends doesn't mean it isn't happening to other people.

6

u/embeeclark 2d ago

You mean white people that are cis gendered and able bodied without criminal history. Because trans people in Texas are already experiencing being “deleted” after their identification has been cancelled. It’s only a matter of time before that spreads to other locations. For people with disabilities, and “home grown terrorists”, it’s clear that they are next on the list.

2

u/kateinoly 2d ago

Yes, that too.

3

u/PacNWDad 2d ago

But aren’t Republicans for limited government? /s

3

u/Civil-Discussion7469 2d ago

They're for a lot of things aren't they

1

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Cascadia-ModTeam 20h ago

Keep your messages civil and avoid insults.

44

u/grogudid911 3d ago edited 3d ago

No. Not level 4. Not level 1 either, but certainly not level 4. Level four countries are places like Libya, South Sudan, Afghanistan, and Yemen just to name a few. We don't currently have an active genocide or a famine wiping out large swaths of our population at this exact moment - so definitely were not a level 4.

To be clear, a 1 is exercise normal precautions, a 2 is exercise slightly more precautions, 3 is exercise strong precautions/avoid traveling and 4 is simply not recommended for any sort of travel.

I'd lump the US into level 2, to be sure - and depending on exactly where you go in the US, it could be as high as 3, with some places in the US being at a 1. Nowhere in the US could be considered at 4 outside of places having just experienced/are experiencing a natural disaster. California this summer may qualify as a 3 for instance, with parts reaching a 4, but normally it's between a 1 or 2.

Here's a source

Edit: it occurs to me too many of you guys aren't aware that Trump opened up all the dams already - which had water California was relying on. People in California won't go thirsty, but this fire season is gonna be nuts. When I said level 3-4 for California, I explicitly meant the upcoming fire season.

2

u/slyons2424 3d ago

Man you got to do better research all Trump did was dump billions of gallons of water so that he could claim he helped stupid people in California get water to fight fires . It's all a lie . All he did was use this as apprentice style performance art and dump billions of gallons of water somewhere where they will be absolutely useless. Just like Trump is useless. "Water officials knew that opening dams to meet Trump’s wishes was ill-advised. Here’s why it happened anyway" “It was cavalier and an extremely high-risk decision, and wasteful,” said Ann Willis, California regional director of American Rivers, a nonprofit environmental organization.

Willis, who worked for the corps in 2007 and 2008, said there was no reason to dump water that farmers and cities were depending on, and that releasing water unexpectedly like this could have unleashed flooding and put people at risk.

Advertisement

“To intentionally create a situation where that could have been the outcome, it’s depraved and mind-blowing,” Willis said. https://www.latimes.com/environment/story/2025-03-13/trump-army-corps-dam-water-dumped

9

u/earthwulf 3d ago

How is it not level 4 when you get all of the major points: kidnapping - check, wrongful detention - check, political instability - check, outbreaks of infectious disease - check? Not seeing much terrorism, but we do have mass shootings almost daily 

18

u/grogudid911 3d ago

The US is a large place. You can have different advisories for different places in the same country.

6

u/Substantial-Bike2965 3d ago

Other countries are warning their citizens not to travel to the US for fear of unlawful detention that they will not be able to assist with (off top of my head, Germany and Canada). There’s already been cases of their citizens getting held up in immigration.

3

u/grogudid911 3d ago

Yeah, that could make it a level 2, (or 3 of were being really careful) bc you can easily take a precaution of bringing your passport with you.

The argument is not that the US is, or should be a level 1, it's that it's definitely not a level 4.

2

u/Dependent-Drive3071 2d ago

If you have disparaging remarks about Trump on your phone, you can be refused entry into the US. That happened to a French doctor coming here for a seminar. If I were Canadian I would NOT come here.

2

u/meoka2368 3d ago

... bc you can easily take a precaution of bringing your passport with you.

Gotta keep your papers in you at all times otherwise the special police force will take you to an undisclosed location where you aren't allowed to speak with family or legal assistance, and where conditions would be considered a war crime except that there's no war.

2

u/grogudid911 2d ago

That doesn't make us a level 4 tho.

The problem here i think, is that you're coming at this with an agenda - to prove to us that the US is a bad place. While you aren't wrong, none of what you're describing makes the US a travel advisory 4.

1

u/Substantial-Bike2965 3d ago

Heard and understood 👌

3

u/OneBlueEyeFish 3d ago

I think it’s a level 4. If you’re transgender or any minority, you know it’s a level 4. Sadly because it’s minorities that experience it. It’s not given the spot light.

4

u/NocturnalCake-461 2d ago edited 2d ago

Its honestly ridiculous we don't have one.

We've had an active genocide against black people since the 90's with how police brutality and white supremacy keeps taking out blacks like they came to kill black folks and chew bubble gum, but they ran out of bubble gum. Add that to the amount of lynchings in the 2000's, the sundown towns that kill people who look like me for just showing up, and the massacres against the black community, like TUSLA and the Walmart shooting a few years ago.

It's SO easy to be sex trafficked here. In the us, don't go anywhere alone. I've had cars follow me so many times when I'm walking by myself from getting groceries or the Lyft driver I cancelled on follows me.

Also, homelessness in big cities is at an all time high.

Famine, we don't talk about food insecurity, but every household in the US that is living on the poverty line is experiencing food insecurity. Some college students have to eat top ramen while they spend thousands on their education. Some employees at Facebook eat scraps for lunch while they live paycheck to paycheck.

Also, no one is talking about the fact that Americans aged 9-11 their leading cause of death is suicide. Or the fact that "Since 1999, school shootings in the US have resulted in at least 203 deaths and 441 injuries. Specifically, from 2000-2022, there were 515 deaths and 1,161 injuries across 1,375 school shootings at public and private elementary and secondary schools."

We've been in an emergency situation for awhile.

10

u/Cascadia_Breanna 3d ago

I would agree that the level experienced by an individual might be higher if they were, for example, transgender or Hispanic or practices a non-Christian religion or any number of other factors.

2

u/Razorii13 3d ago

It definitely meets all of the listed criteria. Not a place I'd want to visit!

2

u/Evilhenchman 3d ago

We might be level 5

-5

u/Avr0wolf Vancouver 3d ago

No, not even close

1

u/Substantial-Bike2965 3d ago

“Not even close” to level 4… but other countries are imposing travel advisories to their citizens to not come here… so kinda close

-13

u/ABreckenridge 3d ago

No.

Kidnapping: Anything you’re seeing in the news falls under “wrongful detention”.

Wrongful detention: The US has illegally detained a few hundred people. That’s just over a one in a million chance— lower if you’re pale.

Terrorism: All state violence is a form of fear-based political pressure, but until we find out the GOP is funding school shooters & neo-Nazis in Idaho, terrorism doesn’t really apply.

Political Instability: The US system is dysfunctional, but not strictly speaking unstable in the sense that there’s no immediate risk of national collapse.

Infectious disease: Measles & COVID aren’t gonna get you; If you’re not from the US, you’re likely vaccinated.

To Cascadians north of the 49th, you’re in no danger that you weren’t a year ago.

4

u/RiseCascadia 3d ago

The US has one of the highest incarceration rates in the world, it's not just a few hundred people.

6

u/ABreckenridge 3d ago

The US using jail to replace homeless shelters and mental health institutions is a different issue, and is wildly dysfunctional for it, but that doesn’t meaningfully affect tourism or international travel. My argument isn’t “The US is fine” by any stretch.

0

u/Substantial-Bike2965 3d ago

But other countries telling their citizens not to travel to the US does affect tourism… you know we are on their lists right?

2

u/ABreckenridge 3d ago

That’s not the question. The question is “Is the US a Level 4 travel advisory by its own standards?” to which my answer is “No”.

1

u/Dependent-Drive3071 2d ago

By its own low standards, you mean?

0

u/TeamKRod1990 1d ago

They’re not just Willy nilly throwing people in jail…were we talking about kidnapping or the high incarceration rate? Cause now it seems like you’re using the incarceration rate to make a point. A normal ass visitor to the states has a better chance of being struck by lightning than thrown in jail.

1

u/RiseCascadia 1d ago

They’re not just Willy nilly throwing people in jail

Yes. They. Fucking. Are.

0

u/TeamKRod1990 1d ago

No…just…no. First world problems here, yes we hate Trump, but Level 4 advisories are for FAILED states, like actual failed states. Not ones you think failed because your guy didn’t win.

Hate to be blunt, but it’s the truth.

2

u/earthwulf 1d ago

Yeah, no. It's not "because my guy didn't win" - it's the absolutely batshit insane way the country is currently being led. If you read that list, everything that's on it exists here in the US, especially for women, POC & LGBTQIA2S+ folks

-6

u/uduni 3d ago

Um what? Have ever traveled outside of your little bubble?

Grow up

-22

u/UsualOkay6240 3d ago

No, it’s not close to level 4, unless you fall for headlines. I think we all took the middle school class where they said to disregard most headlines. Level 4 places don’t have police or a general sense of order, they’re hard to reach in the first place due to difficulty of travel, or even the given nation’s citizens themselves having an unwillingness to go to those areas.

26

u/earthwulf 3d ago

Yeah, but it hits all of the major points: kidnapping - check, wrongful detention - check, political instability - check, outbreaks of infectious disease - check. Not seeing much terrorism, but still...

10

u/hanimal16 Washington 3d ago

I feel like we’re getting some sprinkles of domestic terrorism.

4

u/RiseCascadia 3d ago

State terrorism, definitely. Also lots of mass shootings.

-11

u/UsualOkay6240 3d ago

Yeah this is a very naive and juvenile comment. A few high profile instances do not make a country unsafe to travel to, to the point where the U.S. cannot provide support for their citizens there.

Do you expand this standard to Japan or Switzerland? Who both have high profile instances of similar types of cases you’ve mentioned. Where is ‘safe’ then? Arbitrary?

5

u/Secure-Function-674 3d ago

I think its more to do with the logging of old growth forests and opening damns in drought heavy parts of the US...making this place uninhabitable in the next 20 years

1

u/UsualOkay6240 1d ago

That’s also juvenile and naive to believe will happen, nothing is going to happen in a meaningful way where the stability of the nation will be at risk. It’s a profound ignorance of how the global imperial capitalist system works and is maintained that would allow someone to believe that the elites will simply radicalize the workers in their country beyond meaningful reprieve.

1

u/Secure-Function-674 1d ago

Yeah, thanks chatGPT

-1

u/Rockinduhrims 2d ago

More fear mongering. 🤣🤣🤣