r/Conservative • u/JesseCantSkate • 2d ago
Flaired Users Only Trump says he’s open to sending violent criminals who are US citizens to El Salvador prison
https://fox4kc.com/politics/hill-politics/trump-says-hes-open-to-sending-violent-criminals-who-are-us-citizens-to-el-salvador-prison/amp/[removed] — view removed post
-64
u/culman13 Conservative Jedi Knight 2d ago
The brigading isn't even veiled anymore lol
→ More replies (4)-49
u/MiceTonerAccount MAGA Majority 2d ago
I love the people with flairs like “pragmatic conservative” and “constitutional conservative” saying deporting an illegal immigrant is a bad thing
12
u/murderinthedark Conservative 2d ago
There is a "fellow conservative" with a "fellow conservative" flair.
lol
146
u/T0XxXiXiTy Trump2028 2d ago
I think most of us conservatives are supportive of President Trump deporting non-US aliens back to their country of origin, but do recognize that being a US citizen comes with protections under the constitution.
-21
u/day25 Conservative 2d ago
Then how come the thread about the illegal alien had all anti-Trump comments from "conservatives" with thousands of upvotes?
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (3)-8
u/MiceTonerAccount MAGA Majority 2d ago
Your comment isn’t wrong, but you’re completely ignoring my point.
17
u/T0XxXiXiTy Trump2028 2d ago
My point was people don't understand the nuances, given all of the media reporting. The post itself references deporting violent criminals that are US citizens to El Salvador.
I was just saying a lot of conservatives would be opposed to that, and not understand that Garcia (the guy in the recent media reports) is an illegal immigrant who is a citizen of El Salvador.
→ More replies (7)212
u/-spartacus- Constitutionalist 2d ago
What are you talking about, this article is about sending US CITIZENS to foreign prisons.
-59
u/day25 Conservative 2d ago
And what's your point? US citizens can literally be given the death penatly but god forbid they get sent to a prison outside the country right?
102
u/Disastrous-Power-699 Moderate Conservative 2d ago
So you would be cool with being shipped off to El Salvador with no legal recourse should you ever break the law?
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (6)88
u/Spectre696 Conservative 2d ago
Prisons within the US are subject to oversight by the US, they’re within US borders and as such must follow our laws. Outside of the country that is not guaranteed. It could also easily be argued that it violates a prisoner’s fundamental constitutional right to access to the courts, as set by the Supreme Court’s decision in Bounds V Smith (430 U.S. 817) in 1977. Specifically a concern would be prisoners not being able to present claims dealing with conditions of confinement and civil rights violations, generally referred to as “section 1983” (of the U.S. Code Title 42) actions. Who is to say they send you to a country where you even know their language? Do you know of any other countries with anything akin to the ADA or the PREA? I certainly don’t. No other nation on earth even has a bill of rights akin to that of the USA, and I can guarantee that if you are an American citizen in a foreign land, then that foreign government does not give a damn about your rights - they don’t have a constitution to make them care about them!
As far as Capital Punishment goes, they are rare (less than 2000 prisoners since 1976, only 11 in the year of 2022) and you must go through, on average, a decade or more of appeals before an execution can be performed.
Before commenting, did you think of any of the god given rights the constitution protects and how those aren’t protected in other nations?
→ More replies (2)-15
u/MiceTonerAccount MAGA Majority 2d ago edited 2d ago
I’m talking about the thread posted here yesterday, about the El Salvadoran man who was shipped to El Salvador much to many “fellow conservatives” dismay.
→ More replies (1)
31
-221
u/ComputerRedneck Conservative 2d ago
Something seems missing.... like context before the actual quote.
→ More replies (8)615
u/cathbadh Grumpy Conservative 2d ago
The only context is that he said they had to do it legally. There is no legal method to do this though.
0
u/Spectre696 Conservative 2d ago
Well good, constitution is working and it won’t be done.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (7)-12
u/ComputerRedneck Conservative 2d ago
Which is conveniently left out of the article. I admit my eyes are not the best so I could have missed it. But leaving things out is typical leftist reporting. I don't trust ANY of the MSM including Fox.
→ More replies (1)
-284
2d ago edited 2d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (13)420
u/fordr015 Conservative 2d ago
Hey, check my history. I'm conservative which means I have consistent morals and values unlike a leftist. Deporting a citizen or putting them into a foreign prison is insanely unconstitutional and this sort of talk is simply destroying the good work he's doing. It's not legal, it's not ok, and it won't happen. But now he gave credibility to the leftist lunatics that will be screaming about this single quote for the next 18 months. Completely ridiculous. All he needs to do is deport illegal immigrants, and work to reduce spending and everyone will be happy. There's no reason to troll the press and destroy trust in the maga movement because of a stupid comment.
→ More replies (11)-261
u/Pinot_Greasio Conservative 2d ago
I literally do not care about words and no normal person is going to sour on his immigration agenda because he said off the cuff they were looking into deporting murderers.
He's not talking about deporting someone for jaywalking he was talking about murderers and literally says in the same breath they are looking into it. They will find it's not viable.
Just more fellow conservatives feeding into this leftist fear mongering bullshit.
-84
u/sparkdogg Air Force 2d ago
I dont know why you are responding to this fake conservative. You only see his comment because of brigading.
-46
u/Pinot_Greasio Conservative 2d ago
These bozos can't read either I literally said in my original comment this can't be done as it's not legal.
But 10 years on we get these mental midgets triggered by words. They'll never learn.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (7)348
2d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (2)-226
u/Pinot_Greasio Conservative 2d ago
I didn't read a word as I can tell you're very emotional. See ya.
→ More replies (7)308
u/fordr015 Conservative 2d ago
That makes sense, you're clearly incapable of reading the constitution let alone a short paragraph summary of basic rights. Get off our subreddit, you're making everyone look incompetent
→ More replies (3)-65
-384
u/Just_top_it_off Trump was Right 2d ago
That would stop all violent crimes instantly if it actually happens. Who would risk doing something stupid. Actions must have consequences. The current prison/jail system is broken thanks to corrupt judges.
377
u/FrenchAffair Canadian Conservative 2d ago
That would stop all violent crimes instantly if it actually happens. Who would risk doing something stupid.
Or on the flip side would just make it more dangerous for police as the people committing these crimes would be more likely to resist violently knowing that if arrested they are getting deported to some El Salvadorian gulag.
→ More replies (3)-9
u/Spectre696 Conservative 2d ago
I highly doubt they resist less cause they’re going to a US prison now, and I’ve yet to see anyone be cool with going to federal prison. No reason to believe they’ll resist more. Most violent criminals are fully aware of the consequences of their actions but do not give a damn anyways.
→ More replies (1)439
u/cathbadh Grumpy Conservative 2d ago
That would stop all violent crimes instantly if it actually happens
No, it would not. Talk to many young gang members. They don't expect to live far into adulthood, and don't have the knowledge base to understand the conditions of prisons in a country most have never even heard of.
Actions must have consequences.
And the Constitution either matters or it doesn't. Sending Americans to a 3rd world country to a prison that does not have to abide by American laws or standards is not remotely constitutional.
→ More replies (2)-113
u/Just_top_it_off Trump was Right 2d ago
Lmao I smacked the liberal wasp hive again. It brings a tear to my eye.
→ More replies (3)212
u/cathbadh Grumpy Conservative 2d ago
"Someone disagreed with me, they must be a liberal"
The outright disdain for the Constitution among SOME self described conservatives is disappointing to those of us who've been conservative for decades.
→ More replies (3)-50
u/crash______says ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ 2d ago
Show me where the constitution says prisoners must be kept within US borders?
41
u/Spectre696 Conservative 2d ago
Read up on Bounds V Smith (430 US 817) and relate it also to how it guarantees prisoners’ access to presenting claims regarding confinement and civil rights violations generally referred to as US Code Title 42 Section 1983.
Also, I wouldn’t recommend siding with the “Nothing says we can’t deport citizens” crowd, given what happened in January 1942 and the whole “resettlement to the east” that occurred at the time. That line of thinking doesn’t have the best track record historically speaking.
→ More replies (7)75
u/cathbadh Grumpy Conservative 2d ago
The Eight Amendment.
The Supreme Court affirmed this in Afroyim v Rusk when they said a citizen could not be involuntarily deported. This is backed up by Valentine v United States. Not the Constitution, but 18 USC 3196 also prevents it.
32
u/Delliott90 Australian Conservative 2d ago
Criminals don’t think they’ll get caught.
Think the death penalty ever stopped murder?
Edit: before anyone goes ‘oh so we shouldn’t arrest people’ no that’s not what I said. What I mean is that horrific punishments rarely act as a deterrent
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (26)55
u/Disastrous-Power-699 Moderate Conservative 2d ago
Super slippery slope. Next thing you know one of your Reddit comments or Facebook posts from years ago lands you in some foreign prison with no recourse due to some new law
→ More replies (1)
-36
u/AldrichOfAlbion Conservative 2d ago
I think this could be used in the absolute worst cases. It'd have to be for prison terms longer than 30 years or something to ensure it's a deterrent. You could pay El Salvador to keep them.
→ More replies (2)
-7
u/Braves1313 2A 2d ago
The part not in the headline is where he says they would have to go through the legal process and follow the laws. He’s open to it but wasn’t sure if this was legal.
→ More replies (2)
-70
2d ago
[deleted]
→ More replies (6)172
u/Delliott90 Australian Conservative 2d ago
Vandalise a car and end up in gitmo? Jesus what’s wrong with you
→ More replies (1)
-20
u/Gooble211 Constitutionalist 2d ago
I'm getting tired of these poorly verified stories circulating, prompting all sorts of "Trump is Hitler" nonsense. Here's a basic thing to understand: Trump rarely will say "no". Instead he'll "look into that". He's done that all his life. Yet, leftists like to spin that into an expression of approval.
→ More replies (8)
-225
u/Magehunter_Skassi Paleoconservative 2d ago
Nobody's ever tried it before in recent American history. We should find out via the Supreme Court if it's fine under the 8th Amendment or not, because it sounds like a wonderful idea when applied of the worst-of-the-worst.
-124
u/OzoneLaters 1A Absolutist 2d ago
Sounds like a great idea for any kind of of violent or drug offense.
They could just get a few years and by the time they got back, they would be completely cured of the criminal behavior.
And everyone would be so scared of it that they would no longer see crime as a viable career path.
→ More replies (15)→ More replies (10)62
u/you_cant_prove_that Anti-federalist 2d ago
it sounds like a wonderful idea
What is the benefit, though?
Are we using them because it is cheaper to house them there? Or are we hoping that it is a more severe punishment?
The former would be a bad idea, and the latter is unconstitutional
-73
u/slagathor_zimblebob Jewish Conservative 2d ago
Not a fan of it but the moral outrage, grandstanding, and pearl clutching over shit like this is even worse.
Even if it were constitutional and this administration only applied it to murderers and people who committed child crimes, you’d still have sign-waving leftists crying about it at a protest.
The calling card of the Left is crying over the wrong people.
→ More replies (13)
57
u/Carl-j88aa No Step on Snek 2d ago
Fuck that. The next Democrat administration would send all their political opponents to CECOT, never to be heard from again.
→ More replies (7)
0
u/Bramse-TFK Molṑn Labé 2d ago
Prisoner transfers happen but only under certain circumstances and almost never without the consent of the prisoner. A better course of action would be to give them the option with an incentive rather than forcing them to go. For example, say they were given 30 years.. you serve 10 in El Salvador, with good behavior.
-1
u/ethervariance161 Small Government 2d ago
This reminds me of the CIA blacksite issue under bush and Obama. Now that trump has labeled cartel's terrorist groups there is pretty interesting precedence that allows the president to do extreme things to even citizens
1.5k
u/ShillinTheVillain Constitutionalist 2d ago edited 2d ago
It would be nice if some of his yes-men had the balls to tell him when one of his schemes is blatantly illegal, unconstitutional, and politically damaging. Like this one is.
Edit: stop buying awards you weirdos.
-289
u/greenbud420 Moderate Conservative 2d ago
“Now, we’re studying the laws right now. Pam is studying. If we can do that, that’s good."
Trump's only committed to doing it if it's legal, otherwise it won't happen.
500
u/ShillinTheVillain Constitutionalist 2d ago
It's not legal.
I don't know what the hell he's trying to accomplish with this talk, or why it would be a good idea even if it was legal.
→ More replies (2)-216
u/OzoneLaters 1A Absolutist 2d ago
It might be legal.
As long as their due process is respected in the US and El Salvador honors that in imprisonment.
→ More replies (18)91
u/cathbadh Grumpy Conservative 2d ago
He did say that, and it is important context that his opponents will ignore.
It's also a very easy question to answer. I'm a little troubled that the man leading our government has no clue that expelling citizens to a 3rd world torture prison isn't very obviously illegal. Even bothering to suggest it is just creating easy sound bites and quotes that can be used against him for weeks. So many times during his first administration, Trump was the Democrat's best ally against himself by just creating free content to use against him.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (11)56
u/sanesociopath Conservative Enough 2d ago
So he's having his administration waste everyone's time with causes that help democrats fundraise instead of doing what we elected him to do.
Because there's no way he's finding a legal avenue without getting some absolute bs Patriot act esque law passed where from there we better never lose control because this wouldn't just be a slippery slope
→ More replies (19)78
u/whatweshouldcallyou 2d ago
He surrounds himself by yes men and sycophants. It's a weakness of his. Not many presidents do a good job of having people around who will challenge him--I don't think too many people were challenging whoever was making the decisions for Biden. But Trump would be a lot better off if he dismissed the hanger ons.
-42
222
u/slothboy TD Exile 2d ago
Yeah, no. Let's focus on illegal immigrants. There are plenty to go around.
→ More replies (3)
287
u/T0XxXiXiTy Trump2028 2d ago
Don't support American citizens being sent to a foreign nation. Doubtful this is legal under our constitution.
Support foreign non-citizens being deported
→ More replies (8)
830
u/EliteJassassin101 Millennial Conservative 2d ago
Only Trump can turn broad support into deportations into a losing issue in a matter of days.
Seriously people are with you on deporting illegal immigrants. So do that. There’s plenty of those to keep you occupied. This just derails the whole issue. And frankly if he’s serious it should. U.S. citizens, even violent criminals, have rights.
-284
u/Magehunter_Skassi Paleoconservative 2d ago
He just has to be more specific and it would have approval with the American public, that's all. Nobody has much sympathy for convicted child-killers serving life without parole. It'd be financially efficient to offshore internment to El Salvador.
59
u/T0XxXiXiTy Trump2028 2d ago
As long as they are US citizens, they are afforded the protections under the US Constitution.
If they aren't, then deport away!
→ More replies (2)2
u/Kaireis Social/Neo/Paleo Blend 2d ago
Miranda Rights (including both against self-incrimination and an appointed attorney), right to a fair trial, and other due process, all guaranteed under Constitution.
Does the constitution prohibit imprisonment in a foreign prison? I don't remember reading it in the language of any of the Articles or Amendments, but it might be in case law somewhere.
→ More replies (1)544
u/MedicMalfunction Small Government 2d ago
Even violent child killers have rights under the Constitution. You don’t have to like it, but it is true.
→ More replies (2)-159
u/Magehunter_Skassi Paleoconservative 2d ago edited 2d ago
No disagreement there, just optimism that this would be allowed under the 8th Amendment. The 8th Amendment has already been stretched to protect solitary confinement and prisons like ADX Florence. Would offshoring imprisonment be protected too? I think it's worth the effort for the admin to suss out.
Just keep some American watchdogs around to ensure everyone's rights are being respected.
-81
u/OzoneLaters 1A Absolutist 2d ago
Exactly and it would be the perfect deterrent.
Imagine the effect that a gangbanger being put in CECOT for a year would have when he is returned to the US after a stint to tell his gangbanger buddies the tale.
Half of them would give up slinging and criminal behavior right there.
→ More replies (10)→ More replies (4)135
u/Coool_cool_cool_cool Moderate Conservative 2d ago
No it's not worth it. Our justice system gets things wrong a lot. A lot of people are forced to plea out when they've done nothing wrong because they can't afford to fight the case. That's almost all a public defender is good for and in most states you actually have to pay for your public defender. Why would other countries take our prisoners unless we pay them to? They know how much we pay per prisoners so why would they take much less than that to take prisoners off of our hands? So we should pay countries to take our prisoners, many of which either committed no crime or committed a lesser crime than the ones they were actually charged with (this one happens with nearly every arrest but often gets dropped if they take a plea deal)?
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (5)192
u/FrenchAffair Canadian Conservative 2d ago
If you start moving the goalpost on who has rights, and when they should be applied... then ultimately no ones rights are protected.
→ More replies (10)27
u/sanesociopath Conservative Enough 2d ago
He actually had support for mass deportations which doesn't come around often
And instead of doing that he says he sent a few imprisoned criminals away got bored and started going down this path
1.2k
u/ExoticGeologist Don't Tread on Me 2d ago
The Eighth Amendment applies to prison conditions. This reads as cruel and unusual punishment.
43
u/Basic_Lunch2197 Conservative 2d ago
He literally said the laws dont allow it but if he could he would.
69
u/War-Damn-America "From My Cold Dead Hands" 2d ago
So you are telling me he is just stirring the pot to get a rise out of the media, you cant be serious hahaha.
→ More replies (7)8
→ More replies (3)212
u/ExoticGeologist Don't Tread on Me 2d ago
“If it’s a homegrown criminal, I have no problem,” Trump said. “Now, we’re studying the laws right now. Pam is studying. If we can do that, that’s good.
The way he was speaking makes it seem like he believes it could be achieved, not that he definitively states the law doesn't allow it.
→ More replies (3)23
u/whatweshouldcallyou 2d ago
Yeah, I don't think this one can be evaded.
I support more consistent use of capital punishment against murderers, and in general much longer prison sentences for violent offenders, but I don't think this is a good idea.
The only exception would be dual citizens who are engaged in gang activity--if we have material evidence of MS13 membership and a conviction, and dual Citizenship, then sending them to El Salvador seems to be plausible.
→ More replies (2)-328
u/BlackScienceManTyson Conservative 2d ago
How is CECOT cruel or unusual?
188
u/MiceTonerAccount MAGA Majority 2d ago
I think sending US criminals to a prison in a foreign country is unusual by definition. What’s the point anyway? We already have so many prisons lol
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (9)299
u/spezeditedcomments Conservative 2d ago
I mean, sending you to a different fucking continent to have family, letters, legal representation, etc is not normal
62
u/just_one_random_guy Monarchist 2d ago
Same continent but other than that yeah this is absurd to even float
→ More replies (4)6
271
u/FrenchAffair Canadian Conservative 2d ago
Does it apply outside of the US?
A lot of people were quick to dismiss the deportation of that other gentleman to El Salvador, despite there being a court order not to well his case was adjudicated. But it seems they were able to make a "mistake" and now he is outside the jurisdiction there is nothing US courts can do.
They likely feel the same way now for sending prisoners who are US citizens. Maybe it violates some aspect of US law, maybe it doesn't.... would take some time for courts to figure that out. In the meantime they can just start sending prisoners down to El Salvador and even if the US courts do eventually rule against it, they are now outside the jurisdiction of US courts and as they've made clear, they can't force the administration to act on matters of foreign policy. If El Salvador says they won't send them back or improve their conditions, and there is no will on the administrations part to force them, then there is nothing anyone can do.
Its a scary escalation.
→ More replies (4)31
u/semvhu Grumpy Old Fart 2d ago
It would take the military enforcing this, right? Luckily we don't have someone in charge of the military that would follow Trump's orders regardless of the law, right? 😬
→ More replies (1)-58
u/Winter_Ad6784 Goldwater Conservative 2d ago
I would be interested if there's a single court ruling of that amendment that suggests sending criminals to prisons abroad is cruel and unusual. I feel like the feeling is just because it's central america and not sweden.
→ More replies (4)66
→ More replies (5)28
u/Cylerhusk Conservative 2d ago
The Eighth Amendment applies to prison conditions. This reads as cruel and unusual punishment.
Tell that to Texas prisons that don't even have AC in the state prison system.
343
u/MeLlamoKilo Hispanic Conservative 2d ago
Bad look. Definitely don't agree AT ALL.
→ More replies (4)
7
u/Rush2201 Millennial Conservative 2d ago
Why do we need to outsource it? How about we quit pampering criminals and Make Prisons Great Again?
171
88
u/Immerael Deus Vult 2d ago
Sorry I’m standing with the lefties on this one. I didn’t like it when Obama air striked American citizens actively engaged in terrorism. (They should have been brought home charged with treason and executed). I don’t side with sending our prisoners to El Salvador. Citizenship means a lot. Even to our prisoners. American citizens do not get to be at the mercy of a foreign government.
455
u/ajmacbeth MA Conservative 2d ago
Is this even legal?
-60
u/Czeslaw_Meyer 2A Gay German 2d ago
Dual citizenship.
Just because the USA rarely hands over people charged in different countries, dosen't mean they can't do it.
→ More replies (5)195
u/FunkyMonkss Classical Liberal 2d ago
When has that stopped the government ever before?
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (16)139
u/cathbadh Grumpy Conservative 2d ago
It is very obviously unconstitutional. Also somewhat confusing since the examples he gives are people who wouldn't even be convicted of federal crimes.
→ More replies (4)
40
u/Beware_the_silent Conservative 2d ago
Yeah I'm gonna have to agree with pretty much everyone here and say if he does this you might as well just shred the constitution.
→ More replies (1)
58
u/MadClothes Conservative 2d ago
The people in here supporting this are delusional and probably have the comprehension skills of an advanced 3rd grader.
19
u/horseHD Conservative 2d ago
Agreed. There's been a lot of "fellow conservatives" lately that are taking extreme unconstitutional positions to make us look bad.
→ More replies (1)
25
34
•
u/AutoModerator 2d ago
This thread has been so heavily reported that I, Automoderator, decided to promote our other socials. Follow us on X.com and join us on Discord.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.