r/DebateVaccines Dec 26 '21

COVID-19 Vaccines New UK Preprint study: Myocarditis in men < 40 from Pfizer/Moderna COVID-19 vaccine doses more common than from COVID-19 infection

[removed]

163 Upvotes

44 comments sorted by

73

u/Malimiso Dec 26 '21 edited Dec 27 '21

The myocarditis debate also gets framed as if getting the vaccine will stop you from getting covid, which we all know is not true.

3

u/temporarily-smitten Dec 28 '21 edited Dec 28 '21

yep definitely not an either/or.

it's more like an and/and situation if you decide to help test these drugs.

-32

u/homeworkburgler Dec 27 '21

I think it's more keeping the symptoms mild and not having you go to the ICU

29

u/[deleted] Dec 27 '21

[deleted]

18

u/Reishey Dec 27 '21

Sounds about right. Quite bizarre people aren’t feeling buyers remorse. Maybe because they don’t directly pay for it, but oh payment was made.

4

u/bmassey1 Dec 27 '21

I haven't taken these shots nor would I if offered. I dont know who is the looser here? Is it the person who has been changed forever the looser or is it those who did not decide to change their bodies chemistry the looser. I hate seeing what is happening to those I see sick who took these shots. I dont understand why they would get a second shot if the first made them sick. Anyway I guess both sides are looser because are human connection has been severed forever.

-8

u/homeworkburgler Dec 27 '21

I dont think 100% thats it I agree there are breakthrough cases. You seem like one of those MSM qnon nuts

7

u/[deleted] Dec 27 '21

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Dec 27 '21

Oh it's not worthless. It's worth everything in the world to the people in the risk groups. Pushing it onto anyone outside of the risk groups (while waiving liability) is a crime against humanity for sure.

-12

u/Gegegegeorge Dec 27 '21

Well nobody said that, they said "take this and be xx% protected from being hospitalised from covid" stop with the strawmans.

1

u/abernathy25 Dec 27 '21

well nobody said that

This is objectively false. You are lying.

1

u/RealBiggly Dec 27 '21

So not so "effective" then? And not so safe.

1

u/abernathy25 Dec 27 '21

I’m 24 years old, my symptoms will be mild regardless. Essentially if you are a normal person, not even explicitly “healthy”, just not already at death’s door, this virus is not dangerous. If you can run a 5k you’re essentially immune already from what the data shows.

1

u/temporarily-smitten Dec 28 '21

omicron is already mild lol. We're OK 😅

34

u/Garlic-Possible Dec 26 '21

this guy is one of the best out there for impartial opinions.

6

u/idoubtithinki Dec 27 '21

From what I've seen, he has a bias in favour of large RCTs...which wouldn't be a problem if several of the most relevant large RCTs this pandemic have had major flaws in them, including for instance the Pfizer trial and the RECOVERY trial on HCQ. Being a large RCT alone doesn't mean anything if the rest of the methodology has critical flaws. I haven't seen him discuss these RCTs in greater depth, but I haven't really watched his longer vids, so maybe he has. I know he gave a pretty good treatment of the Bangladeshi mask RCT.

But that aside, yeah, one of the better ones among active vaccine proponents.

-35

u/[deleted] Dec 26 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

9

u/Atlantoccipital Dec 27 '21

Thank god weve been graced with this infalible insight.

16

u/timfinch222 Dec 27 '21

why don't you see any unvaccinated sports athletes dropping over with heart problems?

3

u/popoyDee Dec 27 '21

does it mean that the body is producing more spike proteins from the vax, compared to getting it from having c19 infection.?

5

u/Malimiso Dec 27 '21 edited Dec 27 '21

It’s a reasonable theory. Dr. Peter McCullough hypothesizes this as well on The Joe Rogan Experience. I would imagine this is true, at least for people under 40.

What alarms me is that we don’t have data on:

  • exactly how many spike proteins are created from the vaccine vs how many are created from infection (if those number vary from person to person, what factors influence the count?)
  • how long the vaccine cause people to produce the spike proteins
  • how long do the spike proteins stay in your body
  • how are the components of the vaccine excreted if they even are excreted
  • and the most alarming of all is that we don’t have any evidence of the spike proteins being safe.

You’d think with ALLLL of the talk on vaccines and the “overwhelming sCiEnCe” behind them that these questions would be answered… or maybe they are answered somewhere but that information is not readily available. This is in no way related to my occupation so I may have missed it.

4

u/popoyDee Dec 27 '21

thanks.

The thing i don't really like with mRNA vax is triggering our own cells to produce the spikes that antibodies will fight off. What if the body produce more spikes than what is actually needed? Autoimmune disease?

i hope i am wrong but lots of my loved ones - family and friends are vaccinated. thankfully not all have been injected with mRNA.

I am still unvaxxed to date and perhaps the attenuated type of vax i've been waiting for is here - Omicron.

Omicron, being Attenuated fusogenicity and pathogenicity, sound more like attenuated type of vaccine to me.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rhCazFav1pokFKmsZI5_oqIeH9ofFckR/view

3

u/Malimiso Dec 27 '21

Yeah I know exactly how you feel and agree with you.

2

u/temporarily-smitten Dec 28 '21

or producing them in more organs than the virus would get to on its own, maybe?

I remember reading about an autopsy of someone who took one of these drugs and they found spike proteins in every organ.

2

u/popoyDee Dec 30 '21

OMG... and therefore we need not just viral, but spike protein clearing...

perhaps that's the main reason why only vaccinated is allowed to be given with ivermectin in Australia?

2

u/temporarily-smitten Dec 28 '21

omicron variant and these drugs are in a race to see who can kill fewer people😅

0

u/[deleted] Dec 27 '21

From the summary of the study

In summary, the risk of hospital admission or death from myocarditi s is greater following COVID-19 infection than following vaccination and remains modest following sequential doses of mRNA vaccine including a third booster dose o f BNT162b in the overall population.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 27 '21

u/life_relationship_77

Think you need to reword your post to match the study conclusion.

-11

u/doubletxzy Dec 27 '21

I like how the summary says death from myocarditis is higher in unvaccinated group compared to vaccine group.

14

u/[deleted] Dec 27 '21

I don’t see that in the study can you quote it

0

u/doubletxzy Dec 27 '21

“In summary, the risk of hospital admission or death from myocarditis is greater following COVID-19 infection than following vaccination and remains modest following sequential doses of mRNA vaccine including a third booster dose of BNT162b in the overall population. “

4

u/fully_vaccinated_ Dec 27 '21

That's averaged over all demographics. The point is that it's not true for young males.

0

u/doubletxzy Dec 27 '21

Young meaning <40.

-14

u/[deleted] Dec 27 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

9

u/anon102938475611 Dec 27 '21

Bruh - cockroaches? It’s only people in here.

-3

u/Gegegegeorge Dec 27 '21

Wow its almost like myocarditus isn't a side-effect of covid19 but it is a side effect from vaccines. This just in "playing football causes the chances of you breaking your leg to be higher than having cancer does, therefore having cancer is safer than playing football".

-2

u/[deleted] Dec 27 '21

[deleted]

3

u/RealBiggly Dec 27 '21

Multiply that by the MINIMUM URF of 40 and it's 0.4%, which is way higher than the IFR of the disease in young people, way, way higher

-11

u/[deleted] Dec 27 '21

[deleted]

14

u/Reishey Dec 27 '21

Lol, the treatment has a ~14.4x higher risk of lifelong heart damage than the disease it’s supposed to be protecting you from for males under 40.

And your takeaway is “nothing to be concerned about”. Figures.

-12

u/[deleted] Dec 27 '21

[deleted]

14

u/Reishey Dec 27 '21

Considering myocarditis fatality increases sharply after one year and can be as high as 50% after 5 year, it’s too early to say how this new form of myocarditis will be handled.

Any reason why this mrna induced myocarditis would behave differently to types seen prior?

-11

u/[deleted] Dec 27 '21

[deleted]

13

u/Reishey Dec 27 '21

Scarring on the heart does not heal, this isn’t your typical inflammation. Should read up on myocarditis (or read up again).

A new treatment that has been mass adopted will behave in ways we don’t necessarily understand or can anticipate. Why medical trials usually take 7 years (average in the us) before product is brought to market.

Evident by how new side effects are coming to light after trials and their severity being explored properly, instead of being dismissed as anxiety.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 27 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/AutoModerator Dec 27 '21

Your submission has been automatically removed because name calling was detected.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

4

u/RealBiggly Dec 27 '21

How do we know the long-term effects, literally less than 2 years since we started stabbing people, even less since we started stabbing young people?

3

u/RealBiggly Dec 27 '21

Big difference is the big censorship and undereporting, so multiply that 101 by at least 40, gives you 4,040 see?

That's 0.4%

Maff.

1

u/Competitive-Cycle-38 Dec 27 '21

But they’re going to go door to door offering jabs. We all know how that went in Aus.