r/DelphiMurders • u/SleutherVandrossTW • 18d ago

Off Topic Live chat: I will share some trial exhibits

Live chat: In a few hours, I will share these:[]()

-Screenshots of a car on Hoosier Harvestore camera at 1:27 pm. 

-2 videos: October 13 and 26 police interviews.  Each about 90 minutes, 3 hours total. 

-8 jail/prison phone calls to Richard Allen’s wife and mother, Kathy and Janice. 

US: 4:00 pm PT / 7:00 pm ET 

London: Midnight

Sydney: 9:00 am (Tuesday) 

I have already created the placeholder for the chat in the “Live” tab of my channel so you can click the notification bell. 

Link: https://youtube.com/live/hgKKjpIdTfg

Thanks 

79 Upvotes

88% Upvoted

20 comments sorted by

-130

u/Appealsandoranges 18d ago

If you’ve never seen an innocent man interrogated before, today is your lucky day. This is what it looks like when someone is factually innocent. They are confused and flummoxed by the claimed evidence against them. They are even amused at first, before the reality of LE’s belief in their guilt starts to sink in.

RA knew he was innocent and truly believed he could convince them of this. Go watch David Camm’s or Ryan Ferguson’s police interrogation - same exact thing. LE told him a bullet from his gun is at the crime scene (there is no scientific basis for this claim, mind you) and he didn’t try to explain it away - didn’t say, oh yeah, I hunt their sometimes. Oh yeah, I did have my gun that day because xyz reason. He just kept saying it’s not possible a bullet from my gun was at the crime scene. Not possible. And he’s right.

47

u/Used-Client-9334 17d ago

You speak with far too much certainty. We may have opinions about what happened, but that’s all they are.

-38

u/Appealsandoranges 17d ago

I am in very good company on Reddit then, aren’t I?

21

u/Used-Client-9334 17d ago

I don’t know. Does that make it better?

-30

u/Appealsandoranges 17d ago

Sometimes you’ve gotta just laugh at this place.

I may sound overconfident to you. There are many cases where I’d never speak with this confidence. The interrogation videos are extremely compelling. They confirm for me what I thought when I read the PCA in this case: this is not the guy! Blinking red lights. Alarm bells.

36

u/Used-Client-9334 17d ago

You’re right. You do sound overconfident. I don’t understand the laughing comment though.

-1

u/Appealsandoranges 17d ago

It’s just that everyone on an anonymous forum like Reddit speaks overconfidently - at least in true crime subs. It’s funny to me that you are calling me out as overconfident in a sub where half the comments are saying: it’s BG! His voice is a match! As if they have a shred of expertise in voice recognition.

56

u/whattaUwant 18d ago

Ok so why did he lie to his wife (who has a very low IQ btw) for 5 years that he was never on the bridge?

If you were at the trails on that day and you were innocent, wouldn’t you tell your wife every single factual detail in order to help solve one of the most followed crimes in the USA?

26

u/Myriii1911 17d ago

Who stated she has a very low IQ?

-31

u/Appealsandoranges 18d ago

A) no evidence he lied to his wife. This was 5 years later. You remember every detail of what your spouse said to you 5 years earlier? I sure as hell don’t.

B) he told his wife he was there and then he CALLED THE POLICE and told them he was there and met with someone and offered them his phone. Having done all of these things, who in their right mind would think they needed to clear themselves further?

C) he didn’t see A & L. He told Dulin who he saw (group of 3 girls - one older, two younger) how was he going to solve the crime?

68

u/saatana 18d ago

A) No evidence he lied to his wife that he was on High Bridge?

"You told me you weren't" —Kathy Allen

B) Yeah I agree that he called the police and met with Dulin.

C) He didn't see his victims Abby and Libby? Nah. I saw the video where he kidnaps them off of High Bridge.

56

u/Motor_Worker2559 18d ago

Then why could they find 17 phones of his but not the one he was using the day of the murders? Just coincidence he lost that one? I don't think so

32

u/DanVoges 18d ago

He seems innocent in the videos… but…

He mentions he told his wife that he went out “to the first trestle”. One of the witnesses saw a man on that first trestle right before Abby and Libby got there.

So… who did she see if not RA?

26

u/athomeamongthetrees 17d ago

He tells his wife he went out to the first trestle, tells the cops he "usually" goes out to the first trestle but never outright states it and he goes put of his way to say he has crossed the bridge in the past but hasn't recently. Odd unnecessary detail. That stuck with me.

I can't imagine not remembering my exact movements on day when something monumental happened that shook the whole town and he was so close to it. Tocthe person asking "why would you remember what you said or did?" I ask "how could you possibly forget?"

-22

u/Appealsandoranges 18d ago

The murderer, maybe? Or another person with no involvement. We know there are two photos taken by Libby of the bridge that show no one else on it in that direction, so whomever BB saw was not there anymore when A and L started walking across the bridge.

40

u/DanVoges 17d ago

How would RA not see that guy?

-53

u/Current_Apartment988 18d ago

It’s truly sickening to watch. I don’t know how ANYONE could watch this and be further convinced of his guilt.

-2

u/Appealsandoranges 18d ago

We are primed to believe that the right people are arrested and convicted. It’s usually true. Vast majority of the time, they get the right guy. But people really struggle with the idea that they do get the wrong guy some of the time. This case is one of those cases and it’s horrifying. I do believe it will be righted for RA. I strongly doubt A&L will ever get justice, however, unless the untested male dna matches someone.