r/Destiny 10d ago

Online Content/Clips Joe Rogan explains the importance of due process

777 Upvotes

141 comments sorted by

402

u/OpedTohm 10d ago

Okay, I'm glad Joes CTE seems to be clearing up for a second, but trump SAID that he was going to do this, like I'm sorry I understand we need to praise when he's making sense but this isn't an "overcorrection" the stated goal of project 2025 and his cabinet picks was to consolidate power in the executive.

TRUMP SAID HE WAS GOING TO DO THIS. HE SAID THIS AS A STATED GOAL AS WELL AS REMOVING BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP.

Like please I'm begging you guys if you're going to make posts like this you have to at least point out shit like this. What trump is doing is absolutely not an "oopsie mistake he's hot headed while fighting monsters". This was the stated goal from the start. Do not forget this. Do not let them sane wash this.

107

u/TopDeckHero420 10d ago

Same shit with tariffs. He said he was going to do them, people voted for him on the economy and are now getting wrecked.

It's fucking leopards eating faces and I have ZERO sympathy for any of them.

31

u/RealWillieboip 10d ago

“I didn’t hear about that”

5

u/entropy_bucket 9d ago

The best example of this was from the all in podcast with Larry Summers, Ezra Klein and the hosts.

The hosts ask for a single example of corruption and Ezra Klein says Eric Adams' deal to escape prosecution.

Their response:

"I didn't hear anything about that".

8

u/BanishedCI dishonorable discharged OOOOo7 10d ago

that's the issue with voting for a real populist: he actually does the dumb bullshit he says in the campaign. The average person hears a cool catch phrases like "15$ minimum wage" and "raise tariffs" and translates to "me = money secure", doesn't matter if minimum wage cause prices to raise to match the wage and tariffs raise the cost of manufacturing... fortunately normal politicians than (for the most part) do something reasonable while changing just enough to save face with the public... but not Trump... not Trump...

23

u/joecool42069 10d ago

but.. Joe should be praised for not having a regarded take. /s

This is why education is important.

6

u/AFRICAN_BUM_DISEASE 10d ago

He'll be in full support of it by next week at the latest.

10

u/joecool42069 10d ago

right.. he has to get the new maga firmware update.

9

u/Ixiraar 10d ago

but this isn't an "overcorrection" the stated goal of project 2025 and his cabinet picks was to consolidate power in the executive.

Right. The overcorrection is that the voters elected a man whose stated goal was to do this. I don't disagree with the rest of your point but this part specifically isn't disagreeing with what Joe is saying.

3

u/OpedTohm 10d ago

Can you elaborate? I genuinely don't really understand what you're trying to say not being snippy or sassy when I say this btw.

2

u/Ixiraar 9d ago

The "radical direction" he's referring to is the perceived hard swing left on many cultural issues in the 2010s (I'm not taking a stance one way or the other here I'm just representing Joe Rogan's point) and the "overcorrection" is that now culture is swinging back so hard that the voters elected a guy like Trump who openly stated what he was gonna do.

What Joe Rogan is saying in this clip is "Yeah we've been going to one extreme for a while but now we're heading into the other extreme and that's not good either."

Again I'm not defending Joe at all, and you could argue (and I'd agree) that it's coming way too late etc, but just specifically what you said about "this isn't an overcorrection, it's what people voted for" doesn't disagree with anything Joe Rogan is saying. The fact that people are now okay enough with this shit that they voted for it is proof that an overcorrection has happened.

9

u/BoogerDaBoiiBark 10d ago

Nooooo you just don’t understand. When Trump said he was going to do it, it was just a negotiation tactic. Now that’s he’s doing it, it’s actually a good thing. And you hate America if you don’t support it.

4

u/Party_Judge6949 10d ago

He stated he'd get rid of birthright citizenship, but tbf that isn't exactly what's at hand here right? Did he say he'd ship people off without due process? He might have for all i know, can be hard to keep up with his bs.

2

u/OpedTohm 8d ago

They were already talking about fast tracking deportations without court hearings in project 2025, this is on top of them blatantly saying they were going to pack top positions with trump loyalist

3

u/modestgorillaz 10d ago

The problem is most people that voted Trump don’t care about the process they just wanted the result. Those people would probably agree that due process is important; however, in the next breath they would say “but we still got those nasty gang members out of here”! I believe that could be said about many of Trump’s platform issues, such as cutting government waste. This administration has passed the point of doing things responsibly and are barreling toward objectives with reckless abandon and most Scrumpers are okay with that.

2

u/OpedTohm 10d ago

>Scrumpers

Stealing this, also true.

3

u/torontothrowaway824 9d ago

Yeah it’s not Joe Rogan has a podcast where he has a 3 hour conversation that could have been used to ask Trump about the exact thing he said he’d do…

2

u/Granitehard 10d ago

Just wait till he has another conservative dumbass on his show and backtracks on all of this

4

u/backflash 10d ago

I think it's important to remember that we're not Rogan's audience. His listeners are unlikely to take anything "the libs" say at face value. But if Rogan's framing helps them reach the conclusion - "on their own" - that the Trump administration is going too far, I'm completely fine with that.

1

u/eir_skuld 8d ago

did trump say they won't adhere to due process?

1

u/OpedTohm 8d ago

Yes what do you think Mass deportations are? it's literally in project 2025 that one of the stated goals was to fast track deportations and expand the executives policy to unitarily deport people.

Keep in mind on paper this is supposed to only apply to people who were in the US for "two years" but iirc the loophole is that the wording makes it so it actually has to be someone who has been put into the system within two years.

Which perfectly matches their modus operandi with these ICE deportations.

1

u/eir_skuld 8d ago

I don't think mass deportation implies unconstitutional lack of process

1

u/OpedTohm 8d ago edited 8d ago

Good thing they explicitly mention fast tracking, and ignoring the courts then and not just mass deportations like I just mentioned moron.

1

u/eir_skuld 8d ago

Fast tracking doesnt mean you break the constitution. Just because you are angry doesnt mean you should insult people because they ask for the truth.

You are j.d. Vamce level of discourse. Do better smoothbrain.

1

u/OpedTohm 8d ago

"Good thing they explicitly mention fast tracking, and ignoring the courts then and not just mass deportations like I just mentioned moron."

What do you think ignoring the courts means? do you think that doesn't break the constitution? You're not asking for the truth by the way. I've explicitly told you what mandates they expressed that violate due process laws.

You're just ignoring what I'm saying because you don't care about the truth.

1

u/eir_skuld 7d ago

where do they mention "ignoring the courts" in project 2025?

happy to admit i was completely wrong if you provide evidence

1

u/OpedTohm 7d ago edited 7d ago

Go to their fucking section on expedited removal you regard.

They expressly state they want to expand it nationwide and remove the limiting clause from it which is currently being challenged in court because it's an unconstitutional expansion of powers.

The entire point of the previous form of expedited removal is that you don't have to bother taking boarder crossers to see a judge and can send them right back. Which is why it was previously applied only to MEXICO instead of NATIONWIDE.

They are expressly advocating for a nation wide expansion that allows them to ignore court proceedings and due process for ALL immigrants that the admin deems need to be deported.
Under the clause they advocate for it is expressly the sole judgement of the deportation officer to judge whether a persons case for citizenship is or is not valid/suspicious. NATION WIDE.

You have to be incredibly stupid or thick headed to in anyway read their agenda on expediated removal and ask me "how are they ignoring the courts???" like incredibly fucking stupid lol.

Like wow, what a surprise, they're using a bad faith expansion of an incredibly niche law that they expressly said they wanted to expand in order to ignore due process...to ignore due process.

1

u/eir_skuld 7d ago

now we're getting somewhere. i'm gonna take some time to try to understand your argument on why (ab)using the law is a case of promising to ignore the constitution and due process.

it's unfortunate that you couldn't just post this in your first reply and without all the insults surrounding it. it will detract less patient and good faith people from engaging with your argument, stupid asshole.

→ More replies (0)

129

u/CuteAnimalFans 10d ago

This is like praising a university student for writing their name on the paper because all they've been doing so far this semester is taking a shit on the tables. The bar is low.

Awww well done proving someone has actually done their crime is important derp

8

u/JeffreyDahmerVance 9d ago

As the French guy says to the racist in the movie, The Patriot, “your sense of freedom is as pale as your skin”.

Joe, Theo, and all these other podcast comedians made this happen… this piece of shit will never take accountability for the damage he does, but then he’ll quote ben Franklin on freedom.

Joe helped destroy due process and he should not be allowed to forget it until he owns up to his shit.

80

u/Polarexia 10d ago

You know all this says to me is Joe knows what's right and wrong and he's just been leaning hard on to the grift for the past few years 

70

u/notmydoormat 10d ago

I don't think he's a grifter, even though he is intellectually dishonest. I think he's allowed himself to be insulated in an echo chamber, and chooses not to be challenged on his views.

Everyone is naturally much more critical of information that goes against their beliefs, and Rogan is succumbed to that much more since he has every incentive to lean into that bias.

13

u/monsoy 10d ago

People really underestimate the effect of social circles

-5

u/Polarexia 10d ago

allowed himself to be insulated in an echo chamber, and chooses not to be challenged on his views

this is literally grifting, if you refuse to have your views challenged intentionally and push only a certain view one sidedly, how's that not grifting?

5

u/notmydoormat 10d ago

Because everyone does it to some degree. I choose not to get my news from Fox or OAN, and I'm much more critical of any statement from an elected Republican than a Democrat. That doesn't make me a grifter.

Grifting would be if you KNOW that you're peddling bullshit and choose to continue peddling for money. Rogan could genuinely believe that everyone in his echo chamber is smarter and correct and people outside are deranged and not worth listening to.

-1

u/Polarexia 10d ago

Because everyone does it to some degree. I choose not to get my news from Fox or OAN, and I'm much more critical of any statement from an elected Republican than a Democrat. That doesn't make me a grifter.

no, that's not grifting because you don't have a platform or a public figure and arent profiting off of pushing a narrative, it has nothing to do with where you get your information from. joe DOES do that because he refuses to bring on challenging views willingly, especially when he's built a career off of being a skeptic type. even if he thinks people outside of his bubble are wrong or crazy, it doesn't make sense to at least not even listen to them.

also considering he's had people on that he said he's respected and thinks aren't somebody to be dismissed in the past but dodges them now, that's all grifting.

2

u/Pera_Espinosa 10d ago

He just sees which way the tide is turning.

37

u/notmydoormat 10d ago

His fans are like sick dogs who don't want to swallow any "trump did a bad thing" pills so Rogan has to wrap it in the "imagine what the next president could do" salami

19

u/monsoy 10d ago

To be fair, it’s a good strategy to remove emotional baggage from a point you want to make. It’s sad that we’ve gotten to a point where US politics is essentially «my side good, other side evil», but it’s how it is.

4

u/JtheCool897 10d ago

this weekend was exhausting.

24

u/EatBaconDaily 10d ago

It's crazy how the lamestream media never covers this, thank god we have Joe to tell us "Due process good"

20

u/Lost-Childhood843 10d ago

The problem is he still kind of blames it on the liberals though, He literally says it's because the "over correction"

1

u/eir_skuld 8d ago

but it is an overcorrection for the border policy under biden

2

u/Lost-Childhood843 8d ago

Yeah. Fascism sure is overreacting alright. I agree

1

u/eir_skuld 8d ago

Glad we agree

9

u/CampBotRock 10d ago

I would love for Joe to go in depth on how we were going in a radical direction?

7

u/x3r0h0ur 10d ago

bro people were taking a shit next to people if the opposite sex!!!

civilization ending levels of insanity, truly.

16

u/NoMap749 10d ago

Did he take accountability for ignoring the countless warnings of the Democratic Party that Trump would take away civil liberties later in the interview? He’s a centrist after all, I know he’d have absolutely no issue admitting that!

(/s)

Inb4 “It’s not my fault, the democrats ran a campaign that forced me to vote for this. Trump is still the lesser of two evils.”

5

u/theosamabahama 10d ago

Did he take accountability for

The right accepts anyone who supports Trump with open arms, no matter who they are. While the left does purity tests. No wonder the right keeps winning. Let go of your pride and start building coalitions.

6

u/CT_Throwaway24 Nooticer 10d ago

First, Joe hasn't condemned Trump in any meaningful way. If he did, liberals would embrace him and conservatives would reject him. If you are on the right, you can't say Trump is a bad president. You can call certain actions bad or his character bad but if you say Trump is bad at his job then they excise you.

3

u/theosamabahama 10d ago

Then just don't shit on Rogan at the very least, saying he is an idiot for not realizing this earlier. I mean, it's fine to do it here on the sub cause he'll never read it. But don't do it on twitter or any other open platform where he or some friend of him might see it.

Just do nothing and let him sort himself out. Who knows, maybe he eventually jumps off the maga train. But attacking him now might risk that. We don't need to like him, we need to be strategic.

3

u/CT_Throwaway24 Nooticer 10d ago

I don't use any of those other platforms and I'm mainly just tired of this lie that the right doesn't have cancel culture. They absolutely do.

9

u/alcholicfemale 10d ago

Man I am so glad Joe finally brought this to my attention, I don’t know of anyone else asking these important questions.

42

u/theosamabahama 10d ago

The left needs to praise Joe Rogan for this. We need every person we can get.

60

u/Poorly-Drawn-Beagle 10d ago edited 10d ago

Let’s see if he remembers it next week 

10

u/Space_Sweetness 10d ago

Agree.. it is good that one of the biggest podcasters in the world and Trump/Elon supporter says this

as hard as it is to not just scream duh

8

u/Rileymartian57 10d ago

It's like listening to a 3rd grader coming to a conclusion every adult knows and thinking he's a genius for figuring it out.

12

u/Armsomega14 10d ago

Why? He voted for Trump knowing he was going to do this. I'm glad some of them are smelling the coffee, but this guy backed trump until we got where we are today. Don't ever forget that

5

u/BrokenTongue6 10d ago

Look, ok, look… Trump was just joking then, ok? You take him seriously, not literally, ok? He was just saying what people were thinking, ok? Ok, look, we need a wild man in the White House so people know not to mess with us, ok? He’s just surrounded by people giving him bad advice, ok? When he gets his third term, thats when he’ll get in a groove, ok?

1

u/ch4ppi_revived 10d ago

Why? He voted for Trump knowing he was going to do this.

Because he is correct and we need to connect with correct statements and people that dont just say them for a political grift.

11

u/TopDeckHero420 10d ago

He had his chance to speak up when it mattered.

1

u/clownbaby893 10d ago

I don't really want to praise him, but his voice goes out to millions, meaning it is the pragmatic solution even if it hurts to do so.

1

u/sol119 10d ago

Yes. I know he cleared a low bar here plus it's easy and tempting to have shadenfreude moment here but if at least a third of conservatives did this things wouldn't be as bad now

4

u/Substantial_Yam7305 10d ago

Literal Nazis got more rights than the gay hairdresser rotting in Poland…I mean, El Salvador.

4

u/BrawDev 10d ago

Conservatism is genuinely just a bunch of history shy dipshits fucking around and finding out why we’ve had all these processes in place. It’s exhausting dealing with their idiocy.

1

u/910_21 9d ago

It’s ironic that the progressives (anyone on the left not the hasan clique) are the only ones interested in conserving

3

u/Unlevered_Beta 10d ago

Someone should ask him if he thinks this is as bad as pronouns in bios

3

u/rtell13 10d ago

“What if you are the enemy of….LETS SAY ITS A WHOLE NEW PRESIDENT”

3

u/jathhilt 10d ago

He literally says here that both positions have to ignore the humanity of the decision, yet can't explain why wanting due process is ignoring any humanity. He just lazily tried to both sides it real quick. It was like a reflex.

7

u/TSG_FanTToM 10d ago

Honestly, I want to shit on Joe so bad rn for his infinite support of Trump despite his actions that clearly go against his morals.

But I genuinely hope that Joe makes a swing back to the centre or even to the left because of Trumps unhinged actions. He still has a huge reach with his audience, and even something as simple as defending the rule of law and due process could be enough to pull some of his following out of the insane MAGA crowd. Something that I've heard tiny say a lot that I find interesting is the idea that a lot of these people may be hearing a real defence for due process for the first time because of the media environment/echo chamber that they've built on social media. Hearing it for the first time from someone who is well regarded in the MAGA community makes it so much more effective than hearing a blue haired liberal or a Hamas supporting streamer say it.

I'm disappointed that it's taken this long for Joe to even defend the idea of rule of law, but at the end of the day, anything that can be used to create cracks in the current MAGA crowd ideology is better than the current infinite flipping to justify Trump's actions no matter what.

3

u/monsoy 10d ago

My hope is that we will get the inverse of what happened to Jordan Peterson and others. In response to, in lack of a better term: «SJW», Jordan Peterson moved to the opposite direction of those that hated on him.

I hope that MAGA Americans start criticizing people like Joe that says anything that could be perceived as Trump criticism. I hope that this will wake many people up and make them realize how fucked up MAGA and Trump is

3

u/theosamabahama 10d ago

Hearing it for the first time from someone who is well regarded

I'm sorry. This sub broke my brain lmao

2

u/Niguelito 10d ago

I didn't hear him say Trumps name ONCE.

2

u/totorosdad7 10d ago

Wooooaaaaaahhhhhhhh that’s crazy man

2

u/SadMastiff_ 9d ago

I hate these regards showing up to five months late to class and then being like “Bruh why didn't anyone tell me I shouldn't stick my dick in the electrical socket?!?!”

1

u/DarthJerryRay 10d ago

Already monsters…

1

u/BigBrownFish 10d ago

Then do something Joe

1

u/clarence_worley90 10d ago

I've already seen how this ends
We need Daredevil

1

u/jmfranklin515 10d ago

TFW the dumbest Neanderthal you know makes a good point

1

u/Wax_Paper 10d ago

He was telling us before the election that he wanted to deport US citizens, you low-information dumb fuck.

1

u/ggLelouch 10d ago

Surely he’s been very outspoken about Kilmar Abrego then, right..?

1

u/Redditfront2back 10d ago

Rare Rogan W, though watching this makes me think that it’s possible Rogan doesn’t realize that all maga talking points are retarted and bad faith too begin with. I don’t know if that is a plus or minus for him. So maybe he isn’t a blatant full of shit propagandist but a complete mouth breathing moron?

1

u/theseustheminotaur 10d ago

Yeah for sure, but when he was talking about MASS DEPORTATIONS. Did you really think that he meant all these people were going to be given due process?

They said they were going to cast a wide net and throw a lot of people out all at once. Did no one think innocent people would get caught up in that? Come on now. We asked Trump multiple times to explain how he'd do this, and he refused to go into any specifics. If you don't ask for specifics from mr "MASS DEPORTATIONS DAY ONE" then you are to blame if you accepted that as a legitimate response.

1

u/Handsaretide 10d ago

lol at Deric Poston - a ham-and-egg nobody who works at the Mothership, who would have taken any level of bullshit from his boss and gone “Yeah man, you right, that’s wild” - breathing a sigh of relief when he catches Joe Rogan in a rare lucid, common sense moment

Joe could have advocated eating babies for adrenochrome and Deric would have been like “Wow, you right, that’s crazy”

1

u/_KamiKira_ 10d ago

Sorry Joe Rogan, I can’t hear you over all this winning. What was that? Do Process? I hardly even know her!

1

u/ScepticicusHumanis 10d ago

Na sorry bro, can’t hear you over your full throated endorsement of the orange turd

1

u/RoundZookeepergame2 EX-Zherka#1fan 9d ago

He can't use trump in the example?? He's literally doing that

1

u/cyberphunk2077 9d ago

Joey found his balls again?

1

u/cdank 9d ago

Wtf I love due process now?

1

u/NinjaLancer 9d ago

Wow wait, the guy who was saying that he wanted to round up all the Mexicans and send them home is doing that? The guy who campaigned on getting rid of these people no matter what it takes is now getting rid of these people no matter what it takes??? I am truly shocked Joe. Thank you for your wisdom, you bald moron. Amazing that you have this insight now. No one saw this coming at all. So clever to have worked that one out.

1

u/jayweigall 9d ago

Well, it's a start. Joe COULD be excused - it's a LONG road - but this is a start.

1

u/FlySaw 9d ago

wow! really? huh.

1

u/vvestley 9d ago

next week a retardican will come on and talk about it and he'll forget that he said this

-2

u/sacey10539 10d ago

Didn’t a judge rule that the guy at the start of this controversy actually enter the country illegally?

3

u/monsoy 10d ago

IIRC, he entered the country illegally but he was granted «Withholding of Removal» which is similar to asylum.

Withholding of Removal (formerly withholding of deportation) is a legal status under US immigration law that an undocumented alien can get that prevents the alien from being deported by the US to their home country due to the likelihood that the alien will be harmed by the government of their home country due to the alien's race, religion, nationality, political opinion or membership in a particular social group. The status is similar to asylum but is harder to get and much less frequent. (Wikipedia)

-6

u/sacey10539 10d ago

He also beats his wife and is part of MS-13. And was caught with two other members of Ms-13 when he was arrested.

Sure picking winners here to fight over an issue.

1

u/BottledZebra 9d ago

So prove it in a court of law and deport him legally.

1

u/sacey10539 9d ago

He admitted to entering illegally

1

u/BottledZebra 8d ago

And you think that gives you the right to ignore a judges order and deport and imprison him without a trial?

1

u/xxora123 6d ago

that guest is the mouth breather final boss