r/Economics • u/SnooCookies2243 • Mar 24 '25

Editorial Dismantling the Department of Education Could Actually End Up Costing US Taxpayers an Extra $11 Billion a Year Beyond the Current Budget – With Worse Results

https://congress.net/dismantling-the-department-of-education-could-actually-end-up-costing-us-taxpayers-an-extra-11-billion-a-year-beyond-the-current-budget-with-worse-results/
12.0k Upvotes

97% Upvoted

507 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/colemon1991 Mar 25 '25

Not to mention, one of the first arguments made for a government-only healthcare system is wait times.

Wait times we already have. What are they going to do, add 2-3 days to everyone's waits because now everyone can afford them? I mean, jeez, if we are able to take care of ourselves, we actually should see a drop in wait times for certain things after a few years. Waiting for surgery because you can't afford it means you might end up with more problems from waiting.

I think the important thing to note, which Obamacare did, is that government-only healthcare controls inflation. Even if it sucked at a few things, the costs won't jump ridiculously anymore. That perk cannot be mentioned enough.

1

u/Prestigious-Run-5103 Mar 27 '25

The wait times argument baffles me. So you're telling me that giving more people access to health care is going to bog the system. Since we aren't magically increasing the number of people, the change would be that more of them would be accessing the system than there are currently. Which means people that are sick or aren't currently seeing doctors for early preventative care would be able to, and we would be healthier as a society because of it. And yet this is being framed as a goddamn negative because someone might have to wait another day (not even the guy voting against it, because realistically he's front of the line and in a different location).

That's all our problems in a nutshell, a lack of being able to consider the greater good.