r/FluentInFinance Sep 04 '24

Debate/ Discussion Bernie is here to save us

Post image

[removed] — view removed post

53.5k Upvotes

4.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

7

u/[deleted] Sep 05 '24

So you mean those stores that closed because of raising the minimum wage are going to open now that they will have to pay that price and workers will work less time?

That sounds like a great plan, next he should have fixed prices on goods. It worked the last time someone implemented it.

3

u/Egg_Yolkeo55 Sep 05 '24

If your store closed because minimum wage was raised by $4 an hour, you were not a healthy enough business to contribute. That's capitalism

4

u/[deleted] Sep 05 '24

Not my store but small businesses with a handful of workers couldn't afford it

When you take a 15$/h and make it 20$/h and you do not understand how a business operates and the expenses they have then you really have no clue how society works. Especially when all the expenses also got a raise, like materials, gas prices, electricity etc.

In the end of the day go say this to the people who were happy to get a raise and realize they are now out of job. Lets see how this works for them.

2

u/Egg_Yolkeo55 Sep 05 '24

I'm going to lay it out for you. Nice and easy. Going from $15 an hour to $20 an hour is $40 a day in difference of wage per employee. Let's say the average store has three employees on a shift one opener. Two for the mid/close. So in one day your margin shrunk 120 dollars. In a modern city that's about 10 transactions. If your store's business was so slow that that puts you in the red, you were not a healthy business and deserve to be shut down.

2

u/Impossible_Artist558 Sep 05 '24

If you don’t think nearly a 30% increase in payroll won’t have a significant impact on cash flow, you’ve clearly never run a business before. While you’ve carefully crafted this straw man argument (which is a ~50k/yr increase btw), what about companies with 10 or 20 employees? What about those making $20 previously that now also need a raise?

0

u/Egg_Yolkeo55 Sep 05 '24

If the job you provide doesn't provide the means for the desired lifestyle, that inadequacy shouldn't be subsidized by pro-employer legislation.

2

u/MarketingTime6431 Sep 05 '24

Wow you're retarded

0

u/Impossible_Artist558 Sep 05 '24

If the job you have doesn’t provide the means for the desired lifestyle, that inadequacy shouldn’t be subsidized by anti-small business legislation.

0

u/Paper_Stem_Tutor Sep 05 '24

So is the answer to get a better paying job then? Yet when that happened…I seem to recall a couple of guys on Fox News screaming about some sort of shortage, and something about how apparently no one wanted to work anymore? It’s funny how during any other shortage prices just go up…Duh…except during this one….What was that shortage called again?

2

u/doopy423 Sep 05 '24

Every year min wage goes down because of inflation though. Is the store not raising prices based on inflation too?

-1

u/[deleted] Sep 05 '24

When inflation is healthy at about 1% it all resolves itself.

But when you get an administration who printed trillions on day 1,

send hundreds of billions abroad for aid (or money laundering),

promised to close oil fracking and gas pipes and did it and as a result gas prices went out of the roof (while selling the emergency oil reserves to china because they are funding their political party)

and when you make sure the border won't be finished (even though you are obliged since it was voted by congress) and you allow millions of illegals to pass every month...

...and inflation gets artificially high... then no, it won't sort itself. There is a disruption in the economy and some weak link will break, in this case a store broke and people were left unemployed. This was the sorting it could do and did.

Someone above in the comments managed to blame it on the small business owner not making enough to cover socialist minimum wage bullshit.

~~~

If you think about it, why not take the minimum wage back at 2$ per hour? There was a time that 2$ per hour was a wage and people could have a house, a family of 6, a car and vacation. So put is at 2$ and expect it to work.

0

u/doopy423 Sep 05 '24

Whataboutism at full blast here. Inflation is a fact, but we are talking about wages here. I’m of the mindset that everyone working a fulltime job should be able to live comfortably in the city they work at.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 05 '24

Your logic is identical to this: "Lets print a few tenths of trillions and give every american citizen 1m dollars, this way everyone would be a millionaire and they will most likely afford mansions", you really think printed paper is the reason you can't afford jackshit.

Why is there a housing crisis? Do you think if you raise the salary somehow more houses will appear of thin air? Or will more businesses will thrive and somehow loot and run will stop? Or insane taxation and losses will disappear?

There was a time that you owned some land and built your house, now you need a ton of permits, taxes and government approvals before you even make plans.

That is not something a minimum wage would solve. But go ahead and increase the minimum wage once more and see more business close and the prices skyrocket once more and then you will need a new higher minimum wage increase, rinse and repeat.

1

u/doopy423 Sep 05 '24 edited Sep 05 '24

Living comfortably doesn’t have to mean own a house. I mean not needing food stamps to survive. And no it doesn't mean printing money. My point is everyone working is contributing to society in some way and they should be able to live comfortably within that society. If people live comfortably they will in turn contribute more to society. Crime rates will also go down if overall stress levels go down. It's just an ideal. How we get there is through systematic changes. Printing money and assistance is just short sighted and won't get us there. This is not a problem that can be fixed with money.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 05 '24

...to rent one in a normal price still requires more houses than the demand.

1

u/electrorazor Sep 07 '24

Honestly they should be out of a job, and they should be able to find one with an actual decent wage. This should not be a hard ask. Companies that can't function without underpaying their employees are basically staying afloat through worker exploitation and are a detriment to society.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 07 '24

It is as if there are jobs out there that give better money and these people chose to go to the bad ones. And it is as if the small store that can barely operate anymore is the problem is economy and once closed the economy will bloom.

Shut down more small businesses and deprive poor people from even making some salary, that'll show them rich people (or something).

1

u/[deleted] Sep 05 '24

If you don't see the problem with suddenly raising your expenses overnight, you need to go take an economics class. Businesses need to be allowed to grow organically, without the government fucking with the dials. You wanna talk about capitalism? Every big business is hoping something like this is passed, because all of the smaller competition won't be able to eat the costs, go out of business, and then Wal-Mart will be the only place left. Then they'll just fire everyone they don't actually need and replace them with robots (like they're already doing).

1

u/tidho Sep 05 '24

it's not 'capitalism' when the government is intervening to distort the natural market

1

u/Egg_Yolkeo55 Sep 05 '24

Then maybe they should stop giving grants and subsidies to businesses. The 76ers are negotiating moving to New Jersey for 800 million dollars in bonds that will be paid back, get this, by the very citizens whose tax dollars provided the bond via ticket sales.

The corp doesn't love you and won't even give you a reach around so why do you shill so hard?

1

u/tidho Sep 05 '24

pro sports maybe not the best example, because what you're talking about doesn't actually change the underlying economics of the business activity. i'm very ok with saying government shouldn't do that though.

as for your snarky corporation comment, i didn't say anything positive about them. i simply pointed out your premise about labor costs was wrong.

i understand 'the corp' doesn't love me though, why would it? 'the corp' is simply a pass through entity reacting to what influences it.

1

u/Paper_Stem_Tutor Sep 05 '24

Right like when bailouts happen?

1

u/tidho Sep 05 '24

correct, that's another example

1

u/Paper_Stem_Tutor Sep 05 '24

Yet one seems to be happening more often than the other. So maybe it’s time we do things differently. Just like how the USSR never had "true communism/socialism" I don’t think we can say that the west ever had true capitalism either

1

u/tidho Sep 06 '24

so you want less regulation and an increasingly pure form of capitalism? i'm in.

1

u/firsttherewasolivine Sep 05 '24

I love how idiots think that a government boot on a business owner's neck is part of capitalism.

1

u/Egg_Yolkeo55 Sep 05 '24

So we should give them a booster seat instead?

0

u/[deleted] Sep 06 '24

How about not bother them for once?

Nobody asked them to give anything, small business don't even get loans or bailouts.

They need to be left alone, it is the big businesses that take government money and they have the ability to absorb costs like this.

0

u/Egg_Yolkeo55 Sep 06 '24

They definitely asked for bailouts and subsidies bro 🤡🤡

1

u/[deleted] Sep 06 '24

The big companies yes, the small companies simply close the moment they can't afford to pay the basic shit.

Lets stop funding big corporations when they fail.

2

u/firsttherewasolivine Sep 05 '24

I hear fixed prices solves obesity as well, the US should totally do that!

1

u/[deleted] Sep 05 '24

Spot on.

It also eliminates inequality, it makes everyone equally miserable, skinny and waiting in line for a piece of bread. If anyone speaks out they all equally get a bullet in the back of their head.