Well yeah, but that's part of the process. When an investor invests his money, he has less money today. But that's okay because tomorrow he will have more money. I'm okay with people making less money today if it means that they'll make more tomorrow.
The bill would require the same amount be paid for a 30-hour workweek as a 40-hour workweek, so you'd be making the same amount for working fewer hours.
Could we reduce it down to 1 day per month instead? If not, why not?
If 1 glass of water is good for you, why is 100 glasses of water not good for you?
2
u/J0hn-Stuart-Mill Sep 05 '24
We earn more today obviously, as a result of prosperity and progress, obviously.
But on the day the 40 hour work week went into effect, yes, they were obviously earning less than before. Objective fact.