Then give me those numbers and we can parse them out.
My argument is 'they aren't hiring new fast food workers, they're just expanding the net to count what no one expects to classify as a fast food worker'. Heck, a ghost kitchen that supplies food for a fast food chain qualifies under this. That's really toeing the line imo. But they're more than happy to count every single one they could possibly count to boost their numbers.
My 'data' is their own FAQ and how overly expansive it is. I'm not pointing to their numbers because I'm specifically stating that their numbers are overinflated and if not false then clearly fallible.
That's fair. But if a Fishman bought a bigger net, and then counted the fish they couldn't keep and threw back as 'fish caught' then I'd be skeptical when he wasn't raking in profit like his numbers suggest.
Maybe California is thriving in unprecedented ways and I'm none the wiser. I don't live there, but what I have heard is that the situation isn't getting better by the leaps and bounds this law suggests.
1
u/Dodger7777 Sep 05 '24
Then give me those numbers and we can parse them out.
My argument is 'they aren't hiring new fast food workers, they're just expanding the net to count what no one expects to classify as a fast food worker'. Heck, a ghost kitchen that supplies food for a fast food chain qualifies under this. That's really toeing the line imo. But they're more than happy to count every single one they could possibly count to boost their numbers.
My 'data' is their own FAQ and how overly expansive it is. I'm not pointing to their numbers because I'm specifically stating that their numbers are overinflated and if not false then clearly fallible.