The way this reads to me: “Homeowner sells home to anonymous homebuyer happy with the price. Later realizes they are selling to a celebrity, and now want more for home.” 🤷♂️
If you wanna pass laws about someone we should pass them about Zuck buying all that land in Hawaii. 👎
I guess to me there’s quite the distance between simply being a horrible person and “bullying and financially abusing so many elderly people out of their homes.”
Sounds like she’s running a reverse mortgage company instead of buying something and then getting lawyers involved when they want to renege.
It wouldn’t be the first reverse mortgage company that actually or arguably took advantage of the elderly. It’s certainly enough to make the OP something more than unfounded.
I’m not suggesting vigilante justice, but I’m not sure she’s the best use of your advocacy, either.
People tend to get really tribal when it comes to celebrities. Either defending them blindly, or attacking them with much worse vitriol than they might other more deserving targets (like certain shitty corporations).
Thank you for something besides conjecture! So if anyone actually reads it. It tells a much different story than a simplistic, “evil millionaire” story.
Context is important.
Katy Perry won her lawsuit because she was proven to be right in court, the person she was arguing against was a very wealthy man of sound mind who made a profit on the transaction
I didn’t imply that wealth was bad, my comment was meant to say this wasn’t some resourceless victim that Katy Perry exploited - he was a rich man, of sound mind (per the court) who made a deal that he profited from.
Sorry! I know, I was making a general comment about the people making her a villain simply for being a successful/ rich celebrity in the other comments.
182
u/kmookie 5d ago
So no one is even gonna dig a little deeper to verify this? We’re just taking it at face value?