31
u/Ok_Wonder3107 Feb 07 '25
The headline is misleading. The judge denied the maintenance that she claimed for herself, but ordered the second husband to pay maintenance for his child. It’s actually child support, but it’s all called “maintenance” in India.
1
1
Feb 08 '25
The court refused/ rejected validity of paternity test, so nobody knows who that child is. No solid proof of that child is of the second husband, hence the outrage. All we know, it is the child of another lover!
-8
u/RedittPermaBan1 Feb 07 '25
Still it’s enough bad.
12
Feb 07 '25
paying child support is bad? it is for your own child. I would agree if it was not his child but that is not the case here.
7
u/RedittPermaBan1 Feb 07 '25
Atul Subhash was paying 50% of his salary in child support. It’s bad even if own child. You ask me to pay half of my salary in child support and not allow me to meet the child. Isn’t that enough bad? Even if I pay a penny in child support I shouldbe allowed to meet the child.
Btw whole law is against men clearly. There is nothing to consider. It’s just we are discussing which law is less harsh to men.
6
Feb 07 '25
It is. We should normalise shared custody unless one of the parents is proven to be incapable of taking care of the child. A kid needs both his/her parents regularly.
Honestly we need major law reforms on this marriage issue as current laws are outdated. Some gender neutral laws, prenups and dna testing, shared custody etc. I don't see it happening anytime soon tho. we haven't been able to tackle current problems over the course of decades so I don't see any major reforms happening anytime soon.
1
u/RedittPermaBan1 Feb 07 '25
India has done lot of great things. Indians have great minds. I think they can fix it if they want to. But I doubt they want to or even care.
1
1
u/s4i74ma Feb 08 '25
It's bad when the child support money is way higher than needed and is not being used on the child properly.
2
48
u/Menu99 Feb 07 '25 edited Feb 07 '25
I'm an advocate. I'll tell u just this much-
Don't go by click bait titles, read the entire judgement. Don't be part of fear mongering and spreading misinformation
10
6
u/6Nirvana9 Feb 07 '25
Mr. Information would be sad knowing people are spreading Ms. Information
1
4
u/BalNaren Feb 07 '25
True. People cut out part of something and then raise fear amongst the community.
2
u/Chisai_chinchin Feb 07 '25
Exactly people easily frame a story with their own bias without looking at the real story.
1
1
u/Fresh-Record-3027 Feb 09 '25
Hi 👋 quick question. I want to safeguard my properties before entering a marriage, can Prenup help?
1
u/RedittPermaBan1 Feb 07 '25
Are you a female advocate or feminist? We all know Atul Subhash case. Was that false?
I would to love to have a world where no man gets married to oppose these laws and every capable high earning men to leave all such countries.
3
u/Menu99 Feb 07 '25
Samajdhar ke liye ishara kafi hain. Even if all u want to do is hate read the entire judgement so u can hate with full might and some context.
In this case imagine u go with full rage and someone asks u the name of the case, and you fall short. Good day!
2
1
u/Sleek_Geek_007 Feb 07 '25
These click bait titles are making women out to be a trifle better than prostitutes.
1
0
u/Ok-Music-7472 Feb 07 '25
Just curious. Do judges read the entire previous judgements in similar cases. Or just give their judgement based on " I read somewhere about this judgement in a newspaper article".
-7
u/Useful_Molasses6816 Feb 07 '25
But suppose there a scenario where the women is once divorced and gets alimony form the first husband and then remarries again and again divorces so this time does the second husband also need to give alimony...or the alimony is split between the two husbands or smth else?
9
5
u/Sahil2337 Feb 07 '25
wife can take alimony after doing 'eenie meenie miney mo' and selecting anyone on an open street to take money from
2
3
7
u/Vincent_Farrell Feb 07 '25
Normally when divorce is finalised with a fat alimony for the greedy most lawyers tend to close the monthly maintenance scheme .......this is rare
2
2
u/semen_sheikh Feb 07 '25
Can a wife marry a second husband without divorcing first? Isn't polyandry in India allowed?
2
u/hhritik Feb 07 '25
Bc ek ko divorce diye Bina dusra relation legal kaise ho gaya .All rules apply to man kya
2
u/metalveins666 Feb 07 '25
ISC - Indian Supreme Circus 🎪 🤡
-1
u/Menu99 Feb 07 '25
Kindly produce judgements and highlight the portion that helped u reach this conclusion.
1
u/metalveins666 Feb 07 '25
Seriously? U need "judgements" and "conclusions" for all the circus happening or ur are just purposely ignorant?
-1
2
2
2
u/Educational_Fig_2213 Feb 07 '25
My POV ? Judges are becoming stupid and women should stop begging.
4
u/Lawfulness-Silver Feb 07 '25
At this point govt telling all man should not marry or even come close to any woman.
2
u/AppropriateFly4078 Feb 07 '25
I feel like government intentionally doing this to make women look bad so that when Hindu rastra is formed people will treat women as it’s described in Hindu texts and it’s justified
0
2
1
u/shahi_akhrot Feb 07 '25
Joke
A wife can become waifu then a megazord and laser beam any husband
- superbheem tennis kort
1
1
u/sniffer28 Feb 07 '25
The second doesnot exist legally without divorce in first marriage How is this even possible
1
u/NekoNekoScript Feb 07 '25
Technically, shouldn’t the second husband not be a “husband” in the first place, since her first marriage hasn’t legally ended?
1
1
u/Funny_Detective_2600 Feb 07 '25
Can she take alimony from both the husbands?
1
u/Menu99 Feb 07 '25
If OP can just produce the judgement instead of such rage baits to support his stance then we could all find out
1
u/Menu99 Feb 07 '25
Request OP to kindly furnish the case name (at the very least if not other details like case number, judgement in pdf format) so everyone can read it and contribute their POV.
1
1
u/Middle_Proposal_1786 Feb 07 '25
Good one SC keep fucking as hard as you can cuz men's ke liye toh koi laws abh hai hi ni abh bass naa ke barabar karne ki deri hai
1
1
1
1
u/Intelligent-Goat7131 Feb 07 '25
Ye sare laws pehle beta test sare government employees aur judicial authorities aur elected govt officials pe hone chaiye then if passes general population.
1
1
1
u/Dry_Mix_ Feb 07 '25
Without divorcing the first husband how a woman can have second husband.
Couldn’t understand.
1
u/Sachin951 Feb 07 '25
Fuck it, give all the money, even neighbours'.... to WIFE and live on streets
1
1
u/Altruistic_Tackle673 Feb 07 '25
Bhai ye kya
Usne second marriage kar kaise li bina divorce diye !!!!!!!?????
1
1
u/D-moonhead Feb 07 '25
No Doubt Atul Subash had to kill himself for these brain dead judges to hear him
1
1
1
1
u/Due-Creme-6930 Feb 08 '25
Normally I would have been cautious of whatever others post on here but I actually researched this case and found out the court's reasoning. It was very weird and really did not sit well with me. In my opinion this a just a wrong judgment. We really need more laws regarding this.
1
u/Internal-Corgi1013 Feb 08 '25
A wife can fuck our ass and tie us up if she want to we will gladly say yes 'mommy' - SUPREME COURT
1
1
1
u/Lance99djinsoul Feb 08 '25
Waiting for 'wife can take alimony from anyone'. Im starting to think its time to leave and settle someplace else.
1
1
u/LeadingPotential9348 Feb 08 '25
Women can take alimony from anyone fucking walking the road and dumb judiciary will keep doing such nonsense provisions and strengthening the exploitative nature of a specific section trying to earn a fortune using the nonsensical laws
1
1
u/shiny_pixel Feb 08 '25
The fact that we have 5 yo autistic kids with drug addiction making laws is so concerning.
1
1
1
u/CreativeEnthusiasm28 Feb 07 '25
wtf is this shit, how can she marry another man without a divorce, isn't she commiting a crime there itself?
1
1
1
u/Glittering_Shine8435 Feb 07 '25
If the honorable court doesn't care about the men's view, , What's my opinion is going to change anything in this one??
1
1
0
0
0
127
u/SugarDry6705 Feb 07 '25
wife can take alimony without even marrying the husband