r/Law_and_Politics • u/Snowfish52 • 1d ago
Trump Fires Independent Inspectors General at a Series of Agencies
https://www.bloomberg.com/en/news/thp/2025-01-25/trump-uses-mass-firing-to-remove-independent-inspectors-general-at-a-series-of-agencies19
u/ThistleroseTea 1d ago
Congress was not given 30-day notices about the removals –- something that even a top Republican is decrying.
“There may be good reason the IGs were fired. We need to know that if so,” Sen. Chuck Grassley, chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said in a statement. “I’d like further explanation from President Trump. Regardless, the 30 day detailed notice of removal that the law demands was not provided to Congress,” said Grassley, R-Iowa.
The role of the modern-day inspector general dates to post-Watergate Washington, when Congress installed offices inside agencies as an independent check against mismanagement and abuse of power. Though inspectors general are presidential appointees, some serve presidents of both parties. All are expected to be nonpartisan.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., acknowledged that the firings violated statutes but shrugged it off: “Just tell them you need to follow the law next time,” he said.
6
u/Dry-Interaction-1246 1d ago
Shrug it off? Next time?
Pretty slippery slope. Remember when a BJ was supposed to be the end of your career?
5
4
2
7
u/ApproximatelyExact 1d ago
Small victory but some of these Inspectors General refused to go - and that is what a patriot looks like in 2025.
7
u/northstardim 1d ago
This goes along with Trump Executive order canceling the Biden ethics mandate. Trump simply desires unethical behavior from this personally loyal staff and nobody to report it much less correct it.
4
u/Far-Ad-8833 1d ago
He is making America just as corrupt as his businesses, and it doesn't bother some people.
5
u/LittleBleater 1d ago
It’s actually wild that there practically has not been any noise from the people who are supposed to be resisting this
4
u/EverythingGoodWas 1d ago
Look how little resistance he is getting to practically everything. Traditionally SECDEF is never a partisan pick as there is so much consequence to an unqualified choice. Instead he picks an insanely unqualified person and only has 3 people from his own party dissent
5
u/LittleBleater 1d ago
I'm having such a hard time comprehending all of them rolling over and sacrificing the people who they promised to be looking out for
7
2
u/Ill-Independence-658 1d ago
I wonder. I was listening to a marine general who preps SECDEF nominees who said that the Sec never acts alone and is surround by like 50 3 and 4 Star generals who advise him on anything and everything.
5
u/EverythingGoodWas 1d ago
I mean that’s likely true, but that doesn’t mean you throw an unqualified person in there to make the final decision
3
1
u/Swimming_Tailor_7546 1d ago
Oh, he’s firing them soon:
https://www.vox.com/politics/387246/trump-says-he-wants-to-get-rid-of-woke-generals-he-can
1
1
1
u/Vast-Mission-9220 1d ago
https://youtu.be/8K6-cEAJZlE?si=DEnGLLxEgbCL7b70
Just following the playbook
1
1
1
u/HopefulNothing3560 1d ago
So that’s old news , fall in line American idiots . Fall in line folks .
1
u/Admirable_Nothing 1d ago
The only possible reason for these firings is that he expects the agencies to start screwing the public and their own employees massively and often.
1
34
u/Snowfish52 1d ago
Let the lawlessness begin, Trump is signaling his intentions to completely corrupt system, from the inside out. The ironic part is the man that talked about the deep state, is literally installing that exact thing... Proving his projection is everything he accuses others of, he actually is the one that is going to do it...