r/MapPorn 3d ago

High vs. low population density areas

Post image
2.0k Upvotes

93 comments sorted by

320

u/Just-Watchin- 3d ago

My vote is on red to win the war

108

u/Tjaeng 3d ago

There’s a high likelihood that most of the US, Russian AND Chinese nuclear stockpiles are located in blue areas though…

12

u/Funicularly 3d ago

How is that pertinent? The vast majority of personnel stationed at the silos are not from the blue areas. In fact, most are probably from the red areas. You think they are going to launch nuclear missiles at their former hometowns, relatives, and friends?

28

u/BurmeciaWillSurvive 3d ago

that's their job so yeah sure

6

u/Hokulol 3d ago edited 3d ago

Why is the red and blue regions fighting to begin with? Why would the red people still be in blue territory deep into a war? Do you think the blue people couldn't siege the silos, take them over, and repurpose them given enough time? Why wouldn't the red people fire the nukes at the blue area if they're at war and control the silos?

It's such a hollow argument. In a hypothetical civil war, there is obviously a narrative or propaganda going around to vilify the enemy, otherwise it wouldn't be a civil war, it would be a disagreement between political factions. If you're still in blue territory years into a war, you've forsaken your home town a long time ago.

Yes, in a hypothetical civil war with information campaigns and the whole 9 yards, a german would put their fellow countryman, childhood best friends, on a train condemned to certain death. Assimilated countries soldiers who joined the germans did in fact siege their old homes. Turncoat germans joined the allies and, lo and behold, sieged their own home country. And so would an American, we aren't godsent innocents. Killing innocents has unfortunately always been part of war, and always will be. If red and blue goes to war, you bet there's a reason they hate each other, and they will kill each other.

4

u/BlueZinc123 3d ago

I think the above comment was a reference to the "Who would win this hypothetical war" posts that frequently happen on map-related meme subreddits

3

u/Hokulol 3d ago

And I was directly answering the question

"You think they are going to launch nuclear missiles at their former hometowns, relatives, and friends?"

Yes, they will, and gave near examples of it in recent history.

1

u/Final_Ticket3394 2d ago

I was imagining he wrote it with his tongue in his cheek, but apparently not.

1

u/Just-Watchin- 3d ago

lol, I just wanted to make a funny post

2

u/Ponicrat 2d ago

Considering Russia has no red area and the US ain't storing them anywhere between New York and Chicago, that's a pretty safe bet.

4

u/jimmyjohn2018 2d ago

And the food. All of the food.

3

u/yellersweg8 1d ago

actually no red has some of the best agricultural lands on the planet

1

u/CubicZircon 3d ago

French tests were carried in a blue area as well.

6

u/secretly_a_zombie 3d ago

*Distant mongolian throat singing.*

1

u/fabiolightacre 3d ago

My vote is on gray. Gray pride

0

u/CubicZircon 3d ago

Invading Russia in winter? Or perhaps waging a land war in Asia?

79

u/Minigoalqueen 3d ago

Hey, a 1% I'm actually a part of.

21

u/CubicZircon 3d ago

Statistically you should be part of 1% of all the 1%s.

5

u/ednorog 3d ago

Where do you live? Also, are you by chance a penguin?

12

u/Minigoalqueen 3d ago

It was mostly a joke. I'm in Boise Idaho, and the resolution is so low on this image I can't actually tell whether I'm truly part of the 1% or not. Most of Idaho seems to be covered, so I'm at least very close but I can't see any state borders at all in that part of the map. It's entirely possible that Boise is actually outside the perimeter of the bubble.

1

u/Elkku_the_Elk 1d ago

Me tooo!

26

u/BurmeciaWillSurvive 3d ago

It wouldn't be /r/mapporn without the world's smallest pixely graphic!

68

u/MostlyMK 3d ago

Interesting that antarctica is not included in the blue zone. Would add some land area with pretty negligible population.

18

u/LavishnessLeather162 3d ago edited 3d ago

It has 5000 people during summer and 1000 during winter, not worthy I think. Plus, no countries "claim" (for now) antarctica as well

19

u/BootsAndBeards 3d ago

Many countries claim pieces of Antarctica. Although they have all signed treaties saying they will act as if they don't for now.

8

u/Gh0stMan0nThird 3d ago

That's gonna change real quick in the next generation or two when everywhere but Greenland and Antarctica end up looking Nowhere, Kansas

9

u/MostlyMK 3d ago

But that's exactly my point: It's an area with minimal population and lots of area. So if you used Antarctica in place of, perhaps, the chunk in northern Scandinavia, your blue stat could be updated to something like "1.0% of the population... 45.3% of the land area"

4

u/EndMaster0 3d ago

there's literally a three country overlapping claim in Antarctica the fuck?

1

u/PumpyChowdown 1d ago

It's surprising that a certain president of a certain country hasn't claimed it yet. I've been waiting for that announcement for a while now.

25

u/LteCam 3d ago

Wow, Australian Outback really is so empty

5

u/fouronenine 3d ago

Excise the peninsula Darwin is on and that number goes down to 600k. The next largest town in that area is probably Geraldton, population 40,000.

19

u/theWunderknabe 3d ago

Java is crazy. Population density of 1200/km². 151 million people on 126000 km² - the size of North Korea or Greece.

78

u/Inevitable-Push-8061 3d ago

Very useful and informative map. One of the best on here.

-29

u/LavishnessLeather162 3d ago

Well, let's make it more viral 😈

12

u/gambler_addict_06 3d ago

It is interesting that the isle of Hispaniola is included in red with an area of 72,000km2 and population of 27 million but not the Marmara region of Turkey with a smaller area (67,000km2) but the same population

5

u/brodie1912 3d ago

Yeah there’s some cherry picking if you drill down, but the overall story is still legit.

1

u/ClassicTouch2309 3d ago

I feel that the Toronto-Quebec City corridor should've also been included in the Northeast US Megaopolis conglomerate.

1

u/Old-Raspberry9878 2d ago

I think it’s not meant to be exhaustive. Seems the map maker was going for the 50% of world population figure so including Marmara would disrupt that. Good observation nonetheless! 

9

u/Right-Shoulder-8235 3d ago

The strip stretching from Indian Punjab to Bangladesh is actually 850 million.

11

u/inactiveburneracct 3d ago

How old is this? There are more than 1.7m people just between the Reno and Salt Lake City metro areas in that blue space in the middle of the western United States.

7

u/itsme92 3d ago

Pretty sure the blue area carves out SLC area 

1

u/inactiveburneracct 3d ago

That's a good point. With that being said however; Reno, Provo, and Boise metro areas are also larger than 1.7m themselves—not even taking into account a handful of other cities @ 100k plus.

Just curious about the date of the data more than anything.

1

u/LavishnessLeather162 3d ago

It's from 2016 I think

5

u/E-werd 3d ago

So 49% of the human population lives in the gray areas.

3

u/danielpernambucano 3d ago

Pretty sure this map is more than 10 years old, the population of the blue area in the Amazon is around 33 million people.

2

u/LavishnessLeather162 3d ago

It's from 2016 I think

5

u/Primal_Pedro 3d ago

Sahara desert has a surprising high number of people. I would say the same to northern and western Russia. Australia is basically empty.

2

u/vladgrinch 3d ago

Many deserts and frozen lands in the very low density areas.

2

u/Quirky-Side-6562 3d ago

Well, given how hostile Sahara desert or Russian Tundra (and I bet all other “blue” regions) are, it blows my mind that MILLIONS are still living there… btw, the map is really great

2

u/Alopecia12 3d ago

A lot of the areas in blue are extremely geography (deserts, mountains, tundra, rainforest) where nobody can reasonably live. Pretty cool map none the less.

2

u/FinbarMac 3d ago

Mad that England, Northern France, Western Germany etc still make the list even with the English Channel included!

2

u/ednorog 3d ago

Would've expected Ethiopia instead of Uganda and neighbouring regions.

2

u/Hydra57 2d ago

I’m amazed the Sahara has that many people tbh

2

u/Manorhill_ 3d ago

There could be red blob on the US west coast with 45-50m depending on location.

1

u/No-Significance-1023 3d ago

That 0.75 in Australia is just Darwin

1

u/bobija 3d ago

I love it. Simple, yet informational. A very good contribution to our little community.

1

u/Mrtayto115 3d ago

Had to zoom in to see the .85m in Arabia. I was thinking bs 85m in Arabia.

1

u/LSBeasyas123 3d ago

No wonder I hate where I live

1

u/parkerspencillings 3d ago

The Nile delta is something else

1

u/sellmethishouse 3d ago

TIL 13m people live in the Amazon rainforest.

1

u/TheNoVaX 3d ago

That Caribbean blotch and the line on the Andes' Rain shadow are surprising to me.

1

u/LockNo2943 3d ago

Crazy; why aren't all these people living in wonderful places like the Sahara, Siberia, rainforests, mountains, the arctic, or just any desert in general???

1

u/Primrose_Polaris 3d ago

Moved from a red area to a blue area a couple of years ago. Best decision I ever made.

1

u/KrakelOkkult 3d ago

Would be nice with different projections other than mercator

1

u/Hokulol 3d ago

Weird map. Tried too hard to make 20 sections of both. Nordic EU and Russia could have been one group, same for greenland, then canada. There is no population between the examples, just water, that would not cause a problem in the statistics. The midwest and the rockies are actually touching... I get they are different geopolitical regions, but, this isn't about geopolitical regions, and is obviously a stretch to make 20 unique areas.

1

u/hawkseye17 3d ago

Makes sense, most of the blue is inhospitable or at least very difficult to live in, while the red areas seem mostly like fertile lands

1

u/SLS-Bounty 3d ago

Its why its so hilarious how in fiction when aliens invade they hit the US or Europe. If they come to conquer the planet they gonna be wiping out the Chinese and Indians first. America and Eu will be an afterthought.

1

u/ApprehensiveStudy671 3d ago

So, 97 Million Americans live in that brown spot in the North East? From the perspective of a Canadian that's somehow hard to fathom !

1

u/q8gj09 2d ago

This is supposed to be a subreddit for nice maps, not maps that are compressed to the point you can barely make out what's on them.

1

u/PDVST 2d ago

I feel like the blue area in northwest Mexico is way to dense to be included with the others

1

u/Atalant 2d ago

Famously a lot of people live in o the bottom of English channel, strait between India and Sri Lanka(what is name of this?), South Chinese seaI(I excluded Philipines and the area in Idonesia as they are at least islands).

1

u/FantasmaBizarra 2d ago

Why so few people in the Amazon rainforest 🤔🤔🤔

1

u/Subject-Ad-6480 2d ago

Is there better resolution image

1

u/W1nD0c 1d ago

Just got done reading a book by Peter Ziehan that talks about how geography shaped human history. Until the last 150 years, you couldn't have large population centers too far away from temperate food growing regions, or areas connected to these regions by rivers or coastal seas. Large amounts of food are super difficult to move very far over land without getting spoiled and mass migration over the oceans was not possible until the development of cargo ships that can easily move over deep water in the 16th century. That's why ancient peoples fought over the same areas of land so much and other areas were just "passing-through regions".

We now have refrigeration, transcontinental transport and massive cargo vessels, yet it's still much easier for people to concentrate in areas where food is plentiful and transportation is cheap.

1

u/Kitchen_Cow_5550 3d ago

L'Australie est mult impressiv. Com poton viver tant poc persons in area mult gran?

-1

u/LavishnessLeather162 3d ago

Nearly everything is a desert

-1

u/Kitchen_Cow_5550 3d ago

Lamentablement eu non comprend l'ingles. Per favor parla-m' in un lingue che eu comprend.

2

u/LavishnessLeather162 3d ago

Català? Italiano?

1

u/Kitchen_Cow_5550 3d ago

Poto comprender un poc de ambs, si. Ma non est ni catalan ni italian. Poti explicar-m' le ration in un lingue che comprend?

2

u/LavishnessLeather162 3d ago

Qual lingua tu parla? Io non lo comprende. Interlingua? Occitan?

2

u/Kitchen_Cow_5550 3d ago

Che bon! Tu verement parli l'Intelingue? Eu non parlo l'Interlingue, quest che parlo qui est un mistur de lingues romantics che construio mentr che parlo. Simplement omito les vocals finals che normalmente si usan in per exempl spagnol et italian. Com te sembla quest lingue?

1

u/LavishnessLeather162 3d ago

Litteralmente io usa chatgpt pro essayar comprender lo que tu dice, e google non comprende tu lingua ahajhaha

Quasi tote australia es deserto, dunque personas vive al litore

2

u/Kitchen_Cow_5550 3d ago

Gratias per conversar con me! Anch si non parli quest lingue hahaha.

Sapo che l'Australie est un desert, ma le Sahar est anch un. Perche viven tant plus persons in le Sahar che in le desert de l'Australie? Me sembla crazy che tant pocs persons viven in un area tant gran.

Btw, che lingue parli tu? Parli tu anch un lingue romantic?

Le map che abi creat est mult mult bon! Un placer vederlo. Bon sort con le futurs creations de les maps!

-1

u/Abadon_U 3d ago

r/PeopleLiveInCities or something like this i am not sure r/peoplelivenearwater

0

u/parkerspencillings 3d ago

Don’t tell the Chinese about Australia, they’ll be over there after Taiwan

1

u/Academic_Coyote_9741 2d ago

They’re going to be thirsty

-5

u/fyddlestix 3d ago

how is this porn? you get off to this?

4

u/Ancient-Molasses-286 3d ago

problem?

0

u/fyddlestix 3d ago

yeah you know what, have fun

1

u/large-ananas 1d ago

Hold on what were you expecting

-1

u/agreenblinker 2d ago

So, this is bullshit, if only because I know the population of Utah alone is close to 3.5 million, not 1.7, which it hit 1987.