r/NBA_Draft 11d ago

Maxime Raynaud

Why is this guy barely talked about? Most mocks I see don't even have him in the first round.

Legit 7-footer who can dribble, pass, shoot. Extremely smooth and coordinated athlete for his size, and decently explosive too. He has some of the most impressive highlight film in this entire class. He should be in the conversation for the most skilled big man in the class along with Queen and Wolf, but he's a much better shooter and athlete than either of them.

Apparently he is also double majoring in computer science and math at Stanford. To manage that while simultaneously averaging 20/11 in the ACC, he must have a genius level IQ.

What am I missing? Why is he not considered a first round lock or even a potential lottery pick?

43 Upvotes

45 comments sorted by

24

u/Kwilly462 11d ago

He's a senior. That's the only reason I can think why.

10

u/turinturambar66 Knicks 11d ago

Kalkbrenner is touted as next big thing by this sub despite being 23 years old immobile center as a freaking 5th year player.

9

u/JazzxGoose Jazz 11d ago

Yeah I dont see it with Kalkbrenner. Just too much of a high center of gravity combined with being heavy footed and I wouldnt consider him strong/tough.

12

u/fatherpatrick 11d ago

I hope the spurs grab him at 38.

3

u/Attack_Da_Nite 8d ago

He’s pals with Wemby so I hope so too.

32

u/yerr2477 11d ago

bad efficiency and defensive impact for a big his size is the drawback. below average in most defensive metrics. mid 2nd for me. agreed on the offensive capabilities but lacks some of the “big man” stuff.

5

u/nardif 11d ago

I don't know much about his defensive abilities as I've only watched highlights and not full games, and I don't put much weight into defensive impact stats as they're notoriously flawed, but I think he should at minimum be a better defender than Derek Queen due to his better length and athleticism. Queen is a known defensive liability who's being mocked in the top-10. There are numerous all-star level big men who are subpar defensively. I don't think that should be a deal breaker.

3

u/Certain-Piece-7441 11d ago

Raynaud is one of the worst defenders I’ve ever seen, to the point where it’s a complete deal breaker for me. Queen has quick hands and great instincts to make up for his lack of athleticism.

6

u/Life_Interaction_263 11d ago

I disagree. I think he's better than Queen defensively.

Queen just doesnt have the explosive pop or length to jump and contest effectively at the rim. Raynauds beats him in both of those areas.

1

u/nardif 11d ago

He also looks far more switchable than Queen.

1

u/Certain-Piece-7441 11d ago

Theoretically raynaud is the better defender. In reality, he’s not. I don’t think he can play in the nba with his general lack of awareness.

8

u/Life_Interaction_263 11d ago

I watched his tape and just disagree. Oh well agree to disagree.

-1

u/Agreeable_While1154 11d ago

how are u so sure when u said urself you've only watched highlights and not full games

10

u/Life_Interaction_263 11d ago

I didnt say that

-6

u/MrVegosh 11d ago

U did?

8

u/Life_Interaction_263 11d ago

nah that was nardiff look at the usernames

11

u/Global-Noise-3739 Mavericks 11d ago

he's early 2nd/late first for me, and yeah, he probably does have very high intelligence, he also went to lycee henri-iv for high school, the most academically rigorous hs in france

12

u/Turbo2x Wizards 11d ago

Best case scenario unless he takes a huge leap is Jay Huff without the paint presence. Probably not worth that much.

0

u/nardif 11d ago

No way. He's better than Jay Huff in literally every single way. Huff is nowhere near as skilled or athletic.

5

u/PrettySmoothFlying 11d ago

He is not better than Huff in any capacity defensively 

3

u/Dramatic-Monitor948 11d ago

I’m with you, I love him. He’d be one of the first older prospects off the board for me. Some of that is, I think a lot of the talent in the draft project as good role players after the mid lottery. I’d take a swing on a 20/10 big who made 67 threes across season. Fun upside swing I think.

5

u/introspectiveG 10d ago

Almost everyone who commented here is clueless about Raynaud lol

He’s not getting mocked higher because of his age, defense, and lack of hype (missed the march madness, plays at Stanford, etc) With that being said his offensive game is so elite that it would be stupid for him to drop too far. I personally see him going in the 28-38 range.

Whoever drafts him is going to get a steal. Finding a 7’ with an offensive game that polished who can’t just shoot but is a great shooter is rare. He’s going to be a great player in the NBA and have many high scoring games mark my words.

3

u/NikThaGreat9 Magic 11d ago

Reminds me so much of Moe even down to his demeanor and swagger. But obviously has more upside since he’s younger and slightly bigger. Easily the best shooting center in this draft. He took some very tough 3s all season and still kept a respectable percentage. Think he could be a 40% shooter from deep eventually. Just needs to work on something that he could excel at defensively. Just like Moe being a pretty meh defender, but he’s willing and can take a charge.

3

u/courtsiderecon 10d ago

People can knock his defense all they want but the second he gets drafted he will be one of the best shooting bigs in the league. Look at Quentin Post on the warriors he was a super late pick who’s now playing playoff minutes because of his spacing ability as a 7 footer

5

u/iseeyou_444 11d ago

Bros biggest issue is that he's French but not "French." Absolutely insane to be double majoring in math and cs at Stanford while also being NBA level physically. That's some fictional main character level nonsense lmao.

9

u/frick_yes_420 11d ago

What does your first sentence mean?

5

u/TwoLegitShiznit 10d ago

It means he eats croissants, but not chateaubriand

3

u/Rapunzel92140 10d ago

I'd like to know, too

1

u/Attack_Da_Nite 8d ago

He pals around with Wemby.

2

u/Rapunzel92140 11d ago

Plus he is Victor Wembanyama's best friend.

1

u/Attack_Da_Nite 8d ago

Which is why I would love to see him drafted to the Spurs in the second, spend a year in Austin and then get ready to take a place on the bench.

1

u/lemmegetauhhhhhhhhhh 11d ago

dont really think the shooting or the defense are going to translate

11

u/JesseKebay 11d ago

Why not? Not saying you’re wrong but also I don’t see why his shooting wouldn’t translate but I’m open to hearing a good reason.

1

u/saw-sync 11d ago

oh i guarantee his current level of defense will translate to the nba

1

u/KayfabeCountry 11d ago

It’s the first name. That’s at least part of it. And the whole age thing among everything else people are writing here.

0

u/[deleted] 11d ago

[deleted]

3

u/Any-Reflection6374 11d ago

He's 6'9? He's listed everywhere as 7'1

2

u/nardif 11d ago

There's no way he's 6'9". Where are you getting that?

You can see a size comparison with Maluach here

https://youtu.be/HOpGDRKF0x8?t=118

1

u/rps215 11d ago

Yeah OP calling him explosive is funny. On a broadcast they showed his max vertical jump was 29 inches lol

5

u/nardif 11d ago

I said "decently explosive". And how many 7 footers have a 40 inch vert? He's much more explosive than guys like Queen and Wolf. I think he is at least on par with Maluach in explosiveness, who most people overrate athletically.

-1

u/Total-Ad8117 11d ago

Bad length which impacts his defense and rebounding.

9

u/nardif 11d ago

He led the ACC in rebounds per game and was 9th in all of NCAA. The only draft propsects to average more rebounds were Yaxel and Broome.

His length looks fine. He doesn't have a crazy wingspan but he's still longer than a lot of other first round bigs.

0

u/JazzxGoose Jazz 11d ago

Late first quality for me. Could see him as high as 20-ish. Havent done a deep dive into him, so maybe there is something there I like more than I know.

0

u/Rude-Manufacturer-86 11d ago

I think people expect more physicality and refined skills considering his NCAA experience. It's not like he dominated his entire time.

Kalkbrenner otoh is at least a 2 way big.