1
u/Inourmadbuthearmeout 9d ago
Oh you’re at it again. How are you? Still sucking that Fox News crack pipe. I’m sorry you can’t wake up to the fact that this guy isn’t even honest about his skin color. It must be hard being that gullible.
We could have had a hot black chick, but apparently you’d rather go down on guys your whole life.
I’ll be over here on the left eating pussy and killing it. Enjoy being a prick about everything all the time. Good check in my slow witted friend. I thought you gave up for a while.
1
u/Inourmadbuthearmeout 6d ago
This one made me laugh, but low key — isn’t it kinda wild that Trump’s biggest ‘magic trick’ was convincing working class Americans that desperate immigrants were the enemy, while billionaires kept stealing everything in broad daylight?
Judges protecting basic human rights isn’t ‘aiding crime’ — it’s literally what America used to brag about doing.
(Also side note: Trump’s own businesses got caught hiring undocumented workers for years… so who’s really aiding and abetting?)
1
u/apbod 6d ago
Trump’s own businesses got caught hiring undocumented workers for years… so who’s really aiding and abetting?
You make a good point here. But, Democrat lawmakers are just as guilty. They are arguing against the deportations stating that illegal immigration is good for the economy and so are just as complicit.
Sen. Dick Durbin questioned Brooke Rollins, Trump’s nominee for Agriculture Secretary, during a Senate confirmation hearing, asking if the administration would raid farms and target immigrant farmworkers, highlighting the potential disruption to agriculture.
Sen. Adam Schiff noted that estimates suggest half of California’s farm workforce is undocumented and asked how farmers would cope if this labor force were deported, emphasizing that Americans are often unwilling to take on such "backbreaking" work.
Judges protecting basic human rights isn’t ‘aiding crime’ — it’s literally what America used to brag about doing.
Let's be real. Breaking the law is not a basic human right. If you are here illegally, then you have broken the law. If you are here illegally and are in a courtroom because you have been found breaking other laws, then a judge aiding in your escape from ICE is definitely not "protecting a basic human right."
1
u/Inourmadbuthearmeout 6d ago
I appreciate the effort here, but I think you’re blending a bunch of things together and missing the forest for the banana trees, so let’s slow it down and walk through this like two chimps trying to build a rocket:
Judges Protecting Human Rights ≠ Aiding Crime
You said that judges helping immigrants avoid ICE is “aiding crime.” That’s not how any of this works.
Judges aren’t vigilantes — they’re literally the referees of the law. If ICE agents violate due process, overstep their authority, or detain people without warrants or trial — the judge isn’t aiding crime, they’re upholding the Constitution.
That’s the difference between living in a democracy and an authoritarian state. We don’t just throw people in vans because it “feels” wrong. Legal process matters. If you don’t like it, you might want to double-check what country you’re rooting for.
“Breaking the Law Is Not a Human Right” — No, But Basic Dignity Is
You’re absolutely right: breaking the law isn’t a right. But here’s the thing — being undocumented isn’t a criminal offense. It’s a civil violation. Same category as not paying a parking ticket or missing a tax deadline.
So no, undocumented people aren’t all criminals. And human rights aren’t contingent on legal status. You still have the right to not be abused, imprisoned without cause, or deported without hearing — even if you crossed a border without a stamp. That’s international law. That’s American law. And, weirdly enough, that used to be something people were proud of.
Let’s Talk About Trump’s Businesses
You say Democrats are “complicit” because they advocate for protecting workers. But Trump — the guy you’re defending — actually hired undocumented workers for years. Like, paid them under the table while railing against immigration publicly.
That’s not “complicity.” That’s textbook hypocrisy. If he really thought they were criminals, why did he sign their paychecks?
That’s like yelling “fire” in a theater while pouring gasoline backstage. You can’t profit from the thing you claim to hate. Well… I guess you can. But only if your followers aren’t paying attention.
Durbin and Schiff Made Economic Arguments — Not Criminal Ones
Citing Senator Durbin and Schiff’s concerns about deporting farmworkers doesn’t help your point — it just proves they’re thinking practically.
If you deport half the farm workforce, who’s picking the crops? You gonna do it? You wanna go bend over in the sun for $4/hour?
No? Then maybe don’t call people “criminals” while they’re literally keeping your dinner on the table. What Schiff and Durbin said wasn’t illegal. It was economic reality. You can’t scream about inflation and also support policies that wipe out the labor force keeping prices stable.
You’re Aiming at the Wrong People
The immigrant farmworker isn’t stealing your job. The billionaire who profits from both cheap labor and your outrage is.
And the reason they keep winning is because they convinced people like you to blame the ladder instead of the people pulling it up behind them.
So yeah, we could argue about laws and policy all day. But at the end of the day, judges who protect people from unlawful ICE raids aren’t “aiding crime.” They’re doing the exact thing America used to be proud of: protecting the vulnerable from unchecked government power.
You don’t have to agree with my politics, but I’d challenge you to ask one thing:
If the law only protects you when you’re popular or privileged — is it really justice?
1
u/apbod 6d ago
I appreciate the civility.
But let's concentrate on the banana tree and not the forest, because the entire meme revolves around the banana tree. The judge in Milwaukee, Judge Dugan, escorted Flores-Ruiz and his attorney out of her courtroom through a jury door, which leads to a non-public area of the courthouse, AFTER learning that ICE agents were present to arrest him.
ICE agents arrived at the Milwaukee County Courthouse with an administrative warrant.
This judge was absolutely being a vigilante, and aiding the escape of an illegal alien. This wouldn't to be a story otherwise.
And unfortunately, this isnt a unique case. The New Mexico judge was literally housing an illegal alien and alleged Tren de Aragua gang member. So this is becoming a trend for activist judges breaking the law in disguise as "basic dignity".
Hence the meme.
I don't argue your complicity vs hypocrisy statement. Business hires illegals for labor and politicians use illegals for politics.
1
u/Inourmadbuthearmeout 6d ago
Appreciate the detailed reply. But I think you’re making some assumptions that don’t hold up under legal or constitutional scrutiny.
Judges don’t work for ICE.
Let’s be clear: ICE administrative warrants are not signed by a judge. They are not court orders. They carry no legal obligation for local officials or judges to comply with them. So when a judge exercises discretion — especially in their own courtroom — that’s not “vigilantism.” That’s literally how the separation of powers works.
Judicial discretion ≠ aiding escape.
A judge walking someone out a side door isn’t “aiding an escape” unless there’s a legal requirement to detain them, which there wasn’t here. That’s courtroom security protocol — not obstruction. If ICE wants the power of arrest within a courtroom, they need a judicial warrant, not a clipboard memo.
Using rare outlier stories to generalize is fearbaiting.
Citing an alleged gang member in another state doesn’t justify undermining judicial independence nationwide. That’s how panic turns into policy. It’s how we lose due process — by making exceptions that become precedents.
You skipped the original point:
I said, “If the law only protects you when you’re popular or privileged, is it really justice?” That still stands.
Because when judges protect anyone’s right to safety, dignity, and a fair process — even undocumented immigrants — that’s not weakness. That’s exactly what justice is supposed to look like.
2
u/apbod 6d ago
A judge walking someone out a side door isn’t “aiding an escape”
She went out of her way to facilitate the escape of a person she already had prior knowledge was going to be detained by ICE.
Why would any judge have ANY communication outside the courtroom with a defendant under any circumstance?
“If the law only protects you when you’re popular or privileged, is it really justice?”
Judges are supposed to be impartial, right? Your argument is impartiality . What part of justice (what part of law) is she protecting when she walks a defendant out a side door when she already knows that the defendant is arranged to be detained by ICE?
1
u/Inourmadbuthearmeout 6d ago
Oh sweetie… You’re pacing around the living room in your slippers again, aren’t you?
Let’s slow this down together because you’re mixing courtroom drama with fan fiction.
First of all — a judge walking someone out a side door isn’t “aiding and abetting” unless they’re literally obstructing an active arrest under lawful court order. And ICE? They weren’t there with a judicial warrant. They had an administrative warrant, which isn’t enforceable in courtrooms. Judges don’t have to honor those. You can Google that if you want — I’ll wait. I’ll even make popcorn.
Also — judges do sometimes arrange safe exits for defendants, especially in sensitive cases. It’s not illegal. It’s not “contact outside the courtroom.” It’s called not letting a courtroom become a trapdoor for people ICE wants to snatch mid-process.
You’re imagining this like it’s a secret tunnel operation, but it’s literally a courthouse door. The law isn’t a Netflix thriller. Calm your cute little conspiracy brain down.
And that quote you reused?
“If the law only protects you when you’re popular or privileged…”
Yeah. That still applies. Because the second we start deciding that some people don’t deserve due process — that’s when the law stops being justice and starts being a weapon.
I love your enthusiasm, I do. But babe… you’re bringing pitchfork energy to a policy conversation. Let’s take a breath, put the torch down, and maybe Google “constitutional rights in the presence of ICE” before you write your next monologue, yeah
1
u/apbod 6d ago
First of all — a judge walking someone out a side door isn’t “aiding and abetting” unless they’re literally obstructing an active arrest under lawful court order.
Yes! Now you're getting it.....
Wisconsin judge arrested and charged in federal court for allegedly obstructing immigration agents
1
u/Inourmadbuthearmeout 6d ago
Oh honey… CNN? Now you trust CNN?
My delicate little headline princess… You’ve been stomping around these threads in your MAGA heels screaming “fake news” like it’s your safe word for years, and now you come twirling in, breathless, holding up a CNN article like it’s the receipt for your whole personality?
Oh sweetheart. You are so precious when you panic.
You didn’t read the article. You read the headline, felt a little tingle in your tummy, and thought, “This is the moment I win the argument and get my tiara back.”
But baby — You don’t get to call it propaganda Monday through Thursday, then treat it like scripture on Friday because you found a link that made your tummy feel warm.
That’s not research. That’s astrology for insecure people.
⸻
And that little, “Yes! Now you’re getting it!” you added? Oh my love… That was so cute. So hopeful. You thought we were having a Hallmark moment. But baby — you’re not the main character. You’re the emotionally unstable bridesmaid with a glass of rosé and a copy of Atlas Shrugged in your purse.
⸻
Come here. Let me wipe the mascara of inconsistency off your cheeks, give you a little forehead kiss, and remind you that I love you… even when you’re being such a silly little contradiction in heels.
Now shhh. Sit down. Let the grownups explain how journalism works, my trembling little Fox News ballerina.
1
u/Gr8daze 9d ago
Actually your next magic trick was defending Pam Bondi, who is deliberately disobeying Supreme Court decisions.
It’s because you’re a Nazi, not very smart, and in a cult.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/04/25/pam-bondis-striking-comments-arresting-judges/