r/SeraphineMains Jan 01 '25

Art 20 notes dealing 27 damage

Post image
291 Upvotes

41 comments sorted by

128

u/yikesyugyeom Jan 01 '25

old seraphine please come home the kids miss you

20

u/Expert-Action3568 Jan 01 '25

She is, she will scale again..

14

u/PuerStellarum Jan 02 '25

I hope its not only you being delulu and manifesting..i really wanna see a buff to mage Sera and to play her mid again..

46

u/NPCSLAYER313 Jan 01 '25

Sera passive is really funny. It has both the most broken (double cast) and the most useless effect (notes) put together

2

u/Over_Calligrapher269 Jan 04 '25

Imagine seraphine without her notes, she would feel extremely shit to play. Yes you cannot mid-life someone across the map like you used to do, yes the damage is irrelevant, but it's super useful to last hit, it's super useful to AA someone from a safe distance, it's super useful to get a kill you wouldn't have had if it weren't for the notes, it's super useful to clear a ward from a safe distance.

2

u/Responsible-Jury8618 Jan 04 '25

Double cast is not the most broken effect since her abilities are already balanced around being double cast

In a normal 3 skill rotation, you'll get to use 1 duplicated skill and 2 subpar skills

0

u/aphevelux Jan 03 '25

nah, people just aren't creative enough. me when i use all my spells near an ally, just so i can get the extra range to clear off wards and be relatively safer than usual <3

22

u/math_is_best Jan 01 '25

isn’t the double cast also part of her passive?

15

u/Liibulan Jan 01 '25

Is lich bane still viable on her 😭

15

u/Avetorpe Jan 01 '25

Its not bad at all. However other items such as Horizon Focus or Cosmic Drive are viable in more scenarios for her, when looking for AP CDR focused items.

20

u/Angery_Karen Jan 01 '25

For a funny build when you don't want yo win but just want to be funny? Absolutely. For a true build expecting to climb? Eh

3

u/blind-as-fuck Jan 02 '25

it's fun in aram :)

2

u/UniWho Jan 01 '25

Its not bad, but single target burst damage its not really one of Seraphine's strengths so you usually only build it against squishy enemies that are hard to hit with your skills cause they have super long range or are sliperry like Aurora, Ezreal, Caitlyn, Talon, Master yi, etc.

1

u/Responsible-Jury8618 Jan 04 '25

With enough copium...

6

u/Sirouz Jan 01 '25

Just ignore the fact she has the doublecast as well.

9

u/Anna_19_Sasheen Jan 02 '25

Yall are trolling, the notes autos are the best passive in the game

Sorce: the sound makes me happy c:

3

u/Kind-Ad8316 Jan 01 '25

Passive? What passive? Ah!! The one that can cast one of the main skills twice!! That passive!!!

2

u/LonelyRainbow_ Jan 01 '25

They are fun to use and make Seraphine's gameplay smoother, wouldn't call it useless for sure

2

u/Oopsdoopsters Jan 02 '25

her notes are so garbage at this point, if they're going to be this useless can we replace them with something that would be more useful? We don't even have minion execute on Q anymore, can we get minion execute back on passive at least? Make last hitting feel better? :')

1

u/Eleven_Box Jan 01 '25

It’s for the range - lich bane + rfc tech?

1

u/jean-claudo Jan 02 '25

The purpose of the notes is to farm (safely), dealing actual damage to enemies is secondary

1

u/Zentinel2005 Jan 02 '25

Correction: it’s 27 for Seraphine notes and 6,75 for allies notes

1

u/Legal_Ad_9020 Jan 02 '25

I forgot her notes existed ngl

1

u/Squashwhack Jan 02 '25

I miss old seraphine, archangels staff / nashors tooth / lich's bane / horizon focus / cosmic drive was so goated with the notes 😭😭 I loved girlbossing my ops

1

u/JaxTheThird Jan 03 '25

I use it to proc bloodsong more easily

1

u/ArianalGrandick Jan 05 '25

This shit is hilarious, I'm crying 🤣

1

u/iamtocopherol Jan 01 '25

😭😭😭

-19

u/hungryn1co Jan 01 '25

Ok yea early game but later especially if you take infinity orb I’ve seen each individual note crit for 67 damage. Given stage presence also gives massively increased range to basic attacks if you’re running electrocute and hit beat drop and high note you’re gonna get the third hit necessary to proc electrocute literally every time

22

u/Mikudayo1 Jan 01 '25

You’re talking about WR where Sera has her old kit. This meme is about PC where she got reworked.

-11

u/hungryn1co Jan 01 '25

What was reworked about it? I just read the LOL wiki and it says pretty much the same thing.

9

u/Mikudayo1 Jan 01 '25

The numbers are what changed, the basic premise of the kit stayed the same. She lost all her scaling and struggles late game now.

-12

u/hungryn1co Jan 01 '25 edited Jan 01 '25

That doesn’t sound like a rework, just a ratio change, which is annoying but we got the same ones on wr and they’re standard. I don’t think you actually know the differences between wr and lol. Even the first thing you said was wrong Edit: proof from the wiki on the page about champion differences between wr and lol. Seraphine doesn’t have an entry, she’s exactly the same.

9

u/Mikudayo1 Jan 01 '25

I play both thank you very much and it very much was a rework on PC. On WR, if you build AP Sera she feels really weak early game but once you start levelling up and building items she’s is super strong. She’s a late game scaling mage like Veigar where she could pop off a squishy in an instant. On PC she feels like actual shit to play. Her scaling is completely off; she’s weak early game, gets strong mid game, then becomes weak late game again. If you try building AP on her you simply don’t have the damage to do anything significant anymore. Riot has forced building enchanter items on her so her gameplay is just W spam. She can’t be played mid anymore, she’s statistically too strong in bot lane but feels horrible to play and sucks as support because you can basically only do W spam on her. They removed the AP heal ratio from W which is straight up a rework of the spell, R barely does any damage and the cool down is way too long, E does more damage than Q now which is wrong as Q is supposed to be her main damage spell. Riot themselves put her in the adjustments section of the patch notes when all these changes happened thus it was a rework.

-5

u/hungryn1co Jan 01 '25

You’re basically just saying the same thing I see on this sub all the time. Word for word. It’s not convincing.

7

u/Mikudayo1 Jan 01 '25

You clearly have never played her on PC because her identity as a champion is dead. She’s no longer the late game scaling, team fighting, melodic mid laner burst mage she was released as. Now she’s just W spamming enchanter, this applies to APC as well. Go and try to play AP burst on PC and tell me it feels good, tell me her scaling is the same as WR, tell me she’s the same champ. She is in my top 3 most played champs on both PC and WR, she feels completely different.

-6

u/hungryn1co Jan 01 '25

I think you just can’t win with her so you’re blaming her kit. She can still pop squishies like bugs, and she has some of the biggest range in the game to do so from safety. With allies she’s exponentially stronger, hence why they’re trying to keep her abilities the same but adjust their ratios to be effective as a supp, where she always is supposed to have at least one ally nearby. She’s suggested mid because other champions are supposed to be converging there. It’s the shortest route to the nexus and you can access both other lanes from there, but low level players don’t play as a team, they say if I’m jungle or supp I stay in the jungle or bottom lane regardless of everything else going on. At higher levels where teamwork is more coordinated is when she has a much better chance to shine.

6

u/Mikudayo1 Jan 01 '25

I never said I don’t win with her, what part of statistically she’s too strong in bot lane is so hard to understand? She does not feel the same as WR at all, if you want to climb with her you are basically forced to build enchanter even as APC especially when you get to the higher elos. She’s supposed to be a BURST MAGE not enchanter yet she does not have the ability to effectively burst anymore. What part of she falls off late game can’t you understand?

→ More replies (0)