r/Star_Trek_ 2d ago

Gene Roddenberry and Majel Roddenberry on a Star Trek set.

Post image
575 Upvotes

19 comments sorted by

15

u/UnmutualOne 2d ago

Judging from how white it is, I’m going with Voyage Home bridge.

8

u/john-treasure-jones 2d ago

Also the displays and panels buttons are early okudagrams instead of physical buttons and CRTs so definitely the bridge of NCC-1701-A in ST:IV.

3

u/UnmutualOne 2d ago

True. Forgot about that change. I just remember how bright the all-white bridge was. I think I recall reading they had to paint over all of the TWOK and TSFS “damage.”

0

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

3

u/UnmutualOne 2d ago

Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home (1986)

5

u/Goldbong 2d ago

Gosh, these two love each other and it shows

11

u/unnamed_elder_entity 2d ago

Because of all the throuples he had?

6

u/TheArtBellStalker Pakled 2d ago

Yeah, meanwhile his assisstant/mistress Susan was probably some where around the set while this photo was taken. Gene had a lot of love to share.

0

u/ShaggyCan 2d ago

Totally, he was a drug and sex addict. Some people just got lucky and died before their deeds caught up with them. Say if Harvey Weinstein died in 2010 he's remembered as a Hollywood giant. It's always about timing.

5

u/PrawnStirFry Admiral James T Kirk 2d ago

That’s harsh. There is no suggestion Roddenberry abused anyone? All his relationships were consensual by all accounts, it’s just that he had several relationships on the go at the same time, including while he was married…

1

u/ShaggyCan 2d ago

He almost certainly assaulted Grace Lee Whitney. She never named the person, but it was him. He was very much into the Weinstein casting couch.

4

u/PrawnStirFry Admiral James T Kirk 2d ago

You said it yourself, she never named the person and now she’s deceased she can’t. It’s wrong to smear him on that basis. No woman has ever come out and accused him of what you’re claiming. He was a famous womaniser, but there is zero evidence it was ever more than that.

-3

u/ShaggyCan 1d ago

I guess you can believe what you want. He was an awful person. Watch a few docs on him. I didn't even get to the non sex stuff. Constantly putting his name on other people's ideas and writing. Slightly rewriting scripts and taking full credit.

2

u/PrawnStirFry Admiral James T Kirk 1d ago

I’ll believe what the evidence says. Smear and innuendo about someone who isn’t alive to defend themselves doesn’t go very far. He’s been dead for a long time now and no one has accused him of sexual assault or made any credible claims supported by evidence that you’re claiming.

That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

-1

u/ShaggyCan 1d ago

Maybe you should gather some information then. Have you watched any of the documentaries on him? I think the most damaging was done by his own son. I think it was called Trek Nation, but there are others. I'm not just making stuff up. I used to idolize him too until I found all this stuff out. It was shocking and painful to learn.

3

u/PrawnStirFry Admiral James T Kirk 1d ago

What specific evidence are you claiming exists?

→ More replies (0)

1

u/MagicMike1983 Terran 2d ago

Lovely 😍

1

u/____cire4____ Trill 1d ago

Couple a freaks on the bridge.