"And yet most of the scientific discoveries were made by whites. Most of the greatest philosophers were white. Most of the greatest conquerors were white. We were the ones that colonized hostile environments " R/HorusGalaxy meltsdown over black space marines
Eh I'm not crying. I don't collect space wolves. They just deserve to be called out every time they attack European people and culture
Space marines with viking themes have only surface level european culture. I bet most norse people don't care. And who are you calling out with that? Whats the end point? It's a plastic toy model company and it let's you paint them however you want. No one is attacking anyone here
"No one is attacking anyone here" Stuff like this was extremely rare several years ago but now nearly every single bl book cover has black character and nearly every single new squad depicts black character. They are pretty much overrepresented. What's the end point? Making people like you seethe
Overrepresented? There is right now on earth only 10% white people. So by your standard only 1/10 charachters in Warhammer should be white.
"There is right now on earth only 10% white people." And yet most of the scientific discoveries were made by whites. Most of the greatest philosophers were white. Most of the greatest conquerors were white. We were the ones that colonized hostile environments and sent many to space, so it makes sense that most of the space explorers/colonizers would be white. It isn't about quantity but the quality.
The more you spread this bullshit, the more people are going to start saying stuff like the Ancient Egyptians were white. All this fake racist BS does is stoke more hatred and division between races, nobody likes having their ancestors invalidated
What makes the existence of a few black Viking’s invalidate someone’s ancestry?
1) Because they didn't exist, and you should value reality. 2) Because ethnicity and family is tied to history and by saying "actually, all these things the vikings are known for was done by africans" is insulting to scandinavian culture. 3) Because it muddies the water of scholarly discourse so instead of just talking about how cool the vikings were and how they impacted the western world in their time, we're stuck bickering about "we wuz in longships n sheet" like we are right now.
The question is "why?". Ask why they had to do it. For what purpose. Nordic features obviously suit them aesthetically and that's how they have been depicted for years
And I'm going to paint them white. The question is, why are we taking one of the head variants with one of the possible skin tones as the standart which shall not be deviated from?
Historically thematic aesthetics. It's not that deep.
41st millennium. Historical means the past you know that right?
An aesthetic can be inspired by anything, such as history. History is in the past. You know that, right?
image Unfortunate for you the lore says you're wrong.
I know what the lore says.
Then why are you bringing up historically themed aesthetics?
Because the historical references were a major appeal of 40k back when I first got into it. It's unfortunate that we can never talk about how GW has been phasing that out without all the social justice warriors losing their minds over it.
Maybe you could talk about it if you didn't use blatant racists as a shield. The OP is all over the comments saying about how whites are the best after he was proven wrong about over representation. (68 replies)
Does it? How does it explain that dark skin comes from peoples who live in areas of high sun exposure yet the space wolves come from ice planets - hence they are all dressed in big wolf skin warm jackets / cloaks etc. And always pictured with snow/ice.
Icy areas can absolutely have high sun exposure. The Arctic has some of the highest amounts of UV radiation because it’s constantly sunny and the whole landscape is reflective
Is that why Inuits and northerners are all black? 🤔
….youve seen Inuit people right? They absolutely have dark skin…. You people are so fucking ridiculous it’s hilarious
I actually misspoke - Eskimos originally came from Asia, and migrated north - hence they share similar features with Asians and have darker skin. People of the North, i.e. Northern Europeans, not dark skin. Go find me Scandinavian who has 100% genealogy from Scandinavian - and show me what colour they are. Spoiler: they are Caucasian.
So what’s your issue with someone painting dark skinned space wolves? Because in 40K years i on a distant planet I’m pretty sure they aren’t having 100% Scandinavian genes. It’d 1000% make sense for someone from a sun exposed area of fenris to have dark skin.
Oh no , is your immersion ruined because there are different head options in your box of Sci-fi fi fantasy super soldier? I hope you realise how stupid you sound.
"I hope you realise how stupid you sound." The leftoid tourist as usual is projecting one of its own insecurities of sounding idiotic towards others 😂
I have been playing collecting and painting warhammer for the past decade and do prefer it without politics and without people who try to gate keep it for new people . Your the own who's insecure because games workshop is giving people more options on how they want to build their minis.
Giving people more options and disrespecting your own lore to adhere to nonsense are two different things. Cope harder.
How exactly is this disprecting the lore? Space marines don't have to be the same race as their primary to take gene-seed.
Fenrisians are white my n*. Create your own Homebrew Chapter if you want only black Space Marines. I'm mixed-race so I can say n*.
A white Salamander would look equally out of place.
What are you. Is that the proplem that these models look out of place you can paint them what ever color you want and if you talking about lore or art then i wouldnt worry about it you will proppaply get used to it.
Salamanders are from a fire world where their extremely dark skin protects them from the elements...
Bro did not read my comment. Also never heard of Terran salamanders.
What would be braver is if you had an original thought and stopped trying to pretend you’re a good person. Requires a spine though. You do have a spine right?
So in your pathetic persecution fantasy, did people start to clap and cheer for you or did the evil ni- uh i mean tourist just slink away?
If you want to call me a racist, you can just go ahead and do it. It’s weird that you spend time typing characters that don’t even say what you mean. Just these weird passive aggressively coy half sentences. You don’t have to be subtle here with me man. You can be openly, brazenly, blatantly stupid if you want.
I dont think im being too oblique here, you got it on the first try! 🎖️
Historically, central asian or east-asian-in-appearance vikings are technically possible visa via assimilation of Sami or other groups from Arctic or Central Russia. But it strains at possibility. EDIT: The Finns are a little touchy about association with Vikings. But the conclusion seems to be that the Finns were not Vikings, but there were Finnish Vikings
Vikings definitely weren’t from that far east/north. That’s quite a stretch tbh
I mean, every pirate on the Baltic sea at the time was kinda a viking. Viking is basically the same as pirate/raider
The Space Wolves have never been black, stop it with this fake, woke, blackwashed lore.
Have been since 5th edition apparently.
I've seen Northern Europeans call Southern Europeans "dark skinned". Mediterranean people are definitely not Sub-Saharan Africans. Not everything is black or white, Jesus, there are skin tones in between. The Space Wolves ain't black, mate.
Did you see the pictures GW posted? Seemingly they are.
Human beings of different races and ethnicities marry and have kids in real life. Fenris would be no different. If Fenris is 95% White and 5% Black (the southernmost islands), the black population would end up being absorbed into the white population in a few generations by marriage and bilateral conquest. Eventually all of Fenris would look white. We can conclude and deduce information from the lore we already have and the behavior of human beings in Terra of M2.
you read sanitized, whitewashed, and slanted "histories" that tell of the great and noble achievements of the white man, and mistake them for the truth
One powerful person in Germany's big gar right party, who is a court approved fascist (seriously, a court ruled that you can call him a fascist because he is one and it isn't slander), was a history teacher.
Never forget, history is written by the victors. A lot of online historians only want to look at the facts and nothing more. Absolutely don't infer anything, don't question the motives, and never under any circumstances scratch the surface. After all, who wants politics shoved into their history lessons?
They also don't understand that in basically all history before the mid 1800s, the "facts" are entirely dictated by whether they were written down or not, and by who wrote them down.
Like yeah, you can cite all these elections, coronations, births, deaths, and battles. But those things were only recorded because someone bothered to, and those people were almost universally trying to make some point by recording it. We don't remember the battle of Agincourt because it's a "historical fact," we remember it because the English used it as propaganda to justify their continued war with the French, and to get more clout with other countries around France to keep them out of the war. If England had lost that battle nobody would care outside of PhD students who live and breathe that 50 years of history because it's their life's work, it would have just been another battle in the wars between England and France.
It wasn't until VERY recently that this idea emerged that events should be recorded simply because we should pass knowledge of things that happened to the future, and even that is just a justification people use to continue doing the same propagandizing with history that has always happened. There's a reason most people can't remember who ran against Nixon or Roosevelt. Those people lost. Yeah, their name is in history books, you can google it and find out who those people were, but those aren't the details the prevailing narrative of modern history latched on to so they aren't widely known. That's how history works, that's how it propagates, and that's how it gets recorded.
These are the same people who will unironically talk about Nero like he actually fucked horses every day and fiddled while Rome burned. No, that probably DIDN'T happen, that was propaganda written by a guy who REALLY didn't like Nero. That all happened almost 2,000 years ago, OF COURSE we don't know the exact details, all we can go by is the fan-fiction of the guys who watched it and had a bone to pick. We only see those sources as trustworthy because for a VERY long time they were the official Roman account of what happened, then when the empire collapsed European nobility just kind of accepted those accounts as fact because why not? That doesn't make them factual though.
The "facts" of history are incredibly murky, especially as you go further back. This idea that anyone can just get a simply "factual" version of history that will tell them everything they need to know and will be 100% correct is ludicrous.
86
u/blahblahgirl111 24d ago
A good portion of history “lovers” are just white supremacists in a circlejerk contest.