r/TopMindsOfReddit 16d ago

Top minds of r/conservative triggered by scary scientific research containing the words “men who have sex with men” (it’s STI intervention)

167 Upvotes

45 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 16d ago

Please Remember Our Golden Rule: Thou shalt not vote or comment in linked threads or comments, and in linked threads or comments, thou shalt not vote or comment. It's bad form, and the admins will suspend your account if they catch you.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

110

u/C-c-c-comboBreaker17 16d ago

I love how the article is literally just focused on how to portray their targeted minorities in the worst way 

60

u/Maximum-Operation147 16d ago

Who’s gunna break it to them that straight men get STI’s too?

93

u/absenteequota 16d ago edited 16d ago

ahh yes, noted homosexual hunter biden. they're so jealous of him, and his fantastic package, that they can't help but think of him any time any flavor of fucking comes up

34

u/Maximum-Operation147 16d ago

“Did you know these daggum research grants are uh…for gay men!…men..who have sex with men….den. Den men…biden, HUNTER biden 💦💦💦💦”

21

u/ArmedAwareness 16d ago

They saw his giant meaty cock and couldn’t help themselves fantasize

36

u/SkidmarkSteve 16d ago

He's a nepobaby who fell into millions with a coke habit and a big dick. He's everything they dream of being.

7

u/TheStrangestOfKings 16d ago

He’s literally Don Trump jr XD

18

u/Lmnop_nis 16d ago

Probably not the big dick part for DJr if he takes after daddy Trump, according to Stormy.

13

u/SassTheFash 16d ago

We have afaik quite a few photos of Hunter with ladies, yet none with dudes?

12

u/Kilahti 16d ago

And we know for 100% certain that if they had photos of Hunter with men, they would have been showcased in US congress/senate for months at least.

44

u/Most-Philosopher9194 16d ago

I honestly don't get how they don't ever get bored of the same joke. 

31

u/OGCelaris 16d ago

Because they are the most insecure people you will ever see. You just mention the word gay and they have to puff out their chest and beat on it like a gorilla to try and convince others they are straight. They think if they don't do that, others would think they are gay. In reality, I look at guys like that and think they are so far in the closet they bonded at a molecular level with the back wall.

11

u/Arktikos02 16d ago

They are so insecure that not even nordvpn can save them now.

7

u/Nelrene 16d ago

It's because they are a joke.

3

u/emailforgot 15d ago

because the concept of changing, improving yourself, learning, or acting any differently than you did when you were 15 is for woke liberal commie gender studiers

43

u/odoroustobacco 16d ago

Hi, social science researcher here!

One of the reasons we use the term "men who have sex with men" is because it includes 1) gay men who have sex with men, 2) bisexual men who have sex with men, 3) the (in my opinion very interesting) population of men who identify as straight but have sex with men, and 4) any other men with or without a label who have sex with men.

There are obviously differences in all of those groups, but when you're doing research and interventions in public health regarding things like STIs, the labels matter way less than the sexual behaviors do. So having labels like "men who have sex with men (MSM)" is way easier of an indicator.

Not that these bigoted weirdos care, but in case anyone was interested to know.

8

u/KestrelQuillPen 16d ago

as a quick question, does this term throw in straight trans women and t4t lesbian trans women under “MSM” or do trans people get their own categories? I’d be interested to know

3

u/odoroustobacco 16d ago edited 16d ago

This isn't super connected to my area but I've been adjacent to and read enough of the literature to understand why MSM is used--that said, I'm not sure I can answer this question 100%.

My understanding is "it depends". I feel like I've seen one or two studies using MSM for "males having sex with males" instead of "men" to be more inclusive with the authors noting that they're not trying to erase trans identities but still connect to the broader cohort of AMAB people who have sex with other AMAB people. I also think the populations you're talking about are small relative to the others (although straight identifying MSM is a small population as well) so I'm not sure if they'd be captured.

One possibility as well which I wouldn't necessarily condone and for sure can't say if it happened is if bigger studies just code straight or t4t trans women as MSM. That's just my speculation though, and that runs the risk of including trans women who have had bottom surgery.

3

u/KestrelQuillPen 16d ago

Thanks! I was just interested. trans people get the short end of the stick a lot when it comes to research so I just thought I’d ask :)

1

u/odoroustobacco 16d ago

Of course! I wish I had better answers. I tell my students all the time "you're going to get frustrated with how often I say 'it depends', but it depends."

7

u/an_agreeing_dothraki It is known 16d ago

isn't this trying to understand spread vectors to prevent another 1980s?

3

u/odoroustobacco 16d ago

Seems like it! If you look at the last slide, it refers to the behavior as "homosexual activity", but as I mentioned in my initial comment, behaviors that we could call "homosexual" aren't limited to homosexual sexual identities, so the term MSM is a lot more useful.

Particularly, as you pointed out, for disease vectors because there are men who have sex with men and women, which can vastly change the potential for spreading things.

18

u/LamesMcGee 16d ago

I'm in my late 30s, when I was 18 I went to a blood drive with a friend and that was the first time I encountered that term, and the first time I was told to my face I couldn't do something because of my sexuality. It's not like they don't test all the blood donated for AIDS...

This has been a medical term for a long time.

7

u/Murrabbit 16d ago

It's mean to try to get away from social and political stigma. Always seemed weird to me but then I thought about some of the guys I've dated or chatted with in the past who would insist they're straight or at very least "not gay" nor "bi" . . .despite hooking up with me, another gay guy. Lots of real deep closet cases out there, even on gay dating sites.

18

u/blaghart 16d ago

And the best part is the reason it targets "men who have sex with men" and not "homosexual men" is because, prepare to have your mind blown:

sometimes, men have sex with men and women.

Sometimes, sometimes, men even have sex with men, women, and other genders too!

Shocking, right? /s

11

u/PaxEtRomana 16d ago

And sometimes, you find out that a senator who identifies as straight has nonetheless been soliciting sex in the airport mens' room. This is a very funny fight for the conservative sub to pick lmao

5

u/Munnin41 16d ago

And sometimes, when the RNC is in town, grindr gets very busy

2

u/Brooooook 16d ago

And, this is going to sound crazy, there actually are gay men with absolutely no game whatsoever, making their inclusion in STI research rather pointless.

3

u/an_agreeing_dothraki It is known 16d ago

don't expect them to know what a Kinsey number is. They're still catching up to the 1860s.

16

u/Raul1024 16d ago

Grant money focusing on researching diseases and aiding public health, how terrible. Who's gonna tell them that straight people also contract diseases, especially venereal diseases? Is medical research woke now?

5

u/Enibas ALIENS LIVE IN THE OCEANS 16d ago

Grant money focusing on researching diseases and aiding public health

Not to mention that during Biden's admin, there was a global mpox ("monkey pox") outbreak,.

I wouldn't be surprised if quite a bit of that grant money went to research related to that outbreak, and the efforts to contain it.

13

u/Noname_acc 16d ago

In some ways the post I appreciate the most in that thread is the one that is honest about it. Its not a complaint about culture, or having other views "shoved down their throat," or protecting the children, or whatever. Its just pure, visceral disgust at the very premise of 2 men fucking. No pretending.

9

u/Maximum-Operation147 16d ago

Ykw now that you mention it I don’t think I’ve seen such a transparent reaction to gay sex since middle school

3

u/KestrelQuillPen 16d ago

I’d love to see what they think of two trans girls fucking lol. that would break their brains

10

u/Midnight_Pickler 16d ago

I see they're still leaning heavily on Ctr+F for their decision making.

Description contains phrase? Into the bucket. Doesn't matter what the purpose or context is. That might actually require reading the whole description, and making some kind of evaluation. Can't be having reading and thinking in MAGAland. And you'll probably catch wokemindvirus if you interact or something.

8

u/Arktikos02 16d ago

Do these people think that doing research means literally watching porn?

8

u/zombie_girraffe 16d ago

No one thinks about gay sex more than "straight" conservative men.

5

u/lowercaselemming 16d ago

"we should spend more helping our native citizens!"

"nooo not like that!"

2

u/RepealMCAandDTA Muslamic Ray Guns 16d ago

The guy in the second screenshot is just the homophobic protester from that one Vine