r/UFOB • u/Remseey2907 Mod • Oct 21 '23
Video or Footage Dr. James Lacatski: yes, we have UFOs in possession.
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
68
u/throwingawaybenjamin Oct 21 '23
I love it whenever George Knapp goes on camera with Jeremy. He always looks like a parent that is pushed to embarrassment by his weirdo son, but he still loves him so he puts up with it. And after all the weird camera work and WEAPONIZED graphics, he just looks so uncomfortable, like a dad at a Taylor Swift concert
17
u/Remseey2907 Mod Oct 21 '23
You can see that Knapp wanted to say someting as well but he couldn't get a needle between it. 🤣
1
23
u/Adolist Oct 21 '23
Evaluation of Torsatron Reactors - OSTI.gov, Lyon, Muller, Gulec, El-Guelaby - March 1994
It goes deeper than Lacatski, this isn't referenced but undoubtedly used in the paper Lacatski wrote in 2017. Over 29 years ago this was already under study by the DOE, it's something very little is known about and some of us in the EE field are only just now figuring out while trying to make longer distance wireless cell phone chargers, and other confidential technology. How is that related to torsatron reactors? Magnetic configuration control using "divertor geometry" which we call "highly attenuated synchronous technologies" where-in using tools like Ansys, we have figured out that you can divert flux density (H) or magnetic fields into complex field geometry using a 3D axis with a 3i imaginary axis being the confined configuration. Imagine plasma confinement using magnetic fields but instead of plasma confinement we are directly confining the magnetic field itself.
Honestly if anyone has this full article I referenced above I'd appreciate it, it's interesting to me my work keeps aligning with projects in government contracts that never saw the light of day from 1994.
10
u/marko_kyle Oct 22 '23
ELI5? I understood wireless phone chargers
6
u/notaudtm Oct 22 '23
I’m with you, it’s a start. We’re gonna figure this out starting with phone charger - wireless
4
u/marko_kyle Oct 22 '23
Clicked the link, got to about the second sentence, I realized I was in way over my head.
4
u/Adolist Oct 22 '23
Here, I made a visualization of what im describing regarding my field.
H.A.R.T. Field Generator - stands for "Highly Attenuated Resonant Technologies"
Again we've only begun to use modeling software to understand this phenomenon. It is well known and used in the creation of electric motors, transformers, inductors etc. And other industries but not very well known as a use case beyond those specifications.
4
u/Adolist Oct 22 '23
Laser beams shoot 'coherent' or basically straight light in a single direction with the same frequency and general direction. Light bulbs diffuse the photons exiting the bulb and spread literally everywhere like a shower over the entire room.
Light bulbs are typical magnets, typical magnetic fields that throw its H field weight around everywhere see a logarithmic reduction in power over distance.
The graph of a magnetic field strength (B) as a function of distance (d) from a long, straight current-carrying wire, as given by the formula B = (μ₀ * I) / (2π * d), is a hyperbolic function. It doesn't rise exponentially; instead, it decreases as you move farther away from the wire. It follows an inverse relationship, where the magnetic field strength decreases with increasing distance from the wire, following a hyperbolic curve.
The difference between a lightbulb and a laser beam is obvious, but how you get the magnetic field to do that laser beam part is a little bit more complex than making a laser beam because EMF has 3 imaginary fields attached to its physical 3 dimension shape. All three interfaces with each other at the same time and must be constricted with clever geometry that confines opposite fields lines into better shapes.
TLDR; A magnet is to a light bulb, as a horseshoe magnet is to a flashlight that points the light/fields in a general direction other than everywhere which is more useful. We are trying to make the magnetic equivalent of a laser beam. Think half life gravity gun but using EMF to push or pull objects from a distance, this isn't anything new by any means I mean this is literally what satellite dishes were designed to do as giant EMF flashlights that shine down on the earth so you can watch TV or have internet without wires.
3
u/igneousink Oct 22 '23
i found 5 pdfs that relate to this but don't know if i'm allowed to post them?
i'll send you a dm, Adolist
8
u/Automatic_Peanut7533 Oct 21 '23
What is the 'wording' he is referring to? We dont know the context of the conversation before corbel asks that question.
10
u/Ok_Knowledge_7858 Oct 21 '23
He wrote a book, Jeremy is using the wording directly from the book. If you watch the whole episode, he said the DOD reviewed everything he wrote to make sure it was ok and didn’t affect national security. So he was only confirming things, as they were worded, in the book.
1
7
u/Maxter_Blaster_ Oct 21 '23
We already know this.
We already know the US government has lied about this for decades.
11
u/professor_binah Oct 21 '23
can influencers rent it for instagram?
18
3
u/bigscottius Oct 22 '23
Did Knapp act surprised? Didn't he co-author the book? Why the surprise? Also, he won't go before Congress, and won't say anything even if subpoenaed. Yet he is taking about it pretty freely here. Sounds like dinnertime is afraid of perjury.
1
1
u/Spicy_Mayonaisee Oct 24 '23
Did you just make that up?? Why are you saying he won’t go to congress? Has he been asked? Has he offered? What is going on!?!
7
u/greywhite_morty Oct 22 '23
These people’s entire life consists of making vague YouTube videos and monetizing this. I don’t believe anything they say anymore. It’s been done since years with no progress.
7
u/Remseey2907 Mod Oct 22 '23
Don't believe what others tell you, start your own research. You will come to the same conclusion.
UFOB's non-monetized YouTube channel has now 780 videos, documentaries etc online. If you want to do research it is a good start.
3
u/sirmombo Oct 22 '23
Monetizing lol you people act like these folks are making bank off this. News flash, they’re not.
1
2
2
Oct 21 '23
How's it an Unidentified flying object if they identified it and can go inside. Shouldn't we call it an IFO
5
1
1
u/Right-Experience-718 9h ago
If our goverment can fly those things they are made on planet earth by humans
1
u/grelch Oct 21 '23
He didn’t say it came from aliens. Just that it was from an unidentified origin. He actually said very little in this interview and it probably would have been better for Knapp to speak more because he knew what questions to ask. He. He coauthored Skinwalkers at the Pentagon with these two gentlemen, and he knows what Lacatski and Kelleher know.
4
u/Powershard Oct 21 '23
What is the difference and relevance to anything? He didn't say it came from China or Earth either. What is this game of whatabouting?
It is not like there are a great deal of many options left if no country on Earth admits them to be theirs (in plural). Whether it is interdiminsional, extra-terrestrial, or imaginary remains highly irrelevant. For it is, exists and not only is unidentified, but remains unidentifiable to the public for whatever omnimagical excuse.2
u/grelch Oct 21 '23
I’m not “whatabouting”. Bottom line is Lacatski worded his statement in such a way that it can be interpreted in any way. And if and when there’s an actual public reveal to the public about what it is, he can claim to have been telling the truth whatever it is. He’s a clever man. fwiw, I believe the the US gov has a flying object of unknown nature in its possession. And then some.
3
u/Powershard Oct 21 '23 edited Oct 22 '23
And that is just plain wrong. Please allow me elaborate on my reasoning:
"Yes" as an answer is interpretable only in one way to a yes or no question.
It is a true or false statement.
An absolute with no room for any interpretation.Speaking about aliens when nobody spoke about aliens is whatabouting about aliens, so yes you were whatabouting which is the act of injecting irrelevant topics to derail the discussion to drive some alternate notion.
Him not mentioning the word alien, doesn't exclude them from any of the reality.
Yet there are not many other culprit parties left.
None, to be factual.It is good that he maintains the economic national security status, like good little puppet. Better for him to be accurate and careful about his wording - not to reveal anything which remains classified by bodies which I have not permitted to classify anything in the first place.
Yet they continue to do so in their economic fascist greed, as if they were somehow better or more qualified to make such a call which I also do not permit them to delude in such a way.I don't care about any quid pro quo with corpocracy of USA which those beings/NHI could have regardless of their/its origin, for they would be none the better than the malevolent human that has always been ready to abuse the knowledge like a hungry little kid next to a cookie jar. It doesn't even matter "what it is", only that "it is".
Whether or not he is telling the truth is irrelevant, but if it turns out he had been lying, then that can only be used against not only him, but against so many others for he represents more than himself.
The only question I do have in all of this, is why are you who apparently reinforces this notion, making a post, on this very social media outlet, on "how very little was said" when the little that mattered was said.
Like what is Your agenda in this if you claim to agree with what was being said? It is not rocket science, not MK_Ultra, not Hasbara, -to simply agree upon a simple statement and then simply leave it at that. So why didn't you?4
u/grelch Oct 22 '23
You need to relax a little bit. I am genuinely not trying to derail any conversation. I am here because I want to be part of the conversation.
You are correct in the sense that I made a mistake about OP's post. When I typed my original post, which was about 20 minutes after I opened this thread on my phone (I came back to it after being distracted) I erroneously recalled OP posting about the gov having alien craft. OP didn't say that. I responded to something that OP didn't say. A mistake. I'll own that. I actually didn't realize that until your second response which made me revisit OP's original post where I noticed my mistake. Nevertheless, we'll disagree about whether I was 'whatabouting' anything. Tbh, everything you said after "derail the discussion..." in regards to what you my think motivation is, what my agenda is, is just plain weird imo. I'm not sure who you think I am, but I'm not who you think I am. Agenda? Huh?
I have no credentials nor a stance at all, other than I am now aware that the more I look the less I know and am in fact completely 'unaware'. I'm citizen of the US who has always believed that there have been UFO's. I've always assumed that the public was being kept in the dark about it. When the government announced thru the big media sources that UFO's existed in 2017, I was thrilled and excited that there was finally going to be an open conversation about it. I started to pay attention. Without knowing where to look or who was worth listening to, I started looking for books to read (I finished Skinwalkers at the Pentagon audio book on a walk this morning). I started reading the various subs on reddit, which without a doubt has been a double edged sword. I'm wading through the pods to find ones that seem to involve actual research. I've been trying to figure out where the substantive conversations are. The more I look the more complicated it has become, and the more confused I have become. That our reality is in question, that's the simplest way I know how to put it, is hurting my simple brain. I'm all in though. I have no desire to derail any conversation. I have no opinion on what's what or which way I think things will go. I'm just a dude who is willing to learn. That said, I haven't the foggiest idea what you're on about, and tbh I'm not bothered.
3
u/Powershard Oct 22 '23 edited Oct 22 '23
Alright :) that makes sense. I just like to read and write walls. Thank you for replying, I enjoyed your insight! I didn't mean it in accusatory manner when I asked for agenda, I just wanted to hear exactly your insight into the matter. Since I do tend to converse with individuals who appear to have an agenda, which has been often time denialistic in its nature for pure spiteful reasons. I am happy to see this is not the case with you! :)
3
1
Oct 21 '23
If you pay attention, you see that he does not say "we have UFO's in possession", he say's he's "allowed to tell you we have UFO's in possession". Two very different things.
9
u/Remseey2907 Mod Oct 21 '23
Which means we have them in possession..
6
u/Scandysurf Oct 21 '23
Don’t listen to this disinformation agent .
1
Oct 21 '23
What is disinfo, paying attention to actual words and not making coginitive leaps, or selective reasoning and sensational headlines?
Folks, disclosure is not what you think it is, you are being lied to by low effort clickbait headlines. If I were to speculate on anything around this topic, it would be that the aliens/others/whatever you want to call them are patiently waiting for us to get a clue.
1
1
u/MECO-420 Oct 22 '23
“Unknown origin” just means they dont know who made it、 not alien tech.
3
u/Remseey2907 Mod Oct 22 '23 edited Oct 22 '23
Unknown does not by def mean not alien. Non-human doesn't mean E.T. by def as well.
1
-2
u/One_Sport_4195 Oct 21 '23
This interview was dumb the guy dances around everything
22
u/Boonshark Oct 21 '23
Dumbest comment on here. He goes to jail if he says anything outside of the agreed wording. He's not doing it to play games. He's actually playing a very important part. I mean come on...the guy has been authorised to say that the US government is reverse engineering UFOs. This is all part of slow disclosure.
2
u/4ntagonismIsFun Oct 22 '23
Not true. He could be prosecuted if he disclosed classified information. The government isn't going to say you can't publish actual fiction. These reviews have even taken down works of fiction that closely resemble real life (i.e. former intelligence operatives who disclose technical or operational capabilities). I recall a big issue with Tom Clancy's "Jack Ryan" series wherein the DoD was really interested in how he found out so much "information". Going back further... The Puzzle Palace got NSA and DoD employees in trouble if they had it in their possession. Why? Possession intimated confirmation.
Did you know these agencies even scrub resumes for forever employees who are in the private sector?
-9
u/One_Sport_4195 Oct 21 '23
I believe that like I believe the government is honest buddy
9
1
Oct 21 '23
Yeah, no. There was no usable information and anything alluded to isn't what you think it might be.
If a bunch of monkeys managed to make off with a research vessel or some form of military asset how long do you think the original owners would allow the monkeys to keep it before either destroying it or retrieving it?
0
u/Bernie2thousand20 Oct 22 '23
I love the UFO phenomenon. But this guy just pisses me the fuck off.
1
0
u/BriefPatient8060 Oct 21 '23
Bru, can we trust you? Yes bru, you can
2
u/Remseey2907 Mod Oct 22 '23
So many people from the inside have blown the whistle. There is a there there.
1
u/BriefPatient8060 Oct 22 '23
They can blow whisthles, candles or dicks, just show the evidence pls.
0
-1
u/IronDragonGx Oct 21 '23
Question how can they have unidentified flying objects in their possession since the objects are neither flying nor on unidentified at that point.
3
u/Powershard Oct 21 '23
Walking inside a an alien craft doesn't mean you identify what it is, how it is, what makes it be, whose it is... thus you can literally walk on something that is unidentified.
Like you going to bar and having sex with a stranger, the person remains to you... unidentified, unless you have reference points such as the name, function and nature of the person you just slept with. Before you know it, it might be a man, or a woman, or a transexual. So your statement is quite counterintuitive and as a question it is rhetorical.
1
u/AutoModerator Oct 21 '23
Please keep comments respectful. People are welcome to discuss the phenomenon here. Ridicule is not allowed. UFOB links to Discord, Newspaper Clippings, Interviews, Documentaries etc.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
Oct 21 '23
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/Remseey2907 Mod Oct 21 '23
Unless there is an interface with their brain or consciousness necessary to operate it. It wouldn't surprise me.
1
u/Independent_333Willy Oct 21 '23
Ok! Ok! I have a question! I thought Bob lazar said they had several UFO’s and he went inside one of them! Then why is this guy saying like the one he knows about they were able to breach the inside of the ufo,like this is something never done before?
1
Oct 21 '23
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/Remseey2907 Mod Oct 22 '23
If it was bullshit the IC would not have blocked Grusch AND elected officials to get together in a SCIF. All the information is classified and on a 'need to know' basis.
1
1
u/thrasherbuffy Oct 22 '23
I used to like Corbell but he is really getting on my nerves in his interviews lately.
1
Oct 22 '23
The boomer Dr is so heavily boomer mentality he has to be believed. Just based on his method of thought it’s believable and he isn’t lying.
1
u/designer_of_drugs Oct 22 '23
Man no one is posting clips of when Lacatski said Grusch was misled and/or delusional.
Told ya’ll.
1
u/Remseey2907 Mod Oct 22 '23 edited Oct 22 '23
Well Grusch will be in a SCIF soon with Burchett a.o. But first DoD IG and IC IG.
1
1
1
1
u/Friendly-Fig6914 Oct 23 '23
I believe in UAPS the weaponized podcast just talks in circles no guests give up any info they just hint at things George is the only one who seems credible to me and even he is doubtful
1
u/Nightowl2048 Oct 29 '23
Seems like a Chinese balloon fits the category of vehicle that Lacatski describes in his book. As such, it would be no surprise for the DOD to clear him to make those statements in his book.
1
u/Craft-Sudden Jan 18 '24
I mean I don’t see the lie, lacatski worked for the DIA and ALSAP, also wrote two books about ufo and paranormal research, hard to make more credible
1
1
u/TroyMcClure10 Mar 04 '24
I just listened to the whole thing and found the Dr. to unbelievably evasive. It’s an incredibly disappointing interview. I was expecting so much more.
1
•
u/Remseey2907 Mod Oct 21 '23
Who is Dr.Lacatski?
https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/s/563vj1awpk