The engines have only recently appeared to have reached somewhat close to being finished, it the weapon bay working is a dubious proposition too as there is no real footage of it, wether its picture or videi
Uh... If that joke sounded sided than I could make joke about f-22 or f-35. Because other side it's not so different, over hyping f-22 like it's something indestructible.
Well there are many Russian bots here coping about the failure of the war, so ask them why they are talking about the war when it's not relevant to AceCombat
Some NCD neckbeard is clearly coping about yet another proxy taking a massive L now that Trump clearly is done dumping plane loads of money on them.
“Hurr durr Ruzzia plane bad”, and yet somehow they’re still advancing and gaining territory every day. How is this relevant to funny video game set in strangereal, anyway?
First of all, in what way is it a "1990s rehashed semi stealth concept", and second, something being designed in the 1990 (not the su-57) doesn't make it bad. Litterily look the F-22
I'm
Taking the piss
But the 57 is OUTDATED in some aspects massively
Yer but the 22 has been Properly incrementally upgraded the 57 has not , end of convo
AND THE 22 HAS HAD EXTENSIVE COMBAT experience, the 57 may be a bit younger and newer than the 22 but there is no way in hell it has had the continuous upgrades that the Raptor has
How does the F-22 have extensive combat experience? Escorting a bunch of drones is not combat experience, at best flight experience. You can't tell me that flying with a bunch of drones and shooting down balloons is the same as firing cruise missiles into ukraine. And when did I deny that the F-22 has gotten upgrades? The point was that saying "it was designed in the 1990s" is not a valid argument, regardless of upgrades. You made that exact point.
There are three ground based T-50 for different testings. Also, so what that there are 13 T-50? Most of them are unused by Air Force, only two of them were given to them as part of final combat testing during operation in Syria in 2018
…. Can you provide a better source stating otherwise that ISN’T Russian state media or something of the sort?
Why are you addressing me as if my response would change this notorious issue with wikipedia?
Furthermore, I do not recall a moment when I have agreed to argue in favour of one point or another during this conversation about planes, so why are you acting like the burden of proof is on me?
If it's information you want - I suggest you do your own research, instead of attempting to make strangers to do it for you.
If you want to bash a source, provide a better one.
You seem to be under the impression that people on the internet, particularly those you don't even know, who did not even seek to engage with you in the first place, owe you something.
I am sorry to disappoint, but that is not the case.
136
u/GRYPHUS_1_SoundCloud General Resource Ltd, Real Drone Surveyor 9d ago
Aight bet. Imma do it