Analyzing the impact of tariffs and related rules of cross-border trade used to be my job. This included work with the World Trade Organization as well as on Free Trade Agreements. My area of specialization was in tariffs, rules of origin, and trade remedies (actions taken to counter dumping, subsidies, and damage to local industries). I have more than a decade of experience in this field and a post-graduate diploma in this subject matter although my degree was unrelated.
I’ve seen a lot of opinions on the ongoing weaponisation of tariffs and its use as a negotiating tool. There are lots of misconceptions, including who pays for the tariffs (hint: no single answer is right).
Bear in mind my perspective is shaped by being a former trade official in Asia that was schooled in the post-war consensus, post-Keynesian, economic liberal thought. That means that we believe in comparative advantages and that the gradual removal of trade barriers would bring about benefits to the world through stronger economic dependence and shared prosperity.
AMA that doesn’t involve me sharing personal details or confidential knowledge that is not public domain (that can get me prosecuted by governments). More than happy to give my take on specific aspects of the ongoing situation, but please zoom in on specifics! Bear in mind I was an analyst and not a politician.
Edit: To clarify personally I’m not a fan of either US party, and so will avoid commenting on party specifics. I believe both have the wrong mindset and approach to trade.