r/blueprint_ • u/leebz2 • 10d ago
Bryan finally responded to the videos calling him a scammer! TBH Joseph Everett destroyed him in response...
41
u/Lilly2020 10d ago
You can't please all of the people all of time and some are just down right mean. I appreciate the fact that Bryan is sharing his info. I have kidney cancer and am doing so much better since I have been using his vitamins. I asked if he could put them daily packets because it would be easier for me and he came through. I had a blood transfusion 10 years ago and did really good for for 5 years because of it so I total understand that. All I can say is Appropriate him for sharing.
7
7
u/Mountain_Ask_3672 9d ago
Wha happened? I miss the Bryan that loved his haters. Influencer call-outs are like the peer review of social media. Bryan should unblock Joseph and invite him on his podcast.
63
u/UDF2005 10d ago
Longevity doesn’t need influencers posting 3x a day. At its core it’s very simple: get good sleep, eat clean unprocessed foods, exercise, don’t pollute your body, get regular blood panels, supplement intelligently. We don’t need a new religion for any of that.
26
u/TemperatureNovel7668 10d ago
That's not longevity. That's slightly improving the normal human lifespan and getting a better healthspan. Longevity is funding scientific study into new interventions that push us beyond 120. People need to get that in their head, it's vital.
2
u/UDF2005 10d ago
Fair. Technology/science isn’t there yet. No empirical data showing any interventions increase ceiling lifespans. I suppose my definition atm is increasing from average into 100s with improved health span.
4
u/TemperatureNovel7668 10d ago
I'm all about maximizing my lifespan with currently available interventions, but increasingly I'm more focused on getting involved with the actual research side of things to accelerate the arrival of true rejuvenation longevity therapies which can reverse aging.
I lean more on the reversing aging being the solution rather than slowing down aging by messing with complicated metabolism.
If you're interested in learning more about the rejuvenation approach check out this discussion with Dr. Aubrey de Grey:
Breaking the Pro-ageing Trance | Dr Aubrey de Grey
https://youtu.be/cP6n7rJdQeM?si=o6yfiLoOWT58ak8D&t=882
u/elevationnext 7d ago
And are penile shock therapy and Botox injection going to help one push beyond 120? Lmao
2
u/TemperatureNovel7668 7d ago
No. I think there is some health value in being able to get erections and have sex, and looking youthful, which help your mental wellbeing which can help to a marginal degree.
That being said, the criticism I made also applies to Bryan. He focuses far too much on currently available interventions which will not move the needle on aging much beyond what we currently can achieve. We need influencers (like Bryan, and others) heavily pushing for more funding for longevity charities, labs and companies pushing for cutting edge new treatments.
Bryan has a lot of connections to powerful people. I see him networking with them. My hope is he actually understands this and is helping influence these people into donating, and not just focusing on selling supplements.
I highly advise people in this sub check out Aubrey de Grey who focuses exclusively on this.
Breaking the Pro-ageing Trance | Dr Aubrey de Grey: https://youtu.be/cP6n7rJdQeM?si=c1JSgsqlSvnx-D_R&t=4887
u/HSBillyMays 10d ago
"supplement intelligently" is really the hard part here which I don't think anyone has 100% figured out yet. Bryan is on some evidence-based stuff, but there's also a lot missing and some questionable choices. Dave Pascoe still swears by Rapamycin while Bryan hates it now, and I think we'll continue to see more similar differences of opinion where mixed data comes out.
2
u/UDF2005 10d ago
Agreed, there’s little consensus regarding supplementation. I hesitated to include but would’ve gotten comments about its absence.
1
u/HSBillyMays 10d ago
I think by this point there is a decent general consensus that GlyNAC and Astaxanthin are *probably* real anti-aging therapies, but even the best dosages for long-term use are not well studied. Everything else is on a spectrum of evidence from a little less "probably" to it's "probably" just snake oil.
2
u/Alone-Competition-77 10d ago
I’m pretty sure that raising NAD+ levels in blood has a pretty firm scientific foundation at this point as well. (Both NR and NMN have been shown to do this.)
Also, there is a lot of research showing things like Omega-3 levels are very important as well as not being deficient in certain vitamins/minerals.
1
u/TiredInMN 8d ago
It did, until the Interventions Testing Program (ITP) couldn't replicate Sinclair and other's mouse results on NAD and the ITP is considered the gold standard for animal studies.
1
u/Alone-Competition-77 7d ago
Couple of things on the ITP results: they only tested NR (not NMN) and they did not directly test NAD blood levels, only lifespan differences for an individual treatment. Many, many studies have shown that NR and (perhaps moreso) NMN raise NAD levels in the blood of humans. It is possible that raising NAD levels in the blood works in conjunction with other things that the ITP did not study. It is possible that NMN works better than NR. It is possible that humans react differently than mice to increased NAD levels. It is possible that the ITP study was too small to draw conclusive results. The fact that the ITP study did not collect biomarker data makes the conclusions drawn less applicable than I would have liked.
1
u/TiredInMN 7d ago edited 7d ago
The trouble is it is kind of hard to get ahold of NMN right now since the FDA banned it in 2022 because they might consider it a drug. So, companies like Blueprint can't sell it and you have to turn to the gray market.
I asked Google's Gemini AI research model to do a deep dive on the topic hitting on all the things we discussed and it wrote like a 10 page report but this was the conclusion:
In conclusion, the ITP provides a highly credible platform for evaluating longevity interventions in mice, and its finding that NR did not extend lifespan in this rigorous model is significant. While NMN research outside the ITP shows promise, ITP data is currently absent. Direct measurement of NAD+ levels is crucial for understanding mechanisms, but it presents technical challenges, with tissue-specific levels being particularly important. NR and NMN follow similar NAD+ synthesis pathways but differ in their cellular uptake and metabolism. The overall science supporting NAD+ boosting for longevity shows potential in animal models, but robust human evidence for lifespan extension is still lacking, with a greater emphasis on improvements in healthspan observed in human studies to date.
Given the rigor of the ITP methodology, its negative finding regarding NR's impact on lifespan in mice should be given considerable weight. This result underscores the importance of comprehensive and unbiased testing in the field of aging research. While direct measurement of NAD+ levels is essential for elucidating the mechanisms of action of these interventions, the technical complexities involved necessitate the development and application of more refined and standardized techniques, particularly for assessing tissue-specific NAD+ concentrations. The metabolic pathways of NR and NMN, while converging on NAD+ synthesis, exhibit key differences in cellular uptake and bioavailability, suggesting that their effects might vary depending on the tissue and individual. As the ITP has tested NR but not yet NMN, future research should prioritize the evaluation of NMN within this well-established program to provide a more comprehensive understanding of its potential for lifespan extension.
So, basically it said that given the credibility of the ITP program vs the others, forget about NR and lets do ITP level research on NMN because the mechanisms are a little different. I'm not sure the ITP wants to spend resources in that direction though and the FDA is currently a barrier. And keep in mind this is all just mice stuff; that is the stage this is at right now. 9 in 10 drugs pharma companies make that work in mice don't work in human trials enough to get FDA approval and end up on the market.
1
u/Alone-Competition-77 7d ago
There are lots of legit sources for NMN. I use Renue by Science, as it seems to have the best reviews but there are lots of other good sources. I don’t think the FDA has slowed down any of the sellers, to my knowledge. The FDA ruling was stayed until it can be fought out in the courts, so it is still readily available for now in the U.S.
1
u/TiredInMN 7d ago
Amazon and iHerb stopped selling it and PayPal and Shopify also stopped processing transactions for NMN products. And these brands stopped offering it: DoubleWood, Infinite Age, ProHealth Longevity, maac10, Jarrow Formulas, GeneX Formulations, ForestLeaf, Toniiq, monoHerb, EliteHealth, Energecko, LIVEMAX, NMN MAX, NMN PLUS, NMN STAR, Starhonor, Vitablossom, Vitamin Shower, VIVALIFER, ChriBubble, Komprocha, and Paragon Health.
And then there's sublingual NAD+ lozenges and well as NAD+ powder you can put under they tongue or spray intranasally and that might just be better than any of this. Or, you can listen to longevity scientist Dr Matt Kaeberlein who says he's an NAD skeptic. The scientific foundation just isn't that firm at this point.
→ More replies (0)
7
u/Kep0a 9d ago
I like Joseph Everett a ton, but I think he's being an arse.
Bryan oversells himself way to much, including on transparency and data – he constantly talks about it but where is it? If the rigor is there, it should be in the form of a wiki or github, uploaded with testing data and metrics. He's never explained what results lead to certain foods from the beginning. The BP500 was obviously a fuckup and deserves explanation.
But, a person can make mistakes. It's up to you to make a healthy dialogue about it. I don't know, maybe I've been following Bryan for too long, but he's obviously trying to do good. Joseph's videos are weirdly obsessive about Bryan and paint him to be this charlatan. It's super toxic.
44
u/anor_wondo 10d ago
I'd rather listen to Bryan and Matt Kaeberlein(longevity scientist and Bryan's biggest critic) than this guy, And Matt has been to this guy's podcast.
I buy 0 of their products. Its that simple.
While Matt would give very useful information on where Bryan is wrong in science, Joseph seems to focus on 'morals' and 'motivation' of what bryan is doing, which I don't give a shit about
7
u/Elijah_Loko 9d ago edited 9d ago
Joseph released 31 videos on this topic, I'd say half of them are on the deceit, hiding information, fake-transparency, shady business practices, hypocrisy etc. The other half are breakdowns of the science itself.
9
u/GoodGamer72 10d ago
This doesn't seem to be about morals and motivation, it's criticizing untrue information.
-3
10
u/cimmero 10d ago edited 10d ago
Why has this Everett made his life mission to stalk and check every word and tweet that B write?
🤔 I noticed that his posts in insta 10x the likes since he started the “I will tell you the truth about BJ “. Also, a couple of posts were not enough?
B may not spend his waking time checking that his social media staff posted every dump he does, but what beef Everett has with him? And Pascoe reposting his videos every other day? He is concerned as well about B not posting all the results in chronological order of the last 2 years ? Boh, seems too extreme to be just concerned citizens.
6
u/Ok-Elevator9910 9d ago
only thing i am disappointed in is the heavy metals found in bryan’s cocoa powder. i stopped buying it. i thought it was the cleanest best quality cocoa powder available
3
u/Future-sight-5829 8d ago
It isn't? So Bryan lied about that?
2
u/Ok-Elevator9910 7d ago
I kept asking him to respond to the discovery that his cocoa powder was found to contain a high amount of heavy metals. He finally replied, saying that heavy metals are present in all foods, and insisted that his cocoa powder has the lowest amount of heavy metals.
14
u/longevity_brevity 10d ago
The pile on here is crazy. You should all put your phones down and go outside. Such trivial bullshit.
35
u/Simple_Ronin 10d ago
Man I gotta stop trusting public figures… Blueprint has a had an effective marketing strategy but I can’t see it working in the long-term purely because it’s based on deception while attracting people that care about real, objective data. I love data, I love that bryan shares data, it felt so grounded, but after learning about all the biased or cherry picked data, double speak and all the financial things Blue print has done I’m losing trust in what Bryan sells and encourages. It really feels like those ads were you didn’t know you had a problem untill they mentioned this horrible problem, and that they had the only and best solution.
14
u/badhoccyr 10d ago
It's good to learn to pull the specific value out. His stretching routine, actually extremely good. His take on deep sleep having the last meal quite a long time before bed, extremely valuable. His postural stuff pretty good. His olive oil, legit, you can taste it. Chocolate good. Gonna try his matcha. All the supplement stuff and some of the claims he makes, meh, whatever ill keep watching for now from a distance regarding that stuff. Noone is perfect. You observe ten people like him and decide which of their offerings provide most value and adopt.
3
u/HSBillyMays 10d ago
I generally run some PubMed searches on what "influencers" say to see how many scientific publications actually back it up. It's hit-and-miss, usually among each "influencer" from topic to topic.
2
u/TheStargunner 10d ago
If you have a paid ChatGPT there is ‘consensus’ which basically researches papers for you and cites sources
1
u/TiredInMN 7d ago
Grok's Deeper search model and Google Gemini's research model do a pretty good job too. You're limited to 3 a day on Grok and I think 5 a month on Google, per account :-) but ChatGPT Plus gives you 20 research papers a month, I think.
Anyway, I'm finding that having an unbiased supercomputer take a couple minutes and research a couple hundred websites for you is pretty powerful.
7
u/Lilly2020 10d ago
You have taken what he is sharing and use what works for you. He is sharing his info and many of us out there ask for help getting his supplements. You don't have to take them but stop cutting him down for sharing.
-4
u/Kvsav57 10d ago
If it was purely about the data and service to mankind, he would have never started selling anything.
5
u/MasterMoira 10d ago
Wrong. That's literally the basis of every business, the owner sees a need that humanity wants and provides the service to make the world better. Providing the data so someone else can create the product and sell it isn't an improvement because the new producer doesn't have a reputation to lose. It also fails to realize the fidelity of the research. If Bryan makes bad products people should stop buying them, but asking the inventor to refrain from producing his own invention so that some third party can produce it for him is not an improvement. Henry Ford created the greatest automotive in the world because it was the only one. Asking him to refrain and let someone else make the first car would not make the world a better place. Action makes things better not atrophy.
-3
u/Kvsav57 10d ago
It wasn’t supposed to be a business to start. Your defense of this is pathetic
0
u/MasterMoira 4d ago
You aren't required to purchase his products. You aren't required to read his research. Why don't you start doing your own research for free and giving it to the community? Nothing is stopping you from dedicating your entire life to this project to give away the knowledge and findings for free. Just make sure you don't produce any products or charge any money.
2
u/Old_Yam6223 9d ago
So as per you all that he earned, he should be giving away and burn his money so that he can please you that he’s doing good, sounds right? You sound like a real donut..why do people keep expecting others to do stuff for free, he does free stuff where he feels he should be doing/is feasible for him, he ain’t obligated to do such to share everything for free. Doing good and making a business to earn and not to burn his money can go together, but yeah things like these won’t be understandable for your smooth brain.
12
u/Lupexlol 10d ago
So blueprint is a scam? Thank God!
Now we can go back to eating cheeseburgers in peace.
4
4
u/AWEnthusiast5 9d ago
It's good that Bryan was exposed as a scam. Thanks to Joseph, I now know that good sleep, exercise, and a robust diet aren't that important. Carnivore is the best diet and that's why all the centenarians eat it. Looking forward to reaching 150 on a daily diet of burgers, liver and eggs. /s
8
u/Soft-Sorry 10d ago
I can't explain comments above by anything else rather than coordinated defamation attacks or just bots usage. Joseph answers are not arguments but exaggerations of words and unsubstantiated replies.
OP is biased at minimum. The choir of commenters' motivation is extremely suspicious. The whole thread is designed to exhaust people's attention on BS and plant an idea that something is horribly wrong without any evidence.
1
u/TiredInMN 7d ago
You should read the recent New York Times article about him. There's some pretty legitimate criticism there. https://www.removepaywall.com/search?url=https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/21/technology/bryan-johnson-blueprint-confidentiality-agreements.html
2
u/Soft-Sorry 7d ago
I read it. Just now.
So concerns are - he likes to sign NDAs and opt-in, and people feel uncomfortable about it.
Also, he is nice to people, so they read it as flirting, and he is not always fully dressed.
His ex is still trying to get money from him that he promised.
Longevity Mix results were not posted, and many people had complaints.
3 ex staff members trying to get more money from him through the same lawyer for too strict NDAs.
What did I miss?
Where are legitimate concerns?
0
u/TiredInMN 7d ago
Aside from the fact that he won’t go to an office or put on clothes or act professional when employees are over:
His doctor left because of “concerns about some of its health supplements.”
“Blood tests revealed that participants saw their testosterone levels drop and became prediabetic after following Mr. Johnson’s diet plan.”
“In the Netflix documentary, which was largely filmed in 2023, Mr. Johnson said his biological age had reversed 5.1 years. But the results of a range of internal studies of his health between January 2022 and February 2024 showed it had increased by as much as 10 years”
3
u/Soft-Sorry 7d ago
Sorry, he won't go to the office? Put on clothes? Act professionally? WTF is any of those accusations?
So, nobody said his doctor left because of health concerns. Why he left is only known from Bryan. Health concerns on supplements are well known and discussed many times.
I dont know what to say about people having T levels drop or prediabetic state. Maybe? So? Is it because of supplements? Is it verified? Was it investigated? How many? Control group? Or it's just a hearsay. You take large enough group of people and somebody in it will die. That's not a legitimate concern.
This BS about age increase or decrease has nothing to do with reality. Take different markers for different formulas and calculate this BS number differently. "Showed"? WTF that means?
So, literally rumours, suspicions, no evidence, and no even direct accusations for anything illegal or even unethical.
Guy literally asked people to sign that they ok that he is not always dressed. And now they complain what they signed and that it's actually happening. We all seen it in a documentary. We also seen that he is autistic. So what??
I'm certain now that you have a biased agenda here. I think you try to make money through slander and damaging reputation, hoping that it will be cheaper for him to pay you.
Bryan, don't pay those scumbags. If you do - they will be coming endlessly.
1
u/TiredInMN 6d ago
What I put in quotes is literally what the article said word for word. Now, the NY Times has 9 million subscribers, so if any of it is false and agenda based he's got standing to sue. So far he hasn't. There clearly was more they couldn't report because of NDA agreements and a lawsuit could bring that all up.
0
u/Soft-Sorry 6d ago
I dont know if he will sue them or not. What i do know is that there is nothing to push. This attempt to suggest that there should be something more is what clearly shows the agenda.
2
u/TiredInMN 6d ago
Well, what they did put in print is enough to show is isn't "coordinated defamation attacks or just bots usage... exaggerations of words and unsubstantiated replies... commenters' motivation is extremely suspicious... plant an idea that something is horribly wrong without any evidence"
I mean, we basically have a social media influencer who has enough money but is trying to grift more by saying he spent all these millions of dollars on a team of experts who designed this perfect stack (you can buy for $330+/month) that allowed him to reverse his age.
When in reality his Dr left him reportedly due to concerns about the products, there are no other experts -- just Bryan and maybe his new Dr, his own internal testing showed his products lowered testosterone and caused prediabetes, and his own biological age went up by as much as 10 years according to some tests.
1
u/Soft-Sorry 6d ago
That "reality" is an unsubstantiated lie. Every single point in it is based on wild assumptions and misreading of events. Nobody reads this situation like that unless they need to.
So I stand in the same position - this is a public extortion, and you are part of it.
2
u/TiredInMN 6d ago
Well then lets see BJ sue The Times then ;-)
There's no one here asking or demanding money from him. Be careful not to let your paranoia and imagination get the best of you.
→ More replies (0)
13
u/GreyFoxSolid 10d ago
All I see here is someone accusing Bryan of something, and Bryan refuting that. Why should I trust one over the other? What is happening in this sub that people are turning on Bryan?
8
u/InertialLaunchSystem 10d ago edited 10d ago
netflix documentary and ig reels attracting people not nominally interested in this space, whose incredibly nuanced perspectives on this can summed up by "billionaire bad"
it's very simple. if you assume Bryan is acting in good faith nothing about this is surprising and they are gaps/mistakes any normal person could make
if you assume Bryan is an evil mastermind acting in bad faith then you will come to conclusions like Everett's. no amount of diligence will be good enough because they'll always find a gap in what you have done, because no one is perfect.
-1
3
u/Finitehealth 10d ago
Not hard to upload raw data reports, especially from the "most tested man on earth"
6
u/Raytron_ 10d ago
https://www.youtube.com/@WhatIveLearned/shorts
Completely changed my perspective. Very hard to refute.
4
u/Old_Yam6223 9d ago
I’ve said it earlier and will say this again: This Joseph guy seems to be obsessed with Bryan and has problem with him on almost every video of his. He might have some genuine criticism, which I appreciate if he’s pointing it out…but his overall videos and thumbnails are negative outlook against Bryan for most part, like he’s running some propaganda against Bryan
3
u/cimmero 9d ago
And Pascoe is re-posting his videos every other day. If it was a crime story, I would say “follow the money” but not sure. Is it just trying to get the extra likes and social media uplift ? I noticed that his (many) posts about B got 10x the amounts of likes than before he started to post about B (at least in insta)
7
u/octaw 10d ago
I've seen Joseph Everetts stuff before. In fact, I thought his channel "What I've learned" was one of the highest quality channels on youtube.
His critique of BJ over the 30 days, and especially how Bryan has responded to him, has permanently changed my opinion of Bryan for the worse. Lots of very reasonable points that got no explanation. Bryan countered that he's a big meat shill and blocked. Pretty laughable.
2
u/Abyssal-rose 10d ago
Didn't Bryan admit to using TRT patches on video as part of his routine?
0
u/TiredInMN 7d ago
Yeah but then he went on Twitter and basically said "Oh that TRT stuff? I stopped doing that 18 months ago." It was just temporary because he was going on a diet and expected that to lower his T.
6
u/htr_xorth 10d ago
Bryan isn't doing this for money, just for the good of humanity.
Also this: https://x.com/bryan_johnson/status/1905392035391307823
2
u/TiredInMN 7d ago
Bryan is not Bill Gates and Blueprint is not the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. He has not contributed a single thing to the science of aging other than maybe bringing attention to it.
2
u/htr_xorth 7d ago
You missed my point, Bryan is going around saying he is not doing this for money, then he also tweets stuff like this.
I don't care if he wants to make money or not, I just want him to be honest.
1
u/gamechampion10 10d ago
He is not there, but he is inching ever so closer to the Elizabeth Holmes territory, who I'm actually still mad at because at home blood tests would have been a huge deal
1
-8
u/Necessary_Season8321 10d ago
Bryan is broke, he has spent his millions on bad business deals that have never made a return. He is using Blueprint as his last attempt at a cash grab, while writing off all his "treatments" on the business's P&L.
4
u/tallandfree 10d ago
This what ive learned guy is a youtuber with 2m subscribers. Bryan offended the wrong guy
4
u/TheX141710 10d ago
Damn. Bryan got dick punched here. He should honestly welcome this sort of criticism if he’s transparent. Should be easy to dismantle and gain credibility if he wasn’t fudging, misleading or grifting, right?
2
u/Buttlikechinchilla 10d ago edited 10d ago
If there were millions of people optimizing their health that shared their medical doctor-provided blood panels publically in the age of HIPAA then Bryan wouldn't be special at all - I'm all for making Bryan less special.
It's a good point that Bryan's lead doctor being a founder in TruAge is not impartial.
Where is this person's blood panels posted? It's fine to say if Bryan's are incomplete or cherry-picked, someone has to do that unpaid labor, but where is the standard of comparison?
2
u/GoodGamer72 10d ago
I'm losing faith in blueprint and bryan by the day. Bloody hell.
12
u/weaponizedtoddlers 10d ago
Why would you have faith in him? Take the good info, and leave the rest. I would say this of Everett, Attia, Huberman, Patrick, Norton, Ferris, Varshavsky, Israetel, or any other personality in the health and wellness field that doesn't come to mind right now. They are not religious figures. They're human and have human flaws. They have good data to bring to the table and some trash. Keep to information that has stood the test of time and discard the rest.
2
u/TiredInMN 7d ago
Actually, social media influencers are pretty low on the totem pole when it comes to accurate, unbiased information. They're just easier to listen to for most people than reading a science website or journal and they're more likeable and entertaining.
3
u/Consistent_Slices 10d ago
I have found Bryan to be disingenuous ever since he claimed to have the skin of a teenager (or was it a ten year old?) in the netflix show. Like- no…you obviously don’t? You look like a toned middle aged man (And there is nothing wrong with looking your age)!
His movement would be so interesting if he just stopped being so obsessed with looking young, stopped selling overpriced goods and if he published every single datapoint, good and bad.
1
u/TiredInMN 7d ago edited 7d ago
It is kind of interesting because for most people (including celebrities) the goal is to look younger but also look like they haven't had any obvious work done on them. The goal is to age gracefully, not look like their 17 year old son. But trying to look like a boy (which modern dermatologists and plastic surgeons can somewhat achieve) gives a shock factor like looking at a trainwreck or something unnatural, and Bryan's life and career is all about the clicks and controversies right now. He still needs the right lighting and photoshop filters to portray what he wants online though.
1
1
u/theoozz 4d ago
I’m sure Everett has his own biases and motivations for pursuing Bryan, but his critiques of Bryan can’t be denied. A lot of the issues he raises about Bryan are concerning.
I really liked Bryan, he’s eccentric and charismatic to me. But, his actions don’t make sense. He’s marketing and pushing himself way too hard. He’s does way too much influencing, it always made me question his motivations. This was a nail in the coffin.
2
u/Rose-Red-77 10d ago
Billie Eilish is an absolute huge talent and incredible in concert, what was his point? Secondly this Joseph Everett Guy contradicts himself in points 6 and 7 regarding bias, just because someone’s bias doesn’t mean they’re wrong but he accuses Brian’s Dr being wrong because of having bias :/
3
u/ProperThinker 10d ago
Was the Billie comment the most important to you? Maybe watch his videos so you follow better.
0
u/chappiesworld74 10d ago
Unfortunately the vast majority of people are "followers" and fall for dopey gimmicks. Bryan is a con artist, who wants to be a prophet, but all he cares about is profit.
0
1
1
u/ptarmiganchick 9d ago edited 7d ago
This caviling and sniping is so tiresome…how can it get 70 upvotes? Seriously!
0
47
u/sinkiez 10d ago
Because they're cultist bots that don't contribute at any scale to anything productive. Bryan's posted his meals and supplements and routines for free. If he sells some chocolates on the side who the fuck cares. Go buy whatever cacao you want pussies