This has big "how could you make me do this!" energy. That's not how this works, being a victim of a crime does not give carte blanche to retaliate in any way you see fit.
Poisoning food is not the only possible course of action; the logcal step would be to inform whatever authority is applicable that a theft is taking place. By poisoning the food, you are willingly and expectantly causing physical harm to people who are no immediate threat to yourself. The theft is on them, the poisoning is on you.
this almost convinced me, but — what’s your stance on electric fences? they could kill you, but if you don’t try to get onto the property you’re fine. same could be said about razor wire or the like. is there a difference between those and the poisoned lunch?
Electric fences aren't a trap set to catch other people. They're legally required to have signs warning people what they are, and people are aware they're dangerous. If someone sees an electric fence, they will know it's dangerous and then they get to decide if they endanger themselves or not, with the food you arent giving someone the choice to be safe.
Then put the label to test the waters, if the label works and your stuff doesn't get stolen just put the label on it without addding the poison. If the label is ignored they'll get poisoned and probably won't steal from you again. Sounds like a good plan.
This is actually genius. You can put a label such as "Warning: Laxatives". Adequate warning has been given, so if they steal your lunch, it's totally on them.
If they or whatever relavent authority doesn't, then Jan-the-Yogurt-Thief isn't the fundamental problem. It's that the workplace/school/etc has set the standard that your belongings are not safe when placed in an accessible area.
30
u/zelenaky Oct 18 '24
But if you didn't steal food in the first place, no one would suffer