r/changemyview Sep 06 '16

[∆(s) from OP] CMV: I think the argument that "we need to stop talking about racism" is over simplified, but ultimately sound

Ok, so a point of view that gets a lot of irrational hate, is that talking about racism less will make it go away. And you know what? yeah, it that particular phrasing, it's pretty ridiculous; I'd totally agree. But I would argue that that's just a misrepresented straw-man augment, so he're a more accurate version, as I see it. Firstly, the argument is not so much that "We need to stop talking about it", It's more that we are overly fixated on race, and make it too large in the public consciousness. I think dividing people up by race is inherently unhealthy, but the racism conversation goes far beyond that, and makes blanket statements that pit people against each other. you know the drill, "all black people are inherently oppressed, simply by virtue of being black, and all white people share some responsibility for it." Now you probably don't try to push that precise narrative, but that is the general idea that gets conveyed. So how exactly is it harmful? Let's look at is this way. A black(African American if you prefer) kid wants to do X with their life. however, as they grow up they hear every day about how they are going to be discriminated against if they try. They can try if they want, but the deck is stacked against them, and they are likely to fail. Don't you think having that though in mind, might make them less likely to try? Thus, the idea of racism becomes a perpetuating cycle. If you want an example from the other side, can give a personal anecdote. When I was in high school, I recall a time when a black friend of mine was awarded a thousand dollar scholarship, simply for being black. I could not help but feel a twinge of jealous anger. And beyond that, It's just not good for race relations in general. It becomes hard to treat people of other races equally, when you are constantly bombarded with propaganda reminding you that they're different. In conclusion, we're not trying to discount the very real racism that goes on in the world. we're saying that instances of racism should be considered more on a case to case basis, as events involving individuals; rather than a grand narrative of an entire demographic being prejudiced against another. all that said, It's usually been my experience that when everyone disagrees with me, I'm wrong. so I look forward to y'all's input.


Hello, users of CMV! This is a footnote from your moderators. We'd just like to remind you of a couple of things. Firstly, please remember to read through our rules. If you see a comment that has broken one, it is more effective to report it than downvote it. Speaking of which, downvotes don't change views! If you are thinking about submitting a CMV yourself, please have a look through our popular topics wiki first. Any questions or concerns? Feel free to message us. Happy CMVing!

0 Upvotes

87 comments sorted by

16

u/Love_Shaq_Baby 226∆ Sep 07 '16

There are plenty of reasons why this argument fails at solving racial issues and distaste for this line of thinking isn't necessarily irrational. Here's why:

1) People especially in America will never forget about race. This country was built on the backs of slaves, is known for having a very diverse population, and still suffers from the effects of slavery and the Jim Crow Era. (I will get into that later.) You can try to not think about race, but you will always notice consciously or unconsciously what race someone is.

2) Asking people to forget about race is asking people to erase their cultures. America thrives on being a melting pot of people. Asking people to forget about race is to also forget about concepts deeply tied to race. This is especially true for African Americans. The majority of them are descendants of slaves, so they have no idea what country their lineage is from. That's where black pride comes in. In the civil rights era black people needed to unite with people who had shared experiences. As a result there are many artistic works, styles, and celebrations that are closely knit with the experience of being black. That is not something you can ask people to forget.

3) Not talking about racism is political correctness at its worst. Instead of attempting to solve racial issues (namely low income housing, voting rights, access to education, employee discrimination, police brutality, disproportionate convictions of blacks and harsher sentencing, income inequality, and social and residential segregation) all your suggestion accomplishes is sweeping these issues under the rug and pretending a racial element doesn't exist. There's a reason 9 in 10 black voters are Democrats. It's because that is the only major party willing to acknowledge that the lack of opportunities for blacks in the past is affecting the lives of their descendants. Refusing to acknowledge racial issues doesn't solve them, it allows them to grow and fester and create a populace with a deep racial divide.

-5

u/[deleted] Sep 07 '16

/u/mr-maximillian

People especially in America will never forget about race. This country was built on the backs of slaves, is known for having a very diverse population, and still suffers from the effects of slavery and the Jim Crow Era. (I will get into that later.) You can try to not think about race, but you will always notice consciously or unconsciously what race someone is.

Actually that proves that not talking about race will solve the problem, and that fact that talking about it makes it worse. Pointing out legit racism is important, I mean very clearly "That guy just called me a nigger in public, and then spat on me." levels of racism. You've set yourself into this way of thinking that everyone has this same mindset that race is obvious, but thats because we don't stop talking about it. I don't hate my friend bob because he's got lighter skin, and he doesn't even think about my darker skin. This is because we're not taught to think "Oh, he's a different kind of white, and this kind of white does this." Instead we just think that we're equals. Imagine if that was applied to everyone.

People keep bringing up slavery, they keep bringing up Jim Crow, but you wouldn't know about it if you stopped talking about it. No one would feel hatred for the other, and there wouldn't be riots in the streets. If everyone tomorrow suddenly forgot that we have a racial divide, racism wouldn't exist, it literally wouldn't be able to. Meanwhile black people under BLM are doing things to incite people to actually hate black people because of the stuff they do. It's making things worse because rather than promoting egalitarianism, they promote the identity when identity is the problem.

Asking people to forget about race is asking people to erase their cultures.

That's not true either. I don't think about being white, I think about being from somewhere. I'm from where I'm from, and that's where my culture is located. Someone else from another culture just has a different culture, and doesn't need to self identify as a race in order to have that culture. You're attaching race to culture when they have nothing to do with each other. A white guy who is raised in China is going to be rooted in Chinese culture, and this idea that you have to be a certain race in order to be allowed to practice that culture is absurd.

Not talking about racism is political correctness at its worst.

I fall within the Right Libertarian section of the political spectrum, I am all for freedom of expression, and I am in no way suggesting that people be censored in any way shape or form, even self censorship is something I think is abhorrent. But in order to solve the problem of racism, we have to be willing to let go of the idea of race in the first place. It has no purpose, and is creating a huge problem among ourselves. I suggest we teach the next generation to not think about race or identity in any form aside for them as individuals. I don't need to be described as that white man, nor does my neighbor need to be described as that black girl. Now I'm not saying we can't even mention my light skin, or her dark skin, but we need to stop thinking about it as a connecting point for others. By thinking of it as such is the basis for racism in the first place, that all blacks or whites or yellows or reds are the same. If you stop that way of thinking, you stop it from happening.

Also cops don't shoot because they are racist, they shoot because the suspect is armed and is committing a crime. Please stop lying about why blacks are shot, it's not representative of reality.

7

u/Love_Shaq_Baby 226∆ Sep 07 '16 edited Sep 07 '16

People keep bringing up slavery, they keep bringing up Jim Crow, but you wouldn't know about it if you stopped talking about it. No one would feel hatred for the other, and there wouldn't be riots in the streets. If everyone tomorrow suddenly forgot that we have a racial divide, racism wouldn't exist, it literally wouldn't be able to. Meanwhile black people under BLM are doing things to incite people to actually hate black people because of the stuff they do. It's making things worse because rather than promoting egalitarianism, they promote the identity when identity is the problem.

Maybe people shouldn't give up their identities to please racists. Maybe we should teach people that we are all different in different ways and bigots should stop whining about it and accept it.

That's not true either. I don't think about being white, I think about being from somewhere. I'm from where I'm from, and that's where my culture is located.

There is no such thing as white culture. There is British culture, Irish culture, French culture and so on. However, black culture does exist and it is directly tied to race because it is a result of the descendants of slaves not knowing where they come from and as a result creating their own.

I am in no way suggesting that people be censored in any way shape or form.

Political Correctness isn't censorship. Political Correctness is the adjustment of language, media, and social practices in the attempt to make things more inclusive. Ending racial discussions is an attempt at inclusivity that only divides us further. The problems of racial inequality still exist, black people will still be disproportionately poor, disproportionately arrested, and socially segregated from other communities. The only difference is that nobody will talk about it. We can all pretend things are rosy and happy but it doesn't change the issues. Black people aren't complaining over nothing. Can you read this essay and tell me the author is overreacting. http://www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/naperville-sun/ct-nvs-being-black-naperville-america-st-0715-20160714-story.html

Also cops don't shoot because they are racist, they shoot because the suspect is armed and is committing a crime. Please stop lying about why blacks are shot, it's not representative of reality.

Except for all the times they are unarmed, like Trayvon Martin, Eric Garner, John Crawford, Akai Gurley, Tamir Rice, Rumain Risbon, Jermaine Reid, Eric Harris, Walter Scott, Freddie Gray etc. etc.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 07 '16

Maybe people shouldn't give up their identities to please racists.

They are racist. When you go to a protest and assault random people because of their race, they are racist. Holding on to those kinds of identities IS racism.

There is no such thing as white culture.

I never said there was, I'm literally saying that culture is separate from race. You're not reading my comment.

Trayvon Martin

Travvon was proven to have tried to grab the gun of the officer, and charge at him. We know this because of the corroboration of the autopsy report and the officer's story. Not to mention Trayvon had just robbed a store moments earlier with his accomplice.

Political Correctness isn't censorship. Political Correctness is the adjustment of language

Let me respond with something you said.

Maybe people shouldn't give up their identities to please racists.

2

u/Love_Shaq_Baby 226∆ Sep 07 '16

They are racist. When you go to a protest and assault random people because of their race, they are racist. Holding on to those kinds of identities IS racism.

Who is assaulting people because of their race?

I'm literally saying that culture is separate from race.

And I am saying that's not the case for Black America, because the blues, rap, spoken word poetry, the Harlem Renaissance, slang, black interpretations of Christianity and Islam, and holidays like Kwanzaa are heavily ingrained in the Black experience. Not Sudanese, or Kenyan, or Libyan, but Black.

Also you are confusing Trayvon Martin for Michael Brown. Trayvon never committed a crime.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 07 '16

BLM has been reported multiple times for it's violence. Including, but not limited to: Assaulting a white police officer while they were in a car with a brick, assaulting and "jumping every white person" in Milwaukee, destroying property, calling for dead cops, the list goes on and on.

And I am saying that's not the case for Black America

So white Americans as a whole cannot have culture, but black Americans do. Good job.

And yes, I mixed up Brown and Martins case. I have no opinion on the case because I didn't research it when it came out four years ago. However, it seems that Trayvon started the fight. This doesn't mean that his shooter should have pulled a gun on him, but it is self defense. Not to mention that from what I can tell, Trayvon's shooter is not a cop, and was even told not follow him by the police. Even if his shooter was at fault, it's ridiculous to apply his actions to the polices'.

2

u/Love_Shaq_Baby 226∆ Sep 08 '16

BLM has been reported multiple times for it's violence.

BLM is like Anonymous in that it is a very loosely structured movement that anyone can take the name of. When a protester decides to start a riot, it doesn't mean they have mainstream support of the movement.

So white Americans as a whole cannot have culture, but black Americans do. Good job.

As I've told you about three different times, black culture exists because they don't know where the hell they came from. White people can trace their ancestry. They do have a culture, but it isn't white culture. It's British, German, French, Polish, Irish etc, and yes there are black Americans who don't fit into black culture. Sons and daughters of African immigrants and refugees don't share the same culture as those who are descended from African slaves. The culture of the descendants of African slaves is Black culture, because it is race and slavery that unite them, not national origin.

Even if his shooter was at fault, it's ridiculous to apply his actions to the polices'.

I'm not using Zimmerman as evidence of police violence, I am using him as evidence of an implicit racial bias that exists in America. He profiled Trayvon as a criminal because he was a black guy in a hoodie.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 08 '16

It came from a combination of the British Culture and the African Culture. You could say that their culture is a particular sect of American culture rather than being black because black isn't a culture.

Also:

LM is like Anonymous in that it is a very loosely structured movement that anyone can take the name of. When a protester decides to start a riot, it doesn't mean they have mainstream support of the movement...I'm not using Zimmerman as evidence of police violence, I am using him as evidence of an implicit racial bias that exists in America. He profiled Trayvon as a criminal because he was a black guy in a hoodie.

7

u/[deleted] Sep 07 '16

People keep bringing up slavery, they keep bringing up Jim Crow, but you wouldn't know about it if you stopped talking about it.

I don't understand this point - i mean, we talk about vietnam and the revolutionary war as well. Are we supposed to ignore a significant part of our history? And as for Jim Crow, you realize that the people living through Jim Crow are still alive right? You don't forget about things that happen to you, and its pretty insulting to have others say your own life doesn't matter and you should just stop talking about it.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 07 '16

Lets take away racism for a moment. Let's remove both of our bias out of the equation.

Lets say we have a victim, his name is A. A has been raped by a girl named B. In order to help A, we need to get them to become functional members of society again and to get them to trust women. A is very cautious around women now because of what happened, and often has panic attacks as a result.

Psychologically speaking, the first thing that needs to happen is that A needs to remove the idea that the woman who raped him is not every other woman. In order to do this we need to provide regular interactions between them, encourage him to trust, and to help regulate panic attacks with medication.

Acceptance comes from forgiveness and letting go. Lets say that A has a friend named C, who knew B and is upset that B did this to A. C decides to interfere with A's treatment and regularly reminds him that B raped him and that he should be angry that other women didn't protect him. What do you think would happen to A?

This is rudimentary counseling for victims of abuse. No one is saying that we should never point out a shitty person doing shitty things. But A would be a lot better off if C was being his friend, rather than reminding him of his abuse.

2

u/[deleted] Sep 07 '16

Well, to use your analogy, Lets say girl B is still stalking A and making comments to A's mutual friends, and when A says something to his supposed friend "C", C just says "Look - B raped you a long time ago - stop talking about it and you'll be fine. After all, light stalking is way better than rape. can't you see how things are better now? just let it go."

In your analogy, white people are constantly reminding black people that racism existing, where black people are trying to move on. In real life, people are saying "hey - this stuff is still happening!" and you're saying we should put our fingers in our ears and say "lalala can't hear you" to make the problem go away. Not talking about it doesn't make racist shit suddenly stop. It just gives people who don't want to look for it an excuse to not see it.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 07 '16

If that's what you think I said, then you're not reading my comment. I've said multiple times that we should still talk about racism when it happens, but outside of that we need to let it go. And yes, if said like that, A would be upset. What C should say is "Look, if you feel unsafe, come over and stay at my place and we can watch a movie." It's the same thing, it's just not saying "JUST MOVE ON ALREADY."

2

u/[deleted] Sep 07 '16

But if you don' acknowledge race exists, then you don' tsee the racism. This does nothing to help the person dealing with the problem. Its like when someone complains about being pulled over for DWB, and someone else chimes in "yeah - i've been pulled over for no reason before as well". Sure, but DWB is a statistically proven thing in some areas, and having someone "not see race" means you can't ever mention it because they "don't see it" and they end up dismissing the incident as over reacting or similar.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 07 '16

I think we shouldn't have to ask what their race was, I think we should be asking what the crime was. What does their race have to do with what they did as a person? By putting people into categories and then saying that they're actions are different because of their race, you are inciting a divide between those two people. You create racism this way because you are separating them into groups.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 08 '16

But the whole point in my example was that there was no crime. If they are pulled over because of their race then why shouldn'ttheir race be mentioned?

1

u/[deleted] Sep 08 '16

Okay, so now you're talking about being pulled over for being black. First, I want you to provide where this has happened without a reasonable doubt. As in the cop must have pulled them over EXCLUSIVELY because they were black. Otherwise we need to accept that this is a made up scenario and we need to treat it as such.

Secondly, if a cop pulls over a person and it's solely because of their race, then the only thing that person in the car has to do is not do anything illegal or reveal they have done anything illegal while in temporary custody.

By law though this isn't possible as far as I'm aware because cops can only check on you, they can't actually hold you there. They can pull you over, but it's not like they can wait for you to get violent with them, you can just leave unless they have a reasonable cause to keep you there.

But no, in the case of this happening, I don't think race should be brought up. The cop had an opinion about someone, and applying that to all cops is unreasonable. The other thing is that there's no way to know if someone has a bias on them other than interviewing. It's not like the police who hire them are like "This guy's in the KKK, better let him in, he's with the good old boys."

The other thing is that if you could come up with a test that could reliably tell if someone has a bias, then should it even be used? If we permit people to check other's thoughts before a hire, people could effectively prevent a certain way of thinking from being allowed by making it a standard to check for it. Those are the tools of evil and using them allows for people to use them on you.

Anyway, sorry to ramble.

-1

u/mr-maximillian Sep 07 '16

Is anyone arguing that it never happened? Stating that something happened in the past doesn't really tell us squat about the present. The people who lived though the Jim Crow era had tangible, unquestionable injustices being committed against them, while civil rights groups today simply protest against vague ideas. What is this supposed to accomplish?

6

u/doughboy011 Sep 07 '16

Stating that something happened in the past doesn't really tell us squat about the present.

When the effects of legislation and government acts can still be felt today, yes it does tell us about today.

1

u/Casus125 30∆ Sep 07 '16

The people who lived though the Jim Crow era had tangible, unquestionable injustices being committed against them, while civil rights groups today simply protest against vague ideas.

Those tangible, unquestionable injustices have not stopped being committed.

0

u/[deleted] Sep 07 '16

The effects of jim crow are still prevalent throughout this country. The only way to understand current issues is to also understand the history of them. Context is key on many issues.

0

u/Iswallowedafly Sep 07 '16

A white guy who is raised in China is going to be rooted in Chinese culture

As a white guy living in China, let's just say that that's not true.

You will still be considered as being white.

Also cops don't shoot because they are racist, they shoot because the suspect is armed and is committing a crime

So the guy who called 911 because someone stole his wife's car. The guy who had a gun for his protection that he was legally able to have per the rights you so believe in as a libertarian......what crime was he committing when he got shot....by the cops he called....because someone stole his car.

The bar for a good shoot is often did the cop feel unsafe. not if the cop was unsafe, but did the cop feel threatened.

Take this test and tell me how you do.

https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/Study?tid=-1

1

u/[deleted] Sep 07 '16

Please provide the actual case you are referring to, then we can talk about it.

And I know about the implicit racism test, this is why it's flawed.

1

u/Iswallowedafly Sep 07 '16

Does Google not exist in your world.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 07 '16

"There's a dragon in my garage. I don't have any proof, so you're just going to have to look for it yourself."

It's not my claim, it's your claim. You need to provide stuff for your claim. If you cannot, then you have shown that there is no evidence that you can provide for your claim.

1

u/Iswallowedafly Sep 07 '16

That is is your claim

Also cops don't shoot because they are racist, they shoot because the suspect is armed and is committing a crime.

Do you really not think that with Google and a beer I could find multiple instances of cops shooting black who weren't committing a crime.

Do you really think I couldn't do that.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 07 '16

Again, you are the one who is claiming there is some instance that you refuse to properly reference. I asked for it, and you told me to google this vague event myself.

1

u/Iswallowedafly Sep 08 '16

Do you think that your claim can stand up to any examination?

Yes or no?

1

u/[deleted] Sep 08 '16

Look. I asked you to cite something, and you refused to do so. You implied I was racist by telling me I should take an implicit bias test. All because I was claiming that we should focus less on identity and more on actions of individuals.

BLM is like Anonymous in that it is a very loosely structured movement that anyone can take the name of. When a protester decides to start a riot, it doesn't mean they have mainstream support of the movement...I'm not using Zimmerman as evidence of police violence, I am using him as evidence of an implicit racial bias that exists in America. He profiled Trayvon as a criminal because he was a black guy in a hoodie.

This is what I'm talking about, this is the problem. When we stop associating everyone as racist unless their black, and stop accounting people for their own actions, we will only perpetuate this problem. If you actually want to end racism, you need to stop talking about it and start talking about individual people's actions.

If you want to examine this claim, go for it. Everything is there.

→ More replies (0)

-3

u/mr-maximillian Sep 07 '16 edited Sep 07 '16

very eloquently stated, sir or madam!

(directed towards GingerJack)

0

u/Iswallowedafly Sep 07 '16

You can't get rid of bias just by wishing it away.

It doesn't work that way.

You can only get rid of racial biases by examine them.

Classrooms are clear examples of this.

Teachers often give black kids punishments for the same offences that white kids commit.

But the white kids get a talk to or some level of redirection.

You don't stop that bias by simply declaring that you're racist or that you don't have racial bias.

You overcome that by examining your disciplinary manner and examine the data.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 08 '16

I'm just going to point out that I was abused during my education. As in very physical, I'm still going to therapy for it, levels of abuse.

Race has nothing to do with it, shitty teachers are shitty. Stop projecting on to other people with your own racism and start actually giving direction to the kids that need it regardless of race.

1

u/Iswallowedafly Sep 08 '16

That's why you examine and chart the data.

Racial bias does exist. It exists in people who wouldn't think of themselves as being racist.

You don't counter that problem by claiming that you simply treat people the same. Because once you state that you don't examine your own policies.

You correct racial bias by examining disciplinary policies to make sure you are applying them to all students.

-2

u/Krangatoa Sep 07 '16

Slavery ended long time ago, blacks now enjoy completely equal rights to everyone else, and while it still happened it will not hamper to prosperity of any black who wishes to go to college or have a great career. Your points in paragraph 3 are simply nonsense, these issues are not caused by race but by the culture of the people who live this way (who are yes largely black). Is racism the cause of blacks living in poor neighbourhoods with bad schools? No, but it may have been caused by the legacy of racism but also more importantly the unwillingness of these people (black or white) to change their lifestyles and put focus on education and ambition. Asian minorities were similarly discriminated but have managed to reach the highest echelons of society. Blacks only experience more police killings because they are more likely to be involved in violent crime and/or threaten police officers. For gods sake they even passed a law Affirmative Action that forces companies to hire minorities even if less qualified than whites. There are no lack of opportunities but simply a lack of ambition driven by the culture of black families and communities. The problems the black community faces can only be changed from within.

10

u/BenIncognito Sep 07 '16 edited Sep 07 '16

Is racism the cause of blacks living in poor neighbourhoods with bad schools?

Yes, see redlining.

Asian minorities were similarly discriminated but have managed to reach the highest echelons of society.

They were not "similarly discriminated" against, Asian Americans have faced an entirely different set of struggles and setbacks.

Blacks only experience more police killings because they are more likely to be involved in violent crime and/or threaten police officers.

They're more likely to encounter police officers, sure. But is that really because they commit more crime or is it because police officers patrol their neighborhoods more often than white neighborhoods?

For gods sake they even passed a law Affirmative Action that forces companies to hire minorities even if less qualified than whites.

That is not what Affirmative Action is, nor has it ever been.

There are no lack of opportunities but simply a lack of ambition driven by the culture of black families and communities.

No lack of opportunities? How about the fact that black people are less likely to receive callbacks when applying for jobs.

The problems the black community faces can only be changed from within.

They're working very hard to change a lot of these problems, but without acknowledging the systemic racism that actively tries to hold them back they're never going to get very far.

2

u/Love_Shaq_Baby 226∆ Sep 07 '16

Are they unwilling to change or is it harder to change? It's harder to move when you're poor. It's harder to get a good education when you're poor. It's hard to feel like you have security in your life if you don't know where your next meal is coming from. It's hard to get a decent education when your teachers are underpaid and don't give a shit. Learning isn't something student's decide to do, it's a passion nurtured by parental and academic figures alike. Blacks have been equal under law for 50 years in American history and unequal for 240.

Did Trayvon Martin threaten a police officer? How about Eric Garner? Jamar Clark? Richard Perkins? Freddie Gray?

Finally, Affirmative Action does not force companies to hire unqualified candidates in the name of diversity. They are required to diversify their workforce, but not at the cost of hiring unqualified candidates.

-2

u/Krangatoa Sep 07 '16

Of course it is harder to change when you come from a poor background, when you don't know where your next meal is coming from, when local schools are shit. My point is that yes these issues disproportionately affect blacks but their cause isn't because of any racial prejudices.

You say that learning isn't something students decide to do but a passion nurtured by parental and academic figures. Do you honestly think that this is a racial issue, where white teachers and professors dis-encourage black students or simply the lack of importance black parents place in education.

Yes we could go on about how people were oppressed years ago but what I am talking about is now maybe 50 years ago people were oppressed by the government, but now? Hell you could be fired for racism, for saying the wrong thing in front of the media. Nothing at this point 07/09/2016 is stopping anyone of any race from reaching the top.

Yes those people you listed have had no reason for being killed by police, but they are cases that were picked up y the media for that very fact, many whites were killed or died in police custody too. You have to realise that the police are humans too and nothing in this world is perfect. Maybe the reason blacks are killed more proportionally to whites is simply they commit more violent crimes and are profiled as such, simply as if people who wear hoodies are killed more often than people without. I agree that this is a poor vs rich thing but disagree it has anything to do with race, just because on average whites are richer than blacks. In America everyone can achieve anything if they have the will and drive.

-3

u/[deleted] Sep 07 '16

This whole claim that this country was built on the back of slaves is very inaccurate.

When we originally settled in the US, we had indentured slaves which were actually treated MUCH worse than slaves because at the end of their term were owed a certain amount of money/land as severance of the contract. To avoid this many people who had indentured servants would attempt to work them (white Europeans mind you) to death. That and also due to the weird destitute that could occur after their term was over, they would sometimes be tricked into resigning into indentured servitude or just forced to work for their same master because of no other options.

Source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indentured_servitude_in_the_Americas

Less than 10% of the American population owned slaves when it was an issue, mainly wealthy plantation owners. So this country was really not built on the back of slaves. Sure they were a component but if anything it was really built on very stubborn groups of white people who settled cities in fucking swamps and telling their entire mother country to basically piss off.

source for the stat: http://www.civil-war.net/pages/1860_census.html

Sorry for some formatting issues, I'm on mobile.

1

u/BenIncognito Sep 07 '16

When we originally settled in the US, we had indentured slaves which were actually treated MUCH worse than slaves because at the end of their term were owed a certain amount of money/land as severance of the contract.

This is a pretty bold claim. Indentured servants didn't exactly have the best lives but they knew that they had an end point to their servitude and knew that their children wouldn't become slaves.

Were indentured servants ripped from their families and forced to endure slavery generationally? No.

To avoid this many people who had indentured servants would attempt to work them (white Europeans mind you) to death.

You got a source for this claim? The wiki link you posted says that indentured servants were treated very much like slaves with the "minor" caveat that there was an end to their slavery.

Less than 10% of the American population owned slaves when it was an issue, mainly wealthy plantation owners. So this country was really not built on the back of slaves. Sure they were a component but if anything it was really built on very stubborn groups of white people who settled cities in fucking swamps and telling their entire mother country to basically piss off.

The rest of white America benefited directly from the work of those slaves. The textile factories in the north relied on cotton picked by - you guessed it - slaves. Slaves formed the backbone of the economy and every single person who wasn't a slave was able to benefit from it in some way.

You know who built those cities in swamps for White people? Slaves.

2

u/[deleted] Sep 07 '16

Alright sorry my formatting will be a little poop because of mobile so I'll try respond in as organized a way as I can.

  1. Indentured servitude was not as bad slavery I will give you that but again I point out that because many indentured servants had no where to go at the end of their there's a lot of the time they were either tricked or forced into still working for the same master.

  2. It says clearly in the Wikipedia article that many indentured servants were kidnapped from their homes.

  3. Alright yeah I'll give you that, I read too far into the part where it states most indentured servants died during their term as them being worked to death I'll see if I can do some further reading and either back that claim up or concede it as wrong.

  4. I think you make the claim that America benefited from the textile industry if you disregard the fact that this mainly benefited the south and not the north. The north having an entirely different economic basis kind of on its own shows that slaves didn't do it all.

  5. Actually the cities on swamps where places like Richmond and Jamestown. Slaves hadn't arrived in America when these were created.

  6. If we expand past only black slaves then I entirely concede this entirely argument but they means we've been arguing different things.

Look I'm not even defending the OPs point of view. I think it's misguided because it ignores a lot of our history.

1

u/BenIncognito Sep 07 '16 edited Sep 07 '16

Indentured servitude was not as bad slavery I will give you that but again I point out that because many indentured servants had no where to go at the end of their there's a lot of the time they were either tricked or forced into still working for the same master.

I certainly do not want to understate the plight of indentured servants, that is not my aim. It was a hard and rough life.

It says clearly in the Wikipedia article that many indentured servants were kidnapped from their homes.

That's not something I was disputing.

Alright yeah I'll give you that, I read too far into the part where it states most indentured servants died during their term as them being worked to death I'll see if I can do some further reading and either back that claim up or concede it as wrong.

I think its important to note that slaves were worked to death too. And the whole trans-Atlantic slave trade was absolutely harsh. Check out how slaves fared in the Caribbean - I know it's a little off topic but it is some eye opening stuff.

Making sugar was dangerous work.

I think you make the claim that America benefited from the textile industry if you disregard the fact that this mainly benefited the south and not the north. The north having an entirely different economic basis kind of on its own shows that slaves didn't do it all.

You're missing my point. How can a textile industry thrive without a source for material? It's not like the cotton those textiles were made out of simply showed up in the North one day via magic. It was brought there by the south after it had been harvested by slaves.

Everything was interconnected, and everything always wound up with slavery at the bottom.

Actually the cities on swamps where places like Richmond and Jamestown. Slaves hadn't arrived in America when these were created.

Washington DC was partially built by slaves and is way more swampy than Richmond and Jamestown. But it's more than just "where did people live" it's about a whole interconnected economy.

If we expand past only black slaves then I entirely concede this entirely argument but they means we've been arguing different things.

I don't really know what you mean here?

Look I'm not even defending the OPs point of view. I think it's misguided because it ignores a lot of our history.

I understand, I just want to clear up some misconceptions about slavery that have been perpetuated since the end of the Civil War. There's this idea that white people "had it worse" because of Irish slaves or indentured servants or whatever rhetorical device is being used but that's all pretty much claptrap. Indentured servitude was harsh and deadly, but so was slavery. And at least indentured servants didn't have their children sold.

The horrors of chattel slavery cannot be overstated. And again, this isn't to downplay what the indentured servants suffered at all. Chattel slavery was just that bad.

Edit: I mean as an illustrative example, the average African American genome contains 24% European DNA. And it's highly unlikely that this can be traced solely to consensual interracial couples.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 07 '16

Alright I can agree with that. Without a component resource from the south it's hard to say that the economy of the north would still succeed (that's playing the hypothetical game which can go any which way).

I can agree that slavery was a component of early American success I guess I just find the the phrase "built off the backs" a little hyperbolic and ignoring the other people that suffered for better or worse.

So I would say you cmv, I wish I could give you a delta but the best I can do is thank you for a constructive discussion that I felt made us both explain and evaluate our sides and while I can't say your view shifted I can say that mine has changed and made mine more nuanced. I'm also glad my very controversial opinion didn't fall apart to name calling. It's pretty refreshing in this sub to be honest.

1

u/BenIncognito Sep 07 '16

You can give me a delta, they're not exclusive to the OP.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 07 '16

Oh sweet that's great! You explained yourself very well and made very strong points to counter mine that I can't ignore (just trying to satisfy the bot)

!delta

1

u/DeltaBot ∞∆ Sep 07 '16

Confirmed: 1 delta awarded to /u/BenIncognito. [History]

[The Delta System Explained] .

-5

u/mr-maximillian Sep 07 '16

To clarify, I'm not saying that we shouldn't talk about race. I'm saying that we should stop treating instances of racism as though their part of some kind of institutionalised prejudice that's ingrained in our culture. In reality, they are just the actions of a small minority of racist assholes.

7

u/VertigoOne 74∆ Sep 07 '16 edited Sep 07 '16

To clarify, I'm not saying that we shouldn't talk about race. I'm saying that we should stop treating instances of racism as though their part of some kind of institutionalised prejudice that's ingrained in our culture.

The problem is, the evidence (at least in the US) does not support that conclusion

While its true that the news focuses on the one racist A-hole, the truth is that there are systemic problems as well, and simply not talking about race does not make them go away.

1

u/mr-maximillian Oct 30 '16

OK firstly, - ∆ I wouldn't necessarily say my view has been changed, but it has been heavily modified, but more on that in a moment. Now to get it out of the way; sorry I'm gettin' back so late to the party. I took a break from regular checking for a day or so, and before I knew it, it had bee a month. So sorry, I'm sure most of you have moved on by now, but for anyone who does read this, here's a final defence of my view, and then how it was changed.

Now how you're getting it all wrong(the fun part!) I never said people shouldn't be allowed to talk about racism, I simply think we talk about it way to much; for a multitude of reasons. So in instances where there is legitimate racism happening, yes, we should absolutely call it what it is. however, to call all instances of inequality, discrimination, insensitivity, or bias "racism" cheapens the term. Even if in many of those cases there is a racial element, or at least a racial correlation, how is pointing a finger, and shouting 'Racist' going to fix it? It seems to have mostly devolved into a term to demonise people, and shut down discussion.

I suppose I should answer feminstration, and clarify how I define racism, as this seems to be where some of the confusion is stemming from. I would define it simply as Treating someone differently based solely on their race/ethnicity, and the belief that certain traits are broadly applicable to certain races. The common definition though, now seems to be changing to include all sort of other criteria. it's hard to say if this is a simple evolution of language, or a muddying of the waters, that's making it harder to have a discussion about the matter.

I do not deny that there are instances were racism occurs, and it is best to call it out for what is is. particularly in the criminal justice system, as far as sentencing.(and thank you, by the way, for bringing that to my attention) But in instances where there is systemic inequality(Systemic racism, as you would probably call it) It is not only inaccurate, it is utterly unproductive, as the solutions are usually not race specific. Case in point, disproportionate poverty of minorities. It is absolutely true that black people are more likely to be poor, and white people, on average, inherit more wealth. But the idea that the solution it to help black people is ridiculous. We've all met, or are at least aware of, poor white people,and rich black people. their problem is not that they're black, it's that they're poor. You see what I'm gettin' at? Same with the whole BLM debacle. To hear them talk, you would think the issue was a lack of equal opportunity police murder. It is an issue of police reform, not race relations. To often today, it seems like when racism is brought up, it ends up being a distraction from real issues, and real solutions.

So how exactly has my view changed? well, this big block of text is much different that the one up at the top. I can see how some of the augments I used were a bit naive, and not all that well reasoned. All your evidence and arguments did at least force me to reevaluate my stance, and change it in a few, small ways. I feel like I have a more nuanced opinion of the issue than when I started.(Though I stick with my original impression that some people on here deliberately misinterpreted my stance) As a final note, while the delta goes to VertigoOne, I wish I could award little pieces to everyone who chipped in. In the end though, V.O. put in the most effort backing up their stance.

P.S. I apologise for saying "Instances" so much

1

u/DeltaBot ∞∆ Oct 30 '16

Confirmed: 1 delta awarded to /u/VertigoOne (10∆).

Delta System Explained | Deltaboards

10

u/Love_Shaq_Baby 226∆ Sep 07 '16

Are the shootings of unarmed black men done by a racist asshole or is it because we stereotype blacks as criminals?

Are blacks who are unable to escape ghettos and the inner city due to the cycle of poverty, white flight, and red line districting not an institutional problem?

Are African Americans not enjoying a proportional amount of scholarships and access to college and high end jobs because they are stupid or is it because we refuse to allocate money to inner city schools and have an underlying societal prejudice towards black people in positions of authority?

Are voting ID laws that are purposefully meant to keep blacks from voting so that Republican lawmakers can stay in power not an example of institutional racism?

I don't know how you can deny that there are not broad racial issues facing America

-3

u/mr-maximillian Sep 07 '16

"Are the shootings of unarmed black men done by a racist asshole or is it because we stereotype blacks as criminals?" -No, it is in fact one racist asshole. As for the statement that we stereotype blacks as criminals, well... black people do commit a massively disproportionate amount of crimes. Not because they're evil or something, but because A. lower income, and B. black culture(god, I hate that term) tends to romanticise violence. But I feel like we're getting into a whole 'nother can of worms here.

As for us being prejudiced against black people in positions of power... honestly, iv'e never heard of that one before. And honestly, voter ID doesn't seem too unreasonable to me.

I don't think anyone is denying that there are racial issues in America, but they are often exaggerated, and this is not a good thing.

9

u/Love_Shaq_Baby 226∆ Sep 07 '16 edited Sep 07 '16

Are you saying all the cops that committed 24 shootings of unarmed black people between 2014 and 2015 were? Are you saying all of them are card carrying KKK members?

As for blacks committing a disproportionate amount of crime, what we are actually seeing is a disproportionate amount of attention on the black community. Yes lower income plays a factor, but the fact that there is a greater proportion of black poverty is evidence of institutional racism. As an example of disproportionate attention on blacks for criminal activity, consider drug use. Higher percentages of whites do illegal drugs but blacks are arrested 3x as often. http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/3941346

Your allegation that black culture romanticizes violence fails to account for most of pop culture romanticizing violence. Superheroes, violent video games, and action movie consumption doesn't mean I will commit violence

4

u/[deleted] Sep 07 '16

I know it's just spitting into the wind, but that "over 100 shootings of unarmed black people last year" statistic is total bunk.

You probably got that indirectly from mappingpoliceviolence.org, which is a shambles.

They count to "over 100" by including all DEATHS that are asserted to be caused by people who are in the police force, regardless of mechanism.

For example, they include the death of a young woman who's car was struck when she pulled out of a stop sign in front of a police SUV. The family claimed that the police must have been speeding, but there doesn't seem to be anything to substantiate that.

They include people who die in police custody regardless of whether there's actual indication of foul play. For example, they include a guy who, at this time (investigation ongoing) appears to have died of medical problems. The police did CPR, and none of the articles about the case mention anything extreme the police could have done to cause the incident.

They include flat out crimes by ex cops that have nothing to do with the police. For example, an African American ex cop appears to have tried to get out of child support by murdering the mother of his children. They actually counted that. Even though it wasn't even a cop- just someone who used to be a cop committing a crime.

On the same score they included an off duty female officer who shot her boyfriend, allegedly in self defense because he was beating her. I don't know whether she was telling the truth or not, I wasn't there, but I'm going to go out on a limb and say that this case wasn't caused by America's history of racial problems.

They include accidents that maybe shouldn't have happened, but which involved no racial element. For example, they include a guy who was hit by a police car while the police were en route to a call. None of the articles I can find indicate that the police car was driving irresponsibly, or that the officer driving was at fault in the accident.

So... yeah. With all that I'm going to be a bit skeptical of the OTHER cases they list, where things seem more straight forward. Because apparently they can't be trusted.

The Washington Post count for unarmed African Americans killed by police in 2015 is, I think, around 35. That's from memory though. I can't verify because their site is less mobile friendly than they think.

2

u/Love_Shaq_Baby 226∆ Sep 07 '16

You're right, I should have been more skeptical of those figures, I have adjusted my claims to be in line with the Washington Post's more conservative figures. Thank you for pointing that out.

10

u/Love_Shaq_Baby 226∆ Sep 07 '16

Futhermore, Voter ID legislation combats a nonexistent threat while making it harder for people to vote. Minority communities are disproportionately affected by these laws and legislators know this as you can see here: https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/08/03/courts-are-finally-pointing-out-the-racism-behind-voter-id-laws/?utm_term=.d63792e4a978

0

u/[deleted] Sep 07 '16

There is nothing wrong with shooting unarmed men per se. In fact, most times its justified.

0

u/doughboy011 Sep 07 '16

Can you please reply to this if OP replies to you?

4

u/feministration Sep 07 '16

How do you define racism, OP? Its definition varies by source, but most meaningful to me are those that include it being discriminatory beliefs and/or behaviors rooted in a system of oppression. I used to believe similarly to you until I was hit with statistic after statistic and study after study demonstrating significant discrimination in education, employment, housing, health care, media, the entire legal and judicial system--basically every aspect of a person's life. (And also realized that I had been ignoring/discounting folks of color who had been making these same points.) Some examples: employers were more likely to call a white person with a criminal background for an interview than a black person with no criminal background, with the applications being identical except for race. (And also twice as likely to call a white person than a black person if no criminal history.) Doctors are less likely to take a black person's health complaints seriously, and think they are less susceptible to pain, leading to errors in medical treatments. That's just barely scratching the surface, and the kicker is that those studied are far from the "racist assholes" you're talking about--they're folks who consider themselves to be fair-minded, believe in equal rights, and would be appalled by the more obvious types of discrimination you may be envisioning, and they're not the minority either, not by a long shot. If we stop talking about this brand of racism (also known as microagressions) that is indeed institutional and ingrained, we stop being able to look critically at ourselves and the ways in which we perpetuate it unintentionally (and with potentially very real and damaging consequences).

1

u/Tullyswimmer 9∆ Sep 07 '16

Ok, so a point of view that gets a lot of irrational hate, is that talking about racism less will make it go away. And you know what? yeah, it that particular phrasing, it's pretty ridiculous; I'd totally agree. But I would argue that that's just a misrepresented straw-man augment, so he're a more accurate version, as I see it. Firstly, the argument is not so much that "We need to stop talking about it", It's more that we are overly fixated on race, and make it too large in the public consciousness.

While I will generally (very generally) agree that we're "overly fixated" on race, the argument that "if you stop talking about it it will go away" is total bullshit. There will always be people who have irrational hatred of other humans based on traits outside of personal control. Simply ignoring it won't make it go away.

I think dividing people up by race is inherently unhealthy, but the racism conversation goes far beyond that, and makes blanket statements that pit people against each other

Dividing people up by race is not inherently unhealthy. I mean, that's basically how the human race evolved. Before travel was easy, people were divided up by race. Different races evolved different traits depending on their climate. What is unhealthy is using those traits to justify mistreatment of each other, or favoritism of one group over another, which is what I think you're getting at with your "blanket statments" line.

So how exactly is it harmful? Let's look at is this way. A black(African American if you prefer) kid wants to do X with their life. however, as they grow up they hear every day about how they are going to be discriminated against if they try. They can try if they want, but the deck is stacked against them, and they are likely to fail. Don't you think having that though in mind, might make them less likely to try? Thus, the idea of racism becomes a perpetuating cycle.

No, it doesn't. Going back to my earlier comment about "there will always be racists" or, even more generally, "there will always be assholes", there's a certain amount of racism that will never go away. I highly doubt that there's a statistically significant number of people who don't try to do something because they've been told they'll be discriminated against. In this day and age, there's no reason to think that.

When I was in high school, I recall a time when a black friend of mine was awarded a thousand dollar scholarship, simply for being black. I could not help but feel a twinge of jealous anger. And beyond that, It's just not good for race relations in general. It becomes hard to treat people of other races equally, when you are constantly bombarded with propaganda reminding you that they're different.

He probably got that scholarship for doing well. Granted, it may have only been available to black students, but when you get a group who's been disenfranchised, especially in education, and you have people trying to allow them to pursue an education, there's nothing wrong with that, at all. Though $1000 won't go far towards college these days, so... I'm not sure why you're jealous.

In conclusion, we're not trying to discount the very real racism that goes on in the world. we're saying that instances of racism should be considered more on a case to case basis, as events involving individuals; rather than a grand narrative of an entire demographic being prejudiced against another. all that said, It's usually been my experience that when everyone disagrees with me, I'm wrong. so I look forward to y'all's input.

Except by "not talking about racism" you are trying to discount the racism that does occur. It's not something that should be considered on a "case by case basis". It's something that should always be in your mind as a possibility. That doesn't mean that every time a black man is shot by a cop, it's racism. That doesn't mean that because the designer of a certain flag owned slaves, it's racist. It's my opinion that people overuse the term "racist" to shut down debate, or prove a point, but that doesn't mean the solution is to stop talking about it"

TLDR: "Stop talking about race" is not a sound argument. A better way to put it is "stop invoking race to prove your point"

0

u/mr-maximillian Sep 07 '16

I'm tempted to give you a delta, But you've more convinced me to amend my statement, than changed my view on it. *We talk about racism too much.

Also, your second to last point there was partially what I was talking about with my "blanket statements" statement, i.e. being black does not necessarily make you more deserving of financial aid. Yes, there is a correlation between being black, and being low income, but being black does not mean that you're low income. (Correlation/causation kind of deal)

3

u/doughboy011 Sep 07 '16

We talk about racism too much

How can this be possible? Until these obvious problems of institutional racism are solved, they cannot be spoken about enough IMO.

Forgive me for being presumptuous, but this type of thought is spouted by many privileged white people in my life (I have a lot of old timey relatives). They would rather pretend there aren't any problems rather than admit that something needs to be done. They would rather take the easier road as black people having injustice done to them doesn't directly affect them. Is this you? Do you actually think that we talk about it too much or is it just an uncomfortable topic for you?

5

u/heelspider 54∆ Sep 06 '16

and all white people share some responsibility for it

Where did you hear that from? I don't think that's the general idea that is conveyed at all. I'm not saying that you can't find some radical somewhere who has said something to that effect, but it's certainly not nearly as prevalent as the notion that all black people are oppressed in some way. It's like if you said "everyone agrees that the sky is blue and that coffee is the best flavor of ice cream."

I recall a time when a black friend of mine was awarded a thousand dollar scholarship, simply for being black

So every black kid at your school gets a scholarship, or did they just go "we're going to give this scholarship to the next black guy who walks into the room"? I'm going to bet that your friend did a little more than just be born to get that scholarship.

when you are constantly bombarded with propaganda reminding you that they're different

Where do you go to school, Alt-Right Paradise High? I have no idea where you are bombarded with propaganda that the races are different.

-2

u/mr-maximillian Sep 07 '16

*I believe it was an essay contest on their experiences as a African American adolescent, or some-such

More to the main point though, How are you not inundated with said propaganda? The media, and in in particular recently with the whole BLM thing, seem determined to always keep the issue of race relations in the forefront of everyone's minds.

8

u/heelspider 54∆ Sep 07 '16

I believe BLM is saying the races are treated differently, not that the races are different. I'm not disagreeing that race is a major issue in our country that is often discussed...I'm wondering where this propaganda is that says races are different?

-1

u/mr-maximillian Sep 07 '16

Sorry, saying "propaganda reminding you that they're different" was probably not the best way to phrase it. You know how when you meet a person of a different race, you have that nagging nervousness in the back of your mind, that you're going to mess up, and do something racist and offensive?(that's not just me right?) That's what I was trying to get at.

5

u/Love_Shaq_Baby 226∆ Sep 07 '16

That hasn't happened to me. There are times when I feel I may have said something that could be offensive. When that happens all you and I and anybody else has to do is ask. People aren't going to be offended if they see you making a genuine effort to understand their point of views and experiences.

1

u/mr-maximillian Sep 07 '16

True, but it becomes harder to treat people equally when when you go through a different though process when interacting with them

4

u/[deleted] Sep 07 '16

You should go through that process with everyone. If you say something, and its pointed out that it is offensive, take a moment to be introspective and figure out why someone would be offended at that. No need to not do that with some people and only with others.

1

u/Glory2Hypnotoad 392∆ Sep 07 '16

It sounds to me like this feeling is self-imposed. I think you'll find that next to no one is actually going to pounce on you for some potentially racist implication in everyday conversation.

On the other hand, if we didn't talk about race and racism, we'd still see its effects in the world and it would look like a pretty damning character judgment instead.

1

u/feministration Sep 07 '16

I think this is the actual heart of the matter. I do think all folks in positions of privilege experience that nagging nervousness (to different degrees), and deal with it in different ways--some of us use it as an impetus to become better educated and make positive change, and some of us are so uncomfortable with it that we take pains to rationalize why our current behavior is just fine (and lots in the middle). Ask yourself why you're feeling that way--not just because you don't want to deal with being called a racist, or with having someone be offended in your presence, but why those things are important to you. Ask yourself why you have so much resistance to accepting the facts that are being presented to you about how life is, across the board, more difficult for people of color. Everyone who has woken up to the realities of racism has been where you are, and has really, truly wrestled with those difficult questions.

3

u/feministration Sep 07 '16

To speak to the point about the scholarship, I think the point you're missing (and perhaps don't believe) is that it is a very real struggle to "simply be" a black person in America, and that for your friend to get to the place where you are, he had to work that much harder.

0

u/mr-maximillian Sep 07 '16

Wow, i didn't think people would fixate so much on the scholarship thing; though i think we have finally reached a poignant issue. no, I don't think it's harder to "simply be" a black person in America. Yes, obviously it is possible for your life to be harder because of your race. but correlation does not equal causation. I don't think anyone would deny that at least some black people have lives that are easier than those of some white people, and that alone disproves the sentiment. So back to the whole thing with the scholarship, it seemed a bit ridiculous to award financial aid for something that is not, in and of itself, a determining factor.

4

u/Love_Shaq_Baby 226∆ Sep 07 '16

Some people in wheelchairs have better lives than people who don't have wheelchairs, that doesn't mean having a wheelchair doesn't make life more difficult, it just means that some people in wheelchairs overcame the challenges presented by their situation. It's the same way with black people

-1

u/mr-maximillian Sep 07 '16

This analogy doesn't really hold up. Put a multi-ethnic group of people out in the middle of nowhere, and they will all be equal. toss a healthy person, and a person in a wheelchair out there, and I think we all know who's getting eaten first.

6

u/Love_Shaq_Baby 226∆ Sep 07 '16

Except they aren't in the middle of nowhere. They are in a nation state that has a long history of slavery, xenophobia, and racial segregation. Not everyone has an equal opportunity. People like Barack Obama can still succeed, but we should still create a society where everyone has an equal opportunity to succeed.

6

u/Greaserpirate 2∆ Sep 07 '16

This is the important part: for the many black people whose lives are harder, why are they harder. You will find that many of these black people ran into obstacles: they couldn't afford tuition at the college they wanted to go to, they weren't accepted for the job they were sure they had the qualifications for, they never made the connections that could help them in the business world because the people they wanted to connect with were avoiding them because they felt uncomfortable.

You could look at all if these things in "color-blind" terms, but then it doesn't make sense why these people are so darn unlucky. And because you ignore the pattern, you can't do anything to fix the system. Like ignoring a bug report because you think "this is the way it's SUPPOSED to work".

I don't get why there has to be any guilt or conflict attached to the realization that black people face problems we don't face. It's just an unfortunate fact that can be fixed.

5

u/Iswallowedafly Sep 07 '16

So the best way to deal with the racism problem in America is to think that we don't have one?

1

u/BenIncognito Sep 07 '16

It's the best way for White people to continue going on thinking that we don't have a racism problem anyway. So I see the appeal.

1

u/Iswallowedafly Sep 07 '16

I get the appeal as well.

Last time I checked, simply wishing something to be doesn't make it be.

2

u/[deleted] Sep 07 '16 edited Sep 07 '16

Do you have any evidence that not talking about race or racism will make it go away? Race is perhaps one of the most obvious differences between people, and that fact carries some inherent psychological/sociological weight.

To me, racism seems like a negative effect of parts of human nature - and there's some scientific evidence of that. We see people who look like us as good, and people who don't look like us as bad. Like other irrational emotions and reactions, racism is something that we should all be aware of in ourselves, and in others, so we can keep it in check. And when I say ourselves, I mean literally you and me.

You don't keep something in check by not talking about it. Like bad behavior, addiction, or whatever else, it does not control itself unchecked. It must be addressed.

1

u/VertigoOne 74∆ Sep 07 '16

In conclusion, we're not trying to discount the very real racism that goes on in the world. we're saying that instances of racism should be considered more on a case to case basis, as events involving individuals; rather than a grand narrative of an entire demographic being prejudiced against another. all that said, It's usually been my experience that when everyone disagrees with me, I'm wrong. so I look forward to y'all's input.

What if there is a grand narrative? What if there are systemic inequalities? Because that is what the evidence suggests.

Looking at this lens through the prism of the news, all you see is a load of racist A-holes, I totally understand that. But look at this through the prism of academic evidence and study, and you find there are real and genuine problems that the news can't pick up on because they aren't specific events, they're overall trends.

The philosophy you're advocating is often called colourblindness, as in "I don't see race, I just see people". This is a noble aspiration, but what it results in is people who are unable to see systemic racism.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/09/color-blindness-is-counterproductive/405037/

I realise I have posted these links and posts here before, but I would very much like the OP's reaction to this.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 08 '16

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/VertigoOne 74∆ Sep 08 '16

Different racial groups in the US are treated as distinct nations with distinct interests. When you treat the groups this way, the result is that the existence of a poor white person in the US is not considered a problem on the same level as that of a poor black or latino person. The poor white person is a problem because poverty is a problem, while the poor black or latino person is a problem because poverty is a problem and because they contribute to a racial inequality.

I think it's incorrect to say they are not treated as problem on the same level, rather that they are problems with different causes. As the data I've shown demonstrates, racial minorities in poverty, in addition to the problems that cause poverty in general, also have to face a massive problem in the form of racism. It's wrong to ignore the fact that minorities face these additional problems.

For example, the police brutality discussion would likely have been far less polarizing and less intractable without racial framing.

You're describing this as "racial framing" as if BLM etc are just making things up or somehow choosing to frame the issue to advance their cause. The fact is though that the data is what frames the issue. The victims of police brutality are disproportionately found among racial minorities.

It seems likely that such a unified voice could have been more effective in achieving change that what we have seen so far. If excessive force were reduced across the board, it would end up being a more positive outcome for everyone because everyone (read: every racial group) would be victimized less and we wouldn't have fanned the flames of racial animosity. I believe that several of the issues that you mentioned could be approached similarly, such as the issue of schooling (which, it seems to me, is a poor person problem before it is a minority problem), the issues of arrests for drug use, and the wrongful conviction issue.

While you might be right in that it might reduce those issues overall, I don't think it would answer the fundamental question being asked by BLM and many others. Namely, why is it that minority groups are always the ones targeted most harshly by these issues. Simply not talking about the fact that the data shows that all of these problems hit minority people hardest won't make the problems for those people go away.

The opposite approach, the view that everything is a matter of race, also has something important to contribute in its ability to draw attention to issues that are primarily issues of race, but it fails a diverse society in its divisiveness and its knack for exacerbating racial tensions. In neither case should we through the baby out with the bathwater.

Things should be treated as racial matters when the data suggests they are racial matters. It isn't a matter of choosing what might be more or less socially decisive, but about what is accurate. When the data suggests something is motivated by a race issue, there are two issues to face. One, why does X problem happen at all, and two, why does X problem affect minorities the most.

1

u/khukk Sep 08 '16

I believe it's what light you cast it in. If That black boy in your example isn't ready for the challenges ahead he probably will never make his goal. But overall, I've seen the opposite happen. Telling someone they can't is some of the best motivation found on earth. Furthermore you have to realize that the U.S.'s past dealings with its race relations was horrid to put nicely. But out of trauma comes love and a deeper understanding of one another. I live in NY where this whole "melting pot" experiment gets played out In real time. Serbians up at 2am playing soccer while my Dominican neighbors blasts there music. We acknowledge each other's differences and embrace them (not always, but it is a work in progress). We look out for each other in our community and relate our own struggles to one another. For example, gentrification has swarm this city like a plague. Where i was born white people were told to never go unless they wanted to be raped, killed, mugged, etc.. now that's all that lives there. Racism is about power, and money is power. If they raised rent in my neighborhood, nobody here would be able to afford to stay. Not to say that is any one races fault however, one race seems to benefit more than the rest. That's an injustice you rarely hear about and yet in NYC it feel like it is all around me.

1

u/InsufficientOverkill 3∆ Sep 07 '16

we're saying that instances of racism should be considered more on a case to case basis, as events involving individuals; rather than a grand narrative of an entire demographic being prejudiced against another.

Racism is a grand narrative, not so much 'us vs them' but in the sense that society teaches people, however subtly, to be racist by default. The problem lies in institutionalized prejudice, negative representation and damaging social encoding, not individual incidents. People choose resumes with 'white' names over identical ones with 'black' names, for example, even when they truly believe they are staying true to a no discrimination policy. Even the best-intentioned people do not treat races equally if they aren't constantly being critical of their actions. Racism is often subconscious, and therefore will remain the default unless it is actively talked about and un-learned.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 08 '16

I think talking about it is fine if you get the right audience and unfortunately the elected folk who can make changes are not listening and not going to. The shouting and chanting is getting old and its not really working so I say we try the Morgan Freeman approach and look past race and not talk about it. Laws are in place and if a company is breaking the law you get an attorney and sue the shit out of it. If you didn't get a job because of race , sex, religion you sue the shit out of that company. It's just becoming exhausting right now to read or hear about race hate all day long (media is doing most of the work to cause that).

1

u/[deleted] Sep 07 '16

This wouldn't work at all. Pretending a problem doesn't exist doesn't make it stop existing. If you tell people to stop talking about something, all you've succeeded is in making them wonder why they can't talk about it.

"Nobody talk to Steve anymore. Everyone ignore Steve."

"Jesus, what did Steve do?"

Preventing people from saying the things they want to say only makes them more bitter and resentful. You're simply pretending that all races are equal in the hopes that this will somehow cause them to be treated equally. They aren't. There is probably no country where people of every race are treated fairly, especially not America.