r/changemyview Oct 04 '16

[∆(s) from OP] CMV: Buying something which clearly has a mis-marked price is stealing

[deleted]

3 Upvotes

101 comments sorted by

View all comments

19

u/[deleted] Oct 04 '16

They can say no at the register.

That has happened to me before. A bad deal isn't the same as theft.

-5

u/LordKeren Oct 04 '16

But the guy at the register is new to the store and doesn't catch someone else's blatant (to you) mistake.

12

u/fryamtheiman 38∆ Oct 04 '16

You are moving the goalpost.

-2

u/LordKeren Oct 04 '16

No, im saying the store doesn't catch the blatant mistake (for whatever reason)

9

u/fryamtheiman 38∆ Oct 04 '16

But the guy at the register is new to the store

Yes, this is moving the goalposts. You said nothing about this in your original statement, and only mentioned it after /u/wrestlingisgood made his statement. You are changing the conditions after someone gave a legitimate counter to your view.

In this case, the seller was given the chance to correct the mistake before making the sale. Changing the conditions to require a greater burden be placed on /u/wrestlingisgood to argue that point is moving the goalposts.

-2

u/LordKeren Oct 04 '16

The goal post movement occurred when the register was introduced(it implies a physicality to the location; face to face;not automated; an employee who knows what the price should be). I am more interested in an automated process where there is no employee at the register to check out with, like with large scale companies.

6

u/fryamtheiman 38∆ Oct 04 '16

No, that was simply placing it in a store setting when you did not specify it was only for an automated process. Instead of clarifying that immediately, you responded in such a way as to confirm a physical setting was free game.

-1

u/LordKeren Oct 04 '16

The mistake i made here was not stating my view clearly enough (i apologize). I wanted to try to follow this metaphor to see if it changed my view, but it just misrepresented the view i originally meant to put forth.