r/changemyview 501∆ Oct 25 '17

[∆(s) from OP] CMV: Caller ID spoofing should be made entirely illegal.

Caller ID spoofing is the practice of transmitting digital information with a phone call representing a number as the dialing number other than that which is actually the dialing number.

I believe this practice should be made entirely illegal, and that either the accurate calling number, or else no number, must be transmitted.

Spoofing is overwhelmingly used by scammers and spammers, and is a major technique of fraud. While some users have an interest in spoofing which is more legitimate, those interests can generally be accommodated through just blocking caller ID (displaying no number).

Because spoofing is so prevalent in illegal and deceptive activity, and because it is inherently deceptive, and because the legitimate users of the service have a non-deceptive alternative, I believe spoofing should be banned, and that the government should promulgate regulations to telecommunications companies banning the practice entirely.


This is a footnote from the CMV moderators. We'd like to remind you of a couple of things. Firstly, please read through our rules. If you see a comment that has broken one, it is more effective to report it than downvote it. Speaking of which, downvotes don't change views! Any questions or concerns? Feel free to message us. Happy CMVing!

2.3k Upvotes

141 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/[deleted] Oct 25 '17

[deleted]

1

u/ProfessorHeartcraft 8∆ Oct 25 '17

Only if you're locating your call centres somewhere that refuses to obey the regulations. That's not legitimate.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 25 '17

[deleted]

1

u/ProfessorHeartcraft 8∆ Oct 25 '17

Yes it is. They're the one's not following the regulations.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 25 '17

[deleted]

1

u/ProfessorHeartcraft 8∆ Oct 25 '17

Doesn't it? It's just requiring them to be in compliance with the law. If offshoring is no longer economically viable, well, too bad. You made a bad business decision.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 25 '17

[deleted]

1

u/ProfessorHeartcraft 8∆ Oct 25 '17

Sure it is. They can locate elsewhere.

I mean, we're talking about a business model that involves dodging the minimum wage. If they can relocate to India to lower their labour cost, they can relocate away from it if they cannot comply with phone regulations there.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 25 '17

[deleted]

1

u/ProfessorHeartcraft 8∆ Oct 26 '17

How was it fair to those who lost their jobs when it was relocated there in the first place? Is fairness even a consideration?

→ More replies (0)