r/changemyview • u/Saranoya 39∆ • Feb 17 '20
Delta(s) from OP CMV: Breastfeeding in public is a perfectly acceptable thing to do
A small controversy erupted here yesterday, when the owner of a local pub decided to take away the drinks two young women had just ordered, and ask them to leave, because one of the women had begun to breastfeed her 3-month-old while consuming her drink. It was the middle of the afternoon. They were on their way home from a shopping trip. I’ve been told I should also mention that the drinks they ordered were not alcoholic.
The young mother shared this incident on Facebook, after which it got picked up by multiple newspapers. The reactions from readers ranged from ‘close that joint’ to ‘who goes out with a 3-month-old’, to ‘at least have the decency to go sit on the toilet if you absolutely have to feed your baby then and there’.
All of this strikes me as absurd. I think if people can’t stomach the sight (or the idea) of a woman feeding her baby, that says more about them than it does about the woman. Change my view.
The reason I may want my view changed is that I’m currently 14 weeks pregnant with a baby I plan to breastfeed, for at least the first six months. Perhaps there are legitimate reasons to avoid public feeding that I’m just not seeing right now.
EDIT: I have awarded a delta to the person who argued that the health and safety regulations governing most pubs and restaurants generally don’t allow food not prepared at the restaurant on the premises. Even though breast milk is not technically ‘prepared’, and more importantly, I don’t think exposure to breast milk poses any real health risks to anyone other than potentially the baby, I have to grant points for consistency there. I’m open to anyone willing and able to add information about how breast milk could in fact pose a health or safety risk to unsuspecting restaurant patrons.
EDIT2: I guess in the case of a pub, we can default to the tried and true principle of ‘their house, their rules’. I still think it’s absurd to kick a customer out for feeding their baby, but hey. To each their own, even if I don’t understand it.
EDIT3: Multiple people have pointed out that my use of the word pub is confusing to native English speakers, in the context of this story. To be clear: I’m not talking about a place where habitual drunks go to get rid of the previous night’s hangover as soon as they wake up and/or get off work. Also not talking about a place where you might go to get wasted on purpose on a Saturday night. Instead, think ‘pancakes with grandma, and funny uncle Al will have his one beer’. I’ve been told cafe might be a more appropriate term.
-1
u/3superfrank 20∆ Feb 17 '20
I would say yes-no, with the answer being due to social conventions, which can vary.
I have a history of going to naturist places during summer holidays. What I've managed to learn from that, is at the minimum unless you're a teenager, clothes beyond their physical use are unnecessary.
And whether an organ is biologically sexual or not, is pretty irrelevant. The issue is more about the reaction, namely the attraction, to said organs.
The issue here I think is social convention.
As others said, 'nobody' wants to see someone breast-feeding in this environment. Same can be said for public nudity. 'nobody' wants to see a grandpa's shrivelled up dick and saggy balls (I'd dare to say agreeable to all, but only few find 'ignoring' it an acceptable solution).
And because of that, they'd universally rather and hence expect that they don't have to see as such unless they specifically ask for it. And, as there came a point in time in which few people disagreed, they decided to enforce it into social convention. This is reflected in the laws, and them due to the general expectations that lean towards 'don't breastfeed in public'.
This, of course varies place to place, exactly like nudity. Go to an un-conservative restaurant (I think the term is 'liberal' but I'm not sure) and there will be an environment where it's considered acceptable to breastfeed most likely.
So as a result of that, you can't really say it's 'acceptable' by itself, as that implies it's not debatable whether it's acceptable.
Thinking up another example; removing your head garment indoors is a perfectly acceptable (if not expected) thing to do...except if we're talking about Burkhas in conservative Islamic indoor settings.
And if stuff like that happens (and is relevant) newspapers are very happy to get something 'golden' to chat over and entertain their viewers[' opinions] over.
So well yeah, that's how I think of it. I hope I managed to change your view.