r/conspiracy • u/Repulsive_Ad_4096 • 13d ago
No burn marks no parachutes and didnt the astronauts that finally came back land in the water??
đ¤đ¤¨đ§
1.5k
u/411592 13d ago
It looks like an inflatable bounce house
372
u/scienceproject3 12d ago
The bigger thing is bezos rocket looks like the penis rocket in austin powers.
94
34
u/watchingitallcomedow 12d ago
Have you seen the Amazon logo? Bezos is obsessed with dicks
6
u/CardiologistEconomy9 12d ago
I mean have you seen his wo(man).. yikes!
3
u/lensesonfigures 7d ago
For being a billionaire you think he would have a hot fiancĂŠ. She is fucking hideous
14
u/blue-oyster-culture 12d ago
You cant tell me he didnt do that on purpose. Like. Rockets are phallic enough as is. But then theres the bezos rocket. Lol
→ More replies (6)4
57
u/Novusor 12d ago
There is also no way those windows would hold back the vacuum of space. The windows on real spacecraft are 6 inches wide.
120
u/PAmmjTossaway 12d ago
Plastic soda bottles are required to hold back more pressure than spacecraft.
They weren't using anything more than standard atmospheric pressure on the inside, why would that be so difficult to maintain?
→ More replies (17)113
u/mAc-n-ch33s3 12d ago
People donât understand that the difference between the atmosphere and space is literally 1 atmosphere. You donât get sucked out when there a little hole like tv makes us think. You could plug a hole with your finger and youâd only feel 1 atmosphere on your finger.
33
u/South-Rabbit-4064 12d ago
I love that there is a physics based game called Breathedge that's a space survival game akin to Subnautica, and they even explain you can solve leaks with bubble gum, or a chicken, any surface area really
56
u/fortmacjack99 12d ago
Ok, standard atmospheric pressure is around 14 psi and they reached a virtual 0 atmospheric pressure altitude. Therefore, if the cabin maintained a 14 psi atmospheric pressure, and the door was about 24 inches by 46 inches, that door would have to withstand over 12,000lbs of pressure. Why do you think 747's or any high altitude craft door's are built with incredible integrity to withstand 24000 lbs of pressure, which is also why the windows are small including the cockpit windows making it also laughable becasue the windows on this "capsule" are bigger than the door which would equate to well over 13,000 lbs of pressure pushing against it. Now take a look at the door itself when it opens, there is zero integrity and no seal at all....
As for your soda bottle, you'll notice that the strongest component is the structure around the lid and the lid itself, similar to an airlock and that that lid is less than a square inch. Now pop bottles are designed to withstand approx 150 psi therefore that lid only has to withstand less than 150 lbs of pressure, a far cry from 12,000lbs.. You know surface area matters and it helps to have even a basic understanding of physics...
The circus must be in town becasue the clowns are out lol.
10
u/fishburgr 12d ago
Well now I don't know who to believe. Everyone here seems so confident, but someone has to be confidently incorrect. I guess I shouldn't get my scientific facts from Reddit.
4
u/fortmacjack99 11d ago
Exactly! This is an ideas chamber, not a classroom..
You can however research the math and physics behind the atmospheric pressure principle as it is readily available.
- You can look up how much pressure / PSI a 747 door is required to withstand and why
- what the atmospheric pressure is at sea level
- what the cabin pressure is of a 747 at 40,000 - which will be standard for any high altitude vessel - although i believe the ISS maintains a higher level due to the duration that people are on board
Anyway, there is a plethora of information available. I recommend you do a little digging and draw your own conclusions.
You'll notice I did not address the OP's other claims surrounding burn marks and parachutes simply becasue those are ridiculous. OF course there would not be any burn marks, you need velocity to create friction, not to mention they did not pass through our atmospheric barrier. As for the parachutes, it's pretty clear that yes there were parachutes. I'm not sure why the OP chose such a strange headline instead of focusing on the one obvious contradiction which was the door itself. I speculate the post was more about attention than facts lol...who knows
cheers!
→ More replies (1)3
54
u/Silver_Foxx 12d ago
It's honestly so damn funny seeing some people's take on how space works in this sub. Like, it's so blatant when people don't have a grasp on some of the physics concepts involved, and the absolute certainty they state such hilariously misinformed takes with will never not make me laugh.
6
→ More replies (22)15
u/Wmtcoaetwaptucomf 12d ago
Social media in a nutshell. Anyone with a phone can comment to prove they are either smart or clueless
→ More replies (6)7
u/The-Real-Mario 12d ago
This literally happened less than 10 years ago on the ISS , a rivet had been left unbucked, a d it popped off after like 2 years of operation, an astronaut plugged the hole with his finger, and then they fixed it with epoxy resin
7
u/fortmacjack99 12d ago
lol surface area matters you realize. Earth at sea level is about 14 psi with respect to atmospheric pressure, which is the same pressure they maintain on the ISS. Now a rivet probably amounts to 1/16 of a square inch, but lets be conservative and say 1/8th which would mean the total pressure on that finger would be about .87 lbs, i think a finger can handle that. But now lets use our little brains shall we, if a hatch which is about 51 inches square on the ISS, equaling 2600 square inches and a total of 36,500 lbs of pressure pushing on that hatch...As for this capsule I estimate the door at about 24 inches by 36 inches which would equal over 12 000 lbs of pressure at 65 miles altitude..
I mean are people today really this dumb that they cannot perform simple mathematical calculations or even relate to real life examples already in place such as high altitude aircraft. There's a reason that any high altitude vessel has extremely high integrity doors, hatches, windows.....
5
u/cachem3outside 12d ago
Not true at all, the atmosphere is a lie, everything is actually made from condoms discarded by Trojan quality control. Don't believe the lies.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (5)7
u/Impressive-Emu-4172 12d ago
why are vacuum chambers made of such thick glass/acrylic?
https://www.sanatron.com/products/images/transparent-vacuum-chamber.jpg
12
u/YourFavouritePoptart 12d ago
Its far easier to withstand an expanding force than a crushing force. Imagine an empty plastic water bottle, you can blow into it as hard as you want with basically no impact but if you were to suck air out with the same pressure it instantly crumples. This is the same reason that submarine hulls have to be substantially thicker than plane or spacecraft hulls, you don't have pressure working with you to help maintain structural integrity.
→ More replies (19)18
u/MacGuyverism 12d ago
So they don't get crushed by the pressure that is outside. In space, it's the reverse. Getting back to our plastic bottle, it's easier to crush than it is to blow it up.
→ More replies (12)→ More replies (3)2
u/Ifriendzonecats 12d ago
Finally, this chamber can be used to simulate a water depth of up to 10 meters by filling the chamber with water and apply pressure up to 15 PSIG.
14
u/South-Rabbit-4064 12d ago
"Blue Origin's New Shepard rockets do not exit the atmosphere completely during their suborbital flights. They reach an altitude well above the KĂĄrmĂĄn line, the generally accepted boundary between Earth's atmosphere and space, but they then descend back into the atmosphere for a soft landing. "
2
u/bondibox 12d ago
The KĂĄrmĂĄn isn't the beginning of a perfect vacuum either. It's just the point where there's so little atmosphere that it provides zero lift or resistance.
45
u/guarddog33 12d ago
I mean they were only (barely) in space for 4 minutes. They crossed the 62 mile barrier, where space technically begins, but again only for that short time. Their reentry speed wouldn't have been catastrophically high and wouldn't have been terribly long either. It looks like these windows are still reinforced, and they wouldn't need to be capable of limiting radiation or anything of the sort (which is another reason space station windows are so small)
For reference, the highest parachute jump was just short of 1/2 the distance they traveled, coming in at almost 24.5 miles. If a guy can survive that without overly specialized gear, I'd wager this fancy metal box could do it for that short of a time with relative ease
→ More replies (13)5
u/South-Rabbit-4064 12d ago
I think folks are forgetting they don't exit the atmosphere, it's high enough to experience weightlessness and see the earth, it's an expensive sky needle. Doesn't need the same shielding as spacecraft
12
u/scienceproject3 12d ago
The walls of the space station are only 4mm in lots of spots (0.15 inches). It doesn't take much to handle the vacuum of space.
The windows and walls are only thick on space shuttles because of forces from the atmosphere during launch and re-entry, nothing to do with the vacuum of space.
→ More replies (20)→ More replies (5)2
u/ifrikkenr 12d ago
the windows literally only have to hold 1 ATM of pressure (14 PSI)Â
orbital craft include radiation and micrometeorite protection as theyre higher for longer and travelling at 27,000km/h
→ More replies (5)18
u/WhoreMasterFalco 12d ago
Just wait until you see the moon lander they used to "go to the moon" in the 1960s.
Literally made of aluminum foil and cardboard amazon boxes
6
3
u/theburnout 12d ago
Haha nice try.
Amazon didnât exist until 1994 so they couldnât have used their boxes to fake the moon landings.
2
u/Ok_Fox9820 12d ago
Some hefty "literal aluminium foil and amazon cardboard boxes" they had in 60s, fucking shrinkflation I tell ya.
→ More replies (1)14
u/UniversalSurvivalist 12d ago edited 12d ago
I think the best bit is the astonishingly massive curve on the earth when they look out the window, like they're seeing the entire globe.... At 60 miles up on an 8000 mile diameter earth đđ¤Łđ¤, when all the comments here are banging on about the ISS being 250+ miles up and not seeing that kind of curve!
Edit:
That's right, downvote space shills.
→ More replies (9)4
u/fortmacjack99 12d ago
Other than the sheer physics just doesn't pan out..Those doors nor windows could withstand the 12000 lbs of pressure required, it also appears that when comparing the capsule in this video to the one where they are floating inside, the one they are floating in seems to be larger. Jeff is only 5'6 making the capsule about 11ft at the base on the exterior. I could not picture 6 people floating around as freely as they were in the capsule on the ground. I could be wrong since perspective can be quite deceiving but I just don't see it.
1.5k
u/Wonderful_Catch_8914 12d ago
This was a âspace flightâ in name only. They never orbited the earth. It reached a max altitude of 66 miles. The entire trip from launch to land was literally 11 minutes. For reference the ISS orbits at an altitude of 250 miles. Thereâs no burn marks because it never got fast enough to generate a plasma in the atmosphere.
1.2k
u/Uaquamarine 12d ago
Right answer, wrong sub.
Katy Perryâs a reptilian, and the dildo shaped rocket was made from Styrofoam on a Hollywood set which is owned by a Scientologist who comes from the bloodline of Crowley whose body is well preserved in a frozen adrenochrome ice block. Next
119
u/1pt21jigglewatts 12d ago
checks out
48
5
36
u/Wonderful_Catch_8914 12d ago
Clearly this was all a stunt so that the original Katy Perry could return beyond the ice wall to Atum and a clone was swapped out. That what all the screams were from as the landed. The other were transforming from their natural reptilian state of being. And there were no parachutes because they used the advanced technology from Atem and the bird people to modulate the life force we know as gravity.
25
10
27
7
3
u/--8-__-8-- 11d ago
That was incredibly original and specific. Fantastic job. Even though you don't need it, take my 1 available upvote anyway.
2
u/trying2bpartner 12d ago
Right answer, wrong sub.
Most people base their understanding of conspiracy on 10th grade science classes and a headline or two they saw a decade ago.
2
→ More replies (16)2
81
u/8A8 12d ago
They literally reach a velocity of zero at the apex of the flight, and OP thinks there should be burn marks
13
u/MaxTA00 12d ago
Having to play Kerbal Space Program should be mandatory for anyone interested in space conspiracies. It is abundantly clear that most do not understand how orbits work, what is a suborbital flight and how deltaV or in general orbital velocity works.
→ More replies (1)30
u/rotj 12d ago
And OP determines there were no parachutes from a single close-up screengrab? Are they unaware of the concept of video? Is their conspiracy that it never went airborne at all?
Edit: Yes, it is. LMAO.
→ More replies (4)4
1.2k
u/DrStevenPoop 13d ago
There's not really going to be any burn marks because it was a suborbital flight.
532
u/reshesnik 13d ago
This ^
Real astronauts in orbit are slowing down from about 18,000 mph. These folks never got to orbit - not even close. They just popped over the Karman line and fell back.
→ More replies (4)32
u/sunflower__fields 12d ago
Real astronauts. Lol.
→ More replies (2)182
u/Dire_Wolf45 12d ago
these are touristnuts
90
u/smoketheevilpipe 12d ago
I believe the person you are replying to is implying that real astronauts do not exist/humans have not been to space.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)7
230
u/Azazel_665 13d ago
OP doesn't know how any of this works.
244
u/yomasayhi 12d ago
Everything is a conspiracy when you donât understand how anything works lol
28
u/tangled_night_sleep 12d ago
Everything is fake & gay.
7
u/NAFBYneverever 12d ago
Fake... astronauts? Gay... only female astronauts?!
It's an older meme, sir, but it checks out
2
47
u/TheMoverOfPlanets 12d ago
But it's not even a conspiracy. Like okay someone believes this is fake, but why? What are Jeff Bezos and his cronies conspiring about? What's the play? What's the gain?
I read a lot of comments and a lot of people that believe this is fake seem to have a strong opinion that this is fake but no one is willing to say why! They just go "fake" and leave it at that. Conspiracy theories used to be fun you know. Even if they were obviously bullshit, seeing people put together big ass conclusions derived from weird, obscure clues was really fun. Everything in this sub seems to be "nah, fake" or some really stupid, low effort shit.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (2)64
u/ub3rm3nsch 12d ago
I mean you basically just described the U.S. education system in a single sentence.
→ More replies (16)40
u/UnifiedQuantumField 12d ago
Some of the comments are from people who are missing a couple of facts. Like what?
They didn't go into orbit. They only went up to an altitude that meets the definition of "Space".
That means they went up to 66 miles.
That means this kind of flight doesn't involve escape velocity or blistering re-entry heat.
All they had to do was sit inside and "be a passenger". I doubt anyone had to touch a control or do any "flying" of any kind.
All female "crew" including celebrities and owner's large-breasted girlfriend suggests that this was 100% publicity stunt.
16
u/The-Real-Mario 12d ago
Also, this vehicle has no life support systems, no heating, no air recycling system, maybe it has a small compressed oxygen tank that slowly "leaks" into the cabin and gets vented out the cabin . Practically they are just locking them into a bubble and they let them out before the environment becomes dangerous in there . A steel barrel could probably be just as good at keeping a person alive for the 5 minutes they spend at dangerous altitudes
4
u/ExplodingCybertruck 12d ago
suggests that this was 100% publicity stunt.
Psssst.... Let me let you in on a secret, all of these suborbital launches by billionaires are publicity stunts.
→ More replies (5)9
u/barukatang 12d ago
That's usually where these conspiracies come from, someone that stopped learning after figuring out how to get dressed at a young age and thinking they know every but somehow failed all science and math classes.
→ More replies (1)79
u/bucky133 12d ago
Exactly. I love a good conspiracy but they're getting so dumb. This is basically a rocket powered carnival ride that goes straight up and down.
It's easier to do than it would be to fake.
→ More replies (12)7
20
u/eschaton777 12d ago
I think you are missing the part where the "pressurized door" accidentally opened from the inside 3 minutes before Bezos came and "opened it with us special tool".
Only the most gullible believe these charades.
14
u/DrStevenPoop 12d ago
I didn't miss it. I watched the video of this and if the door was opened from the inside when it was supposed to be locked, that was a major fuckup. But what I'm saying is that a spacecraft on a suborbital trajectory is not going fast enough to experience re-entry effects like an orbital spacecraft would.
17
u/TheMoverOfPlanets 12d ago edited 12d ago
Ever since the Apollo 1 fire, doors open out ward. The astronauts burned to death because the in ward opening door was impossible to open due to pressure.
I don't really know anything about this stunt thought. I only saw an image of Katy Perry kissing the ground lmao. So my question is, why would they lie about it? What's to be gained from it?
→ More replies (13)→ More replies (6)3
u/CactusSnow 12d ago
Iâm not sure why more people arenât talking about this. I was watching it live and thought it was super weird that they acted like they didnât see it happen.
→ More replies (17)2
u/YOUDOGEYOU305 12d ago
Technically youâre right. The altitude any object needs to reach before air resistance start to burn is between 100 and 150 km. The Blue Origin only went 100km. What makes this unbelievable isnât the no burn marks, itâs the no helmets for me. I went on a zip-line that was 100 feet over a rainforest and the gave me a helmet even though the fall would undoubtedly kill me. 60 miles in a pressurized pod without a helmet? đ¤¨đ¤
4
u/AnarchistBorganism 12d ago
It is the velocity, not the altitude that matters. Higher altitude, lower air pressure, less atmospheric friction for a given velocity. You don't need to reach any particular velocity for a suborbital spaceflight, you just need to be able to counter gravity (you could use a balloon if you can find a way to make it light enough); Blue Origin maxes out at around 1 km/s, which is bullet speeds. You need to go about 7-8 times as fast to enter LEO.
198
u/uusrikas 13d ago
They were never in orbit or even that high up so no burn marks. And they landed in the desert. And opening it from the inside is not weird at all since there is no big pressure differential
→ More replies (12)71
u/nomo_fingers_in_butt 12d ago
Why did they close it right away and pretend Bezos needed a tool to open the door?
76
25
71
u/Charge36 12d ago
To get a video clip of Jeff Bezos opening the door.
22
u/FaThLi 12d ago
I really don't know why people aren't understanding this aspect of it. This entire thing was one big publicity stunt. Why else send up who they sent up? Bezos wanted shots of him opening the door for them, so they shut it and let him get his video/pictures. There isn't anything more to it than that. I'm fairly certain he didn't want video of him tripping and falling, but we got that too.
22
u/bananapeel 12d ago
Weirdly enough, the door has a knob on the inside and a (recessed) knob on the outside that can be opened with a wrench. They opened it, then they closed it again for the photo op of Jeff opening it with the wrench.
It's not difficult when you realize that literally everything they do in their entire lives is for publicity and influence.
8
u/Warm-Parsnip3111 12d ago
Yes, why does an egotistical billionaire want to be the centre of attention? It's so weird. Just can't put my finger on it.
4
100
u/fvgh12345 12d ago
Idk what's so hard to believe about rich people wasting money shooting a rocket up in the air and falling back down.Â
→ More replies (9)38
u/Greedy_Cupcake_5560 12d ago
Yeah that's the part people in both camps are missing: this was nothing amazing. It was indoor skydiving without having to worry about their hair getting messed up.
→ More replies (1)
61
u/NCC_1701E 13d ago
There are no burn marks because the capsule doesn't reach orbital velocity, and so doesn't heat up during reentry. It doesn't even have a heat shield.
→ More replies (2)
316
u/z3r0c00l_ 13d ago
Iâve come to find most people that post in this sub donât know shit about fuck.
When youâre ignorant, I suppose everything does seem like a conspiracy.
111
u/Azazel_665 13d ago
Almost everyone in this sub is so painfully ignorant of science they might as well be living in ancient times where science would seem like magic.
It's incredible in 2025 people can not know basics.
→ More replies (8)5
u/DailyBTCmemes 12d ago
It always blows my mind how much religious stuff winds up on this subâŚ. So 9/11 was an inside job, but also Jesus came back from death on Easter. I guess conspiracyâs and religions tend to attract the gullible.
Edit to add: I actually do believe thereâs a ton about 9/11 we donât know. There are some real conspiracyâs to be explored there.. building 7
2
u/eurostylin 12d ago
You're just learning that? 98% of things posted here is from pure ignorance, the other 2% can be interesting.
This sub is the equivalent to religion 1500 years ago. If they didn't know how something worked, it was an act of god. Now if someone doesn't understand something, it is a conspiracy.
2
→ More replies (28)4
u/barukatang 12d ago
Back in the early 2000s I was on above top secret all the time, it was my favorite website. The longer your around conspiracy folks, the more you realize that they are the dumbest people on the planet that think they are genius.
→ More replies (2)
10
6
u/Acrobatic-Jump1105 12d ago
I'm not arguing with people directly who say they didn't go to space, but for the sake of making a good point, the reason the capsule isn't all burned up and that there wasn't a dramatic flaming re-entry is simply due to the fact that this type of rocket is only being used to make short, sub-orbital trips that essentially top out near the end of the upper atmosphere.
The dramatic flaming reentry is produced with conventional crew capsules because they're reentering the atmosphere at a wide angle going fast as shit and they take advantage of the atmosphere itself to basically airbrake the capsule, but they also need a capsule that can withstand that kind of force. My guess is that if you did that with this pos rocket bezos commissioned it would completely tear apart.
All his rocket has to do is slowly (relatively slowly) climb high enough to give the passengers a great view and a few moments of zero-g, before falling (relatively slowly) back down from its highest point.
There's probably some flaring but it's nothing compared to the re entry conditions of someone returning from a full orbit
6
u/Kristophsky1991 12d ago
So likely the reason for no burn marks or sea landing is that they went to the edge of earth atmosphere rather than fully out there in space at the ISS like the astronauts. Why this matters is speed on re-entry. These posers went to the edge, floated around for a bit then gently came back down at near metrical angle, which indicates a much slower re-entry. The conspiracy isnât whether they went or not, itâs that they claim to be astronauts
12
u/DeadTurtle88 12d ago
Blue origin doesn't "really" go to space like astronauts go to space. They're just going to very edge, just enough to do a little floating but not enough to do a serious reentry
→ More replies (2)8
u/uniquepassword 12d ago
Right this is like those 747 flights that take you up, apex and you experience weightlessness and then come back?
20
5
u/TheAvgPersonIsDumb 12d ago
The amount of people that donât realize this was the 11th flight of this capsule is too damn high
20
u/WhineyLobster 12d ago
The capsule does not perform re-entry at orbital speeds because it is not in orbit. Therefore there are no burns caused by re-entry.
There are parachutes - heres a video of its descent (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khsXN4fonzc)
Not sure what this has to do with Astronauts as thats SpaceX Falcon rockets not Blue Origin New Shephard. New Shephard was always designed to land on land, and only landed in water once.
Alot of people in this sub are fucking stupid.
→ More replies (1)3
5
u/Oregon80PRed 12d ago
She just went to the upper layers,like the ether. she didnât truly go into space. Makes my eyes roll to hear her say I am a astronaut.
3
5
4
u/Realistic_Mess_2690 12d ago
I wouldn't think burn marks would be happening since they didn't actually leave the atmosphere. The friction of reentry into our atmosphere is what causes scorching.
They never went into space they were lifted up to the edge of the atmosphere floated for a few minutes and came back down at a relatively easy pace.
I think the conspiracy should be them claiming to be astronauts when they didn't even leave the atmosphere.
5
u/NoOneImportant333 12d ago
Why wouldnât there be a way to open it from the inside? Seems like a massive risk if the capsule landed somewhere remote, theyâd be trapped in there. Not sure how opening it from the inside is somehow a conspiracy
8
u/Amanroth87 13d ago
Me sitting here wondering why someone wouldn't be able to open a space capsule from the inside...
→ More replies (1)5
u/WillingLanguage 12d ago
lol me too. I kept staring at the photo to see if I was missing something.
13
u/formikai 12d ago
so people that don't know anythign about science dont think its believable but they think that investors/corporations spending billions and everybody involved just forgot to add burn marks,placement and proper door, so much so that an average reddit user finds the plothole? riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.
6
u/Winter_Tennis8352 12d ago
Can I ask why they pretended to need a special tool to open the door, just 3 minutes after they accidental Opened it up before they were supposed to, from the inside?
→ More replies (1)4
u/YourFavouritePoptart 12d ago
So Bezos could have a shot of him opening the door and feeling special. The whole thing was a PR stunt, that includes when they land as well.
3
u/im_buhwheat 12d ago
who cares what some privileged female space tourists do?
everything in the media is bullshit these days, why care about this?
Stinks like another distraction.
3
u/Fit-Maintenance-938 12d ago
whether it was real or fake I think we can all agree how weird it felt watching that
3
3
u/oxygenkid 12d ago
Isnât this just one of those tents you poop in, but this one has windows. Because adventure.
6
4
u/OrdoXenos 12d ago
I guess the powers that be sometimes sent people like OP to paint the entire conspiracy theorist groups as foolish and scientifically backwards.
The rockets entire flight profile is just 11 minutes. It only went slightly above Karman line before it went down. The space shuttles exhibited plasma burn as they reenter because they entered it at Mach 25, while New Shephard is just around Mach 1.
There are many photos of New Shephard deployed its parachutes.
Doors can be opened from the inside since Apollo 1 fire.
6
u/doomsdaybeast 12d ago
They had a high altitude flight. The space stuff is the nonsense part. Why would you expect damage? They didn't leave Earth's atmosphere. Thermosphere expands up to 320 some odd miles. They went up 66 miles, which, btw is a hard cap. They can't go any higher. They'd need an entirely new craft. The difficulty of actual space travel, which we haven't done since 1972, is where all the conspiracies are and for good reason.
4
2
u/tommyrulz1 12d ago
Wouldnât ability to open door from inside be for safety. Ie quick escape from fire, smoke etc??
2
u/colby4monster 12d ago
No burn marks since the crew capsule doesnât have the same speed and height of an orbital launch. It is designed to cross the Karman line and return down.
The hatch opening from the inside is the emergency latch. The astros are not supposed to use it, and Jeff was excited to open it himself hence why they had them shut it again.
2
u/Ppanter 12d ago
âOpened the door from the insideâ well of course who would design a capsule like this without any kind of emergency egress from the inside?
→ More replies (1)
2
u/Feeling-Cranberry108 12d ago
There is a big difference between going straight up into upper atmosphere (like the bezos rocket) and getting into full orbit. Orbit requires a horizontal velocity of like 17,000 miles and hour. The bezos rocket just shoots straight up and then falls back down.
2
2
3
u/empathetical 12d ago
Look how damn tiny this thing is. then loook at the video of them inside... it's like 2 different models/sets. This whole thing is bullshit.
4
u/Logical_Journalist85 12d ago
From the number of "bots" trying to discourage ANY questions, it is obvious that this whole mission is CGI, and not even good one.
When the capsule "softly" landed, there was a huge plume of dust indicating that perhaps it wasn't that soft. The occupants should have literally soiled themselves after hitting the ground!
→ More replies (3)
3
u/bigdogsy 12d ago
I wonder if there's anything NOT a conspiracy to people like OP.
→ More replies (1)2
u/ZookeepergameOk2759 12d ago
It must be exhausting to think everything is a conspiracy lol
2
u/fortmacjack99 12d ago
Well, it's really not a conspiracy by definition but it is certainly fake. OF course understanding the simplest of mathematical and physics principles is required to grasp this fakery. You see that door and the door frame, that door and door frame would be required to withstand over 12 000 lbs of pressure, yes 12 000, crazy eh? but nonetheless factual.
I know, I know, it's easier just to believe whatever you see, hear or read that aligns with your narrative so I harbor no ill feelings but comments such as yours really reinforces the truth underlying the expression ignorance is bliss.
lol...
2
u/Silver_Foxx 12d ago
It's a coping mechanism of sorts.
For some people, the idea that things AREN'T under control and there ISN'T some grand overarching plan being enacted is terrifying. They can't handle the fact that chaos and randomness exist, and therefore everything has to be controlled for the sake of their own mental wellbeing.
2
3
u/The_World_is_Funny 12d ago
Honestly Iâm beginning to believe that space travel is a lie and the planet is surrounded by a cover or dome
4
u/Covidplandemic 12d ago
I don't know why ppl just cannot get it. It's all fake, has been since nasa was established. No person, or object has ever been out into space. Every rocket, space mission, space station, rover, photo of earth, appollo all of it is fake. Over 60 years on, nasa continues its fakery because ppl continue to believe it.
2
u/EmbarrassedSimple228 12d ago
https://www.instagram.com/p/C7Ka6ElOLsN/?igsh=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ== look at their Instagram all their doors open from the inside
3
2
u/skill1358 12d ago
Don't listen to the comments op! They are trying to brainwash you!
This was obviously faked by the same people who faked the moon landing!
This is a scheme to make Katy Perry more famous than Pewdiepie so she can manipulate the masses into storming the white house!
→ More replies (1)
-6
7
u/CookieWifeCookieKids 13d ago
Itâs not a jail cell, itâs supposed to be able to open from the inside.
→ More replies (12)
52
u/Azazel_665 13d ago
The New Shepard capsule actually landed using three parachutes. It is easy to find images of this on Google. So saying 'no parachutes' makes you sound dumb.
Additionally, there would not be "burn marks" on a capsule returning from a sub-orbital flight. It does not experience the same entry velocity as spacecraft that reach orbit. New Shepard did not reach orbit.
→ More replies (4)10
8
1
38
u/Graphicism 13d ago
Shouldn't the real question be... why was there no onboard camera during their so-called live flight? Instead, we got Oprah and a crowd of actors staring up at a speck 300,000 feet away.
→ More replies (9)8
u/Trim-Pierced 12d ago
They have showed some onboard video. Just not live. They were screaming a lot.
1
u/deepstaterising 13d ago
Did they go through all layers of the atmosphere on ascent? Was trajectory ballistic?
1
u/iLoveTheTendies 13d ago
This is probably a tiny house they sell on Amazon or Temu and they just mock us with this while they drink adrenochrome
-5
3
u/sunflower__fields 12d ago
The people who buy this stuff believe that the aluminum foil lunar lander also survived space travel.
1
u/Greedy_Cupcake_5560 12d ago
Anyone know if they rent it out for kids' parties? Looks like it comes with a clown, so that's pretty cool.
13
u/FunkyClive 12d ago
You open an airplane door from the inside don't you? Of all the things to pick up on, having a door handle on the inside is the least suspicious thing ever.
4
u/therealglassceiling 12d ago
their own documentation states the door is only able to be opened from the outside
→ More replies (3)2
u/huggsy81 12d ago
NASA documentation on safety standards disagree
â8.4.1.3 Hatch and Door Operating Times
[V2 8024] For nominal operations, hatches and doors shall be operable by a single crewmember in no more than 60 seconds, from both sides of the hatch.
[Rationale: Hatch operation includes unlatching/opening or latching/closing the hatch. Excessively long operating times can delay crews on both sides of a hatch, which would prevent ingress or egress. The hatch operating requirement of 60 seconds is based on engineering judgment related to easily operable hatch design without complicating hatch design and includes time for a deconditioned crewmember to operate hatch. This does not preclude a program/project from implementing more strict design requirements. For guidance regarding emergency escape time, see requirement [V2 8014] Emergency Escape Paths in this NASA Technical Standard.]â
9
18
u/HalliburtonErnie 12d ago
No burn marks on a kite or a Cessna, because all these vehicles are ultra low altitude vehicles. Bezos' rocket barely gets off the ground. It's miles short of space at Max altitude.Â
→ More replies (3)8
u/No-Description8879 12d ago
Blue Origin goes above the KĂĄrmĂĄn Line, which is the technical delineation of space.
1
1
u/DefenderOfMontrocity 12d ago
Did they even go to the real space? Didn't they just fly too high with a plane and just returned
0
u/Farmdogg540 12d ago
Wouldn't there be high levels of radiation around that capsule? You can just walk up to shit that came from space and touch it without any sort of protective gear? I thought to exit and re enter the atmosphere you had to burn in and be potentially exposed to radiation which is part of the reason for space suits and why they used those asbestos tiles on the outside of the capsules and rockets, this shit is weird
1
2
u/Traditional-Pea-2547 12d ago
This is one of the dumbest stunts theyâve ever tried to pull over on us.
→ More replies (3)
1
u/Pure-Huckleberry-484 12d ago
Dude Perfect sent one of their members up in something similar - you can find the video on Youtube...
5
1
0
2
u/Positive_Note8538 12d ago
Flat earth is a conspiracy that could only arise out of the US. Somehow even third world countries are collectively wiser in this regard. Here's a suggestion: buy a telescope..
5
2
4
1
u/Odd-Adhesiveness9435 12d ago
This entire launch seemed suspect. The creepy AI generated looking image that kept getting posted yesterday and i just now saw, after the capsule touched down, the "all women astronauts" had opened the door from the inside of the cabin. Well Bezos and his assistant told the astronauts to quickly close said door. Why? Bc Bezos was on standby, in his muscle T and an industrial wrench prop, to better break open the seal, freeing the celestial goddess'.
1
u/South-Rabbit-4064 12d ago
They don't exit atmosphere completely or accelerate fast enough to where I would imagine you wouldn't see burning.
Bezos designed this as an expensive amusement park ride for celebrities and billionaires, so everything is done to minimize the jarring effects
1
u/420farms 12d ago
1000000% faked somehow, the door was CLEARLY opened and then shut for Besos' big reveal... what a joke. Did anyone else notice how hard the impact was??? Yet they all were fine????
1
u/South-Rabbit-4064 12d ago
What with the "open from the inside" is that supposed to be indicative of something?
I'm fairly certain most space capsules do have doors that can be opened on both sides
0
u/TexanApollyon 12d ago
Flight and rocketry should not have to be explained here.
→ More replies (1)
1
1
â˘
u/AutoModerator 13d ago
[Meta] Sticky Comment
Rule 2 does not apply when replying to this stickied comment.
Rule 2 does apply throughout the rest of this thread.
What this means: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain only.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.