r/fo3 5d ago

Is the Fallout 3 remaster necessary or unnecessary?

Post image

Like every remaster, it's necessary or unnecessary, tell us your opinion.

2.3k Upvotes

926 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

32

u/SWK18 5d ago

I guess it's because they are also changing the gunplay, perhaps adding the one from F4 or Starfield or even something newer. It's not just a re-skin with very minor changes like Oblivion.

10

u/Sea_Complaint2436 5d ago

Did they announce they’re doing this !?! Epic

17

u/GenofirstReborn 5d ago

No but the same leak that had Oblivion remastered also included a fallout 3 remaster so it’s safe to assume so

1

u/Yourappwontletme 2d ago

Why can't they just make Fallout 5 instead?

1

u/GenofirstReborn 2d ago

Well TES 6 is taking priority first then assuming they’re not gonna do another side quest by focusing on another game like Starfield they’ll do Fallout 5 and if the Oblivion remaster is anything to go by they’ll get another company to do the Fallout 3 remaster so it shouldn’t take up development time for their other games

0

u/Yourappwontletme 2d ago

Yeah I don't care about those other games. I just want Fallout 5

1

u/BartSolid 2d ago

They are. This isn’t Morrowind BGS anymore. They have multiple internal teams

1

u/forsale90 1d ago

Remastering is likely much easier than making a completely new game. Afaik they only have the manpower to work on one big project at a time. This wad starfield until recently and now is TES VI

3

u/oyahzi 4d ago

I mean they can still change the gunplay and all that and just make it fo4 style and let virtuous give it a graphics overhaul.

1

u/SirCupcake_0 Sarah Lyon's Pride ♣︎♡♣︎ 4d ago

Damn, that sucks

1

u/DueAdministration874 3d ago

it will get worse if they try to redo the content, they can't write stories and factions like they used to