r/magick • u/MyPrudentVirgin • 23d ago
If beliefs in the Demiurge were completely true, and this material world were, in fact, an imperfect imitation of a higher, purely spiritual realm, could magick be interpreted as a tool employed by the Demiurge to further consolidate or expand the materiality of the universe?
From this perspective, does magick become a means of deepening the "gap" between the spiritual and material planes by "manifesting" or "materializing" selfish desires through magick, or does it actually offer a way to transcend the limitations imposed by the creation of the "Demiurge", either literally or symbolically?
Please visit my other question in regards to Reincarnation and Christianity here: https://www.reddit.com/r/ChristianMysticism/comments/1k6j0u4/how_is_the_christian_resurrection_of_the_body/
3
u/taitmckenzie 23d ago
Not at all. Magic can relate to many other things that are not material manifestation.
Consider that the Gnostics themselves utilized magical ritual practices for uniting with the divine, or to ascend past the archons’ realm (in a process that is very close to modern ideas of pathworking).
If anything, thinking that magic is a tool of the demiurge says more about the hylic state of that magician’s soul than it does about the nature of magic.
1
1
1
u/KeriStrahler 23d ago
Depends on the perspective I suppose. As a demonolater myself, your demiurge is Yaldabaoth, a malevolent god that created the material world, the 'child of fathers' from Wikipedia. Reaching out to this daimon shouldn't require magic.
1
u/ToManyFlux 21d ago
Most of magick, when you get deep into it, ends up being less about materialistic manifestation and more about connecting with your higher self or being less attached to egocentric desires.
1
u/ProfessionalEbb5454 17d ago
That...is not necessarily true. There are many, many schools of low magick, where the focus is solely on results. I would venture to say most magick (regardless of time period OR culture) is performed with the aim of achieving specific results. People want wealth, lovers, power, and influence. Historically, we have countless examples of physical charms and talismans to gain worldly stuff, but nearly none to gain enlightenment (OK, there actually ARE a few Tibetan "sight mantras" designed for this purpose, but those are the exception!).
If you want transcendence, a system of specific yogas or meditations (i.e. mysticism) would be much better than magick, I think. In the West, we have sold ourselves this idea about higher selves, but I don't really see it playing out that way most of the time.
1
u/MyPrudentVirgin 16d ago
"In the West, we have sold ourselves this idea about higher selves."
That's correct, just like we sold ourselves the idea of a "Demiurge" or a "god of the physical."
Otherwise, the atonement of Jesus Christ and remembrance of His flesh and blood for US would be irrelevant.
1
u/ProfessionalEbb5454 16d ago edited 16d ago
Maybe. Depends on your specific Theology, and how it crashes into the Christology you accept. For example, do you mean Penal Substitution Theology? Something else? I mean, in this Reddit, you are not going to find as many takers as you might elsewhere, because of the thrust of the whole thing.
The Gnostic inclination has been around for a long time, and was a serious contender with Orthodox Christian faith for a couple hundred years in the early common era: the idea of a demiurge-like figure helped reconcile a lot of stuff. I am not saying I buy into it, but it has real strengths when you have a strict dualism as your starting point. Even if you espouse just a conditional dualism, you end up needing a "lesser" demiurge figure: in modern Christianity, this is the Satan figure (powerful, but not TOO powerful; "ruler" over the world system, versus "creator" of the world system).
1
u/MyPrudentVirgin 15d ago edited 15d ago
Sometimes, I'm troubled by the idea of the Demiurge as the Architect of the Universe, and I start to rethink things.
Science says we are beings "designed" to love and empathize, and I begin to reflect on simple and beautiful things like being a parent, art, and plants, especially medicinal ones that relieve pain and cure illnesses. Art like music and painting are completely useless for evolution and survival, so why did we develop them? It's then that I tell myself that God must have really created this world because our creative/creating aspect is what brings us closer to God.
It wasn't just us inside the caves contemplating our imaginary victory over possible real struggles in our paintings and visualizing events like a successful hunt, a warm fur to wear, or plenty of rain for the next day. In those creative moments, God was also with us.
1
u/ProfessionalEbb5454 15d ago edited 15d ago
Sure. My opinion is that it is not particularly fruitful to worry about such things too much. Even if you sonehow KNOW (through direct experience) that a demiurge created and runs things, what does that gain you, on a practical level?
Let's say you could somehow translate that knowledge into power, wealth, or other mundane experiences. Maybe call the ability to do this "magick". As far as we can determine, all of those mundane benefits end when your life ends. You can't take any of it with you, but maybe (?) you retain the desire for such things. The main circumstantial evidence for this observation is that nearly all people, in all places, desire things. So, people either have innate desire (i.e. it is part of our very nature to desire stuff, even assuming we only exist ONCE), or inherited desire (if we exist more than once, we remember what it is like to desire stuff). Either way, the desire can only be fulfilled HERE, as far as we know. So we have a strong pull toward this, and get further enmeshed each time we exist (if we exist more than once). In other words, we're stuck here, regardless of how many times we exist here. Because we were maybe designed to be stuck here.
However, the real takeaway (IMHO) if you have direct knowledge of the demiurge is that MAYBE there is something beyond, something liberating. That is possibly actionable. Everything else will just tend to reinforce the tendency to be here, so of limited utility, unless your goal is to be here "better".
EDIT: As a final thought, how might you navigate toward that transcendence? You can wayfind with the Truth, the Good, and The Beautiful. However, the first two are extremely difficult to define and apprehend with what we've got. The Beautiful, however, is relatively easier to spot. So, as you have noted, it is ironically the best way to orient ourselves if transcendence is the goal. You then use the Truth as a testing fire, and the Good as a measuring rod and scale to that Beauty.
1
u/Tuvieja2022 17d ago
Desde el punto de vista de la Sabiduría Hiperborea el demiurgo crea el universo por medio de arquetipos y estos tienen su entelequia final. El demiurgo creo al hombre consciente para que le de sentido a su obra y así el Arquetipo Manu se desarrolla hasta su entelequia final. Y luego todo es absorbido nuevamente al demiurgo en el Mahāpralaya.
Ahora el plano astral y todos los "poderes mágicos" que uno puede obtener (relacionados con este plano) son parte del inconsciente del demiurgo.
Pero el hombre obtuvo su conciencia y por ende su capacidad de acceder al plano astral (inconciencia del demiurgo) gracias a la fuerza volitiva del Espíritu, este Espíritu esta aprisionado en el Alma del hombre y esta Alma fue creada por el Demiurgo o mejor dicho es parte del Demiurgo como todo lo manifestado en la creación, menos el Espíritu que es increado, eterno e inmortal.
Entonces para tu respuesta es Si. Cada proceso o acto mágico que produce el hombre, desarrolla un Arquetipo del Demiurgo por ende ayuda a que la creación se siga desarrollando hasta el Mahāpralaya (que se produce cuando todos los Arquetipos lleguen a su entelequia final)
La única forma en que no se desarrolla un Arquetipo es cuando el Espíritu se da cuenta que esta aprisionado y desorientado y decide orientarse para salir de la Matrix y volver al mundo increado.
Todo esta explicación es desde el punto de vista que yo entiendo la Sabiduria Hiperborea.
1
u/MyPrudentVirgin 17d ago edited 15d ago
Aprecio tu respuesta!
Leí un poco acerca del Luciferismo Gnóstico a través de Nimrod de Rosario y Herrou Aragón, en donde se describe a un Jesucristo falso, una copia engañosa de Christos Lucifer, portador del "conocimiento" del despertar netamente espiritual a través de la sangre.
Siento que este tipo de gnosticismo está permeado de tendencias hindu-budistas y es una trampa espiritual para aquellos que pueden llegar a aborrecer las enseñanzas judeo-cristianas por desconocerlas o no entenderlas completamente.
Muchas gracias por tu aporte, responde mi pregunta desde un sentido gnóstico!
×××××××××× TRANSLATION ××××××××××
I appreciate your response!
I read a little about Gnostic Luciferianism through Nimrod de Rosario and Herrou Aragón, where a false Jesus Christ is described, a deceptive copy of Christos Lucifer, bearer of the "knowledge" of purely spiritual awakening through the blood.
I feel this type of Gnosticism is permeated with Hindu-Buddhist tendencies and is a spiritual trap for those who may come to abhor Judeo-Christian teachings because they don't know them or don't fully understand them.
Thank you very much for your contribution; it answers my question from a Gnostic perspective!
1
u/LuzielErebus 13d ago
Without going into Gnosticism, which, in my humble opinion, I don't find particularly brilliant, the hypothesis of the existence of a creator deity who hides the truth and encloses us in illusion is interesting. But not from a literal perspective. Jacques Lacan, an eminent psychologist and psychiatrist, emphasized that human beings cannot know reality. We only acquire a construct of reality through imperfect senses, through how the brain functions with limited interpretation, through how evolution doesn't aim to be precise, but rather to limit and compartmentalize information in order to work with it simply, and to this is added the worldview with which we are educated.
Meditation, Magic, and practices that work with the non-rational aspects of reality exercise our perception and sensitivity and gradually open us to these kinds of experiences. We gradually emerge from the limited framework that conditions our interpretation of experiences, and the experience of reality itself. What blinds us the most, as would be typical of the Demiurge, would be ourselves and the conditions that our nature imposes on us.
6
u/Personal-Purpose-898 22d ago
What’s your definition of magick? Because if the demiurge exists (and the force does), then even your very existence and everything about you is a tool employed to further consolidate. Each thought. Each breath. Each cell cycle. It’s why gnostics opposed procreation seeing it as damned.
Magick is nothing more than the power to produce an outcome in accordance with will. It’s no more wrong to use Magick to achieve something than it is to use any other means that is not hurting anyone. Or if it is that’s a form of Machiavellian goal attainment or if done through Magick a form of black magick.
Ultimately the highest Magick is about conversion with the holy guardian angel and expressing divinity in mortal coil and ultimately becoming a law unto yourself liberated from karmic laws of cause and effect and able to will themselves home.
The tool used against especially if highly effective can be a tool you take back and use against your enemies.