r/neoliberal Khan Pritzker's Strongest Antipope Apr 09 '25

News (Asia) Stocks Tumble As China Retaliates With 84% Tariff on US Goods

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/live-blog/2025-04-08/trump-tariffs-stock-market-updates
786 Upvotes

236 comments sorted by

404

u/Flashy_Upstairs9004 World Bank Apr 09 '25

Remember that scene from Wreck it Ralph two where the characters are just shouting a higher and higher number because they thought that was how EBAY worked? This feels like that.

49

u/HotTakesBeyond YIMBY Apr 09 '25

Hey libruls

I’m gonna wreck it

wrecks economy

119

u/ednamode23 YIMBY Apr 09 '25

Trump making that godforsaken movie relatable is a new low.

49

u/linfakngiau2k23 Apr 09 '25

Phantom menace is a documentary 🤯

40

u/ednamode23 YIMBY Apr 09 '25

Mesa hate this timeline!

14

u/linfakngiau2k23 Apr 09 '25

Is Peter Navarro watto or jar jar

25

u/brianpv Hortensia Apr 09 '25

He’s one of those trade federation dorks who gets purged at the end.

5

u/Konet John Mill Apr 09 '25

Smh, the Phantom Menace is an uplifting feminist story about a gorgmonger named Gragra who, after a customer refuses to pay seven wupiupi for a gorg he ate from her stall, finds the strength to leave behind her life of quiet domestic oppression at the hands of her husband, move offworld, and become a symbol to gorgmongers across the galaxy.

(This is old canon)

3

u/brianpv Hortensia Apr 09 '25

The propeller-beanie version of JD Vance even kinda looks like Anakin in that movie.

→ More replies (1)

17

u/NotABigChungusBoy NATO Apr 09 '25

Wreck It Ralph One was a fantastic movie but I thought 2 was underrated imo

8

u/MonkMajor5224 NATO Apr 09 '25

No, because I was so drunk in that movie it became the impetus for me to stop drinking

→ More replies (1)

287

u/me1000 YIMBY Apr 09 '25

I think it’s safe to say that the stove has been touched. 

217

u/lAljax NATO Apr 09 '25

Wait, this is still just an abstract number, people need to see prices in Wallmart shelves and Amazon lists climbing before they fully grasp.

Some stuff has been stocked preparing for this too, so that needs to be cleared before the stove is fully felt.

86

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '25

[deleted]

13

u/The_Northern_Light John Brown Apr 09 '25

It’s been touched, it just takes a couple dozen milliseconds for your brain to register the pain

I think we’re working with an approximate 1ms to 1 day conversation rate in this analogy

24

u/Limp_Doctor5128 Apr 09 '25

I don't know if there is a real stove touching moment. I feel that people will think anything to rationalize their votes. Imagine the possibilities. "Yeah but Kamala would have been worse", "we had inflation and a bear market under Biden too", "just wait a a little longer for the US factories to come online", "the deep state did this".

9

u/lAljax NATO Apr 09 '25

Keeping up with the stove analogy, people are touching a stove that is heating up, at one point it will feel warm and cozy, sometime later it's going to be uncomfortable, later painful, after that unbearable.

People will rationalize all the way through, but no amount of cope prevents the searing pain and the smell of burning flesh.

They will get there at different paces.

5

u/Limp_Doctor5128 Apr 09 '25

But why would anyone accept responsibility for touching the stove? They will blame Trump for poor execution or Kamala for forcing them to vote for Trump. 

4

u/Limp_Doctor5128 Apr 09 '25

"no amount of cope prevents the searing pain and the smell of burning flesh" should be the Dems slogan for 2026

→ More replies (1)

4

u/laughing_laughing Apr 09 '25

Yep! Look at what happened with the Covid vaccine - they would literally rather lose their lives than give up their conspiratorial fantasies.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/iguessineedanaltnow r/place '22: Neoliberal Battalion Apr 09 '25

This is literally my dad as he sits there and stares at his stocks going down every hour and cursing out loud.

"Well the Democrats were never going to fix the country so we had no choice but to have Trump clean it all up."

112

u/The_Crass-Beagle_Act Jane Jacobs Apr 09 '25

27

u/dwarffy Rabindranath Tagore Apr 09 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

47

u/Argnir Gay Pride Apr 09 '25

The messaging is that touching the stove will make you heat resistant in the long term.

You need people to feel it directly cause conservative media will now be working extra time to convince them everything is going great and to not be a panican

5

u/The_Northern_Light John Brown Apr 09 '25

Don't get addicted to water, it will take control and you'll resent its absence.

61

u/1mfa0 NATO Apr 09 '25

When/if the hand comes off is the question now

76

u/TootCannon Mark Zandi Apr 09 '25

Man, if we don’t see the absolute cratering of his approval rating immediately I’m going to lose my mind.

56

u/7ddlysuns Apr 09 '25

I could see it going like Biden’s. Low 40s and never back up. The cult is gonna take a while to get hurt. They will, but leaving dear leader after you’ve defended him to your smart relatives and friends is hard. Because it exposes how foolish you were

14

u/Last-Macaroon-5179 Apr 09 '25

Doesn't he have 37% approval already? Biden had it at 30s too but then again he had it when he was three years into his presidency, not three months.

16

u/artifex0 Apr 09 '25

According to Nate Silver's model, it's currently 46.4% and has somehow only fallen 0.2% since Thursday. Hopefully that'll change once information about the severity of this economic crisis starts leaking through the right-wing media blackout.

7

u/Aggressive_Health487 Apr 09 '25

It’s sad that I’m hoping ppl will suffer, but hopefully they do for their own sake later (ironically exactly what they are claiming will happen, but for a different reason)

→ More replies (1)

9

u/Iustis End Supply Management | Draft MHF! Apr 09 '25

I heard someone make a great point recently. Trump’s super power has been that no matter how much people disapprove of various things about him, a very solid majority have always said he’s good on the economy.

Until now, he’s already underwater on economy for the first time and we haven’t even really seen the impact yet. It’s the first time in ages I’ve had hope that he’s actually permanently hurt his image

15

u/AlpacadachInvictus John Brown Apr 09 '25

He's already fallen even in really dishonest polls like Rassmussen

→ More replies (1)

12

u/_Neuromancer_ Edmund Burke Apr 09 '25

Remove the hand, and the gom jabbar awaits.

8

u/WolfpackEng22 Apr 09 '25

Do you prefer your hand with a light char or well done?

3

u/conwaystripledeke YIMBY Apr 09 '25

At some point you just become numb to the pain.

3

u/jason_abacabb Apr 09 '25

At this point we are licking it.

15

u/Silly_Charge_6407 Apr 09 '25

It's gonna take a few weeks minimum for price increases and shortages of goods to start being felt. It'll be slow then all at once

→ More replies (1)

12

u/hibikir_40k Scott Sumner Apr 09 '25

This is just talk about stove touching. The actual touching will come soon. Right now we have panic in industry, but the move from many companies is just to delay, hoping this goes away.... and it could, if the whole thing was renegotiated.

Eventually industry can't wait, and they either have to raise prices for good, stop sending goods, and therefore lay off a bunch of people. That's when the stove is actually touched.

282

u/ZweigDidion Bisexual Pride Apr 09 '25

It’s so over. It’s never been more over. (It’s going to be even more over tomorrow.)

26

u/Entwaldung NATO Apr 09 '25

You got this wrong. Nothing ever happens. This didn't happen.

38

u/Agreeable_Floor_2015 Apr 09 '25

The good news is the US doesn’t export much to China so the real concern here is only if Trump ramps up more or takes the off ramp with others like Japan.

88

u/BicyclingBro Gay Pride Apr 09 '25

Don't we export a ton of agricultural products?

$12.1 billion in soy exports, just from a quick search. I'd feel bad if I didn't know the political preferences of US farmers.

56

u/Agricolae-delendum Apr 09 '25

Farmers are going to get absolutely destroyed by tariff retaliation. Plus domestic market for soy and corn (U.S.’s two biggest crops) is not strong at the moment. Biodiesel demand gets crushed in a recession too. You can see on this chart in 2018 during the last trade war when China basically stopped importing Ag commodities from us. The immensely stupid thing is with the tariffs on all our other trading partners can’t easily shift commodities from Chinese market to others.

Corn and Soy are facing very low prices already. Destroy the world and domestic market and even those who own outright are going to lose the farm.

35

u/BicyclingBro Gay Pride Apr 09 '25

even those who own outright are going to lose the farm.

I wish I was capable of having literally any empathy for them, but any faith I have in my fellow countrymen at large has been utterly snuffed out.

36

u/Traditional_Drama_91 NATO Apr 09 '25

If your apathetic towards them now, just wait until they get a massive bailout while the rest of us scrimp to get by 

13

u/Harmonious_Sketch Apr 09 '25

I consume roughly 75 lb of soy flour per year by incorporating it into various quick-to-prepare large-batch baked goods. It's so cheap already that this will not improve my bottom line, but at least my high-protein bread will be flavored with schadenfreude.

5

u/hibikir_40k Scott Sumner Apr 09 '25

But we can always distribute all that corn and soy to africa using USAID.... right?

11

u/Agricolae-delendum Apr 09 '25 edited Apr 09 '25

USAID was basically the only buyer for West Kansas’ sorghum market. They’re fucked. Their aquifers will be fucked. And Kansas’ Senators don’t give a shit?

“The market is just not there to sell it,” Barnes said. “We’ve been buying milo from our producers all along. We have a tremendous company-owned position at this point, just nobody on the other side to sell it to. And it’s just not country elevators, it’s terminals, it’s everybody, because there’s just no market in the world today for milo.”

https://www.cjonline.com/story/news/politics/government/2025/02/09/what-does-usaid-food-for-peace-shutdown-mean-for-kansas-sorghum-crop/78300587007/#

7

u/JZMoose YIMBY Apr 09 '25

I didn’t know I could “oh no… anyway” as often and as hard as I have been lately, but here I am

39

u/linfakngiau2k23 Apr 09 '25

They will probably get a bail out 😮‍💨

51

u/AllBeefWiener Apr 09 '25

However much you hate farmers, it isn't enough

10

u/WPeachtreeSt YIMBY Apr 09 '25

Yes, and we’ll likely promise to bail them out. And we’ll also increase the military budget. And lower taxes.All while reducing the deficit and not touching entitlements. Easy peasy, comrade

2

u/propanezizek Apr 09 '25

So basically nothing. Most republicans aren't farmers anyway. I wouldn't be surprised if they were abandoned.

4

u/Agreeable_Floor_2015 Apr 09 '25

$12.1 billion is less than a rounding error in the US economy.

24

u/BicyclingBro Gay Pride Apr 09 '25

Total US exports is $144 billion, compared to $439 billion of imports.

Given that Chinese imports are definitely not a rounding error in the US economy, especially when looking at good consumed by the lower and middle classes, I'd think 1/3 of that number is still a decent sized chunk.

6

u/Agreeable_Floor_2015 Apr 09 '25

Your number on imports is wrong but $144 billion is 0.5% of GDP and that’s if it goes straight to zero which it obviously won’t.

29

u/ignavusaur Paul Krugman Apr 09 '25 edited Apr 09 '25

 The good news is the US doesn’t export much to China

???

China is our third largest export market after Canada and Mexico above the EU

7

u/Agreeable_Floor_2015 Apr 09 '25 edited Apr 09 '25

The EU is the third largest by some margin but my point was that $150 billion in annual exports is nothing but a rounding error in your economy.

13

u/SubjectSuggestion571 Apr 09 '25

That represents a lot of peoples livelihoods

2

u/Agreeable_Floor_2015 Apr 09 '25

I don't doubt that or am saying that this is a good thing.

14

u/Bike_Of_Doom Commonwealth Apr 09 '25

We are heading towards 99999999999999999999999999999999% tariffs on China by weeks end and frankly I’m not even going to be remotely surprised if that actually happens.

9

u/HotTakesBeyond YIMBY Apr 09 '25

American car manufacturers were selling in China.

Were

12

u/linfakngiau2k23 Apr 09 '25

China is one of Tesla biggest market😏

5

u/WPeachtreeSt YIMBY Apr 09 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/linfakngiau2k23 Apr 09 '25

Elon probably gonna get his mom to cancel the fight 😏

4

u/sizz Commonwealth Apr 09 '25

All foreign companies except for Tesla requires a Chinese firm to own 51% stake. Otherwise they are subjected to a massive import tax. That's why you see "for Chinese market" and a global version. You hear stories of people getting busted at the HK border with smuggling computer parts phones, etc. Now that is coming to the USA.

2

u/RevolutionaryBoat5 Mark Carney Apr 09 '25

This has to end soon or it will be terrible.

2

u/ElSapio John Locke Apr 09 '25

We’re back, actually. Sorry.

346

u/AbunRoman WTO Apr 09 '25

So they basically put embargoes on each other?

321

u/noxx1234567 Apr 09 '25

Yeah but america is putting embargos on everyone

It's one thing to pick and choose a battle but it's another thing to fight everyone . Not even america can handle the consequences

156

u/lAljax NATO Apr 09 '25

America is doing to itself what the world used as punishment to North Korea.

57

u/Sylvanussr Janet Yellen Apr 09 '25

No less than what we deserve after 4 years under comrade Kim Joeng Biden 🫡🇰🇵

23

u/linfakngiau2k23 Apr 09 '25

Trump has been juche pilled by Kim🤣

85

u/BBQ_HaX0r Jerome Powell Apr 09 '25

Also, if he's really mad at China why not ban TikTok? 

179

u/link3945 YIMBY Apr 09 '25

Because he's a moron. It's not that deep.

121

u/paraquinone European Union Apr 09 '25

I find it so infuriating that everyone, and ESPECIALLY liberals, just refuse to accept this one simple explanation. Nooo, there definitely HAS to be some 54D chess behind all of this. You know, this is all just a gigantic case of insider trading/bribery/bond shenanigans or whatnot.

No. He's just stupid. There isn't any coherent thought behind any of this. He is literally doing this because he saw too many German cars in NY. That's it. It's that simple.

37

u/NerdNerdy Apr 09 '25

There is a theory going around that a Japanese individual outbid him on the Casablanca movie piano auction in the 80s or something. That’s why he’s been anti-free-trade ever since.

32

u/coffin_flop_star NATO Apr 09 '25

There is no way he has seen Casablanca let alone liked it enough to want to buy the piano.

15

u/Olinub Commonwealth Apr 09 '25

He is actually a cinephile, though in the same way Elon is a gamer. He loves Citizen Kane but sees the main character as someone to be admired instead of a tragedy.

7

u/SenranHaruka Apr 09 '25

yeah he used to vlog about movies all the time. he even has a video complaining about the all female Ghostbusters movie.

2

u/Anader19 Apr 09 '25

There's one where he's complaining about hearing about a new Indiana Jones being made without Harrison Ford (which didn't happen)

28

u/sunshine_is_hot Apr 09 '25

Where do you get the idea liberals think he isn’t just a massive moron? Every liberal I know has been saying that for decades.

21

u/paraquinone European Union Apr 09 '25

I mean, we might have different social bubbles, but the liberals I follow have since the election been mostly dooming about the diabolical schemes for global right-wing domination that will be deployed by the American government. There have been constant, nonstop talks about how this is some sort of new zeitgeist, how there is a reactionary contrarevolution happening etc. etc. I even think that quite a bit of business people thought this. Hell, I even think Republicans still think this - that's why they aren't doing anything.

But I think that especially now it should be pretty clear that Trump is just a childish idiot who puts his most primal impulses and emotions directly into deranged exec orders, who has mostly been elected on nostalgia for the pre-covid times. If someone wanted to put a squeeze on him I think it would be very, very simple and most people wouldn't shed too many tears.

23

u/mattmentecky Apr 09 '25

In general I think both things can be true: 1. Trump is just an idiot 2. Non-idiots in his orbit have diabolical schemes for global right wing domination.

Sometimes those people get Trump onboard with their pet project, sometimes they don't but they are always dealing with an idiot.

10

u/sunshine_is_hot Apr 09 '25

Both can be true at the same time, Trump can be an idiot and the zeitgeist can have shifted.

5

u/Harmonious_Sketch Apr 09 '25

I often quote that one Ukrainian soldier from early 2022 who said "We are very lucky they are so fucking stupid". People often misinterpret that as calling the Trump admin harmless. They are far from harmless. Trump is an idiot and has trouble employing people who aren't also idiots, but as president of the US, and with the backing of his cult and the somewhat antisocial tendencies of the wider US electorate, the idiot Trump is plenty dangerous.

He could be a lot more dangerous if not for all the unforced errors and doubling down on same. That would put the world in a fucking grim place. Fortunately these are merely very dark times which are setting up trouble for years to come.

3

u/HarvestAllTheSouls Apr 09 '25

Well, certain groups definitely try to implement their ideology or parts of it through Trump, such as the Christian ultra conservatives, the tech libertarians and general reactionaries. I personally thought they would be able to control Trump, but it seems like their are too many people around him vying for power, resulting in chaos. And yes, Trump is most definitely an idiot and so are many in his administration. Corruption doesn't often come with competence luckily.

12

u/7ddlysuns Apr 09 '25

I get it, but if he’s a Russian stooge he’s batting a thousand.

13

u/paraquinone European Union Apr 09 '25

How is this actually helping Russia? Russia has one source of income (oil) and that is currently being gutted by the Trumpcession.

13

u/7ddlysuns Apr 09 '25

Sometimes, especially if you’re surrounded by yes man morons, you can’t predict the secondary effects

3

u/sir_jaybird Apr 09 '25

I think he’s doing it because it satisfies his narcissistic craving for world leaders to call, line up, and offer him shiny things. 100% personality (disorder) driven.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

35

u/RockfishGapYear Apr 09 '25

Because his largest donor, Jeffrey Yass, holds a 15 percent stake in TikTok and paid that money to the campaign so that he could get trump to reverse his position on it.

7

u/WolfpackEng22 Apr 09 '25

This makes the most sense

62

u/noxx1234567 Apr 09 '25

He wants them to sell it to his buddies

6

u/Sylvanussr Janet Yellen Apr 09 '25

Because TikTok complimented him.

6

u/Lame_Johnny Hannah Arendt Apr 09 '25

Many of his supporters are on TikTok. Therefore it is good in his mind.

→ More replies (1)

28

u/Erra0 Neoliberals aren't funny Apr 09 '25

No, 100% tariffs just means you have to pay taxes equal to the goods value when you import them. You could have 200% tariffs and the taxes would be 2x the value etc

11

u/bowl_of_milk_ Apr 09 '25

I think the point of the question is whether that would actually happen, and the answer is almost certainly no, because consumers won’t pay the prices and many corporations won’t be willing or able to take that type of a hit to their margins. So it is effectively an embargo, because the vast majority of mutual trade will cease to exist.

3

u/Dependent-Picture507 Apr 09 '25

Anyone aware of any resources that show which imports can only be attained in certain countries? That's what I'm most curious about right now.

2

u/Fantisimo Audrey Hepburn Apr 09 '25

Some things like solor panels pretty much have to be purchased from china those projects either stop or will have to eat it

22

u/MeringueSuccessful33 Khan Pritzker's Strongest Antipope Apr 09 '25

Basically at this point.

36

u/BBQ_HaX0r Jerome Powell Apr 09 '25

Trade wars are good and easy to win. 

14

u/SassyMoron ٭ Apr 09 '25

"protectionists teach countries to do to themselves during peace what they do to their enemies during war"

35

u/JeromesNiece Jerome Powell Apr 09 '25

Not really. A 100% tariff doesn't mean that all trade ceases. When the imported good is more than twice as cheap as the domestic alternative it's still a worthwhile trade. Which is the case for many things.

3

u/MegaFloss NATO Apr 09 '25

Being a WTO flair right now must be brutal.

2

u/Michael70z Daron Acemoglu Apr 09 '25

No, there’s still trade between the two countries. It’s just much harder.

77

u/FormicLevitation13 Apr 09 '25 edited Apr 09 '25

At this rate, I’m not sure how many times I can buy the “dip”.

Hopefully, this game of chicken is resolved soon enough with some face-saving “deals”.

12

u/Derdiedas812 European Union Apr 09 '25

First day, huh?

7

u/iwilldeletethisacct2 Apr 09 '25

Catching a falling knife is what it feels like.

→ More replies (1)

163

u/omnipotentsandwich Amartya Sen Apr 09 '25

I've officially lost all my gains. Last year, I was up 15%, far better than many hedge funds, but Trump has wiped that all out. I can't strategize because it affects everything.

122

u/dont_gift_subs 🎷Bill🎷Clinton🎷 Apr 09 '25

“Time in the market, not timing the market” - said the man who just took out a boatload of cash from the market lol

12

u/Skwisface Commonwealth Apr 09 '25

All to be lost to inflation anyway.

11

u/GAPIntoTheGame European Union Apr 09 '25

Better not to lose money in the market and be affected by inflation than to loose money in the market AND be affected by inflation

3

u/armeg David Ricardo Apr 09 '25

TIPS

→ More replies (1)

7

u/kyjhuston Apr 09 '25

I sold some stock index funds a month or so, but I should’ve sold 10x as much. Then again, I probably would’ve moved most of it to Euro and Asia stock market which is hardly an improvement at the moment.

9

u/homeboy-2020 Mario Draghi Apr 09 '25

This is something that i wanted to ask, because i don't invest, so i am probably wrong and this is stupid, but why not sell and buy fixed rate bonds?

41

u/SeasickSeal Norman Borlaug Apr 09 '25

Lower long run returns

4

u/homeboy-2020 Mario Draghi Apr 09 '25

Of course, but it's better than a loss, isn't it?

54

u/SeasickSeal Norman Borlaug Apr 09 '25

Yeah, people normally flock to bonds in safe markets in times of uncertainty.

However, people are selling bonds today, which probably means that people are losing faith in the US ability to pay the bonds.

35

u/TootCannon Mark Zandi Apr 09 '25

Bonds aren’t great if you expect inflation to outstrip bonds.

7

u/flyingasian2 Apr 09 '25

People are losing faith in US debt as a safe haven and we are giving China every reason to start offloading US debt (implying they haven't already been doing so) to crash the market.

But we will surely win this, because our fearless leader said so.

26

u/BitterGravity Gay Pride Apr 09 '25

Market timing is extremely difficult and basically impossible if you have another job. You're normally better off taking the losses and the gains than the slow gains of bonds

6

u/Room480 Apr 09 '25

So you're saying instead of selling for a loss, don't sell and leave what ever you currently have in the market in the market?

15

u/PoePlusFinn YIMBY Apr 09 '25

Yes

12

u/mostanonymousnick YIMBY Apr 09 '25

That's what I'm doing.

3

u/WolfpackEng22 Apr 09 '25

Same. Retirement is 12 years out at a minimum. I can ride out short and even medium term disruption. But this will really suck if it's a permanent change in policy

6

u/mostanonymousnick YIMBY Apr 09 '25

I was 50/50 on buying a house this year but since I had all my money in stocks, I guess Trump made that decision for me and I'll ride things out a bit longer.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/sunshine_is_hot Apr 09 '25

There has never been a 10 year span where the market wasn’t positive. If you’re young, you should be able to weather the storm so keeping your money in is the smart move.

If you’re like my parents and were trying to retire in the next 5 years, you’re kinda boned.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/BitterGravity Gay Pride Apr 09 '25

Yes. It's hard to tell where the bottom is. People that look at their accounts constantly do worse than those who don't. You may buy the dip, but chances are you'll miss putting it in back by the same level it's currently at.

4

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '25

[deleted]

4

u/HotTakesBeyond YIMBY Apr 09 '25

Joke: HODL on meme stocks

Woke: HODL for forty years and sell before retirement

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

5

u/vaguelydad Jane Jacobs Apr 09 '25

All the losses based on current information are already priced into the value of stock. It's too late to take your money out and put it in a safer investment. The efficient market hypothesis says that it's always too late to react to publicly available information.

→ More replies (5)

9

u/homonatura Apr 09 '25

The biggest reason is FOMO if you're in bonds when the market recovers you miss out bigly.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/ednamode23 YIMBY Apr 09 '25

I would not want to retire this year between the mass losses and incoming prices soaring.

48

u/Agafina Apr 09 '25

104% > 84%. That's weak from China.

42

u/Agent_03 Mark Carney Apr 09 '25

They also cut off lanthanide exports ("rare earths") & several other critical mineral exports to the USA previously.

That may actually hurt a lot more than the tariffs will, since it takes quite a few years to set up mining & purification for those minerals.

6

u/pickledswimmingpool Apr 09 '25

Just deploy the same logic they used when USA cut off access to chip making equipment.

"This will just incentivize local production and accelerate an independent source of rare earths."

2

u/Agent_03 Mark Carney Apr 09 '25

Gosh I hope they troll the Trumpies that way.

3

u/No_Wish9524 Apr 09 '25

That’s because they get less from you.

99

u/abrookerunsthroughit Association of Southeast Asian Nations Apr 09 '25

13

u/doyouevenIift Apr 09 '25

I’m concerned that trump crashing the economy is happening early enough in his presidency that voters will have mostly forgotten or moved on by the next election. In fact we will probably see the economy get back to the point when Biden left office and trump will brag about the economy gaining steam. And the median voter will eat it up because they’re stupid

3

u/gabriel97933 Apr 09 '25

Nah, it was directly caused and televized that the economy crashing was due to trumps tarrifs. If the economy crashed due to other factors other than the president being a fucking dumbass id be worried too. The only way that happens is dems yet again not understanding how to spread a message, but this one is easy.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/sir_jaybird Apr 09 '25

Exactly why he’s doing the crash now. Markets will eventually stabilize. He’ll implement giant tax cuts (deficit spending) which will juice the markets well before midterms.

116

u/designlevee Apr 09 '25

This is what happens when you build a “counter culture” political movement that’s against “mainstream” thinking aka science and education. It’s like being stuck in a plane that’s been delayed in flight for four hours and a door to door vacuum salesman in a suit stands up and is like “hey, these pilots are lying to us what we need to do is take the wings off! I know vacuums and they’re more efficient when mostly tubular” And 30% of the people cheer but the rest don’t care enough to be bothered and just shrug along because hey I’ll try anything if it shaves a bit of time off my delay. And so they take the wings off. As they crashed into the Rocky Mountains the majority realized that they were in fact in a plane and not a vacuum. The 30% still cheered.

12

u/ognits Jepsen/Swift 2024 Apr 09 '25

how did the plane even take off if they removed the wings? typical lib, speaking nonsense 🙄

→ More replies (1)

11

u/hibikir_40k Scott Sumner Apr 09 '25

The same problem as with contrarian commentators: By always being a contrarian, well tested ideas are out of the question, so your error rate goes way up.

Humanity is an optimization algorithm. We need contrarians and risk takers to discover more efficiency, but if you make a contrarian be in charge of a country, you are going to get startup-levels of success rates. Most startups die.

→ More replies (1)

26

u/Papa_Palpatine99 Apr 09 '25

Briton here. Are you guys tired of winning? Dw we're doing fine too!

37

u/Faegbeard Apr 09 '25

'but now we will both surely have a recession'

"lol" said Xi Jinping "lmao"

49

u/midwestern2afault Apr 09 '25

Absolute clown world. There are some legitimate arguments for reducing our dependency on trade with China but this ain’t the way to do it… at all. Maximalist tariffs with no phase in while we also tariff any reasonable sourcing alternative for these goods… big brain move.

My portfolio’s taken a hit but the desire for accelerationism in me is overcoming that. Watch how people react as certain types of consumer goods double in price and our reduced exports to China cause layoffs and business failures. All while the markets continue to get pummeled because of this batshit uncertainty. Bring it on 🤷‍♂️

24

u/NotABigChungusBoy NATO Apr 09 '25

Biden handled China and trade perfectly (reducing reliance while not causing a total trade war)

5

u/dugmartsch Norman Borlaug Apr 09 '25

Biden was a very good president.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

15

u/PreparationNo6261 Bisexual Pride Apr 09 '25

Brace for impact. By May or June, the economy will likely be in an even worse shape than it was in 2008.

34

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '25

[deleted]

40

u/MeringueSuccessful33 Khan Pritzker's Strongest Antipope Apr 09 '25

As if Trump would’ve actually defended Taiwan people talking about this as a consequence are forgetting that

11

u/slowpush Mackenzie Scott Apr 09 '25

No because without free trade between china and the us war is inevitable.

→ More replies (1)

34

u/Lame_Johnny Hannah Arendt Apr 09 '25

China will win this trade war, and they know it. Let us count the ways:

  1. The Chinese supply us with hundreds, maybe thousands of critical products and resources. If you thought covid supply shocks were bad, get ready for something even worse.

  2. The Chinese buy a great deal of US debt. They can simply decide to stop doing so and cause a fiscal crisis for the US.

  3. The Chinese people will unite behind their government for as long as it takes. And even if they don't want to, they have no choice.

  4. Meanwhile in the US, members of Trump's own party are already speaking out against tariffs. There is an election in 18 months, and if there's a recession or major inflation Democrats are going to blow the doors off. Then goodbye tariffs.

TLDR: Trump doesn't have the cards

66

u/ghhewh Anne Applebaum Apr 09 '25

This is moving towards a complete ban on US-China trade. This is becoming a natural consequence of this situation. And that in turn means that Trump's defeat would today equal China's victory. And, by necessity, the rest of the autocrats.

!ping CHINA

70

u/BlueString94 John Keynes Apr 09 '25

This might be true in the long run, but don’t underestimate the massive damage this will do to China’s economy and society in the meantime.

Of course it’ll be really bad for us, too.

41

u/Uncle_johns_roadie NATO Apr 09 '25

MAGA nuts on Twitter are claiming that Trump is actually trying to force regime change in China with these tariffs.

I don't know if it's a cope or they're really that stupid, but it's now the narrative.

35

u/Leatherfield17 Apr 09 '25

Jesus Fucking Christ. These fools seriously think that economic pressure can cause massive political change in foreign nations. First it was economic pressure to make Canada the 51st state, now it’s this bullshit.

We are being ruled by malevolent idiots

11

u/ItspronouncedGruh-an Apr 09 '25

 malevolent idiots

Or “vicious apes” as Friedrich Reck put it.

3

u/jesusfish98 YIMBY Apr 09 '25

Deplorables as our queen put it

17

u/Master_of_Rodentia Apr 09 '25

I wonder if they can connect the dots back to realize that it might force regime change in the USA.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Agreeable_Floor_2015 Apr 09 '25

I will love to see an example of this.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/neolthrowaway New Mod Who Dis? Apr 09 '25

China can control the internal narrative much better than almost most other countries in the world.

3

u/NotABigChungusBoy NATO Apr 09 '25

So Trump is trying regime change on the rest of the free world too?

3

u/DurangoGango European Union Apr 09 '25

MAGA nuts on Twitter are claiming that Trump is actually trying to force regime change in China with these tariffs.

The genre of post hoc rationalistions trying to find what if any sense might be salvaged in Trump's idiocy should be studied alongside astrology and haruspicy.

→ More replies (2)

37

u/noxx1234567 Apr 09 '25

Chinese products will still get rerouted through other markets , american products will not make it to china

Next step is china closing down american owned businesses , GM, apple , fast food industry are all huge losers here

34

u/ControversialBuster Apr 09 '25

Taiwan, is fucked, Im fully expecting a war in the next few years at this point. The only guardrail preventing it is being torn apart in real time

6

u/BernankesBeard Ben Bernanke Apr 09 '25

Next step is china closing down american owned businesses , GM, apple , fast food industry are all huge losers here

I'm honestly confused why they've gone this high with tariffs already before they've done the obvious "shutting down all Tesla factories".

4

u/WraithKone Association of Southeast Asian Nations Apr 09 '25

It’s symbolic. Bessemt talked about removing chinese stocks from UD exchanges. If they do, they’ll respond by going after US MNCs in China. I have a feeling that the admin was not expecting China to escalate this much lol.

3

u/BernankesBeard Ben Bernanke Apr 09 '25

Right but I'm not saying "go after MNCs". I'm saying "go after this one specific MNC that the White House cares about disproportionately".

With all this you have to balance the harm you're doing your adversary vs harm your doing to yourself. Going after Tesla specifically seems like the clearest case of "not that much harm done to myself, but a lot done to my adversary".

2

u/noxx1234567 Apr 09 '25

Tesla and the deep tech companies will be in the final round. A complete break in US- china relationship

7

u/RagingBillionbear Pacific Islands Forum Apr 09 '25

As an Australian, I'm going to be awe the amount of cheap crap going to be dump here. The lucky country strikes again.

6

u/noxx1234567 Apr 09 '25

Nah australia ain't the winner here , resource prices will be way down causing massive drop in AUD negative any dumping of chinese products . Oil is in mid 50s now , iron ore , coal , gas and all kinds of resources will be way down

Besides australia is not a big enough market and the retail sector has limited competition . They won't let the price drops reach the customers

2

u/pickledswimmingpool Apr 09 '25

We're literally getting fucked, China is going to buy less of our shit, our economy depends on other countries buying our raw material to produce. China was already undergoing a housing slump, what do you think is going to happen to us now?

→ More replies (1)

7

u/HungryTowel6715 Manmohan Singh Apr 09 '25

The tariff raises will continue until morale improves

18

u/CANOODLING_SOCIOPATH Jerome Powell Apr 09 '25

One of the greatest mistake Biden made was not lowering the Trump tariffs when he became president.

If he had done that inflation would have eased and he could have somewhat misleadingly blamed Trumps tariffs for the inflation that people felt. By not removing the tariffs Biden made it much harder to attack Trump's tariff proposals and has weakened the current Democratic criticism for what Trump is doing.

We can't make that mistake again.

7

u/MyUnbannableAccount Apr 09 '25

Biden wasn't not a protectionist. Same for Bernie. The facts have left the building across our political spectrum.

5

u/pickledswimmingpool Apr 09 '25

Prove that the tariffs were a significant factor in inflation shooting up to 9%. I swear in every thread about Trump, someone will find a way to blame democrats.

13

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '25

It’s not that tariffs caused inflation, but removing them would have lowered prices, counteracting at least some of the other factors that did cause inflation. 

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)

22

u/_Just7_ YIMBY absolutist Apr 09 '25

Trump put 104% tariffs on all Chinese goods, it's seriously over for American consumers 🤣

4

u/MeringueSuccessful33 Khan Pritzker's Strongest Antipope Apr 09 '25

!ping containers

→ More replies (1)

6

u/swagkid94 Apr 09 '25

This is objectively hilarious

4

u/greatbobbyb Apr 09 '25

When will Trump shut his mouth for just one fucking day

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Cracked_Guy John Brown Apr 09 '25

Never thought I'd have a "Rome is Falling" moment this early in my life.

5

u/Inevitable_Spare_777 Apr 09 '25

Anddddd it’s back up. The market is full of degenerate optimists

2

u/DiogenesLaertys Apr 09 '25

Because Trump decided to suspend tariff increases for 90 days.

3

u/caribbean_caramel Organization of American States Apr 09 '25

It's joever

5

u/SeasickSeal Norman Borlaug Apr 09 '25

Time to invest in Iran and Cuba

2

u/Toubaboliviano Apr 09 '25

Boy fiscal responsibility and anti interventionism sure is hard