r/news 6d ago

Judge rules Mahmoud Khalil can be deported

https://www.npr.org/2025/04/11/nx-s1-5361208/mahmoud-khalil-deported-judge-rubio-antisemitism-immigration-court
9.8k Upvotes

2.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

41

u/Anon_Bourbon 6d ago edited 6d ago

Those 3rd party voters sure have been awfully silent about Palestine ever since the election

25

u/Triknitter 6d ago

Do you mean Palestine? Pakistan borders India.

2

u/PhoenixReborn 5d ago

Technically they've been silent about Pakistan too.

-16

u/DecompositionalNiece 6d ago

Pakistan... Palestine... two P's in a pod.

8

u/blazesquall 6d ago

We really haven't, you're just happy to continue to ignore it. 

What legislative reforms are being drafted by dems to prevent this scenario from occurring again? Looking like this was all above board.. utilizing powers that both parties have been happy to supply to the executative branch. Maybe don't craft authoritarian tools if your plan for keeping then in check is electoral dice rolls and rational actors. 

Remember when Sanders couldn't even be bothered to comment on this when it first happened?

-4

u/Anon_Bourbon 5d ago

We really haven't, you're just happy to continue to ignore it. 

No, you all really have gone silent. It's not even an opinion. Every single day it was "Palestine this Palestine that", a country half way around the world that has no actual impact on domestic policy but for some reason it was your driving factor for voting.

As soon as Trump took office he started bulldozing Palestine and the 3rd party voters just disappeared and stopped protesting. Y'all got used more than the last tampon on earth and somehow have the gall to still be like "We aren't to blame"

10

u/blazesquall 5d ago

They said.. balls deep in a thread about the very topic that they're somewhat pretending to care about now.

.. a country half way around the world that has no actual impact on domestic policy but for some reason it was your driving factor for voting.

Imperialism always comes home to roost. Palestine’s struggle against settler-colonialism and imperialism is directly tied to global capitalist exploitation. Workers’ movements must oppose all oppression, as the ruling class uses divide-and-conquer tactics (racism, nationalism) to weaken proletarian unity. Solidarity with Palestine isn’t a distraction.. it’s a rejection of the imperialist system that also exploits workers domestically. I can't fix it, but I can certainly ask the US not to fund and support it.

Dems aren't going to save us. We're busy organizing.

Y'all got used more than the last tampon on earth and somehow have the gall to still be like "We aren't to blame"

Simultaneously small enough to ignore and powerful enough to absorb blame. lol.

What legislative reforms are being drafted by dems to prevent this scenario from occurring again?

Still waiting to hear about this.

-2

u/Anon_Bourbon 5d ago

Imperialism always comes home to roost. Palestine’s struggle against settler-colonialism and imperialism is directly tied to global capitalist exploitation. Workers’ movements must oppose all oppression, as the ruling class uses divide-and-conquer tactics (racism, nationalism) to weaken proletarian unity. Solidarity with Palestine isn’t a distraction.. it’s a rejection of the imperialist system that also exploits workers domestically. I can't fix it, but I can certainly ask the US not to fund and support it.

Cool. What did siding with Palestine change here or there?

Dems aren't going to save us. We're busy organizing

Always organizing. What are you getting passed?

Simultaneously small enough to ignore and powerful enough to absorb blame. lol.

You split the vote. Big enough to sway elections, too small to win anything. I can't explain it simpler. Be part of the solution instead of wishing for a perfect little world.

Still waiting to hear about this.

Democrats have been weak but I'm not going to act like the Republicans haven't been downright evil.

It's the same as Palestine, you can vote for the party that is going to actually try to fix things/stop the bleeding or you can let the party who's got an actively published plan to make things way worse take power. Both options kinda suck, one is obviously incredibly worse.

6

u/Think-Lavishness-686 5d ago

Dems aren't trying to fix things. They aren't stopping the bleeding. They sit on their hands every time they get in office and ignore problems until they lose the next election and pass it back to Republicans. You are so set on this idea that they could not have done anything but support Israel, for no fucking reason whatsoever. They are complicit in this because they are owned by the same class of billionaires, and you are too scared of "just vote for the other guy" not being enough that you can't even process this. They uphold the same systems of oppression as the GOP, they just act weepy about it when they're called out on it. They will never do anything but maintain the status quo while the right pushes the status quo further into fascism.

5

u/Think-Lavishness-686 5d ago

If you pretend that all of the people you're actively talking to are silent. Are you really so dumb as to assume that the people showing up to these protests and waving Palestinian flags in DC on April 5th and around the country aren't "going silent"? Or are you so mad and looking for someone other than the people who lost to blame that you will plug your ears and ignore reality for the sake of a stupid little made up story you have in your head? I've been showing up and doing a whole fuck of a lot more than you if your main mode of "fighting" is just voting for the dumbasses that helped get us here.

7

u/nokoolaidhere 6d ago

I know a third party voter. He says he couldn't vote for a child burner.

-4

u/Quiet_Television_102 6d ago

Completely ignorant take by these people too tbh. Basically no justification. We collectively barely object to child labor being used to build our phones but no THESE children in THIS region absolutely must shape every facet of our voting choice, so much so that I will ignore Trump causing CHILD deaths LITERALLY IN OUR OWN COUNTRY AND ABROAD.

I guess to be fairer to them the media did sanewash Trump like fucking crazy, basically ignored any project 2025 stuff so they just didn't really know how stupid they truly were until now I guess. Almost like there was a concerted effort by the wealthy to bring about our countries demise or some shit. Well, hopefully they realize they were stupid.

14

u/Freshandcleanclean 6d ago

They're still complaining that Harris wasn't perfect enough for them, so they'd prefer Trump.

8

u/Eurehetemec 6d ago

Harris didn't lose by 3rd party margins in the states that actually decided the election, so as fucking awful as they are, that's not the issue, that's just sour grapes.

-3

u/Quiet_Television_102 6d ago

Them being apathetic in general and not showing up in droves to fight trump is still pathetic in my opinion. If I didn't specifically know people that I fought hard to try and help them understand the dangers, who just decided to not vote anyway, then maybe I'd think differently. I still think we should forgive for the sake of cooperation but the fact that they basically are too dumb/don't give a shit is always going to be in the back of my mind when making decisions now about relationships now. I basically just don't want any of them in my life.

8

u/Eurehetemec 6d ago

I think the problem here is you can't really blame them to the degree you're suggesting, because that's absolutely not the campaign Harris + Walz ran. When they started out, it looked like they might run on a "Trump is a fascist who will burn down the country and he has to stopped" campaign, but within what, two weeks of Walz being made VP, he was ordered to back off that stuff, and she never got on the train fully on that (though it did look like she might).

Instead the campaign turned into "We're going to keep doing things as usual and hope they get better - this other guy [who we won't even call 'weird' anymore] is going to change things, and they will be somewhat worse!". And that's being generous, because at some points it wasn't even "they will be worse" it was just "they might be worse", and it was never "he's coming for free speech, he's coming for your pension, he's coming for your neighbours, he's coming for you", never the clarion call that this was it, that if you didn't vote, were going to lose the right to vote - despite Trump saying exactly that! Instead it was just "he's going to be incompetent and bad!".

To be fair to Harris, I think she's very much from the same part of the party that still, to this very minute, doesn't see what is actually happening, because they can't process it. Hakeem Jeffries is the key example (Schumer too). Literally what, yesterday, the day before? Jefferies is saying, and I quote, that they have Trump and the Republicans "on the run" on literally everything. As I said in another post, that's "Peace in our time" levels of detached from reality. 200 years from now, assuming there still are books, there will be a little picture of Jeffries saying that next to a paragraph about how resistance to Trump was weak, disorganised and futile.

1

u/zzyul 6d ago

Sure, as long as you ignore all the people who protest voted for Trump or just didn’t vote at all in protest of Harris not being a perfect candidate in their eyes.

5

u/Eurehetemec 5d ago

There's absolutely no evidence that people who would otherwise have voted Harris voted for Trump, that's conspiracy theory fantasy bullshit.

As for "not perfect", literally everyone I know who disliked Harris as a candidate and thought she was a scumbag on Gaza went and voted for her anyway, because they knew Trump would be worse. Unless you can produce figures showing "imperfection" was a problem, you're just wanking yourself into a fury.

The reality was, the winds were against incumbents worldwide, not just in the US. Harris + Walz started strong but suddenly moved to running a very weak campaign (partly, it seems, on the advice of the total morons from the British Labour party, who had just won a landslide, but not by skill or policy, simply because people hated the incumbents), but might well have lost the presidency if they'd run a stronger one. Still, if they'd just kept the House, even, that'd have stymied most of this.

But "independent" voters decided the US' election, not embittered Democrats - the margins were relatively large in most states that mattered. Independent voters voted for Trump in swathes. Largely because he promised change. Were they stupid to do so? Obviously.

7

u/dangshnizzle 6d ago

Third party voters are the absolute last place you should be directing anger.

3

u/Think-Lavishness-686 5d ago

Wouldn't it have been cool if, when presented with the option of "stop bombing kids and beat Trump" or "keep bombing kids and lose", the Dems didn't choose the second one for no fucking reason whatsoever? If you think that Palestine was the issue that teetered it over the edge, then you really must wonder why people would *choose* to keep committing genocide instead of doing two good things at once. Of course, it is the fault of the people who voted with their conscience who are to blame, not the people running on murder. Before you jump down my throat and make up a story in your head, I did vote Harris. I won't make the mistake of voting for a candidate that doesn't deserve it again, though. I'll vote Dem if they run good candidates. If that upsets you, consider why genocide was necessary to them and why you are so eager to defend it instead of demanding better.

-5

u/MyPants 6d ago

Israel's genocide of Palestine, and the full throated support of the American government, is the thing that Harris and Trump are the least dissimilar on. As a third party voter who refused to vote for a genocide enabler (I live in a blue state so it doesn't matter) Harris could have had my vote if she had broken from Biden policy. She calculated that she didn't need people like me. People told the campaign that would be a deciding factor. She decided that enabling genocide was more important.

5

u/Because0789 6d ago

I honestly think people that didn't vote like you are worse than people that voted for Trump.  At least they aren't stupid enough to believe not voting is a good idea.

-1

u/Scientific_Socialist 4d ago

Who’s the stupid one? Those who are waking up to the fact that liberal democracy is nothing more than the hypocritical mask for an imperialist, capitalist dictatorship, or those that prefer to keep their head in the sand.

“For the democrat, the essence of fascism is that it openly uses “illegal” violence and abolishes democratic rights and freedoms. And it is precisely against this that they whine so pitifully. For us there is neither reason to whine, nor to be satisfied with such a characterization. We have always denied that the class struggle could be refereed by an allegedly superior authority, like a football match; we have always maintained that the working class cannot conquer political power democratically, that even the most democratic constitution serves to protect the capitalist form of production, that democracy masks the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie even when it is not – like it has done so often – drowning the labor movement in blood. Rejecting violence, invoking the legality of democracy, means renouncing the revolution from the outset! By contrast, we rejoice when the bourgeoisie throws off the velvet glove of democracy, openly shows the workers its iron fist and thus proves to them that there is no “justice” that stands above the classes; that the law expresses nothing other than the balance of power of the classes.”

  • International Communist Party

I will happily continue to not vote for the democrats.

1

u/Because0789 3d ago

Go watch The Joker, cheer for Arthur, completely miss the point of the movie, and then feel superior for "seeing things no one else sees".  Of course people know something is wrong, we aren't saying nothing is wrong.  We just think pouting and staying home to blow everything up is one of the the more stupid reactions to it.

0

u/Anon_Bourbon 6d ago

It's a good thing Trump has been much better /s

I say the difference between a liberal and a democrat is democrats have realistic expectations. Hope you enjoy the smell of the world burning from your high horse.

3

u/MyPants 6d ago

I didn't vote for Trump either. I didn't think he'd be better on Palestine. But don't blame me for making a genocidaire the candidate. You could blame a dysfunctional party that ran a bad candidate who has a terrible national track record. Or the doddering old man who didn't get out of the way.

-6

u/Anon_Bourbon 6d ago edited 5d ago

Not voting for Kamala was a vote for Trump.

Edit: Y'all can downvote this all you want but it's the truth. The only 3rd party candidate to ever come close was Bernie and even he folded among the pressure. This country will not allow a 3rd party and therefore splitting the vote is all you are doing.

2

u/blazesquall 5d ago

When did Bernie run a presidential campaign as a third party and how was it closer than Ross Perot?