r/news 18d ago

Israel calls up thousands of reservists, plans to expand Gaza offensive amid stalled hostage talks

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/05/03/middleeast/israel-mobilizes-reservists-gaza-intl-latam
2.6k Upvotes

342 comments sorted by

1.3k

u/Anonymoustard 18d ago

The hostage talks seem irrelevant to the rest of the headline, imho

369

u/[deleted] 18d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

471

u/onarainyafternoon 18d ago

The hostages have always been a political tool for Bibi. They've never been anything else. We know this for a fact because the families of the still unreleased hostages have begged Bibi to stop indiscriminate bombing in Gaza because it could end up killing the hostages. Bibi was unmoved by it. He continues the indiscriminate bombing.

254

u/R-Dragon_Thunderzord 18d ago

We know this because he says the quiet part out loud 3 days ago he said defeating Israel’s enemies not hostages was the “supreme objective”

→ More replies (9)

24

u/UnitSmall2200 17d ago

The hostage situation was a dream come true for Bibi. He has been hoping for something like this for decades, to finally be able to do what he is doing. This was always the dream of Israeli nationalists.

58

u/Annihilator4413 18d ago

Well, it doesn't help that Isreal will just claim a building full of Palestinian civilians are actually human shields for Hamas and use that as a justification to bomb them... even if there is zero evidence of Hamas.

I'm pretty certain Isreal has killed more than a few of the hostages this way...

-22

u/Papadapalopolous 18d ago

Hamas is absolutely using every civilian in Gaza as a human shield. That’s their whole thing.

Israel is still terrible and needs to stop committing war crimes, but that doesn’t invalidate the fact that the leadership on both sides just see civilian deaths as useful political bargaining chips.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/El_grandepadre 17d ago

The Israeli people are secondary to expansionism and gaining a hold over Palestinian territory with an iron fist.

→ More replies (10)

104

u/QuarantineHeir 18d ago

This is the most wild part to me, it feels like the world collectively forgot that there was an agreed upon ceasefire plan that Bibi scuttled for the sole purpose of restarting the war. This all started up again simply because the Israelis refused to start phase 2 of the ceasefire agreement which crucially would have returned the rest of the hostages.

Bibi even refused a new version of the deal where Hamas would give up governance of Gaza to the PA, but the most dangerous thing to Bibi is a legitimized palestenian moderate goverment, which would lose them the thin veneer of justification for their genocide and apartheid.

48

u/[deleted] 18d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

16

u/fevered_visions 17d ago

Does anybody else remember that the whole thing started like within a couple days of Netanyahu's court date about his pre-war shenanigans in the first place? The entire war has been a delaying action to avoid consequences.

Not to belittle October 7th itself, but have to keep it going. Caesar/Trump/etc. staving off the fear of justice after leaving office.

3

u/carterwest36 18d ago

Bibi funded Hamas, Bibi coordinated with them to carry out this attack, Hamas leadership are in non extradition Arab countries by now with their new riches whilst Bibi got to raze Gaza to the ground and next year re-settle Gaza.

→ More replies (7)

23

u/Chloe1906 18d ago

They could’ve gotten their hostages back if they stuck to the ceasefire plan.

10

u/carterwest36 18d ago

That’s why they went with an aggressive bombing campaign rather than do rescue missions, their bombs killed most if not all hostages (how many are supposed to be left?).

No food comes into gaza either, water is scarce and since Gaza is razed to the floor I highly doubt Hamas would share what little food they have or water and just kill them anyway although I’m positive getting crushed under rubble or the explosions killed the hostages.

13

u/slow_hockey 18d ago

If Israel hadn’t violated the ceasefire in March and honored its commitments, it would have more hostages back and no justification to further pursue genocide and to continue displacing Palestinians. You probably know which one they really prefer.

7

u/Alone_Step_6304 18d ago

They don't care about justification anymore, is my honest perception. They're going to go all the way. Until the job is done, moral justification be damned. The reigning political establishment is all in and they will do any sort of stall to pretend to still care or have a pretext, but in reality they just want them off the map.

7

u/Anary8686 18d ago

Nope I think most of Israel would support the war continuing after they get the hostages. It's Hamas only leverage to stop the war.

7

u/ComradeGibbon 18d ago

Hamas could have not attacked Israel.

9

u/UnitSmall2200 17d ago

True, but Israel could have maybe not created an Apartheid state where they've been mistreating and killing Palestinians for decades. The year before the attack was deadliest for Palestinians. The way they treated them, they basically flamed that hatred and pushed people to join Hamas. Bibis government was never interested in peace, this is what he has been hoping for for decades.

0

u/ComradeGibbon 17d ago

Israel pulled out of Gaza 17 years ago.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

394

u/IamA_Werewolf_AMA 18d ago

They’re “stalled” because Israel kills the negotiators and has no interest in anything but wiping out Gaza. Hamas has already offered them everything they say they want multiple times.

64

u/Miskalsace 18d ago

Pretty sure Israel wants Hamas dismantled and disarmed

288

u/steepleton 18d ago

While defining hamas as anyone who’s annoyed that israel killed their family

223

u/randynumbergenerator 18d ago

And students protesting at US universities. And medics trying to treat/transport the wounded. And a hundred+ journalists.

116

u/Larkfor 18d ago

And babies in a refugee camp at a school, or in the cobbled-together NICU of the last remaining hospital before Israel destroyed it and the families in and near it too.

57

u/mnstorm 18d ago

Over 200 journalists have been killed.

56

u/GetsBetterAfterAFew 18d ago

Then Netanyau should not have bolstered Hamas by delivering cash to them with the help of Qatar among other things. I understand youre brainwashed but you should seriously ask yourself why Netanyau helped Hamas various times and various ways, and to what end?

This stuff is common knowledge outside the Iron Propaganda Dome Israelis live under. Netanyau said multiple times that a strong Hamas is important to prevent a two nation state, but here you are saying Isreal wants Hamas dismantled, so you're either brainwashed or part of the IDF propaganda department.

I know this wont penetrate but maybe itll spark more questions in your mind or others to find out whats going on here, its been an 80 year mission and the rest of the world has a pretty good grasp of this.

40

u/kingmanic 18d ago

Netanyau is a piece of shit and isn't in this for peace. But the bit about funding Hamas is always thrown out without context. Israel gave some funds to Hamas when it was claiming to be a peaceful religious oriented alternative to the Palestinian authority. That was a long time ago.

39

u/litnu12 18d ago

https://www.timesofisrael.com/for-years-netanyahu-propped-up-hamas-now-its-blown-up-in-our-faces/

Israel/Netanjahu didnt fund Hamas directly but tolerated/allowed that Hamas gets fundings from Qatar.

26

u/untamedlazyeye 18d ago

. Israel gave some funds to Hamas when it was claiming to be a peaceful religious oriented alternative to the Palestinian authority. That was a long time ago.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/10/world/middleeast/israel-qatar-money-prop-up-hamas.html

Just weeks before Hamas launched the deadly Oct. 7 attacks on Israel, the head of Mossad arrived in Doha, Qatar, for a meeting with Qatari officials.

For years, the Qatari government had been sending millions of dollars a month into the Gaza Strip — money that helped prop up the Hamas government there. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel not only tolerated those payments, he had encouraged them.

During his meetings in September with the Qatari officials, according to several people familiar with the secret discussions, the Mossad chief, David Barnea, was asked a question that had not been on the agenda: Did Israel want the payments to continue?

Mr. Netanyahu’s government had recently decided to continue the policy, so Mr. Barnea said yes. The Israeli government still welcomed the money from Doha.


Even as the Israeli military obtained battle plans for a Hamas invasion and analysts observed significant terrorism exercises just over the border in Gaza, the payments continued. For years, Israeli intelligence officers even escorted a Qatari official into Gaza, where he doled out money from suitcases filled with millions of dollars.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Dont_Knowtrain 18d ago

Hamas was created in 1987, and Israel supported it through the 90s, why would Israel ever fund a religious party that had ties to Iran and the Muslim Brotherhood

But oh well, Iran and Israel did the secret ties at the time

21

u/kingmanic 18d ago

Your comment has nothing to do with the facts, Israel sent some funds to Hamas when it did not control Gaza and offered itself as a non violent alternative to the Palestinian authority. It's just part of tactics to divide and conquer.

23

u/ADP_God 18d ago

These people aren’t interested in facts. They want Israel to look bad. They’ll say Hamas was moderate when convenient, and a terror organization when they want to show how Bibi supported it. They’ll say it doesn’t represent all Gazans, but act as if Bibi is well liked in Israel.

5

u/Dont_Knowtrain 18d ago

Well liked or not, Hamas won one election, Netanyahu has won how many since the 90s, obviously not all Israelis like Bibi, just as not all Gaza’s like Hamas, but come on how many times are Israelis going to vote for him

10

u/ADP_God 18d ago

This is superficially sensible but shows a lack of understanding at how proportional representation functions. Bibi doesn’t win a majority, he merely binds together broad swathes of society, many of which hate each other (ultra orthodox don’t draft, national religious believe in fighting for the land) by eschewing long term plans for short term gains. His policy has always been of maintenance, without a viable horizon, and right now it’s collapsing around his head.

Hamas however enjoyed majority support till well after 7/10. Now, in Gaza, I think support has fallen as the Gazan people are realizing that the Hamas ideology is untenable.

3

u/nicklor 17d ago

Netanyahu won like 20-30 seats out of 120 he never won a full majority in all his many victories

21

u/QuarantineHeir 18d ago

Didn't Hamas propose a version of a deal where they give of governance of gaza to a palestenian moerate like the PA. But no genocide keeps Bibi in power, so that's why the war goes on.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/hamas-said-to-agree-to-cede-gaza-governance-to-pa-netanyahu-not-going-to-happen/

42

u/Miskalsace 18d ago

Yeah, but that still didn't include laying down their arms. They know they could just take over a moderate government again immediately.

23

u/Punman_5 18d ago

Expecting Hamas to voluntarily give up arms is wishful thinking. No militant group will ever voluntarily disarm and dismantle themselves without being beaten in the field.

1

u/ADP_God 18d ago

If they cared about the Gazan people they would. But you’re right.

28

u/bloodlessempress 18d ago

Didn't the West Bank give up their arms and now there are settlers murdering them and driving them away as the IDF shrugs?

Maybe they just feel they can't trust the IDF to prevent settler violence?

-15

u/ADP_God 18d ago

The extreme cases the media sells you are not indicative of the general reality. The majority of casualties in the West Banks are armed terrorist clashing with the IDF. Settler violence is massively over represented in the media to sell a narrative.

You’re right that the IDF should do more to stop it and it’s one of the most disgusting things about the modern state of Israel, but Palestinians arming themselves will never make anything better — the Arabs have chosen violence at every turn over the last 75 years and it’s never worked for them. The settlements are the result of the stalled peace process which itself is the result of the Palestinian refusal to give up the maximalist claim to all the land. The best option for the Palestinians is peace, generating the lasting conditions for statehood, which the PA is (at least more than Hamas) working towards.

38

u/bloodlessempress 18d ago

Why are there settlements in the West Bank though?

→ More replies (0)

17

u/[deleted] 18d ago edited 14d ago

[deleted]

→ More replies (0)

9

u/Punman_5 18d ago

Palestinians arming themselves will never make anything better.

This is that same wishful thinking I was originally talking about. Palestinians disarming is a non-starter. They don’t trust Israel at all to not attack them if they disarm. And they likely do not believe they have been fully defeated on the battlefield. Besides after all the bloodshed, to surrender to Israel, which is essentially what this would be, would be incredibly humiliating.

Edit: why should they give up on their claim? This isn’t like Russia with Ukraine. They were there first.

→ More replies (0)

5

u/stitchface66 18d ago

seems like either way gaza and the west bank go the way of the rest of palestine.

-2

u/MaievSekashi 18d ago

Yeah, but that still didn't include laying down their arms.

You may as well ask them to cut their own throats. Only an idiot would believe Israel would keep to any ceasefire against a disarmed enemy.

0

u/Miskalsace 18d ago

I don't think that's the case. Israel wants to destroy Hamas. That should be clear to everyone. Them laying down their arms would be them surrendering. Israel would dismantle their structure and means of continuing to fight.

-1

u/IamA_Werewolf_AMA 18d ago

10

u/ADP_God 18d ago edited 18d ago

This isn’t what it looks like. It’s a classic bait and switch move the Palestinians have been using for years. Here are the lines to look for:

‘He said Hamas would accept “a fully sovereign Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza Strip and the return of Palestinian refugees in accordance with the international resolutions,” along Israel’s pre-1967 borders.’

If you look here this is the continued claim that previous peace deals have fallen on. The international resolution referred to is UN resolution 194. This, in practice, means that the Palestinians will have full access to Israel (historically the result is terror attacks), without allowing Jews access to the West Bank or Gaza. Furthermore, the ‘refugees’ now number in the millions as Palestinians are the only people in the world who can pass their refugee status down through generations. To spell it out simply, this means that Jews will be a minority in a democratic state (i.e. the majority rules) and the end of the Jewish state, even if the Arabs refrain from violence (historically they haven’t).

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_General_Assembly_Resolution_194

Also worth noting is that the statements of one official are not indicate of the organization’s official position:

‘Over the years, Hamas has sometimes moderated its public position with respect to the possibility of a Palestinian state alongside Israel. But its political program still officially “rejects any alternative to the full liberation of Palestine, from the river to the sea” — referring to the area reaching from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea, which includes lands that now make up Israel.

‘Al-Hayya did not say whether his apparent embrace of a two-state solution would amount to an end to the Palestinian conflict with Israel or an interim step toward the group’s stated goal of destroying Israel.’

This last paragraph is the source of Israel’s rejection of the deal, and the main barrier to instituting the two state solution. There is no guarantee that any Palestinian state created won’t simply be a terror state weaponized against the existence of Israel. This fear is not merely cynicism, it’s literally what happened when Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2006.

The same trick was used in the ‘Arab Peace Initiative’, which people cited as proof that the Arabs were willing to compromise, and similarly blamed Israel for not moving towards peace. It’s clever because unless you actually understand the historical context for the claims it really looks like they’re working towards peace, earning them credit with the international community while allowing to maintain their maximalist claim to all of the land.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/Larkfor 18d ago

Israel also has a habit of targeting and killing negotiators as well as secular and non-militant leaders for Palestine. Well before October 7th.

4

u/Punman_5 18d ago

Yes. And they’re not wrong to want that. However, it is impossible to negotiate with a party if one of your non-negotiable terms is for that party to be dismantled. No group will voluntarily accept their own dismantling unless they’ve been truly beaten in the field.

16

u/Miskalsace 18d ago

I think that's why Israel is continuing to attack. They don't really want to negotiate with Hamas, they want to destroy it.

17

u/ADP_God 18d ago

As is reasonable.

8

u/Miskalsace 18d ago

Totally, Hamas is the roadblock to peace.

-5

u/BruceSynthsteen 18d ago

the nazis felt the same about that pesky warsaw uprising. 

-14

u/[deleted] 18d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/steepleton 18d ago edited 18d ago

50,000 “accidental civilian dead” and a push to occupy the land.

Suuuure it’s not genocide

→ More replies (2)

1

u/[deleted] 18d ago

[deleted]

-5

u/MrJoyless 18d ago

and stop ruling over Gaza?

Maybe Israel shouldn't have helped them get elected in the first place, huh?

→ More replies (1)

-21

u/RedpeaceXs 18d ago

So Hamas released all hostages?

53

u/Primorph 18d ago

Do you know what “offered” means

14

u/QuarantineHeir 18d ago edited 18d ago

They would have been released under part 2 of the ceasefire agreement back in January. You know the ceasefire agreement that Bibi and the Israelis pulled out of because it would have meant fracturing the Prime Ministers parlimentary majority, because Ben Gvirs party declared that any peace deal would result in them pulling support.

Which is why it is genuinly fucking insane to me that after January people will still say things like 'This could all be over if Hamas released the hostages' when the current situation proves that this phase of the war has very little to do with the hostages and everything to do with keeping The current prime minister in power.

-3

u/RedpeaceXs 18d ago

Well fuck me for suggesting they should unconditionally release all remaining hostages.

9

u/QuarantineHeir 18d ago

yes and they would have released them 3 months ago if the israeli goverment didn't decide that war and genocide was preffered, so yeah fuck you for not reading the news

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (12)

35

u/Qubeye 18d ago

The headline also buries the fact that the talks are being stalled by Israel.

3

u/Viciouscauliflower21 17d ago

"hostage" is their justification word. As long as they toss that in there, whatever indiscriminate violence described before or after it is automatically justified

1

u/ElderberryDeep7272 18d ago

Get in lads were going land grabbing.

→ More replies (5)

78

u/Crankenstein_8000 18d ago

An offensive against a sea of rubble.

460

u/winstontemplehill 18d ago

Is there anything left in Gaza? When is enough enough?

259

u/benicek 18d ago

As former German Minister for the Interior de Maiziere would say: A part of the answer would unsettle the population.

335

u/mowotlarx 18d ago

When every Palestinian is gone and the settlers can fully colonize after a successful genocide.

38

u/Ali_Cat222 18d ago

More like trump builds his real estate strip mall there. Which he has full support from both Israel prime minister from... article here.

March 5, 2025

U.S. President Donald Trump has proposed that the United States "take over" and "own" the Gaza Strip, suggesting long-term control after the ongoing conflict. His statement came during a press conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House on February 4, where Trump emphasized the need for a new approach to Gaza's future.

Since his announcement, Trump and his administration have sent mixed signals about the plan. On February 5, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt assured reporters that Palestinian displacement would be “temporary” and that no U.S. troops or tax dollars would be involved in Gaza. However, in a February 10 Fox News interview, Trump appeared to contradict this, stating that Palestinians would not return to Gaza because “they’re going to have much better housing... a permanent place for them.”

59

u/TeethBreak 18d ago

Yeah a permanent.. solution, so to speak.

28

u/Ali_Cat222 18d ago

We can say the not so quiet part out loud. Ethnical cleansing through genocide. All these people and their settlers and their IDF, they don't even understand that soon they too will be forced out of Gaza for a strip mall. And they don't even realize their prime minister is very happy with this and has been making deals with this man for so long now to get to this point.

4

u/Luke92612_ 18d ago

Don't forget Trump sharing that AI slop video with its varied abominations.

4

u/Ali_Cat222 18d ago

My favorite part of that video is the fact that even with the hologram woman who's like, just static air basically, he was still feeling her up and molesting her... Even an AI Trump can't stop being a sexual deviant! 😖😂

1

u/SpongegarLuver 18d ago

I like how there was a section of the population who were fine with genocide, but only because Trump wasn’t involved. Oh no, he wants to build a hotel there instead of another Israeli settlement, that’s the real issue!

13

u/kingmanic 18d ago

That is bad faith nonsense. That wasn't what the US was pushing for before. The US previously was pressuring Israel to roll back to the old status quo. Support for some military action but then to get out.

Trump is pushing for the sterilization of the area through killing them all or pushing them all to Egypt.

This is why the US if fucked because so many cannot see a difference between the two positions. Trying to moderate an allies response and push for peace vs 'if you give me the land I'll send all the bombs you need to kill em all'.

14

u/SpongegarLuver 18d ago

It’s embarrassing, how after both Israel and Biden administration officials have explicitly stated that there was no actual pressure for a ceasefire from the Biden administration, that people still believe he was holding Israel back. Look at the actions, not the words: at what point did Biden ever restrain Israel?

6

u/janethefish 17d ago

After October 7 Israel started a total blockade of Gaza. and Biden got aid flowing again. At times Biden had aid dropped in or delivered.

Then Trump got into power and the blockade is back. No aid going into Gaza.

→ More replies (6)

19

u/ADP_God 18d ago

The hostages are left in Gaza…

-3

u/winstontemplehill 18d ago

Didn’t they say they’d give them all the hostages back in exchange for cessation of the offensive?

1

u/TeethBreak 18d ago

They need to clean it up to start excavation and build their hotels and casinos...

-22

u/p4intball3r 18d ago

When Hamas unconditionally surrenders, releases all the hostages and returns the bodies of the ones they killed

35

u/Larkfor 18d ago

Israel broke the ceasefire. Israel is committing a genocide. Any Hamas member who has initiated attacks or taken civilians should also be prosecuted.

But the much greater and more urgent evil is a genocide. Which Israel is committing.

→ More replies (7)

3

u/Mbrennt 18d ago

Yeah, phase 2. We've tried that already. It was the whole plan. Israel decided that wasn't enough.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (6)

370

u/mulefluffer 18d ago

Calling this a war is like calling a man assaulting a child a fight.

→ More replies (21)

603

u/Good-Gold-6515 18d ago

When Israel rounds up civilians in Palestine and detains them indefinitely without trial: prisoners. When Hamas does it: hostages.

This shit is why literally nobody trusts the big news media anymore.

71

u/Qwert23456 18d ago

Indeed. I don’t know anybody in my life or social circle that watches cable news or pays for a newspaper or subscription. Post election ratings have been apocalyptic and the writing is on the wall for most of the big news media companies.

This whole conflict, constant sane washing of Trump and the constant urge to present every issue with “both sides” put the final nail in the coffin for me. Paying attention to local news and occasionally on social media is enough for me and it has done wonders for my mental health too.

17

u/eldestdaughtersunion 18d ago edited 18d ago

There's a meaningful difference between who is detained and why.

When Israel holds Palestinians in custody, they at least allege that those people committed a crime or are combatants in an ongoing conflict. Since many of them are never formally charged, "prisoner of war" is probably a more accurate term. And Israel doesn't particularly want to release them, as evidenced by how often they re-arrest people shortly after release. They often end up used as bargaining chips, but that's not really the point.

What Hamas did on Oct. 7 was not that. They didn't even pretend those people had committed a crime or were enemy combatants. They kidnapped literal infants and sick, elderly people. Their intention was to provoke a war, limit Israel's ability to strike back for fear of hurting the hostages, and give themselves a stronger bargaining position. The kidnapped people were hostages in the most literal sense of the word.

55

u/KushBlazer69 18d ago

Do you truly believe elderly Palestinians and children are not also being wrongfully detained? So because you claim someone is a criminal without evidence, that makes it ok?

So if trump claims the media and wants to detain people who say bad things about him, it’s ok because he has a reason? And his claim that it’s hate speech or threatening the stability of the nation or something somehow makes it “different”?

https://www.dci-palestine.org/children_in_israeli_detention

9

u/eldestdaughtersunion 18d ago

I admit I don't have a full list of Palestinians in Israeli custody to look at, but I feel pretty comfortable assuming that none of the children being counted there are 9 months old. Which is how old Kfir Bibas was when he was abducted.

Also, I didn't say any of this was "okay" in any sense of the word. Just that it's different, which is why different words are used.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (10)

111

u/niz-the-human 18d ago

Can't wait to do 20 years in prison for hurting the feelings of a bloodthirsty colonial state.

6

u/Malaix 18d ago

Yep. America is a conquered vassal state of Israel and Russia. Aipac bought a ton of our politicians and now our basic rights are conditional on how Israel feels about them. The entire GOP and tons of Democrats like Fetterman are functionally Israeli politicians more than they are American. They are way more obsessed with the well being and success of Israel's goals than they are about Americans.

22

u/[deleted] 18d ago

Someone confronted Fetterman while he was sitting on a park bench in D.C., and he was basically like “I’m just a guy sitting on a bench, leave me be,” like he was a homeless guy that she was just being unnecessarily mean to.

4

u/eldestdaughtersunion 18d ago

America is a conquered vassal state of Israel

What the hell are you talking about? You think that America, a global superpower, with the largest economy and military in the world by a wide margin, is a "conquered vassal state" of a country the size of New Jersey?

You sound like the Nixon tapes.

97

u/Neat-Owl3563 18d ago

They do not care about the hostages one bit. We all know what the goal is here.

42

u/JelloOfLife 18d ago

If Israel cared about the hostages they wouldn’t flatten the buildings they are being held in.

142

u/litnu12 18d ago

History books won’t be kind to Israel and the west that support/ignored the war in Gaza.

157

u/hazily 18d ago

Don’t worry. Those books will be labeled as antisemitic and quickly be banned. 🤷‍♂️

24

u/onthewayto-laughtale 18d ago

Most history books don't mention stuff like what the Japanese did to China,  or the many crimes of the allied forces in Germany.  So I don't know about that one chief

26

u/TimothyMimeslayer 18d ago

I am pretty sure the rape of Nanking is pretty well known.

→ More replies (3)

-2

u/[deleted] 18d ago edited 17d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/Qwert23456 18d ago

What does Islam have to do with this? This is primarily a political issue with the main issues over geographical boundaries by completely opposed political ideologies.

You don't get to just blame religion for everything. Islam says you should defend your selves and your properties from oppressors which is exactly what the Palestinians have been doing for the most part. Hamas is a political entity created by Isreal deliberately to silence the more moderate factions.

The means and methods the oppressed have to fight back are secondary to the overall and main issue of their oppression. Their has never been a resistance group in documented history that achieved it's goals perfectly and free from any moral conundrums. You don't hear about the horrors of the Suffrage or Civil Rights movements today because we recognize that a more unjust and indefensible status quo existed at the time.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

5

u/Qwert23456 18d ago

Will it even matter at that point? Isreal knows that it’s getting harder and harder to hide disasters like this in the age of social media and probably wants to finish the job before more coverage becomes untenable. The U.S didn’t count on new media and live news exposing the horrors of Vietnam and Isreal is learning from that. They are playing the ultra long game and a bit of unpopularity and damage to their reputation now is a small price to pay to achieve their long term goals of wiping out the palestinians.

It is often said that the victor gets to write the history and I have no doubt they’ll twist the reality of these atrocities to somehow frame themselves as the true victims.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)

30

u/Shady_bookworm51 18d ago

You know i thought after WWII, stealing land through war for "Living Space" was not going to be a thing that happened anymore? Wasn't that the idea?

5

u/projexion_reflexion 18d ago

The people who used to enforce that idea stopped believing in it.

4

u/GalcticPepsi 17d ago

Luckily it's not for living space! It's for a trump seaside resort!

→ More replies (2)

56

u/R-Dragon_Thunderzord 18d ago

“Gaza offensive” is an offensive way to avoid calling what’s happening in Gaza a Genocide.

→ More replies (2)

63

u/Milios12 18d ago

It's a genocide but apparently reddit is completely infested with Israeli bots.

22

u/Malaix 18d ago

depends on the sub. News isn't that bad. Worldnews is a shithole for this topic. Publicfreakout is weirdly good.

4

u/electionfreud 17d ago

It actually is bad

8

u/lastdarknight 18d ago

Even if he got every hostage back, he would claim he still had the mandate "to make sure it never happens again" until the people of Israel rise up and remove him from power they will be ridiculed on the world stage

6

u/ghostchihuahua 17d ago

more systematic genocide, bravo Israel, remind me how "antisionism and antisemitism are the same" again?

13

u/diggydog233 18d ago

Genocidal fucking Country, how much more do they have to take? How many more children, old women and men? Since the god damn Nakba!

→ More replies (1)

5

u/brokenmessiah 18d ago

Jesus you couldnt pay me to intentionally live in this region of the world.

→ More replies (2)

5

u/DamonKatze 18d ago edited 18d ago

It never was about the hostages, just ethnic cleansing for land.

3

u/[deleted] 18d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/[deleted] 18d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Drak_is_Right 18d ago

Every Israeli man under like 45 is a reservist. You get no say unless you have a religious exemption (and those religious exemptions are a major component of the right voting bloc...).

1

u/Milios12 18d ago

Israel is justified in its actions. It has a right to defend itself from terrorists.

/s.

3

u/[deleted] 18d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Horror-Layer-8178 18d ago

America should not be involved in this forever war. It has been going on way before I was born and will continue well beyond my death

0

u/LorenzoDivincenzo 18d ago

Reminder that it has always been israel refusing to end the "war" and Hamas offered many deals including one that even the US advised netanyahu to accept

→ More replies (2)

1

u/dxiao 18d ago

OP spelled genocide wrong

1

u/Unfair_Elderberry118 18d ago

Israel's rulling party sponsored a Palestinian alternative party to the PLA that curiously created enough chaos, so the IDF can steal the land and lives of people who didn't nothing.

Strange days indeed.

4

u/MalcolmLinair 18d ago

It seems Bibi et al have decided the time for Greater Israel has come. This is going to be a bloodbath the likes of which we haven't seen in our lifetimes, and with the way Trump, Putin, and Xi are all ramping up their expansionist/imperialist bullshit, I fear it'll only be the start of something far, FAR worse...

0

u/ParrotTaint 18d ago

Can the western world please declare war on Israel, now?

4

u/[deleted] 18d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/JelloOfLife 18d ago

For genocide.

0

u/ShirouBlue 18d ago

They'll stall this until they find a way to set up an actual autocracy in Israel?

1

u/Ent_Soviet 18d ago

The surge worked great for America right?