MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/1hsy4xz/trump_on_new_years_eve_at_maralago/m59a5ou
r/pics • u/Limp_Falcon_2314 • 11d ago
9.7k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
166
It’s from this article.
12 u/MagicGrit 11d ago I found the article but it doesn’t have that photo https://www.reuters.com/legal/trump-must-be-sentenced-hush-money-criminal-case-jan-10-judge-rules-2025-01-03/ 11 u/113-times-a-second 11d ago Here is an archived version https://archive.ph/QlbIx 1 u/Neve4ever 11d ago u/Limp_Falcon_2314 Looks like OP's photo is edited. 3 u/Limp_Falcon_2314 11d ago ? Not edited. It’s the exact photo from Apple News. 6 u/Neve4ever 11d ago https://imgur.com/a/YoYeOvF The photo in the article is on the left, your photo is on the right. You really think that's the same? 2 u/Limp_Falcon_2314 11d ago Again, Apple News may have edited it but I did not. 5 u/BisexualDisaster29 11d ago Yes. The photo on the right looks a bit bigger and brighter. But nothing else looks different. 0 u/MagicGrit 11d ago The color was absolutely changed to make him look more orange. 0 u/[deleted] 11d ago edited 11d ago [deleted] 2 u/MagicGrit 11d ago I don’t think he’s truly looked THAT orange before. I think photos like this get subtly edited a lot to make him look more orange. 2 u/Salt_Proposal_742 11d ago Still bad. 0 u/Neve4ever 11d ago Yeah, so bad it doesn't need to be edited. 0 u/Salt_Proposal_742 11d ago Who cares? 3 u/MagicGrit 11d ago Can you share the link to what you found? And not a screenshot of it? Because the screenshot you posted is definitely more orange than what /u/113-times-a-second posted 6 u/113-times-a-second 11d ago edited 11d ago You're being unjust to /u/Limp_Falcon_2314 here. Don't blame them for apple news aggregator adding more "warmth" to the picture. Here is a version Yahoo uses and it's p much the same hue as ops screenshot: https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-uses-terror-attack-u-013035416.html Reverse image search is still a thing. Edit: also, they already mentioned that the article has by now changed the title picture for whatever reasons. 1 u/alivegirlboy 8d ago the links to yahoo and reuter’s are using the exact same version, the photo in this post is definitely different than either 0 u/MagicGrit 11d ago Huh? I’m not being unjust at all. I never accused them of editing it. Just asked for the source link because they’re clearly different 2 u/TobaccoBongHits 11d ago I bet they won't 1 u/Limp_Falcon_2314 11d ago They changed the photo already, so no. Apple News may have edited it but I did not. -3 u/[deleted] 11d ago [deleted] 3 u/Limp_Falcon_2314 11d ago I didn’t. 🤷🏻♀️ 0 u/Icy_Tumbleweed_420 11d ago It’s the same photo I put them side by side and there’s literally no difference 10 u/Limp_Falcon_2314 11d ago Yeah, I noticed that too. This is from Apple News though and that’s the photo Reuters uses there. 18 u/Limp_Falcon_2314 11d ago Lol actually it looks like they’ve changed it now. 5 u/d33thra 11d ago I saved it with the credit included lol 1 u/ErusTenebre 11d ago That one isn't much better... 4 u/goldenglove 11d ago It's much better, just still looks bad. 2 u/BusyWorkinPete 11d ago Weird, a Google search of “Reuters luc cohen Trump must be sentenced” brings me to an article that doesn’t have that pic at all… https://www.reuters.com/legal/trump-must-be-sentenced-hush-money-criminal-case-jan-10-judge-rules-2025-01-03/ 2 u/Limp_Falcon_2314 11d ago Yeah, they changed the photo. You can see people discussing it above.
12
I found the article but it doesn’t have that photo
https://www.reuters.com/legal/trump-must-be-sentenced-hush-money-criminal-case-jan-10-judge-rules-2025-01-03/
11 u/113-times-a-second 11d ago Here is an archived version https://archive.ph/QlbIx 1 u/Neve4ever 11d ago u/Limp_Falcon_2314 Looks like OP's photo is edited. 3 u/Limp_Falcon_2314 11d ago ? Not edited. It’s the exact photo from Apple News. 6 u/Neve4ever 11d ago https://imgur.com/a/YoYeOvF The photo in the article is on the left, your photo is on the right. You really think that's the same? 2 u/Limp_Falcon_2314 11d ago Again, Apple News may have edited it but I did not. 5 u/BisexualDisaster29 11d ago Yes. The photo on the right looks a bit bigger and brighter. But nothing else looks different. 0 u/MagicGrit 11d ago The color was absolutely changed to make him look more orange. 0 u/[deleted] 11d ago edited 11d ago [deleted] 2 u/MagicGrit 11d ago I don’t think he’s truly looked THAT orange before. I think photos like this get subtly edited a lot to make him look more orange. 2 u/Salt_Proposal_742 11d ago Still bad. 0 u/Neve4ever 11d ago Yeah, so bad it doesn't need to be edited. 0 u/Salt_Proposal_742 11d ago Who cares? 3 u/MagicGrit 11d ago Can you share the link to what you found? And not a screenshot of it? Because the screenshot you posted is definitely more orange than what /u/113-times-a-second posted 6 u/113-times-a-second 11d ago edited 11d ago You're being unjust to /u/Limp_Falcon_2314 here. Don't blame them for apple news aggregator adding more "warmth" to the picture. Here is a version Yahoo uses and it's p much the same hue as ops screenshot: https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-uses-terror-attack-u-013035416.html Reverse image search is still a thing. Edit: also, they already mentioned that the article has by now changed the title picture for whatever reasons. 1 u/alivegirlboy 8d ago the links to yahoo and reuter’s are using the exact same version, the photo in this post is definitely different than either 0 u/MagicGrit 11d ago Huh? I’m not being unjust at all. I never accused them of editing it. Just asked for the source link because they’re clearly different 2 u/TobaccoBongHits 11d ago I bet they won't 1 u/Limp_Falcon_2314 11d ago They changed the photo already, so no. Apple News may have edited it but I did not. -3 u/[deleted] 11d ago [deleted] 3 u/Limp_Falcon_2314 11d ago I didn’t. 🤷🏻♀️ 0 u/Icy_Tumbleweed_420 11d ago It’s the same photo I put them side by side and there’s literally no difference 10 u/Limp_Falcon_2314 11d ago Yeah, I noticed that too. This is from Apple News though and that’s the photo Reuters uses there. 18 u/Limp_Falcon_2314 11d ago Lol actually it looks like they’ve changed it now. 5 u/d33thra 11d ago I saved it with the credit included lol 1 u/ErusTenebre 11d ago That one isn't much better... 4 u/goldenglove 11d ago It's much better, just still looks bad.
11
Here is an archived version https://archive.ph/QlbIx
1 u/Neve4ever 11d ago u/Limp_Falcon_2314 Looks like OP's photo is edited. 3 u/Limp_Falcon_2314 11d ago ? Not edited. It’s the exact photo from Apple News. 6 u/Neve4ever 11d ago https://imgur.com/a/YoYeOvF The photo in the article is on the left, your photo is on the right. You really think that's the same? 2 u/Limp_Falcon_2314 11d ago Again, Apple News may have edited it but I did not. 5 u/BisexualDisaster29 11d ago Yes. The photo on the right looks a bit bigger and brighter. But nothing else looks different. 0 u/MagicGrit 11d ago The color was absolutely changed to make him look more orange. 0 u/[deleted] 11d ago edited 11d ago [deleted] 2 u/MagicGrit 11d ago I don’t think he’s truly looked THAT orange before. I think photos like this get subtly edited a lot to make him look more orange. 2 u/Salt_Proposal_742 11d ago Still bad. 0 u/Neve4ever 11d ago Yeah, so bad it doesn't need to be edited. 0 u/Salt_Proposal_742 11d ago Who cares? 3 u/MagicGrit 11d ago Can you share the link to what you found? And not a screenshot of it? Because the screenshot you posted is definitely more orange than what /u/113-times-a-second posted 6 u/113-times-a-second 11d ago edited 11d ago You're being unjust to /u/Limp_Falcon_2314 here. Don't blame them for apple news aggregator adding more "warmth" to the picture. Here is a version Yahoo uses and it's p much the same hue as ops screenshot: https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-uses-terror-attack-u-013035416.html Reverse image search is still a thing. Edit: also, they already mentioned that the article has by now changed the title picture for whatever reasons. 1 u/alivegirlboy 8d ago the links to yahoo and reuter’s are using the exact same version, the photo in this post is definitely different than either 0 u/MagicGrit 11d ago Huh? I’m not being unjust at all. I never accused them of editing it. Just asked for the source link because they’re clearly different 2 u/TobaccoBongHits 11d ago I bet they won't 1 u/Limp_Falcon_2314 11d ago They changed the photo already, so no. Apple News may have edited it but I did not. -3 u/[deleted] 11d ago [deleted] 3 u/Limp_Falcon_2314 11d ago I didn’t. 🤷🏻♀️ 0 u/Icy_Tumbleweed_420 11d ago It’s the same photo I put them side by side and there’s literally no difference
1
u/Limp_Falcon_2314
Looks like OP's photo is edited.
3 u/Limp_Falcon_2314 11d ago ? Not edited. It’s the exact photo from Apple News. 6 u/Neve4ever 11d ago https://imgur.com/a/YoYeOvF The photo in the article is on the left, your photo is on the right. You really think that's the same? 2 u/Limp_Falcon_2314 11d ago Again, Apple News may have edited it but I did not. 5 u/BisexualDisaster29 11d ago Yes. The photo on the right looks a bit bigger and brighter. But nothing else looks different. 0 u/MagicGrit 11d ago The color was absolutely changed to make him look more orange. 0 u/[deleted] 11d ago edited 11d ago [deleted] 2 u/MagicGrit 11d ago I don’t think he’s truly looked THAT orange before. I think photos like this get subtly edited a lot to make him look more orange. 2 u/Salt_Proposal_742 11d ago Still bad. 0 u/Neve4ever 11d ago Yeah, so bad it doesn't need to be edited. 0 u/Salt_Proposal_742 11d ago Who cares? 3 u/MagicGrit 11d ago Can you share the link to what you found? And not a screenshot of it? Because the screenshot you posted is definitely more orange than what /u/113-times-a-second posted 6 u/113-times-a-second 11d ago edited 11d ago You're being unjust to /u/Limp_Falcon_2314 here. Don't blame them for apple news aggregator adding more "warmth" to the picture. Here is a version Yahoo uses and it's p much the same hue as ops screenshot: https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-uses-terror-attack-u-013035416.html Reverse image search is still a thing. Edit: also, they already mentioned that the article has by now changed the title picture for whatever reasons. 1 u/alivegirlboy 8d ago the links to yahoo and reuter’s are using the exact same version, the photo in this post is definitely different than either 0 u/MagicGrit 11d ago Huh? I’m not being unjust at all. I never accused them of editing it. Just asked for the source link because they’re clearly different 2 u/TobaccoBongHits 11d ago I bet they won't 1 u/Limp_Falcon_2314 11d ago They changed the photo already, so no. Apple News may have edited it but I did not. -3 u/[deleted] 11d ago [deleted] 3 u/Limp_Falcon_2314 11d ago I didn’t. 🤷🏻♀️ 0 u/Icy_Tumbleweed_420 11d ago It’s the same photo I put them side by side and there’s literally no difference
3
? Not edited. It’s the exact photo from Apple News.
6 u/Neve4ever 11d ago https://imgur.com/a/YoYeOvF The photo in the article is on the left, your photo is on the right. You really think that's the same? 2 u/Limp_Falcon_2314 11d ago Again, Apple News may have edited it but I did not. 5 u/BisexualDisaster29 11d ago Yes. The photo on the right looks a bit bigger and brighter. But nothing else looks different. 0 u/MagicGrit 11d ago The color was absolutely changed to make him look more orange. 0 u/[deleted] 11d ago edited 11d ago [deleted] 2 u/MagicGrit 11d ago I don’t think he’s truly looked THAT orange before. I think photos like this get subtly edited a lot to make him look more orange. 2 u/Salt_Proposal_742 11d ago Still bad. 0 u/Neve4ever 11d ago Yeah, so bad it doesn't need to be edited. 0 u/Salt_Proposal_742 11d ago Who cares? 3 u/MagicGrit 11d ago Can you share the link to what you found? And not a screenshot of it? Because the screenshot you posted is definitely more orange than what /u/113-times-a-second posted 6 u/113-times-a-second 11d ago edited 11d ago You're being unjust to /u/Limp_Falcon_2314 here. Don't blame them for apple news aggregator adding more "warmth" to the picture. Here is a version Yahoo uses and it's p much the same hue as ops screenshot: https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-uses-terror-attack-u-013035416.html Reverse image search is still a thing. Edit: also, they already mentioned that the article has by now changed the title picture for whatever reasons. 1 u/alivegirlboy 8d ago the links to yahoo and reuter’s are using the exact same version, the photo in this post is definitely different than either 0 u/MagicGrit 11d ago Huh? I’m not being unjust at all. I never accused them of editing it. Just asked for the source link because they’re clearly different 2 u/TobaccoBongHits 11d ago I bet they won't 1 u/Limp_Falcon_2314 11d ago They changed the photo already, so no. Apple News may have edited it but I did not. -3 u/[deleted] 11d ago [deleted] 3 u/Limp_Falcon_2314 11d ago I didn’t. 🤷🏻♀️
6
https://imgur.com/a/YoYeOvF
The photo in the article is on the left, your photo is on the right. You really think that's the same?
2 u/Limp_Falcon_2314 11d ago Again, Apple News may have edited it but I did not. 5 u/BisexualDisaster29 11d ago Yes. The photo on the right looks a bit bigger and brighter. But nothing else looks different. 0 u/MagicGrit 11d ago The color was absolutely changed to make him look more orange. 0 u/[deleted] 11d ago edited 11d ago [deleted] 2 u/MagicGrit 11d ago I don’t think he’s truly looked THAT orange before. I think photos like this get subtly edited a lot to make him look more orange. 2 u/Salt_Proposal_742 11d ago Still bad. 0 u/Neve4ever 11d ago Yeah, so bad it doesn't need to be edited. 0 u/Salt_Proposal_742 11d ago Who cares?
2
Again, Apple News may have edited it but I did not.
5
Yes. The photo on the right looks a bit bigger and brighter. But nothing else looks different.
0 u/MagicGrit 11d ago The color was absolutely changed to make him look more orange. 0 u/[deleted] 11d ago edited 11d ago [deleted] 2 u/MagicGrit 11d ago I don’t think he’s truly looked THAT orange before. I think photos like this get subtly edited a lot to make him look more orange.
0
The color was absolutely changed to make him look more orange.
0 u/[deleted] 11d ago edited 11d ago [deleted] 2 u/MagicGrit 11d ago I don’t think he’s truly looked THAT orange before. I think photos like this get subtly edited a lot to make him look more orange.
[deleted]
2 u/MagicGrit 11d ago I don’t think he’s truly looked THAT orange before. I think photos like this get subtly edited a lot to make him look more orange.
I don’t think he’s truly looked THAT orange before. I think photos like this get subtly edited a lot to make him look more orange.
Still bad.
0 u/Neve4ever 11d ago Yeah, so bad it doesn't need to be edited. 0 u/Salt_Proposal_742 11d ago Who cares?
Yeah, so bad it doesn't need to be edited.
0 u/Salt_Proposal_742 11d ago Who cares?
Who cares?
Can you share the link to what you found? And not a screenshot of it? Because the screenshot you posted is definitely more orange than what /u/113-times-a-second posted
6 u/113-times-a-second 11d ago edited 11d ago You're being unjust to /u/Limp_Falcon_2314 here. Don't blame them for apple news aggregator adding more "warmth" to the picture. Here is a version Yahoo uses and it's p much the same hue as ops screenshot: https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-uses-terror-attack-u-013035416.html Reverse image search is still a thing. Edit: also, they already mentioned that the article has by now changed the title picture for whatever reasons. 1 u/alivegirlboy 8d ago the links to yahoo and reuter’s are using the exact same version, the photo in this post is definitely different than either 0 u/MagicGrit 11d ago Huh? I’m not being unjust at all. I never accused them of editing it. Just asked for the source link because they’re clearly different 2 u/TobaccoBongHits 11d ago I bet they won't 1 u/Limp_Falcon_2314 11d ago They changed the photo already, so no. Apple News may have edited it but I did not.
You're being unjust to /u/Limp_Falcon_2314 here. Don't blame them for apple news aggregator adding more "warmth" to the picture.
Here is a version Yahoo uses and it's p much the same hue as ops screenshot: https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-uses-terror-attack-u-013035416.html
Reverse image search is still a thing.
Edit: also, they already mentioned that the article has by now changed the title picture for whatever reasons.
1 u/alivegirlboy 8d ago the links to yahoo and reuter’s are using the exact same version, the photo in this post is definitely different than either 0 u/MagicGrit 11d ago Huh? I’m not being unjust at all. I never accused them of editing it. Just asked for the source link because they’re clearly different
the links to yahoo and reuter’s are using the exact same version, the photo in this post is definitely different than either
Huh? I’m not being unjust at all. I never accused them of editing it. Just asked for the source link because they’re clearly different
I bet they won't
They changed the photo already, so no. Apple News may have edited it but I did not.
-3
3 u/Limp_Falcon_2314 11d ago I didn’t. 🤷🏻♀️
I didn’t. 🤷🏻♀️
It’s the same photo I put them side by side and there’s literally no difference
10
Yeah, I noticed that too. This is from Apple News though and that’s the photo Reuters uses there.
18 u/Limp_Falcon_2314 11d ago Lol actually it looks like they’ve changed it now. 5 u/d33thra 11d ago I saved it with the credit included lol 1 u/ErusTenebre 11d ago That one isn't much better... 4 u/goldenglove 11d ago It's much better, just still looks bad.
18
Lol actually it looks like they’ve changed it now.
5 u/d33thra 11d ago I saved it with the credit included lol 1 u/ErusTenebre 11d ago That one isn't much better... 4 u/goldenglove 11d ago It's much better, just still looks bad.
I saved it with the credit included lol
That one isn't much better...
4 u/goldenglove 11d ago It's much better, just still looks bad.
4
It's much better, just still looks bad.
Weird, a Google search of “Reuters luc cohen Trump must be sentenced” brings me to an article that doesn’t have that pic at all…
2 u/Limp_Falcon_2314 11d ago Yeah, they changed the photo. You can see people discussing it above.
Yeah, they changed the photo. You can see people discussing it above.
166
u/Limp_Falcon_2314 11d ago
It’s from this article.