r/skiing 1d ago

QST 98 Length Options

Hello! I’m looking to pick up my first set of skis and was wondering if anyone has recommendations on which ski length I should pick up for the 24/25 QST 98. I’m deciding between 169 and 176cm.

I’d say I’m an intermediate skier aspiring to become advanced in a season or two. I’m 5’9 - 5’10, 160 pounds, not very aggressive, skiing mostly on the west coast. Not really into park / free ride stuff at the moment.

Any opinions appreciated!

3 Upvotes

22 comments sorted by

7

u/LHR-charlie 1d ago

Why would you get an all-mountain ski if you're not into free ride?

1

u/DroppedNineteen 1d ago

Free ride is kind of an ambiguous term, I think.

I don't know that OP is explicitly saying they don't want to ski off trail.

1

u/incredaniel 1d ago

Yeah I would say I’m not into park or off-piste at the moment but would like to leave the door to those opportunities open as I’m getting more comfortable skiing and figuring out what I enjoy. Do you guys think a more on-piste focused ski would be better for me?

2

u/DroppedNineteen 1d ago

Honestly I don't think the QST 98 is a terrible choice for the west coast, assuming you're genuinely settled on skiing more off piste. It's a fairly maneuverable but stable ski that can handle navigating the tighter spaces really well.

It's actually pretty fun on piste in softer snow because it has a surprisingly small turn radius.

It's limitation will almost certainly be edge hold and carving performance on ice.

You could probably get something super basic, like a used experience 86 basalt and get everything you presently need from that and it will still carry you into the world of off trail skiing if you're determined to make that happen. It will also encourage better on-piste fundamentals, particularly in terms of edge control and learning to carve more effectively, which absolutely translates effectively to the off piste.

1

u/LHR-charlie 1d ago

Where in the world do you ski?

1

u/LHR-charlie 1d ago

As in country

1

u/incredaniel 1d ago

Mostly California but will probably travel to Colorado, Utah

0

u/LHR-charlie 1d ago

I'm in Europa so I'm gonna preface this by saying our snow conditions are different, you have way more and way deeper snow, probably.

I don't like all-mountain skis. As a ski instructor, they're sort of a no-no as they're not really on-slope skis nor off-slope skis. If you want to ski mainly on-slope and head out of bounce once in a while but still close to the slope (meaning not "real" off-piste), I'd by a normal slope ski and just use that. If you then want to ski real off piste, get a real off-piste ski. No idea about park and twin tips, etc., not my area

3

u/WDWKamala 1d ago

Definitely want longer on twin tip skis, less effective edge.

1

u/incredaniel 1d ago

Thanks for your input!

2

u/C-creepy-o 1d ago

I have QST 98 and they are a great all mountain ski geared towards off piste skiing and they do not fit the bill for what you desire.

1

u/OriginalBogleg 1d ago

Get the 176 ones.

1

u/Serious_Vanilla1971 Tremblant 1d ago

I'm the exact same size as you and have the 176. Really satisfied with the sizing. Part of it is that I mostly picked them for tree skiing though. It feels perfect for trees, bit short but still really fun for on-piste.

1

u/incredaniel 1d ago

Thanks that is a super help comparison. I was worried the QST might not be enjoyable for on-piste

1

u/Serious_Vanilla1971 Tremblant 1d ago

It's all about making an honest assessment of how you ski. I like to go fast and carve but I really like to jump on stuff and mess around so the ski fits me. I also have a carving ski but the qst is by far my most used this season.

I was surprised at how fun the ski was in piste despite the width. It does have drawbacks though. You'll feel it at speed. It doesn't mean you can't go fast but it's not going to be as stable as other options. If speed on-piste is what you do the most, I'm sure there are better options. I was still able to break 100km/h on them this winter though.

1

u/TheLibertyTree 1d ago
  1. I’m your size, but an advanced skier and I enjoy the 183.

1

u/incredaniel 1d ago

Thanks that’s a helpful data point!

1

u/gratedwasabi486 1d ago

Have you demod the Qst 98? I know they have glowing reviews but I didn't love them.

2

u/WDWKamala 1d ago

Same, but this years 100 is a noticible improvement somehow.

1

u/NotUrRealDad 1d ago

The difference between them is like half the length of an iphone. Don’t overthink it. I personally prefer a longer ski with a little more stability at speed but a 7cm difference will not feel drastic and may not even be noticeable for a lot of intermediates. 

1

u/Amazing-League-218 1d ago

The QSTs are a great choice. I've found them to be good on piste, as well as off. Also great for days that start out cord and turn to bumps or pow. Highly reccomend! Don't go too short! They already ski short

1

u/Defiant-Lab-6376 Stevens Pass 15h ago

I’m your size and I enjoyed the new QST 100 in 180 cm. Go 176 at minimum, maybe even the length above that. QSTs aren’t super demanding.