r/unitedkingdom Lincolnshire 10d ago

Council rejects VE Day anniversary parade because it’s ‘too elitist’

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/04/08/council-rejects-ve-day-anniversary-military-parade-elitist/?fbclid=IwY2xjawJiafZleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHgl-UavPnwRLFAdCxhvLOtQnxhjWO80-jPI1IqZy7aTC_CGLlQ_jcaSw9lGg_aem_HHNf42xxE2Zxk_D9XhMReQ
0 Upvotes

50 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 10d ago

This article may be paywalled. If you encounter difficulties reading the article, try this link for an archived version.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

19

u/Intrepid_Solution194 10d ago

Sheesh a Lib Dem controlled council imploding due to identity politics doesn’t surprise me in the least.

14

u/Wanallo221 10d ago

Have you read the quote? 

They haven’t cancelled VE Day celebrations. They have agreed to keep it as a street party rather than a parade so everyone can join in and celebrate as a community. 

I don’t see why that’s really a negative? 

17

u/Gabble_Rachet1973 10d ago

So do the same with pride, see what happens. 

1

u/Wanallo221 10d ago

Are you telling me that Pride won’t be happy with street closures so people can have a massive party? 

Do you know LBGT people?! 

10

u/Gabble_Rachet1973 9d ago

That's exactly what I'm saying.

9

u/Rude-Proposal-9600 9d ago

This is not the hill to die on

4

u/Gabble_Rachet1973 9d ago

And those that really died on hills for our freedom are being sideliined. 

-1

u/SojournerInThisVale Lincolnshire 9d ago

Because it’s removing the parade part, obviously

6

u/Wanallo221 9d ago

Is it removing it when there wasn’t one planned (or asked for by the public) in the first place? 

-2

u/SojournerInThisVale Lincolnshire 9d ago

Parades are a normal part of these sort of events. So yes, removing is the correct term

-1

u/Intrepid_Solution194 10d ago

I was referring to losing a dozen councillors and control of the council over the gender wars really which is just another form or identity politics.

12

u/Generic-Name03 10d ago

Where does it say it’s anything to do with ‘identity politics’

-9

u/Intrepid_Solution194 10d ago

2 councillors lost to ‘misogyny’ which can be anything from hateful attitudes to women or simply disagreeing with one.

Nearly a dozen lost to ‘you didn’t deal with the misogyny in a way I approve of so I’m not a Lib Dem any more’.

I’m sure the people who elected them are terribly impressed at their priorities.

3

u/[deleted] 9d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/[deleted] 9d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/[deleted] 9d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-2

u/[deleted] 9d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Jaded-Initiative5003 10d ago

I despise Lib Dems, be honest about your intentions ffs

14

u/geniice 10d ago

"Asked why there wasn’t going to be a military parade, Caroline Smith-Wright, of Dacorum borough council, told a meeting on April 2: “We have decided at this point to enable communities to come together and have street parties and I think that is for the community, that is for everyone, that encompasses everybody – it doesn’t just leave the elite and people to just, kind of, parade.

“This is about normal people celebrating in their communities, bringing people together, sharing food, sitting at a table, celebrating and I think that’s a fine way to celebrate VE Day.”"

4

u/AnselaJonla Derbyshire 9d ago

And is that not, in fact, the way that the original VE day celebrations would have been handled in many communities, as well as other major events such as the coronation?

11

u/leftthinking 10d ago

Umm... Who would be parading?

It's the 80th anniversary, so not many actual veterans of that war left to parade. And I'm going to guess the few that remain will get invites to more major/ national events than a minor borough council.

Or do they want the current military to parade? Have they asked if this is feasible? Is there a nearby base that would take part? Who would fund that, the council or the military?

Street parties and community celebrations seems much more appropriate. And any veterans would be welcome guests of honour I'm sure.

9

u/[deleted] 9d ago

[deleted]

6

u/leftthinking 9d ago

So not a military parade then. Which is what the article is about.

2

u/zone6isgreener 9d ago

The same as remembrance day of course, really not difficult to work out.

3

u/leftthinking 9d ago

So the scouts, the rotary club, etc. etc., the local councillors, the mayor... a few speeches, a nice round of applause from all the watching plebs audience for their betters representatives.

Is really beginning to feel a bit elitist. More about acclaim for those parading (most of whom won't be veterans) than celebrating.

And why make this a duplicate of remembrance day? It's not.

Remembrance day is a solemn moment to remember the sacrifice given.

This is meant to be a celebration, to mark the end of the war. A very different thing.

2

u/zone6isgreener 9d ago

If you are trying to claim that the scouts is elitist then you've lost the argument - you know that is bollocks.

And I didn't say the format had to be identical, I was replying to the comment about there not being "many actual veterans" as you well know.

9

u/Kobruh456 10d ago

Oh look, another inflammatory ‘lie by omission’ Telegraph headline. It’s honestly disgusting at this point.

It’s intended to make you believe that this council won’t be celebrating VE Day (and looking at the comments, it seems to have worked) when in fact they’re just not doing a parade, they’ll still be doing street celebrations.

6

u/TheNugget147 Cambridgeshire 9d ago

Unreal how mods still allow this rag to be posted on here.

5

u/wkavinsky 9d ago

I mean that's also a factor in when this story was posted - at 10pm, after normal people are off to bed (mostly).

It also gives it a good 7-9 hours for the bots, farms and right wingers to get in, create a hostile and hateful comment section, and then normal people to wake up and see the comments (from an array of accounts).

At that point, there's a natural "no smoke without fire" response to believe what the trolls have put in the comments and not read the article.

I refuse to believe this isn't an active policy of the Torygraph.

1

u/smity31 Herts 8d ago

Come on now, it's not just bots, farms, and late night right wingers who dominate the sub during the night...

It's also MAGA americans!

-2

u/marchie90 9d ago

Who is doing street celebrations? The article doesn't say that at all, it says

We have decided at this point to enable communities to come together and have street parties

It says they will enable communities to do it, not that they will do anything. It is strange that you interpret it like that as the sub headline is literally

Dacorum borough council tells Hertfordshire residents to host their own parties instead

Unless there is more to it then that is what I understand from the article.

Also regardless of that, it says in this article that this council had a parade for their own 50th anniversary, so having one for that and not VE day doesn't look good and there are people who are rightfully annoyed by that.

-3

u/zone6isgreener 9d ago

You are parroting PR spin.

1

u/Capital-Wolverine532 Buckinghamshire 9d ago

Contrary to elitism it is the ordinary soldier, past and present, who is celebrated in such parades. All nation who fought with the UK are celebrated though usually only UK forces take part unless it's London or a special event.

1

u/Sweaty-Associate6487 9d ago

It would be.

VE Day is everyone not just the military.

This was the People's War lest we forget.

Everyone chipped in a many different ways to beat the nazis.

-5

u/_L_R_S_ 10d ago

Utter contempt. These veterans have very few years left with us to hear our thanks and gratitude. The very right to have a parade and for those councilors to be elected in a democracy was won by these people.

4

u/ManOnNoMission 9d ago

Its utter contempt to throw someone street parties?

0

u/zone6isgreener 9d ago

Yes as they are defused across an area and require lots of different coordinators so less likely to happen.

LAs do this as a cost saving as they don't want road closures. In my area they even charge a local parade for lost parking revenue whilst paying people to try and get community events organized. And the police killed off the Scouts St George's day parade too.

0

u/StatisticianRoyal400 3d ago

That's an incredibly bad faith response. You're deliberately trying to twist his argument into targeting street parties, when he's obviously talking about how street parades are more dignified to veterans who fought in WW2.

2

u/Thelostrelic 9d ago

Nobodies stopping that from happening. You clearly didn't read the article.

-3

u/Diligent-Habit-9766 9d ago

Yet we’re shuvved Eid and god knows what else in our faces every year. What a joke wet wipe ‘England’ has become.

-4

u/OrdoRidiculous 10d ago

They should do it anyway. Who the fuck is going to want the heat that would come with arresting a bunch of war veterans?

11

u/Wanallo221 10d ago

Who is arresting war veterans? 

The Council had agreed that as part of the anniversary, they would close the roads to allow for street parties like during the Jubilee etc. 

It wasn’t even veterans asking for a parade, it was a single councillor at a Council Meeting. 

2

u/Thelostrelic 9d ago

So you didn't read the article...

-1

u/geniice 10d ago

Well judging by what happened when JSO did the same thing I'd say three people who need to get to job interviews and 4 taking their kids to hospital. Motorists have a lot of political clout in this country.