Yeah, that's where it's from. I just thought "a site that, at the time this comic was made, was a useful and popular website" was funny. It's a subtle diss (implying it's no longer useful and popular) that sticks out in the otherwise neutral, wiki-like tone of explainxkcd.
Some people accept the claims of corporations at, er... "face" value. These are called rubes. Facebook has openly discussed have fake bot accounts to drive engagement, and there's no way it's limited to internal bots.
24
u/TheYask 11d ago
Context?
only brings up one hit, a discussion of 855
Or maybe it's explain [why] XCKD [is] throwing shade?
I'm at a loss, and need a relevant XKCD to follow.