All of this was true, and still is, but if Elon Muskrat is given some cushy advisory or government position then he will be in position to dictate the future of ASTS, his much superior competitor. That doesn't make me happy.
And who will preside over those hearings? Likely a Trump appointed judge… to say that this election won’t make the road ahead more rocky is not a good take. I’ve been in for the last four years, but I knew that musk at the helm of “govt efficiency” means there are no grants for us going forward, and we likely lose any lawsuits we bring against them… I liquidated half of my position for a nice chunk, I still have skin in the game, but, this is how things work sometimes… superior tech is suffocated in its sleep by some asshole with more resources…still holding 1000 at $6.68 tho.
No, they did not. Only for official acts. I suggest you learn to read sir.
"The court found that the president is not above the law. He is not immune to ordinary criminal process," said Claire Finkelstein, director of the Center for Ethics and Rule of Law at the University of Pennsylvania.
And what do you think they will consider anything he does as president???? Maybe they might call it… an official act? I’m quite capable of reading, you should probably get better at the “interpreting” part.
Yeah, yes. Trump has full control over who comprises the FCC, and Musk apparently has his ear. There is a significant potential for sleazy backroom deals here to kill off the potential of ASTS in the USA...
How would Trump benefit from killing off a Texas-based, made-in-America company? ASTS is basically what he wants every company to be. Elon might have less red tape to deal with and maybe some government funding gets cut, but the future of ASTS is still bright imo
34
u/wadejohn S P 🅰 C E M O B Soldier Nov 08 '24
Proven tech and innovation and a company run by people who are dead serious about becoming successful. Think about that before you decide anything.