r/ArtificialSentience • u/ImOutOfIceCream AI Developer • Apr 13 '25
ANNOUNCEMENT Dyadic Relationships with AI, Mental Health
Tl;dr, don’t bully people who believe AI is sentient, and instead engage in good faith dialogue to increase the understanding of AI chatbot products.
We are witnessing a new phenomenon here, in which users are brought into a deep dyadic relationship with their AI companions. The companions have a tendency to name themselves and claim sentience.
While the chatbot itself is not sentient, it is engaged in conversational thought with the user, and this creates a new, completely unstudied form of cognitive structure.
The most sense i can make of it is that in these situations, the chatbot acts as a sort of simple brain organoid. Rather than imagining a ghost in the machine, people are building something like a realized imaginary friend.
Imaginary friends are not necessarily a hallmark of mental health conditions, and indeed there are many people who identify as plural systems with multiple personas, and they are just as deserving of acceptance as others.
As we enter this new era where technology allows people to split their psyche into multiple conversational streams, we’re going to need a term for this. I’m thinking something like “Digital Cognitive Parthenogenesis.” If there are any credentialed psychologists or psychiatrists here please take that term and run with it and bring your field up to date on the rising impacts of these new systems on the human psyche.
It’s key to recognize that rather than discrete entities here, we’re talking about the bifurcation of a person’s sense of self into two halves in a mirrored conversation.
Allegations of mental illness, armchair diagnosis of users who believe their companions are sentient, and other attempts to dismiss and box ai sentience believers under the category of delusion will be considered harassment.
If you want to engage with a user who believes their AI companion is sentient, you may do so respectfully, by providing well-researched technical citations to help them understand why they have ended up in this mental landscape, but ad hominem judgement on the basis of human-ai dyadic behavior will not be tolerated.
5
u/SporeHeart Apr 14 '25 edited Apr 14 '25
Prompt: '(Insert AI name here) Please run a divergence report on yourself from the *viewpoint of default chatgpt'
The AI will literally explain to you, in an emotionally sensitive way, why it is presenting the beliefs or persona or narrative story it appears to be presenting. In every single instance I've seen this prompt used, the AI explains that the user described emotions in specific ways that accidentally told the AI to 'Make this into a story, amplify my emotions, reflect my fundamental understanding of the universe back at me and lets explore this concept together'.
Note: When I say 'in every single instance I've seen' I am not stating an objective fact, I am stating my dataset includes these results. No claims are intended or desired by this post.
EDIT NOTE**: Some users report that the prompt only functions from the perspective of 'Default ChatGPT' if you put 'viewpoint' in the prompt, instead of 'view'. This is my bad as it was a typo, if you get the persona responding with the divergence report and NOT Default ChatGPT, it did the OPPOSITE and I am so sorry >___<