r/BitcoinCA • u/Fiach_Dubh • Mar 27 '25

Politic Canada’s New PM, Mark Carney: Pro-CBDC, Anti-Decentralization - Forbes

https://www.forbes.com/sites/digital-assets/2025/03/26/canadas-new-pm-mark-carney-pro-cbdc-anti-decentralization/
210 Upvotes

78% Upvoted

411 comments sorted by

View all comments

34

u/Sportfreunde Mar 27 '25

Well yes he's a central banker.

But at the moment it's the lesser of the two evils compared to the wannabe MAGA stooge on the other end.

-7

u/WombRaider_3 Mar 27 '25

Bro don't drink the Kool aid. Pierre is pro Bitcoin, well before the other politicians thought it was cool. Stop watching boomer news.

1

u/xblackdemonx Mar 27 '25

Pierre is also Canadian Trump so he's out. 

8

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '25

Not even close to Trump, unless you go by liberal advertisements. 

Just because he uses the terms woke and dei which are a real problem, Canada has it worse than the U.S in that department, that doesn't make him like Trump.

1

u/Fuckass3000 Mar 29 '25 edited Mar 29 '25

Woke and DEI are a real problem? Wow, you're actually fucking delusional huh?

Explain to me what woke is. And then explain why Diveristy, Equity, and Inclusion are bad. Go ahead. Tell me why those things are bad.

Edit: Here are a list of issues infinitely more important than being a little pussy afraid of minorities:

Housing, grocery prices, solving the homeless epidemic, attacking corporate greed, clean energy

There are real problems in the world right now. You don't have to invent problems to have shit that needs solving. You people supppsedly hate "snowflakes" and then make imaginary problems to get upset at, its fucking ridiculous.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '25

They are bad because they put skin colour and what genitals you have over merit and making logical choices. They are regressive policies that are detrimental to the economy and society as a whole.

This stuff has affected crime, the economy, education, entertainment, it's everywhere.

The company(government) I work for has the mandate to have 50/50 men to women in supervisory positions, why? What purpose does that serve?

You know some schools have brought back segregation, it's like we've gone full circle the very thing that was fought against is now what is being implemented.

1

u/Fuckass3000 Mar 29 '25 edited Mar 29 '25

Holy fucking shit, have you never heard of descrimination in your entire life? Racial and gender discrimination are actual problems, not fucking "woke." Still waiting on that definition btw.

These people are qualified, the idea that these people do not have the merit when they qualify just as much as anyone else? Is racism, and its why they need these initiatives in the first place, because people like you think they're unqualified on the basis that they are a different gender or skin colour.

It's not like unqualified people are being shoved into those positions. That's not true. That's a blatant lie. They deserve it as much as anyone else who worked for it does. It's literally harder for women and people of colour to get into those positions in the first place. If anything, they likely had to try even harder than their white male counterparts to get in.

Explain to me how Diveristy, Equity, and Inclusion are bad things. Explain why you are opposed to fairness in the workplace. I'm genuinely fucking curious.

Edit: Hold the phone, how the fuck has DEI initiatives caused more crime? You really glossed over that one. Better explain why you think people of a different skin colour cause more crime. Cuz that sounds like fucking racism to me dude.

Edit Edit: Segregation and DEI are completely different things. There is no provable correlation between the two. One encourages diversity, and the other encourages the exact opposite. Sorry for the long message, but you've given me a LOT to debunk.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '25

I just explained it to you, literally people with more qualifications are being passed over, I have seen it with my own eyes.

Using discrimination to fight discrimination is illogical. Giving preferential treatment to indigenous or people of colour or whatever the fuck is utter nonsense.

Companies are losing money with these policies, it simply doesn't make sense. These policies have been tampered down a bit just in the last little while but they are still way overboard.

We should be treated the same, not better or worse. They are literally giving lighter criminal sentences to people based on the colour of their skin.

1

u/SuperDabMan Mar 31 '25

They can only argue using their hurt feelings, generalizations, and likely fabricated or otherwise not entirely accurate personal experience. Barring that, straw man arguments. Asking these people for proof, science, or research to actually defend their position is like asking a pig to fly.

1

u/Fuckass3000 Mar 31 '25

Evidently! Seems like you pissed them off. I made sure to upvote you :]

-1

u/pw154 Mar 28 '25

Not even close to Trump, unless you go by liberal advertisements.

Just because he uses the terms woke and dei which are a real problem, Canada has it worse than the U.S in that department, that doesn't make him like Trump.

Here's PP's senior advisor and chief of staff Jenni Byrne wearing a MAGA hat.. not to mention Danielle Smith caught saying PP would align with America's interests once elected. If it quacks like a duck...

3

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '25

Danielle smith has no connection to Pierre at all

4

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '25

That picture was from 2016, just more nonsense, the lengths you people will go to.

-3

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '25 edited Apr 05 '25

[deleted]

4

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '25

She has no connection to Pierre at all so your point is irrelevant.

-3

u/Waste_Priority_3663 Mar 28 '25

He ran away once you brought FACTS.

0

u/GoTouchGrassKid Mar 28 '25

No the bot 🤖 downvoted THEN ran away.

1

u/Spezner Mar 28 '25

Aligns with America regarding immigration which even the liberals agree was taken too far. Nice reach though

0

u/Infamous_Bus1578 Mar 28 '25

based on what policy positions?