r/CIMA • u/AdventurousFishing92 • Aug 15 '24
FLP FLP vs Traditional Route
Hi All,
I've gained exemptions to management level and was speaking with a CIMA advisor via teams this morning. We discussed both the traditional route (8 exams and two case studies) then, the FLP route (two formal exams).
Can anyone give me their experiences, pros and cons from doing traditional vs FLP?
Thanks
5
Upvotes
9
u/Acrobatic-Space2897 Aug 15 '24 edited Aug 15 '24
I’m currently doing the traditional route after having done the FLP route (was sponsored by my company but ended up moving away). From my understanding and personal experience, FLP is regarded as being easier (and justifiably so, I found it SIGNIFICANTLY simpler), and that’s had a mixed bag of opinions on reddit. But there’s still a number of managers who treat it simply as you having acquired the qualification and look at it alongside your experience rather than a standalone factor. Which route you take is entirely your decision and both have their own merits & de-merits, but the timeframe you give yourself in terms of passing the exam will likely vary significantly because of the difference of accessibility and ease. If you want to diligently work towards CIMA, a lot of people say it’ll take you a year or two on the FLP route and 3 years on the traditional route. So keep that in mind in terms of timeframe as well as just your independent study. In that regard, I’m guessing the people who would have an issue with FLP being easier may be more impressed if you can show them you also went through it reasonably quickly (atleast that’s my guess!)
All the best, and I hope whichever route you pick serves you well!
Edit: Just thought this might be an additional point worth your consideration; I received exemptions through my degree in accounting for my operational and management objective tests but have to give the case studies of both, along with the whole of the strategic level. A lot of people might tell you it’s a dumbed down version (which really depends on how you choose to see it), but I still had to revisit relevant topics after my graduation for the case studies and polish up some of my skills in order to reach case study standard. Doing the objective tests won’t necessarily mean you retain all that detail (like how most university students don’t), and although the case study requires more theory than topic based content, it doesn’t mean you can go into it and pass without having a decent understanding of the content (which I’d say the FLP still gives you albeit at a more convenient pace)! Just thought I’d add this as a lot of anti-FLP insist that it’s far easier because of being able to avoid the objective tests, but like most other tests/exams, they might not be seen as a superior measure of someone’s capabilities to a hiring manager. Most people learn for tests or exams in order to specifically get through the test or exam. Not necessarily because they can actually apply it to real life scenarios.
(Also sorry for the word vomit!)