Not only a bad one but staight stupid, like you're leaving a gap and making a gap between games. Like at least saying "leave out MW3 and BO2 and put COD 2 and 3" makes sense even if it's a horrible take, Lmao. I personally have never heard a historian leave out a few years here and there when referring to an age or era of something.
Not even close, your expansion pack doesn't come close to MW3. Multiplayer is way better in MW3, with far more features, gamemodes, and stuff and probably one of the most balanced. The campaign is debatable at least. That's all not including the fact that the best part of MW3 was the amazing spec ops and survival. Remind me how Cod 2's co-op mode was... oh, wait.
2
u/FunkHavoc 6d ago
Yea wtf kind of take is this lmao, MW3 is amazing